| Table of Contents | Appendix
A | Appendix B | Appendix
C | Appendix D | Appendix
E | Appendix F | Appendix
G | | Chapter 1-3 |
Chapter 4 Part 1 | Chapter
4 Part 2 | Chapter 5 | Chapter
6-8, K-1 | |
|||||
Biological
Assessment on the National
Park Service
TABLES Purpose and Need The National Park Service in Yosemite has prepared the Final Yosemite Valley Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS) to provide direction and propose specific actions to restore, protect, and enhance the natural, cultural, and scenic resources of Yosemite Valley, and to provide a high-quality, resource-based experienced for visitors. The purpose of this Biological Assessment is to review the Final Yosemite Valley Plan in sufficient detail to determine effects of the plan on federal and state-listed threatened or endangered species, federal and state species of concern, state-listed rare species, and species that are locally rare or threatened. All of these species are also referred to as special-status species throughout this document. The Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS aims to restore degraded areas and reduce development within the Merced River ecosystem and other highly valued natural and cultural resource environments. The plan proposes to reduce traffic congestion and supports the use of alternative fuels to reduce mobile sources of air pollution. It presents alternatives to expand orientation and interpretation services and proposes to move nonessential housing, administrative headquarters, offices, and other functions out of Yosemite Valley. Many of these functions would move to the El Portal Administrative Site on the western boundary of the park. The plan proposes options for the size and placement of parking areas, both within and outside of Yosemite Valley. This Biological Assessment will evaluate the Preferred Alternative in the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS, Alternative 2. The areas that could be affected by the Preferred Alternative include Yosemite Valley, the El Portal Administrative Site, Wawona, Foresta, the Tioga Entrance Station, the Arch Rock Entrance Station, the South Entrance Station, the Big Oak Flat Entrance Station, and proposed parking areas in the western part of the park at Badger Pass, El Portal, and Hazel Green or Foresta. These areas are designated as the project area. Detailed maps of the project area are available in Vol. Ic, Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS. This Biological Assessment will:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Consultation The Endangered Species Act (Section 7 [a][2]) directs federal agencies to consult with the responsible agency (in this case, the USFWS) to determine whether proposed actions are likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species or destroy or adversely modify critical habitat. To initiate the consultation process with the USFWS, the National Park Service requested a list of federally listed endangered or threatened species that may be present or may be affected by actions proposed in the Draft Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS. The National Park Service requested that the list include species that are found in the region of the following U.S. Geological Survey quadrangles: Ackerson Mountain, El Capitan, El Portal, Half Dome, Tioga Pass, Yosemite Falls, and Wawona. An informal USFWS list was received on January 24, 2000. A formal updated list was received on March 29, 2000 (see Appendix K-1). The National Park Service evaluated all federally listed species found in the seven U.S. Geological Survey quadrangles that encompass the area that could be affected by the plan (see table K-1). Each species was evaluated by National Park Service biologists familiar with habitat requirements to determine whether each species could be found in the project area. Several species were removed from further evaluation because biologists determined that they do not occur within the project area (see Species Removed from Further Analysis). In addition to federally listed endangered or threatened species, the USFWS provided a list of candidate species and federal species of concern. Candidate species are currently being reviewed by the USFWS and are under consideration for possible listing as endangered or threatened. There were no candidate species identified in the project area for the Draft Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS. Species of concern are species for which listing is possibly appropriate, but for which the USFWS lacks sufficient information to support a listing proposal. Each species of concern was evaluated by National Park Service biologists familiar with habitat requirements and added to the list of species to be evaluated in this assessment, if appropriate (see table K-1). Candidate species and species of concern have no protection under the Endangered Species Act, though National Park Service policies require consideration of these species in park planning (NPS 1988)
Federal Endangered Species
Federal Threatened Species
Federal Species of Concern
California State Endangered Species
California State Threatened Species
California State Rare Species
California State Species of Special Concern
Park Rare Species
The USFWS also provided a list of federal and state-listed species that may occur in Mariposa County (see Appendix K-1). Each species on the Mariposa County list was evaluated by National Park Service biologists familiar with habitat requirements and added to the list of species to be evaluated in this assessment, if appropriate (see table K-1). In May 2000, the National Park Service mailed the Biological Assessment on the Draft Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS to the USFWS and requested formal consultation with regard to the Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS. Later that month, the USFWS requested additional information on the Valley elderberry longhorn beetle. Specifically, the USFWS requested information on whether elderberry plants (which serve as the beetles host plant) occur in riparian habitats below 3,000 feet in the project area. The USFWS also requested the number of stems of each elderberry plan over 1 inch at ground level. In June 2000, the additional information was mailed to the USFWS along with the Revised Biological Assessment on the Draft Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS, which reflected the new information. The public comment period for the Draft Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS (NPS 2000a) closed in early July. At this point, the planning team began to use an analysis of the over 10,600 public comments to guide the direction of the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS. The biological assessment team used decisions made during this period as the basis for this Biological Assessment. The USFWS will use this Biological Assessment to render a Biological Opinion on the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS (NPS 2000b). Species Evaluated in this Biological Assessment Federally Listed Species The Endangered Species Act defines an endangered species as any species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. A threatened species is defined as any species that is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. Of the federally listed species that could be affected by the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS, one is endangered: Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis sierrae); and three are threatened: bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Valley elderberry longhorn beetle (Desmocerus californicus dimorphus), and California red-legged frog (Rana aurora draytonii). The Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep formerly ranged throughout the high elevations of the Sierra Nevada. By the beginning to the 20th century, however, their numbers had been decimated by overhunting, competition for forage with domestic sheep, and especially by diseases contracted from domestic sheep. By 1999, fewer than 200 Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep were left in the entire range, prompting its listing that year as endangered. The bald eagle suffered steep population declines from the effects of pesticides in its food chain, resulting in its listing by the USFWS as a federally endangered species in 1978. Populations of bald eagles, however, have rebounded since the banning of the pesticide DDT in the United States in 1972. As a result, the species was reclassified from endangered to threatened in 1995. In 1999, the USFWS proposed to remove the bald eagle from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife in the lower 48 states of the United States because available data indicated the species has recovered. A final rule is expected in the near future. No critical habitat in the Sierra Nevada has been designated by the USFWS. The Valley elderberry longhorn beetle was listed by the USFWS as threatened on August 8, 1980. This listing was primarily a result of destruction of riparian habitat in the San Joaquin Valley that removed the beetles host plant, the elderberry. Critical habitat has been designated for the beetle in two areas: along the American River near the Sacramento metropolitan area and along Putah Creek in Solano County. However, the beetle also occurs up to 3,000 feet in elevation in the Sierra Nevada. The California red-legged frog was listed as threatened in 1996 after its virtual disappearance from the Central Valley and the Sierra Nevada. The cause(s) of this disappearance are not well understood, but theories include pesticides, habitat destruction, and predation by non-native bullfrogs. Special-Status Species Special-status species that could be affected by this plan are listed in table K-1. The species on this list include the federally endangered and threatened species in the seven U.S. Geological Survey quadrangles that encompass the project area for the plan (see USFWS Consultation), species listed in the California Natural Diversity Data Base, applicable species on the list of endangered and threatened species in Mariposa County provided by the USFWS (see Appendix K-1), and "park rare" plants identified by National Park Service. Park rare plants include those that are:
There is no classification of "park rare" for any wildlife species. Species Removed from Further Analysis The following species are on the list of "Endangered and Threatened Species that may occur or be Affected by Projects in the USFWS 7 1/2 Minute Quads" that was provided by the USFWS (see Appendix K-1). However, the National Park Service has determined that they would not be affected by the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS because they do not occur in the project area, as described under Alternative 2, nor were they historically found in the project area, as described below. Therefore, there is no effect on these species from the Preferred Alternative in the Draft Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS, nor are they potentially indirectly or cumulatively affected by the Preferred Alternative. These species will not be evaluated further in this Biological Assessment. Paiute cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus (=Salmo) clarke seleniris (Federal Threatened). The native range of the Paiute cutthroat trout was extremely limited to approximately 9 miles of stream habitat in Silver King Creek, Alpine County. The California Department of Fish and Game has introduced the subspecies into creeks outside the historic range, including Delaney Creek in Yosemite National Park. The subspecies does not occur in the project area for the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS. Delta smelt, Hypomesus transpacificus (Federal Threatened). The Delta smelt occurs only in Suisun Bay and the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary ("Delta") near San Francisco Bay in California (Thelander 1994). Historically, this species occurred form Suisun Bay upstream to Sacramento on the Sacramento River and to Mossdale on the San Joaquin River (Thelander 1994). The reduction of freshwater inflows to the Delta from water developments, water diversions, and drought appears to be the most deleterious factor affecting this species (Thelander 1994). The subspecies does not occur in the project area for the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS. Sacramento spittail, Pogonichthys macrolepidotus (Federal Threatened). Until recently, the Sacramento spittail was thought to be limited to tidal fresh and brackish waters of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, Suisun Bay; and to marshes in Suisun, Napa, and Petaluma (Baxter 1994, Baxter et al. 1996). Recent surveys have found that some fish spend summers in the main stem of the Sacramento (CDFG 1999a). The Sacramento spittail is threatened by large freshwater exports from Sacramento and San Joaquin River diversions, loss of shallow-water habitat, introduced aquatic species, and agricultural and industrial chemicals. The subspecies does not occur in the project area for the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS. Central Valley steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Federal Threatened). This species does not occur in the project area for the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS (CDFG 1999b). Longfin smelt, Spirinchus thaleichthys (Federal Species of Concern). This species does not occur in the project area for the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS (CDFG 1999b). Red Hills roach, Lavinia symmetricus (Federal Species of Concern). This species does not occur in the project area for the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS (CDFG 1999b). Bells sage sparrow, Amphispiza belli belli (Federal Species of Concern). This subspecies does not occur in the project area for the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS (CDFG 1999b). Northern sagebrush lizard, Sceloporus graciosus graciosus (Federal Species of Concern). This subspecies does not occur in the project area for the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS (CDFG 1999b). Mono Basin mountain beaver, Aplodontia rufa californica (Federal Species of Concern). This listing is specific to the population of Sierra Nevada mountain beaver that occurs in the Mono Basin. This population belongs to the same subspecies as occurs in Yosemite, which is a state species of special concern. Keeled sideband snail, Monadenia circumcarinata (Federal Species of Concern). The keeled sideband snail is a terrestrial snail that is not known to occur outside the Tuolumne River canyon, where it is found in association with steep limestone outcrops and talus slopes (Pilsbre 1939, Maciolek 1985). The California Academy of Sciences has records for eight specimens collected in Tuolumne and Stanislaus Counties. The nearest locality to the project area is Paper Cabin Ridge, above the Tuolumne River. Paper Cabin Ridge is about 18.5 miles west of the Yosemite National Park boundary. Therefore, this species does not appear to occur within the project area. Yosemite woolly-sunflower, Eriophyllum nubigenum (Federal Species of Concern). This annual herb in the aster family is endemic to California and occurs on south-facing granite slabs, domes, and on gravelly soils in the upper Merced River watershed. This species does not occur in the project area and would not be indirectly affected by any actions in the Preferred Alternative of the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS. Critical habitat is a specific area or type of area that is considered to be essential for the survival of a species, as designated by the USFWS under the Endangered Species Act. No critical habitat occurs in Yosemite National Park or the El Portal Administrative Site for any special-status species that is known to occur or has the potential to occur in these areas. Chapter II. Current Management DirectionAuthorities The following legislation and policies address the management of special-status species in the park: the National Park Service Organic Act, the Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Quality Act, the California Endangered Species Act, the Migratory Bird Conservation Act, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Wilderness Act. The USFWS normally takes the lead departmental responsibility of coordinating and implementing provisions of the Federal Endangered Species Act for all listed endangered, threatened, and candidate species. This Biological Assessment is prepared in accordance with Section 7 of the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, as part of the consultation process with the USFWS. The following National Park Service policies and program objectives prescribe the management of special-status species:
Chapter III. The Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEISThe Preferred Alternative Yosemite
Village and This alternative would restore approximately 180 acres of currently disturbed or developed land in Yosemite Valley to natural conditions. It would consolidate parking for day visitors at Yosemite Village, where a new Valley Visitor Center would be located, and in parking areas outside Yosemite Valley. There would be fewer campsites and lodging units than there are now. This alternative would result in a major reduction in vehicle travel in the eastern portion of Yosemite Valley during summer months. The area of the former Upper and Lower River Campgrounds would be restored to a mosaic of meadow, riparian, and oak woodland communities, roads would be removed from Ahwahnee and Stoneman Meadows, and parking would be removed from Curry Orchard. Southside Drive would be converted to two-way traffic from El Capitan crossover to Curry Village, and Northside Drive would be converted to a multi-use (bicycle and pedestrian) paved trail from El Capitan crossover to Yosemite Lodge. There would be minimal new development west of Yosemite Lodge. Actions outside of Yosemite Valley would include relocation of employee housing to El Portal and Wawona, relocation of National Park Service and concessioner stables to McCauley Ranch in Foresta, establishment of day-visitor parking at Badger Pass, Hazel Green or Foresta, and El Portal. Hazel Green is the preferred location for out-of-Valley parking to accommodate visitors arriving to the park via Highway 120. If negotiations with the private landowner at Hazel Green do not yield a satisfactory agreement, Foresta would become the preferred location. Improved visitor orientation would be provided at the Tioga Pass, South Entrance, El Portal, and Big Oak Flat Entrances. For a detailed description of the Preferred Alternative, refer to Vol. Ia, Chapter 2 of the Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS (NPS 2000b). Summary of Major Changes in Relation to Existing Conditions Restore
Remove
Establish or Prescribe
Implement
Construct
Convert
Increase/Expand
Reduce
Relocate
| Table
of Contents | Appendix A | Appendix
B | Appendix C | Appendix
D | Appendix E | Appendix
F | Appendix G | | Chapter 1-3 | Chapter 4 Part 1 | Chapter 4 Part 2 | Chapter 5 | Chapter 6-8, K-1 |
|