HEALTH CONSULTATION
Technical Document Review
Recirculating Groundwater Remediation Well Feasibility Test
FRUIT VALLEY NEIGHBORHOOD
(a/k/a CADET MANUFACTURING COMPANY)
VANCOUVER, CLARK COUNTY, WASHINGTON
BACKGROUND AND STATEMENT OF ISSUES
The Washington State Department of Health (DOH) has prepared this health consultation report to summarize the results of its technical review of the Cadet Manufacturing Company (Cadet), Work Plan and Specifications for a Feasibility Test of Recirculating Groundwater Remediation Well System for the Fruit Valley Neighborhood (August 2003) and Response to Ecology's Comments on Work Plan and Specifications for a Feasibility Test of Recirculating Groundwater Remediation Well System for the Fruit Valley Neighborhood (October 29, 2003).1,2 DOH conducted its review of these documents because of the potential health concerns associated with conducting the feasibility test in the nearby residential portion of the Fruit Valley Neighborhood (FVN) where children live and play. DOH prepares health consultations under a cooperative agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR).
The FVN is located east and north of the Cadet property, which is located at 2500 West Fourth Plain Boulevard in Vancouver, Clark County, Washington. The Cadet property is the source area for the chlorinated solvent contaminated groundwater that underlies a significant portion of the FVN. The contaminated groundwater has migrated eastward to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad tracks, northward between West 31st Street and La Frambois Road, and southeastward toward Port of Vancouver property.3 The predominant chlorinated solvents found in groundwater include trichloroethylene (TCE) and tetrachloroethylene (PCE). Other chlorinated solvents, including 1, 1 dichloroethene (1, 1-DCE), have also been detected.
Chlorinated solvents dissolved in groundwater can evaporate and move up through the soil and enter homes and other buildings, potentially affecting indoor air quality. The objective of Cadet's feasibility test for the groundwater remediation system is to determine whether the proposed treatment system (i.e., recirculating groundwater remediation well (RGRW) and sodium permanganate injection) will be effective in reducing chlorinated solvent concentrations, particularly TCE and PCE, in groundwater below the FVN to target remediation levels. Cadet developed the target remediation levels, which are designed to be protective of residential indoor air, using the Johnson & Ettinger (J&E) vapor intrusion model.2
Because of the potential for residents of the FVN to be exposed to chlorinated solvents during the feasibility test, DOH was compelled to review Cadet's feasibility test work plan and specifications and responses to the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) comments. DOH received the documents on October 29, 2003, and after completing its preliminary review two days later, it discussed its health concerns with the Ecology (Craig Rankine, Washington State Department of Ecology, personal communication, October 31, 2003). These preliminary comments were summarized in an e-mail message on November 3, 2003.4
The Work Plan and Specifications for a Feasibility Test of Recirculating Groundwater Remediation Well System for the Fruit Valley Neighborhood and Response to Ecology's Comments on Work Plan and Specifications for a Feasibility Test of Recirculating Groundwater Remediation Well System for the Fruit Valley Neighborhood summarize the feasibility testing activities that will be conducted in the FVN.
DOH's previous health concerns about the formation of more toxic daughter products and chlorine gas during the injection of the sodium permanganate during the feasibility test are no longer an issue. DOH now understands that the sodium permanganate breaks down the TCE and PCE in the contaminated groundwater by breaking the carbon-carbon double bond associated with these chemicals, rather than the carbon-chloride bond. Consequently chemicals like vinyl chloride and chlorine gas should not be generated (Lenford O'Garro, Washington State Department of Health, personal communication, November 6, 2003).
The comments below summarize the remaining DOH health concerns about the proposed project. Recommendations follow each comment.
Recommendation - DOH recommends that Ecology have Cadet consider and address the potential health effects to the FVN, if any, before injecting the sodium permanganate.
Recommendation - DOH recommends that the Ecology have Cadet address this issue as part of its design plan as well as its health and safety plan, since it appears to be a confined entry situation.
According to Cadet's response to Ecology's comments on the feasibility study work plan, the potential remediation level (PRL) for TCE for protecting indoor air remains at 131 micrograms/liter (ug/l), not the 1.1 ug/l level as Ecology indicated had been discussed with Cadet (Craig Rankine, Washington State Department of Ecology, personal communication, October 29, 2003). Cadet used the J&E vapor intrusion model and 1995 guidance to calculate the groundwater TCE remediation level of 131 ug/l.
Recommendation -DOH requests that Ecology review Cadet's proposed groundwater remediation levels, which are supposed to be protective of indoor air, and have Cadet provide groundwater, soil gas, and air data to support the use of the modeled groundwater cleanup levels because there is uncertainty associated with vapor intrusion modeling.
Recommendation - DOH recommends that Ecology have Cadet evaluate the potential health risks posed by natural attenuation if this is a likely cleanup option for this site.
Recommendation - DOH recommends that Ecology have Cadet select a more appropriate sampling device for collecting VOC samples.
Recommendation - DOH recommends that Ecology have Cadet perform metal testing during the feasibility test to ensure that the chemical oxidation process does not cause a problem with metals.
The goal of the Cadet RGRW system feasibility test is to evaluate whether the system can effectively reduce groundwater chlorinated solvent concentrations to a level that will protect indoor air quality in the FVN. The FVN is an area where children could potentially be exposed to chlorinated solvents migrating from contaminated groundwater to indoor air. Children may be uniquely vulnerable to the hazardous effects of environmental contaminants. Children breathe more air per pound of body weight than do adults resulting in higher levels of exposure to contaminants in air. Additionally, the fetus may be highly sensitive to many chemicals, particularly with respect to potential impact on childhood development. For these reasons, DOH has determined that it is very important to consider the effects that cleanup remedies like the RGRW system may have on children, as well as other sensitive populations. DOH will continue evaluating these potential exposures as information becomes available.
The goal of the Cadet RGRW system feasibility test is to evaluate whether the proposed system can effectively reduce groundwater chlorinated solvent concentrations to levels that will be protective of public health in the FVN. However, since there is some uncertainty about the health risks posed by the Cadet RGRW system feasibility test, this site is categorized as an indeterminate public health hazard.
Action
Ecology should provide written responses to DOH concerning the recommendations
listed in this consult.
Action
DOH will continue working with Ecology to review and comment on remediation
documents associated with the Cadet site.
Barbara Trejo
Washington State Department of Health
Office of Environmental Health Assessments
Site Assessment Section
Designated Reviewer
Wayne Clifford, Manager
Site Assessment Section
Office of Environmental Health Assessments
Washington State Department of Health
ATSDR Technical Project Officer
Debra Gable
Division of Health Assessment and Consultation
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
This Health Consultation for the Cadet site was prepared by the Washington State Department of Health under a cooperative agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). It is in accordance with approved methodology and procedures existing at the time the health consultation was begun.
Debra Gable
Technical Project Officer,
SPS, SSAB, DHAC
ATSDR
The Division of Health Assessment and Consultation, ATSDR, has reviewed this public health consultation and concurs with the findings.
Roberta Erlwein
Section Chief,
SPS, SSAB, DHAC
ATSDR