HPCBS > Indoor Environmental Quality > Energy Simulations and Projected Statewide Energy Savings > Energy Modeling Phase I > Details
Pier Logo High Performance Commercial Building Systems Berkeley Lab Logo
What's New | Publications | Partners | Glossary | Site Map | Links | Contact Us
Corner   Corner
Program Elements Life Cycle Tools Lighting, Envelope and Daylighting Low Energy Cooling Integrated Commissioning and Diagnostics Rule Indoor Environmental Quality
Corner   Corner
Corner   Corner

Detailed discussion of Energy Modeling of Advanced Relocatable Classrooms with Indirect/Direct Evaporative Cooling (IDEC) Systems

The purpose of the Energy Simulations and Projected Statewide Energy Savings project is to develop reasonable energy performance and cost models for high-performance relocatable classrooms (RCs) across California climates. This project is broken into an initial and a final phase. In the initial phase, which took place during the past year, the characteristics of high- performance RCs were defined, modeling assumptions were developed, and a DOE-2 input dataset was developed and executed. A final modeling phase will take place in Year 3 after the energy and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) field studies are completed. The data from the field studies will be used to adjust the model inputs and assumptions so that the DOE-2 simulations can be refined. The refined simulations will be used to determine improved statewide energy savings and predicted energy usage for both standard and improved RCs.

The High-Performance Commercial Building System (HPCBS) RC energy-efficiency implementations are based on earlier work by Davis Energy Group with Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E), which culminated in the PG&E Premium Efficient Relocatable Classroom (PERC) program (Davis Energy Group 2000). The HPBCS RC specification is similar to the PERC Package 2 with two differences: the HPCBS heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system provides heat using a gas-heated hydronic coil rather than electric radiant panels, and the HPCBS roof has a white ("Cool Roof," AB 970) coating. We did not implement Package B Option 1, experimental displacement ventilation (DV). The addition of the DV system would have prevented us from studying the effectiveness of the Indirect/Direct Evaporative Cooler (IDEC) technology. For this study, the IDEC was the primary technology under investigation.

The following input specifications for HPCBS RCs were used to conduct the DOE-2 simulations. These specifications are similar to the details of actual classrooms specified by LBNL and currently under construction by American Modular Systems (Manteca CA) for two school districts in Northern California. The RC is a standard 24' x 40' modular classroom consisting of two 12' x 40' rigid steel frame modules connected to one another along the long axis. Detailed physical specifications are contained in the deliverables report for Element 6, Year 1 Diagrams of the RCs as used for modeling are provided in the DOE-2 Input Specifications deliverable (Apte et al. 2001) submitted by LBNL to the California Energy Commission (CEC) on April 18, 2001. The base case HVAC system consists of a wall-mounted heat pump with flex duct connected to two supply registers in the ceiling and a through-the-wall return. The HPCBS cooling system consists of a wall-mounted IDEC with flex duct connected to three supply registers in the ceiling and two through-the-wall gravity relief dampers. Heating is provided by a hydronic heating coil in the supply plenum connected to a wall-mounted instantaneous gas water heater.

HVAC installed on the end of a classroom

Table 1 shows the key energy-use related differences between standard RCs and the HPCBS RCs.

Table 1. Comparison of Base Case and HPCBS (modified PERC) Inputs

Input Base Case HPCBS

Wall R-value 11 13
Floor R-value 11 19
GLASS-TYPE-CODE 2212 (gray tint) 2660 (selective surface)
Roof ABSORPTANCE 0.60 (bare metal) 0.25 (white coating)
Roof OUTSIDE-EMISS 0.50 0.95
LIGHTING-KW 1.66 0.75

Operating schedules and set points were developed using monitored data from six RCs. Fans were assumed to operate weekdays from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. with night operation set to CYCLE-ON-ANY and an outside airflow of 315 cubic feet per pminute (cfm) (15 cfm/person, 20 students and 1 teacher). The heating set point is 70°F from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. with a setback to 65°F at night and 60°F on the weekends. The cooling set point is 76°F on weekdays and 85°F on weekends. Yearly operation can be set to be nine-month (September-June) or all-year.

Davis Energy Group (DEG) provided LBNL with a final version of the deliverable "Report on Initial Energy Simulations." DOE-2 simulations were completed for standard [standard building shell, lighting, 10 seasonal energy-efficiency rating (SEER) HVAC system] and advanced (PERC Package B building shell, T8 lamps, Cool Roof treatment, IDEC/gas Hydronic HVAC) RCs in four California climate zones. The simulations were conducted for nine-month (seasonal) and year-round schedules. Blended electricity and gas rates of $0.14 per kWh and $0.60 per therm were used to estimate energy costs. The following is excerpted from DEG's final report. These results are for the seasonal school schedule only (the report also contains tabulations of simulation results for the California year-round school schedule).

Table 2. Summary of DOE2 Simulation Results (seasonal school schedule only).

  Electric (kWh) Annual Savings
  Fan CZ Envelope Lights Heating Cooling Fans &
Pumps
Total Source
(Mbtu)
Cost
($)
Energy
(%)
Cost
(%)
Heat Pump Cycle 4 Base Case 2311 993 369 257 4009        
Heat Pump On 4 Base Case 2311 1099 428 1596 5492 -15.2 -$208 -37% -37%
Heat Pump Cycle 4 Package 1 1044 984 156 142 2409 16.4 $224 40% 40%
IDEC On 4 Package 1 1044 51 4 100 1224 20.5 $342 50% 61%
Heat Pump Cycle 11 Base Case 2311 1864 752 683 5731        
Heat Pump On 11 Base Case 2311 2073 984 2678 8132 -24.6 -$336 -42% -42%
Heat Pump Cycle 11 Package 1 1044 1848 451 371 3838 19.4 $265 33% 33%
IDEC On 11 Package 1 1044 82 26 148 1326 31.5 $535 54% 67%
Heat Pump Cycle 12 Base Case 2311 1382 623 567 4994        
Heat Pump On 12 Base Case 2311 1552 776 2154 6874 -19.2 -$263 -38% -38%
Heat Pump Cycle 12 Package 1 1044 1379 334 349 3220 18.2 $248 36% 36%
IDEC On 12 Package 1 1044 69 17 157 1314 26.5 $448 52% 64%
Heat Pump Cycle 13 Base Case 2311 1639 874 724 5659        
Heat Pump On 13 Base Case 2311 1867 1160 2637 8058 -24.6 -$336 -42% -42%
Heat Pump Cycle 13 Package 1 1044 1623 498 394 3674 20.3 $278 35% 35%
IDEC On 13 Package 1 1044 72 28 186 1355 32.0 $530 55% 67%
Note: "Heat Pump" signifies the standard RC with 10 SEER heat pump, and IDEC signifies the advanced RC including PERC Package B building shell, T8 lamps, Cool Roof treatment, IDEC/gas Hydronic HVAC, as described in the DOE-2 Model Input files. The combined heat pump/ Fan On/Base Case refers to the standard RC package operated as designed to provide continuous ventilation at 15 cfm per occupant per Title 24 regulations.

What We Have Learned
During the course of Year 1, two issues impacted the research plan and affected the RC energy-modeling effort. First, the potential for an improved IDEC heat exchanger prompted collaboration with Richard Bourne of DEG to use a higher-efficiency design under development with DeChamps Laboratories. This change would have affected input values used in the DOE-2 modeling. Second, our initial observations regarding the high energy costs of the electric radiant heating system included as a potential heating option in the Element 6 proposal led to rethinking of the heating component of the HPCBS RC design. These issues and their resolutions are discussed below.

IDEC Cooling
Initially it was thought that an upgraded IDEC heat exchanger with improved efficiency would be available through the CEC-funded DEG project (PI: Richard Bourne; CEC Manager: Ray Darby). However, the outcome of that project was not positive, so the original Adobe IDEC heat exchanger will be used in this project. The efficiency of the Adobe design is adequate to meet cooling needs for the RCs. Because no change in heat exchanger was possible the simulation inputs have not been altered.
IDEC Heating
Changes to the heating component option of the high-performance HVAC system were adopted. Currently the most appropriate heating technology to accompany the IDEC appears to be a hydronic gas-heat system. The high-performance heating system option originally suggested in Package B of the HPCBS Element 6 proposal was radiant electric resistance heating. This suggestion was based on the PERC Package 2. Recent re-analysis of the energy benefits of the PERC design, especially in light of the winter peak load crisis in 2000, led us to reconsider the prudence of using electric resistance heating as a replacement for the higher-efficiency heat pump technology. The relatively high end-use efficiency, lower cost, and peak-load relief of natural gas for heating energy appears particularly attractive.
The hydronic gas-heat system design developed at LBNL with DEG incorporates a low-pressure drop fan coil mounted in the IDEC discharge air stream as it enters the RC plenum and duct system. Heat is be supplied by an 85-% efficient, outdoor-mounted, power-vented natural gas (LPG options are available) instantaneous water heater by a water circulation pump and associated hydronic plumbing.
The existing IDEC temperature controller appears to have all of the necessary hardware to control the circulation pump, fan coil and room temperature. Hydronic fluid freeze protection is designed into the water heater. Finally, the heating is accomplished solely by the flow of outside air (400 cfm) provided by the IDEC air handler. DEG developed a sizing spreadsheet for this hydronic heating system for California Climate zones, indicating that it can be used to provide the heating needs of RCs in climates with outdoor temperatures of 32°F or lower. Peak electricity use by the system during heating is approximately 40W, compared with about 3kW for the conventional heat pump and 4kW for radiant electric heating. This change will result in a more efficient and cost-effective HVAC design with major peak electrical load reduction benefits.

Contact: Michael Apte, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), (510) 486-4669

Corner   Corner
Last updated
May 27, 2003
Return to top | HPCBS Home