Skip Navigation
 
ACF
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™  |  Print      

TANF Financial Data > FY 2004 TANF Financial Data


TANF FINANCIAL DATA


Table A2 - FY 2003 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 2004
EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE IN FY 2004 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items

STATE LINE 6
TOTAL EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE		 Line 6a
WORK RELATED ACTIVITIES		 Line 6b
CHILD CARE		 Line 6c
TRANSPORTATION		 Line 6d
IDA		 Line 6e
REFUNDABLE EITC		 Line 6f
OTHER REFUNDABLE TAX CREDIT		 Line 6g
NON-RECUR
SHORT-TERM
BENEFITS		 Line 6i
NON-ASSIST SOLELY UNDER PRIOR LAW		 Total of Other Categories of Non-Assistance Lines 6h - 6m % OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES SPENT ON NON ASSISTANCE 2/
ALABAMA <5,565,164> 867,442 <10,590,149> 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,157,543 -143%
ALASKA 1,422,927 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,422,927 14%
ARIZONA 15,254,292 2,236,302 <516,361> 562,383 0 0 0 0 3,902,190 9,069,778 85%
ARKANSAS 12,052,936 5,153,282 4,163 2,553,550 321,395 0 0 0 0 4,020,546 106%
CALIFORNIA 206,478,466 3,945,525 <4,036,502> 555,650 0 0 0 8,216 0 206,005,577 82%
COLORADO 751,706 3,002 0 0 0 0 0 0 <3,000> 751,704 2%
CONNECTICUT 391,350 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 308,096 83,252 0%
DELAWARE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA 2,208,735 1,830,635 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 378,100 10%
FLORIDA 131,203,838 34,491,118 67,210,862 2,289,963 0 0 0 112,069 0 27,099,826 88%
GEORGIA 20,044,829 6,472,499 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,733,512 11,838,818 80%
HAWAII 2,106,014 313,043 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,792,971 98%
IDAHO 5,809,804 548,604 <810> 0 0 0 0 555,994 0 4,706,016 51%
ILLINOIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
INDIANA 1,440,035 1,237,988 0 182,347 0 0 0 0 0 19,700 5%
IOWA 1 <59,868> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59,869 0%
KANSAS 250,604 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,604 1%
KENTUCKY 18,444,966 1,579,119 6,123,791 819,295 0 0 0 0 0 9,922,761 35%
LOUISIANA 65,261,580 4,800,190 2,311,183 7,421 1,804,579 0 0 <62,523> 0 56,400,730 91%
MAINE <44,557> 0 0 <44,557> 0 0 0 0 0 0 -5%
MARYLAND 14,372,579 7,814,382 0 3,203,499 0 0 0 132,454 0 3,222,244 64%
MASSACHUSETTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MICHIGAN <2,857,201> <178,307> <2,649> 0 0 0 0 0 0 <2,676,245> -3%
MINNESOTA 686,822 538,629 0 4,025 0 0 0 0 0 144,168 2%
MISSISSIPPI 3,928,130 <2,738,858> 529,036 3,644,741 0 0 0 0 0 2,493,211 2127%
MISSOURI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MONTANA 802,113 481,998 134,590 0 30,114 0 0 36,651 <102,678> 221,438 8%
NEBRASKA 2,492,025 2,491,995 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,356,751 <3,356,721> 15%
NEVADA 2,341,961 26,639 0 0 0 0 0 1,046 99,356 2,214,920 21%
NEW HAMPSHIRE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW JERSEY 99,260,943 <4,332,952> 0 17,307 87,935 86,000,000 0 <178,040> 13,680,000 3,986,693 -421%
NEW MEXICO 6,002,439 2,410,050 0 505,318 0 0 0 0 0 3,087,071 13%
NEW YORK 157,495,749 50,292,210 0 5,524,445 0 0 0 3,680 413,239 101,262,175 107%
NORTH CAROLINA 54,394,074 3,270,422 312,726 394,297 0 0 0 1,220,089 40,331,129 8,865,411 91%
NORTH DAKOTA 167,445 <2,592> 239,566 7,072 0 0 0 0 <77,358> 757 2%
OHIO 70,499,557 576,108 616,295 <7,330> 0 0 0 23,440 0 69,291,044 98%
OKLAHOMA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
OREGON 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0%
PENNSYLVANIA 231,812,060 108,771,543 3,098,187 3,064,058 0 0 0 823,142 79,250,338 36,804,792 166%
RHODE ISLAND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
SOUTH CAROLINA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
SOUTH DAKOTA 386,797 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 386,797 100%
TENNESSEE 77,710 77,710 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
TEXAS 32,791,671 18,858,634 32,866 462,746 <229,399> 0 0 3,430,034 0 10,236,790 27%
UTAH 878,744 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 878,743 4%
VERMONT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
VIRGINIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
WASHINGTON 4,364 0 0 <2> 0 0 0 0 4,366 0 0%
WEST VIRGINIA <300,000> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <300,000> -2%
WISCONSIN 13,180,438 544,952 2,071,659 100,172 <323> 0 0 2,252,411 0 8,211,567 158%
WYOMING 18,528,994 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18,528,994 100%
Total 1,184,459,777 252,321,445 67,538,453 23,846,402 2,014,301 86,000,000 0 8,358,663 142,895,941 601,484,572 -
Percentages 1/ 100% 21% 6% 2% 0% 7% 0% 1% 12% 51% -
Percentages 2/ 66% 14% 4% 1% 0% 5% 0% 0% 8% 34% -
1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total expenditures on non-assistance (Line 6).
2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7).An abnormal negative percentage is the result of the total expenditures on non-assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on non-assistance.


Department of Health and Human Services Logo Department of Health and Human Services
Administration for Children and Families


Last Updated: January 8, 2009