Detailed discussion of Energy Modeling of Advanced Relocatable Classrooms with
Indirect/Direct Evaporative Cooling (IDEC) Systems
The purpose of the Energy Simulations and Projected Statewide Energy Savings project is to develop reasonable energy
performance and cost models for high-performance relocatable classrooms (RCs) across California climates. This project
is broken into an initial and a final phase. In the initial phase, which took place during the past year, the
characteristics of high- performance RCs were defined, modeling assumptions were developed, and a DOE-2 input dataset
was developed and executed. A final modeling phase will take place in Year 3 after the energy and indoor environmental
quality (IEQ) field studies are completed. The data from the field studies will be used to adjust the model inputs and
assumptions so that the DOE-2 simulations can be refined. The refined simulations will be used to determine improved
statewide energy savings and predicted energy usage for both standard and improved RCs.
The High-Performance Commercial Building System (HPCBS) RC energy-efficiency implementations are based on earlier work by
Davis Energy Group with Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E), which culminated in the PG&E Premium Efficient Relocatable
Classroom (PERC) program (Davis Energy Group 2000). The HPBCS RC specification is similar to the PERC Package 2 with two
differences: the HPCBS heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system provides heat using a gas-heated
hydronic coil rather than electric radiant panels, and the HPCBS roof has a white ("Cool Roof," AB 970) coating. We did
not implement Package B Option 1, experimental displacement ventilation (DV). The addition of the DV system would have
prevented us from studying the effectiveness of the Indirect/Direct Evaporative Cooler (IDEC) technology. For this study,
the IDEC was the primary technology under investigation.
The following input specifications for HPCBS RCs were used to conduct the DOE-2 simulations. These specifications are
similar to the details of actual classrooms specified by LBNL and currently under construction by American Modular Systems
(Manteca CA) for two school districts in Northern California. The RC is a standard 24' x 40' modular classroom consisting
of two 12' x 40' rigid steel frame modules connected to one another along the long axis. Detailed physical specifications
are contained in the deliverables report
for Element 6, Year 1 Diagrams of the RCs as used for modeling are provided in the DOE-2 Input Specifications
deliverable (Apte et al. 2001) submitted by LBNL to the California Energy Commission (CEC) on April 18, 2001. The
base case HVAC system consists of a wall-mounted heat pump with flex duct connected to two supply registers in the ceiling
and a through-the-wall return. The HPCBS cooling system consists of a wall-mounted IDEC with flex duct connected to three
supply registers in the ceiling and two through-the-wall gravity relief dampers. Heating is provided by a hydronic heating
coil in the supply plenum connected to a wall-mounted instantaneous gas water heater.
|
|
Table 1 shows the key energy-use related differences between standard RCs and the HPCBS RCs.
Table 1. Comparison of Base Case and HPCBS (modified PERC) Inputs |
|
Input |
Base Case |
HPCBS |
|
Wall R-value |
11 |
13 |
Floor R-value |
11 |
19 |
GLASS-TYPE-CODE |
2212 (gray tint) |
2660 (selective surface) |
Roof ABSORPTANCE |
0.60 (bare metal) |
0.25 (white coating) |
Roof OUTSIDE-EMISS |
0.50 |
0.95 |
LIGHTING-KW |
1.66 |
0.75 |
|
Operating schedules and set points were developed using monitored data from six RCs. Fans were assumed to operate weekdays
from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. with night operation set to CYCLE-ON-ANY and an outside airflow of 315 cubic feet per pminute (cfm)
(15 cfm/person, 20 students and 1 teacher). The heating set point is 70°F from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. with a setback to 65°F
at night and 60°F on the weekends. The cooling set point is 76°F on weekdays and 85°F on weekends. Yearly
operation can be set to be nine-month (September-June) or all-year.
Davis Energy Group (DEG) provided LBNL with a final version of the deliverable "Report on Initial Energy Simulations."
DOE-2 simulations were completed for standard [standard building shell, lighting, 10 seasonal energy-efficiency rating
(SEER) HVAC system] and advanced (PERC Package B building shell, T8 lamps, Cool Roof treatment, IDEC/gas Hydronic HVAC)
RCs in four California climate zones. The simulations were conducted for nine-month (seasonal) and year-round schedules.
Blended electricity and gas rates of $0.14 per kWh and $0.60 per therm were used to estimate energy costs. The following
is excerpted from DEG's final report. These results are for the seasonal school schedule only (the report also contains
tabulations of simulation results for the California year-round school schedule).
Table 2. Summary of DOE2 Simulation Results (seasonal school schedule only).
|
Electric (kWh) |
Annual Savings |
|
Fan |
CZ |
Envelope |
Lights |
Heating |
Cooling |
Fans & Pumps |
Total |
Source (Mbtu) |
Cost ($) |
Energy (%) |
Cost (%) |
Heat Pump |
Cycle |
4 |
Base Case |
2311 |
993 |
369 |
257 |
4009 |
|
|
|
|
Heat Pump |
On |
4 |
Base Case |
2311 |
1099 |
428 |
1596 |
5492 |
-15.2 |
-$208 |
-37% |
-37% |
Heat Pump |
Cycle |
4 |
Package 1 |
1044 |
984 |
156 |
142 |
2409 |
16.4 |
$224 |
40% |
40% |
IDEC |
On |
4 |
Package 1 |
1044 |
51 |
4 |
100 |
1224 |
20.5 |
$342 |
50% |
61% |
Heat Pump |
Cycle |
11 |
Base Case |
2311 |
1864 |
752 |
683 |
5731 |
|
|
|
|
Heat Pump |
On |
11 |
Base Case |
2311 |
2073 |
984 |
2678 |
8132 |
-24.6 |
-$336 |
-42% |
-42% |
Heat Pump |
Cycle |
11 |
Package 1 |
1044 |
1848 |
451 |
371 |
3838 |
19.4 |
$265 |
33% |
33% |
IDEC |
On |
11 |
Package 1 |
1044 |
82 |
26 |
148 |
1326 |
31.5 |
$535 |
54% |
67% |
Heat Pump |
Cycle |
12 |
Base Case |
2311 |
1382 |
623 |
567 |
4994 |
|
|
|
|
Heat Pump |
On |
12 |
Base Case |
2311 |
1552 |
776 |
2154 |
6874 |
-19.2 |
-$263 |
-38% |
-38% |
Heat Pump |
Cycle |
12 |
Package 1 |
1044 |
1379 |
334 |
349 |
3220 |
18.2 |
$248 |
36% |
36% |
IDEC |
On |
12 |
Package 1 |
1044 |
69 |
17 |
157 |
1314 |
26.5 |
$448 |
52% |
64% |
Heat Pump |
Cycle |
13 |
Base Case |
2311 |
1639 |
874 |
724 |
5659 |
|
|
|
|
Heat Pump |
On |
13 |
Base Case |
2311 |
1867 |
1160 |
2637 |
8058 |
-24.6 |
-$336 |
-42% |
-42% |
Heat Pump |
Cycle |
13 |
Package 1 |
1044 |
1623 |
498 |
394 |
3674 |
20.3 |
$278 |
35% |
35% |
IDEC |
On |
13 |
Package 1 |
1044 |
72 |
28 |
186 |
1355 |
32.0 |
$530 |
55% |
67% |
Note: "Heat Pump" signifies the standard RC with 10 SEER heat pump, and IDEC signifies the advanced RC including PERC Package
B building shell, T8 lamps, Cool Roof treatment, IDEC/gas Hydronic HVAC, as described in the DOE-2 Model Input files. The
combined heat pump/ Fan On/Base Case refers to the standard RC package operated as designed to provide continuous ventilation
at 15 cfm per occupant per Title 24 regulations.
What We Have Learned
During the course of Year 1, two issues impacted the research plan and affected the RC energy-modeling effort. First, the
potential for an improved IDEC heat exchanger prompted collaboration with Richard Bourne of DEG to use a higher-efficiency
design under development with DeChamps Laboratories. This change would have affected input values used in the DOE-2 modeling.
Second, our initial observations regarding the high energy costs of the electric radiant heating system included as a potential
heating option in the Element 6 proposal led to rethinking of the heating component of the HPCBS RC design. These issues and
their resolutions are discussed below.
IDEC Cooling
Initially it was thought that an upgraded IDEC heat exchanger with improved efficiency would be available through the CEC-funded
DEG project (PI: Richard Bourne; CEC Manager: Ray Darby). However, the outcome of that project was not positive, so the
original Adobe IDEC heat exchanger will be used in this project. The efficiency of the Adobe design is adequate to meet cooling
needs for the RCs. Because no change in heat exchanger was possible the simulation inputs have not been altered.
IDEC Heating
Changes to the heating component option of the high-performance HVAC system were adopted. Currently the most appropriate
heating technology to accompany the IDEC appears to be a hydronic gas-heat system. The high-performance heating system option
originally suggested in Package B of the HPCBS Element 6 proposal was radiant electric resistance heating. This suggestion
was based on the PERC Package 2. Recent re-analysis of the energy benefits of the PERC design, especially in light of the
winter peak load crisis in 2000, led us to reconsider the prudence of using electric resistance heating as a replacement for
the higher-efficiency heat pump technology. The relatively high end-use efficiency, lower cost, and peak-load relief of
natural gas for heating energy appears particularly attractive.
The hydronic gas-heat system design developed at LBNL with DEG incorporates a low-pressure drop fan coil mounted in the
IDEC discharge air stream as it enters the RC plenum and duct system. Heat is be supplied by an 85-% efficient,
outdoor-mounted, power-vented natural gas (LPG options are available) instantaneous water heater by a water circulation
pump and associated hydronic plumbing.
The existing IDEC temperature controller appears to have all of the necessary hardware to control the circulation pump,
fan coil and room temperature. Hydronic fluid freeze protection is designed into the water heater. Finally, the heating
is accomplished solely by the flow of outside air (400 cfm) provided by the IDEC air handler. DEG developed a sizing
spreadsheet for this hydronic heating system for California Climate zones, indicating that it can be used to provide the
heating needs of RCs in climates with outdoor temperatures of 32°F or lower. Peak electricity use by the system during
heating is approximately 40W, compared with about 3kW for the conventional heat pump and 4kW for radiant electric heating.
This change will result in a more efficient and cost-effective HVAC design with major peak electrical load reduction
benefits.
|
|
Contact:
Michael Apte, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), (510) 486-4669
|