Table of Contents | Previous | Next |
Appendix Tables
Chapter Three Appendix Tables
State | Children with Working Parents Under 62 % SMI** |
Children Eligible Under 2001 State Rules |
Enroll- ment |
Apr- 97 Per- cent Ser- ved Un- der 62% SMI |
Per- cent Ser- ved of State Elig- ible |
Enroll- ment |
Apr- 98 Per- cent Ser- ved Un- der 62% SMI |
Per- cent Ser- ved of State Elig- ible |
Enroll- ment |
Apr- 99 Per- cent Ser- ved Under 62% SMI |
Per- cent Ser- ved of State Elig- ible |
Enroll- ment |
Apr- 00 Per- cent Ser- ved Under 62% SMI |
Per- cent Ser- ved of State Elig- ible |
Enroll- ment |
Apr- 01 Per- cent Ser- ved Under 62% SMI |
Per- cent Ser- ved of State Elig- ible |
Enroll- ment |
Apr- 02 Per- cent Ser- ved Under 62% SMI |
Per- cent Ser- ved of State Elig- ible |
1997 Change in Enroll- ment |
-2002 Per- cent Cha- nge in Enroll‑ ment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | 212,036 | 155,090 | 21,875 | 10% | 14% | 28,731 | 14% | 19% | 32,910 | 16% | 21% | 31,590 | 15% | 20% | 34,935 | 16% | 23% | 39,058 | 18% | 25% | 17,183 | 79% |
California* | 1,614,569 | 1,682,645 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Illinois | 540,838 | 352,125 | 98,777 | 18% | 28% | 119,888 | 22% | 34% | 167,951 | 31% | 48% | 185,698 | 34% | 53% | 195,156 | 36% | 55% | 191,310 | 35% | 54% | 92,533 | 94% |
Indiana | 217,381 | 128,962 | 18,000 | 8% | 14% | 29,311 | 13% | 23% | 37,828 | 17% | 29% | 42,960 | 20% | 33% | 52,510 | 24% | 41% | 43,952 | 20% | 34% | 25,952 | 144% |
Louisiana | 200,060 | 187,341 | 15,475 | 8% | 8% | 28,574 | 14% | 15% | 41,902 | 21% | 22% | 43,391 | 22% | 23% | 39,002 | 19% | 21% | 39,690 | 20% | 21% | 24,215 | 156% |
Massachusetts | 260,334 | 190,184 | 51,804 | 20% | 27% | 46,209 | 18% | 24% | 69,308 | 27% | 36% | 73,895 | 28% | 39% | 73,464 | 28% | 39% | 73,031 | 28% | 38% | 21,227 | 41% |
Michigan | 406,033 | 300,920 | 71,312 | 18% | 24% | 102,336 | 25% | 34% | 118,045 | 29% | 39% | 124,389 | 31% | 41% | 123,946 | 31% | 41% | 136,947 | 34% | 46% | 65,635 | 92% |
Minnesota | 163,049 | 199,098 | 24,485 | 15% | 12% | 32,721 | 20% | 16% | 35,565 | 22% | 18% | 35,851 | 22% | 18% | 34,957 | 21% | 18% | 37,812 | 23% | 19% | 13,327 | 54% |
New Jersey * | 321,875 | 200,869 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 34,086 | 11% | 17% | 50,752 | 16% | 25% | 45,435 | 14% | 23% | 45,385 | 14% | 23% | NA | NA |
New Mexico | 96,405 | 121,374 | 7,950 | 8% | 7% | 14,876 | 15% | 12% | 18,563 | 19% | 15% | 19,108 | 20% | 16% | 24,043 | 25% | 20% | 23,286 | 24% | 19% | 15,336 | 193% |
New York | 626,443 | 595,147 | 81,001 | 13% | 14% | 119,978 | 19% | 20% | 151,848 | 24% | 26% | 199,474 | 32% | 34% | 196,786 | 31% | 33% | 186,480 | 30% | 31% | 105,479 | 130% |
North Carolina | 325,803 | 389,681 | 72,532 | 22% | 19% | 86,061 | 26% | 22% | 92,921 | 29% | 24% | 99,724 | 31% | 26% | 103,319 | 32% | 27% | 96,286 | 30% | 25% | 23,754 | 33% |
Ohio | 411,998 | 387,036 | 60,053 | 15% | 16% | 63,225 | 15% | 16% | 66,114 | 16% | 17% | 75,851 | 18% | 20% | 79,806 | 19% | 21% | 100,118 | 24% | 26% | 40,065 | 67% |
Tennessee | 222,664 | 141,706 | 51,608 | 23% | 36% | 55,213 | 25% | 39% | 56,159 | 25% | 40% | 54,593 | 25% | 39% | 59,874 | 27% | 42% | 60,467 | 27% | 43% | 8,859 | 17% |
Texas | 891,998 | 674,354 | 41,721 | 5% | 6% | 76,957 | 9% | 11% | 109,963 | 12% | 16% | 111,547 | 13% | 17% | 121,632 | 14% | 18% | 129,470 | 15% | 19% | 87,749 | 210% |
Virginia * ** | 231,197 | 172,204 | 33,363 | 14% | 19% | 39,613 | 17% | 23% | NA | NA | NA | 23,948 | 10% | 14% | 25,289 | 11% | 15% | 27,113 | 12% | 16% | NA | NA |
Washington | 207,889 | 216,571 | 42,070 | 20% | 19% | 51,520 | 25% | 24% | 57,966 | 28% | 27% | 68,653 | 33% | 32% | 74,318 | 36% | 34% | 77,453 | 37% | 36% | 35,383 | 84% |
Median | 15% | 16% | 18% | 22% | 22% | 24% | 22% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 24% | 26% |
*Data were unavailable for one or more years. **Data provided by Virginia for FY1997 through 2000 could not be reproduced at later periods. Estimate was computed by a simulation model by the Urban Institute using data from the combined March 2000, 2001, and 20002 Current Population Surveys. |
State | County | 2000 Subsidy Usage |
2001 Subsidy Usage |
2002 Subsidy Usage |
2000-2002 Percentage Change, Count Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | MOBILE | 6,641 | 6,102 | 7,342 | 11% |
Illinois | COOK | 125,124 | 124,424 | 127,590 | 2% |
Indiana | MADISON | 801 | 854 | 644 | -20% |
Louisiana | OUCHITA | 1,875 | 1,686 | NA | |
Massachusetts | FRANKLIN | 554 | 393 | 403 | -27% |
Michigan | WAYNE | 49,544 | 48,769 | 52,027 | 5% |
Minnesota | HENNEPIN ITASCA, KOOCHICHING, |
8,357 | 9,429 | 10,443 | 25% |
Minnesota | PENNINGTON | 496 | 485 | 456 | -8% |
New Jersey | UNION | 2,910 | 2,823 | 2,865 | -2% |
New Mexico | DONA ANA | 4,280 | 5,519 | 5,687 | 33% |
New Mexico | GRANT, HIDALGO, LUNA | 695 | 946 | 1,041 | 50% |
New York | ORANGE | NA | NA | 1,636 | NA |
North Carolina | ALAMANCE | 1,068 | 997 | 1,177 | 10% |
North Carolina | JOHNSTON | 1,426 | 1,247 | 1,232 | -14% |
North Carolina | MECKLENBURG | 11,060 | 11,909 | 11,271 | 2% |
Ohio | HAMILTON |
11,019 | NA | 12,866 | 17% |
Tennessee | FAYETTE, HARDEMAN, HAYWOOD, LAKE, LAUDERDALE |
777 | NA | 774 | 0% |
Tennessee | BEDFORD, COFFEE, MARSHALL | 536 | NA | 616 | 15% |
Tennessee | SHELBY | 31,174 | NA | 27,343 | -12% |
Texas | HARRIS | 16,799 | 16,401 | 21,108 | 26% |
Virginia | ARLINGTON | 483 | 388 | 387 | -20% |
Washington | KING | 14,138 | 14,633 | 14,545 | 3% |
Year | Receiving TANF |
Percent Receiving TANF |
Former TANF Receipt |
Percent Former TANF Receipt |
All Others | Percent All Others |
Total Recipients |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALABAMA | 1997 | 4,365 | 20% | 2,648 | 12% | 14,862 | 68% | 21,875 |
2002 | 3,189 | 8% | 4,687 | 12% | 31,182 | 80% | 39,058 | |
% Change | -37% | -144% | 44% | -1% | 52% | 15% | 44% | |
ILLINOIS | 1997 | 43,090 | 44% | 17,142 | 17% | 38,545 | 39% | 98,777 |
2002 | 29,713 | 16% | NA | NA | 161,597 | 84% | 191,310 | |
% Change | -45% | -181% | NA | NA | 76% | 54% | 48% | |
INDIANA | 1997 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 18,000 |
2002 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 52,510 | |
% Change | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
LOUISIANA | 1997 | 5,320 | 34% | NA | NA | 10,155 | 66% | 15,475 |
2002 | 4,780 | 12% | NA | NA | 34,910 | 88% | 39,690 | |
% Change | -11% | -185% | NA | NA | 71% | 25% | 61% | |
MASSACHUSETTS | 1997 | 13,372 | 26% | 10,045 | 19% | 28,387 | 55% | 51,804 |
2002 | 9,295 | 13% | 17,832 | 24% | 45,904 | 63% | 73,031 | |
% Change | -44% | -103% | 44% | 21% | 38% | 13% | 29% | |
MICHIGAN | 1997 | 20,544 | 29% | 11,125 | 16% | 39,643 | 56% | 71,312 |
2002 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 136,947 | |
% Change | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 48% | |
MINNESOTA | 1997 | 6,695 | 27% | 3,404 | 14% | 14,386 | 59% | 24,485 |
2002 | 13,795 | 36% | 3,621 | 10% | 20,396 | 54% | 37,812 | |
% Change | 51% | 25% | 6% | -45% | 29% | -9% | 35% | |
NEW MEXICO | 1997 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 7,950 |
2002 | 5,447 | 23% | 1,026 | 4% | 16,813 | 72% | 23,286 | |
% Change | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 66% | |
NEW YORK | 1997 | 45,410 | 56% | 5,921 | 7% | 29,670 | 37% | 81,001 |
2002 | 36,321 | 19% | NA | NA | 150,159 | 81% | 186,480 | |
% Change | -25% | -188% | NA | NA | 80% | 55% | 57% | |
NORTH CAROLINA | 1997 | 17,671 | 24% | NA | NA | 54,861 | 76% | 72,532 |
2002 | 11,547 | 12% | NA | NA | 84,739 | 88% | 96,286 | |
% Change | -53% | -103% | NA | NA | 35% | 14% | 25% | |
OHIO | 1997 | 23,841 | 40% | 7,180 | 12% | 29,032 | 48% | 60,053 |
2002 | 16,981 | 17% | 6,113 | 6% | 77,024 | 77% | 100,118 | |
% Change | -40% | -134% | -17% | -96% | 62% | 37% | 40% | |
TENESSEE | 1997 | 27,464 | 53% | 10,825 | 21% | 13,319 | 26% | 51,608 |
2002 | 34,001 | 56% | 14,524 | 24% | 11,942 | 20% | 60,467 | |
% Change | 19% | 5% | 25% | 13% | -12% | -31% | 15% | |
TEXAS | 1997 | 12,256 | 29% | 12,287 | 29% | 17,178 | 41% | 41,721 |
2002 | 33,087 | 26% | 12,227 | 9% | 84,156 | 65% | 129,470 | |
% Change | 63% | -15% | 0% | -212% | 80% | 37% | 68% | |
VIRGINIA | 1997 | 24,787 | 74% | 3,757 | 11% | 4,819 | 14% | 33,363 |
2002 | 7,281 | 27% | 3,062 | 11% | 16,770 | 62% | 27,113 | |
% Change | -240% | -177% | -23% | 0% | 71% | 77% | -23% | |
WASHINGTON | 1997 | 18,435 | 44% | 6,479 | 15% | 17,156 | 41% | 42,070 |
2002 | 14,686 | 19% | NA | NA | 62,767 | 81% | 77,453 | |
% Change | -26% | -131% | NA | NA | 73% | 50% | 46% |
Number of Families Receiving TANF, January 1997 | Average Number of Children Per TANF Family, 1997 or 1998 | Estimate Number of Children in TANF Families, January 1997 | Number of TANF Children Receiving Subsidies, April 1997 | Percentage of Children in TANF Families Receiving Subsidies in Average Month, 1997 | Average Monthly Number of Families Receiving TANF, 2002 | Average # of Children Per Family, 2001 | Estimate of Number of Children in TANF Families, 2002 | Number of TANF Children Receiving Subsidies, April 2002 | Percentage of Children in TANF Families Receiving Subsidies in Average Month, 2002 | Percentage Change in TANF Caseload, 1997-2002 | Percentage Change in Number of TANF Children Receiving Subsidies, 1997-2002 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | 37,972 | 2.1 | 79,741 | 4,365 | 5% | 18,041 | 2.6 | 46,907 | 3,189 | 7% | -52% | 24% |
California | 839,860 | 1.9 | 1,595,734 | NA | NA | 462,328 | 2 | 924,656 | NA | NA | -45% | NA |
Illinois | 206,316 | 2.2 | 453,895 | 43,090 | 9% | 48,091 | 2.3 | 110,609 | 29,713 | 27% | -77% | 183% |
Indiana | 46,215 | 1.98 | 91,506 | NA | NA | 49,265 | 2 | 98,530 | NA | NA | 7% | NA |
Louisiana | 60,226 | 2.5 | 150,565 | 5,320 | 4% | 23,700 | 2 | 47,400 | 4,780 | 10% | -61% | 185% |
Massachusetts | 80,675 | 1.9 | 153,283 | 13,372 | 9% | 47,264 | 1.7 | 80,349 | 9,295 | 12% | -41% | 33% |
Michigan | 156,077 | 2 | 312,154 | 20,544 | 7% | 74,338 | 2.1 | 156,110 | NA | NA | -52% | NA |
Minnesota | 54,608 | 2.1 | 114,677 | 6,695 | 6% | 35,859 | 2.1 | 75,304 | 13,795 | 18% | -34% | 214% |
New Jersey | 102,378 | 1.9 | 194,518 | NA | NA | 41,690 | 1.9 | 79,211 | 7,655 | 10% | -59% | NA |
New Mexico | 29,984 | 2.1 | 62,966 | NA | NA | 17,015 | 2 | 34,030 | 5,447 | 16% | -43% | NA |
New York | 393,424 | 2 | 786,848 | 45,410 | 6% | 170,430 | 2 | 340,860 | 36,321 | 11% | -57% | 85% |
North Carolina | 103,300 | 1.9 | 196,270 | 17,671 | 9% | 42,872 | 1.7 | 72,882 | 11,547 | 16% | -58% | 76% |
Ohio | 92,747 | 1.9 | 176,219 | 23,841 | 14% | 84,031 | 1.8 | 151,256 | 16,981 | 11% | -9% | -17% |
Tennessee | 74,820 | 2 | 149,640 | 27,464 | 18% | 63,088 | 2 | 126,176 | 34,001 | 27% | -16% | 47% |
Texas | 228,882 | 1.9 | 434,876 | 12,256 | 3% | 129,937 | 2 | 259,874 | 33,087 | 13% | -43% | 352% |
Virginia | 56,018 | 1.8 | 100,832 | 24,787 | 25% | 30,051 | 1.7 | 51,087 | 7,281 | 14% | -46% | -42% |
Washington | 95,982 | 1.8 | 172,768 | 18,435 | 11% | 54,188 | 1.9 | 102,957 | 14,686 | 14% | -44% | 34% |
STATE | 2002 | 1997 | CHANGE BETWEEN 1997 AND 2002 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Center | Family child care |
Relative | In-Home | Center | Family child care |
Relative | In-Home | Center | Family child care |
Relative | In-Home | |
Alabama | 79% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 74% | 17% | 10% | 0% | 7% | -19% | -24% | -30% |
Illinois | 29% | 14% | 35% | 22% | 38% | 15% | 30% | 17% | -25% | -6% | 16% | 32% |
Indiana | 38% | 38% | 21% | 3% | 36% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 7% | 1% | 0% | -52% |
Louisiana | 67% | 0% | 33% | 0% | 52% | 11% | 15% | 23% | 29% | -100% | 125% | -100% |
Massachusetts | 62% | 25% | 8% | 6% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 9% | 1% | -3% | 65% | -34% |
Michigan | 16% | 18% | 51% | 15% | 23% | 28% | 36% | 13% | -30% | -36% | 43% | 13% |
Minnesota | 30% | 51% | 15% | 3% | 27% | 56% | 14% | 3% | 12% | -9% | 7% | 22% |
New Jersey | 70% | 24% | 5% | 0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
New Mexico | 41% | 19% | 40% | 0% | 38% | 28% | 34% | 0% | 10% | -33% | 17% | -53% |
New York | 37% | 36% | 19% | 9% | 52% | 36% | 10% | 3% | -29% | 1% | 93% | 186% |
North Carolina | 85% | 11% | 3% | 0% | 81% | 12% | 7% | 0% | 5% | -4% | -55% | 122% |
Ohio | 61% | 39% | 0% | 0% | 65% | 35% | 0% | 0% | -6% | 10% | -100% | NA |
Tennessee | 78% | 21% | 1% | 0% | 77% | 13% | 9% | 1% | 1% | 66% | -93% | -87% |
Texas | 79% | 7% | 15% | 0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Virginia | 60% | 31% | 9% | 0% | 54% | 39% | 17% | 0% | 11% | -21% | -47% | NA |
Washington | 41% | 26% | 23% | 10% | 45% | 25% | 19% | 11% | -9% | 7% | 18% | -8% |
Table of Contents | Previous | Next |