U.S. SENATOR PATRICK
LEAHY
CONTACT: Office of Senator
Leahy, 202-224-4242 |
VERMONT |
Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy
Ranking Member, Senate Judiciary Committee
Hearing on “Maximizing Voter Choice: Opening the
Presidency to Naturalized Americans”
October 5, 2004
This hearing addresses a topic that future Congresses
may well consider seriously. Whether it continues to make sense in 21st
century America to allow only “natural born citizens” to be elected
President is certainly open to serious debate, and I welcome the views of
the witnesses who will be testifying today, particularly my House
counterpart John Conyers. Indeed, I believe this amendment is far worthier
of consideration than the amendments the Chairman has made a priority
during this Congress – the Federal Marriage Amendment and the Flag
Desecration Amendment.
At this late date in the 108th Congress,
however, it is clear that we will not be adopting any Constitutional
changes that we are only now beginning to discuss and debate. Meanwhile,
this Committee has completely ignored the pressing matter of voter access
in the elections that will be held just four weeks from today. I had
suggested to the Chairman that we use this hearing date to examine the
allegations of voter suppression that have been raised from Florida to
South Dakota to Michigan. That would have proved a more useful endeavor by
allowing this Committee to exercise its oversight over the Justice
Department’s Civil Rights Division to ensure that its commitment to
ensuring free access to the polls has not been eroded by partisan
calculation. That suggestion was ignored, and we will instead focus on an
issue that at the earliest would affect the Presidential election of 2008.
Since there will apparently not be an opportunity in
this Committee to address voting issues before the election, I would like
to take this opportunity to state some of my concerns for the record.
Sadly, this Committee has done nothing during this Congress to protect the
voting rights of all Americans. In this Congress and the last, we have
seen the Chairman of the Committee and the Majority Leader offer floor
amendments to extend the Voting Rights Act, which is slated to expire in
2007. On both occasions, those amendments were withdrawn after I and
others argued that it would be deeply irresponsible to extend the VRA
without building a record to support that step. Indeed, such cursory
treatment of the VRA would practically invite the Supreme Court to
invalidate the law.
One might think that after Republican VRA extension
amendments twice had to be withdrawn on the same grounds, this Committee
might at least have held hearings on the issue. Despite my repeated
requests, however, such a hearing was never held.
It is thus hard to avoid the conclusion that the
amendments offered by Senators Hatch and Frist were anything more than an
empty gesture offered as political show.
Meanwhile, we have done nothing to investigate whether
conditions for the upcoming election are fair, despite this Committee’s
clear interest in and oversight of compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
We see almost daily press reports about questionable activities by both
Federal and State law enforcement officials that threaten the ability of
minority group members to participate fully on November 2. People for the
American Way has released an excellent report entitled “The Long Shadow of
Jim Crow,” detailing the curtailment of voting rights across the country in
recent years. (I would like to place a copy of this report in the
Record.) We have read that the Justice Department has placed a great and
unprecedented emphasis on “voter integrity,” which has all too often in the
past been a euphemism for suppressing the votes of your opponent.
At the same time, the New Yorker has reported
that a leading official at the Civil Rights Division, traditionally the
protector of voting rights, has publicly suggested that the Justice
Department should leave its voter access mission to volunteers and
concentrate on “integrity” instead. I suppose this should come as no
surprise, since that official – Hans von Spakovsky – came to the Justice
Department with a lengthy background in the “voting integrity” movement.
In addition to membership in the Federalist Society, a virtual requirement
for lawyers holding senior positions in the Bush Administration, von
Spakovsky served on the board of directors for the so-called Voting
Integrity Project. He also wrote an article for the Georgia Public Policy
Foundation urging the sort of aggressive approach to purging felons from
the voting rolls that worked so disastrously in Florida in 2000. Indeed,
the Voting Integrity Project worked on the design of Florida’s 2000
effort. It should probably go without saying that Mr. von Spakovsky also
worked for the Bush campaign as a volunteer during the Florida recount.
While the Justice Department increases its focus on
“voting integrity,” President Carter publicly expressed his fear last week
in The Washington Post “that a repetition of the problems of 2000
[in Florida] now seems likely.” He decried the “highly partisan” Florida
voting officials, the absence of paper ballot printouts for voters, and the
lack of uniformity in voting procedures throughout the State. Of course,
this last problem provided the justification for the Supreme Court’s 5-4
ruling in Bush v. Gore awarding Florida’s electoral votes, and thus
the election, to President Bush. One wonders whether the Court’s concern
about this issue continues.
There is an explicit racial element to the problems in
Florida that cries out for this Committee’s attention. First, even after
the felon purge in 2000, Florida election officials developed a purge list
this year that included as alleged felons 22,000 African Americans, who
generally vote for Democratic candidates, but only 61 Hispanics, a much
friendlier ethnic group for Republicans in Florida. The list was discarded
only after a judge ordered it to be made public at the request of CNN,
Senator Bill Nelson, and others.
Second, according to The New York Times,
Florida state troopers launched an investigation of alleged absentee ballot
irregularities among elderly black voters in a March 2003 Orlando
election. Armed officers visited the homes of dozens of voters, many of
whom are members of the Orlando League of Voters, an African-American group
encouraging civic participation. The investigation continued into August
even though the Florida Department of Law Enforcement found in May that
“there was no basis to support the allegations of election fraud.” These
reports have led many to conclude that voter intimidation may be occurring
in the state that decided the 2000 election and may well decide this one as
well.
The problems facing minority voters are not limited to
Florida. In Michigan, a Republican state legislator has spoken openly
about the need to suppress the vote in Detroit, a city that is more than 80
percent African American. In South Dakota in June, Native Americans were
not allowed to vote because they did not have photo identification, which
was required under neither state nor Federal law.
There are so many issues that could give rise to a
divisive and harmful national dispute following the election that it only
makes sense to give them full airing now. Instead, we are devoting one of
the year’s final hearings to a topic that, however worthy, could as easily
and valuably be held next year.
Today the Senate Judiciary Committee, in conjunction
with the Secretary of the Senate’s office, is providing closed-caption
coverage of this hearing, under a pilot program that uses voice recognition
technology, which is new to the Senate. The Judiciary Committee is proud
of its groundbreaking role in testing this technology for the Senate. This
pilot program will help the Committee and the Senate in reaching
conclusions about the effectiveness of voice recognition technology and the
feasibility of its use for our and for other committees, in ways that can
expand access to our proceedings to those who are hearing impaired, as well
as to others.
To help the Secretary of the Senate evaluate this
project and its possible extension throughout the Senate, we invite all
Senators and their staff to watch this hearing on Senate Channel 13 and to
email their comments about the usefulness of this voice recognition
technology us at this address:
ccpilot@sec.senate.gov. The
address again is:
ccpilot@sec.senate.gov. Thank
you.
# # # # #
|