Skip Navigation
 
ACF
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™  |  Print      

Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE) skip to primary page content
Advanced
Search

Table of Contents | Previous | Next

Appendix Tables

Chapter Three Appendix Tables

 

Appendix 3-A: Child Care Subsidy Usage for April 1997- April 2002
State Children
with
Working
Parents
Under 62
% SMI**		 Children
Eligible
Under 2001
State Rules		 Enroll-
ment		 Apr-
97
Per-
cent
Ser-
ved
Un-
der
62% SMI		 Per-
cent
Ser-
ved of
State
Elig-
ible		 Enroll-
ment		 Apr-
98
Per-
cent
Ser-
ved
Un-
der
62% SMI		 Per-
cent
Ser-
ved of
State
Elig-
ible		 Enroll-
ment		 Apr-
99
Per-
cent
Ser-
ved
Under
62% SMI		 Per-
cent
Ser-
ved of
State
Elig-
ible		 Enroll-
ment		 Apr-
00
Per-
cent
Ser-
ved
Under
62% SMI		 Per-
cent
Ser-
ved of
State
Elig-
ible		 Enroll-
ment		 Apr-
01
Per-
cent
Ser-
ved
Under
62% SMI		 Per-
cent
Ser-
ved of
State
Elig-
ible		 Enroll-
ment		 Apr-
02
Per-
cent
Ser-
ved
Under
62% SMI		 Per-
cent
Ser-
ved of
State
Elig-
ible		 1997
Change
in Enroll-
ment		 -2002
Per-
cent
Cha-
nge
in Enroll‑
ment
Alabama 212,036 155,090 21,875 10% 14% 28,731 14% 19% 32,910 16% 21% 31,590 15% 20% 34,935 16% 23% 39,058 18% 25% 17,183 79%
California* 1,614,569 1,682,645 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Illinois 540,838 352,125 98,777 18% 28% 119,888 22% 34% 167,951 31% 48% 185,698 34% 53% 195,156 36% 55% 191,310 35% 54% 92,533 94%
Indiana 217,381 128,962 18,000 8% 14% 29,311 13% 23% 37,828 17% 29% 42,960 20% 33% 52,510 24% 41% 43,952 20% 34% 25,952 144%
Louisiana 200,060 187,341 15,475 8% 8% 28,574 14% 15% 41,902 21% 22% 43,391 22% 23% 39,002 19% 21% 39,690 20% 21% 24,215 156%
Massachusetts 260,334 190,184 51,804 20% 27% 46,209 18% 24% 69,308 27% 36% 73,895 28% 39% 73,464 28% 39% 73,031 28% 38% 21,227 41%
Michigan 406,033 300,920 71,312 18% 24% 102,336 25% 34% 118,045 29% 39% 124,389 31% 41% 123,946 31% 41% 136,947 34% 46% 65,635 92%
Minnesota 163,049 199,098 24,485 15% 12% 32,721 20% 16% 35,565 22% 18% 35,851 22% 18% 34,957 21% 18% 37,812 23% 19% 13,327 54%
New Jersey * 321,875 200,869 NA NA NA NA NA NA 34,086 11% 17% 50,752 16% 25% 45,435 14% 23% 45,385 14% 23% NA NA
New Mexico 96,405 121,374 7,950 8% 7% 14,876 15% 12% 18,563 19% 15% 19,108 20% 16% 24,043 25% 20% 23,286 24% 19% 15,336 193%
New York 626,443 595,147 81,001 13% 14% 119,978 19% 20% 151,848 24% 26% 199,474 32% 34% 196,786 31% 33% 186,480 30% 31% 105,479 130%
North Carolina 325,803 389,681 72,532 22% 19% 86,061 26% 22% 92,921 29% 24% 99,724 31% 26% 103,319 32% 27% 96,286 30% 25% 23,754 33%
Ohio 411,998 387,036 60,053 15% 16% 63,225 15% 16% 66,114 16% 17% 75,851 18% 20% 79,806 19% 21% 100,118 24% 26% 40,065 67%
Tennessee 222,664 141,706 51,608 23% 36% 55,213 25% 39% 56,159 25% 40% 54,593 25% 39% 59,874 27% 42% 60,467 27% 43% 8,859 17%
Texas 891,998 674,354 41,721 5% 6% 76,957 9% 11% 109,963 12% 16% 111,547 13% 17% 121,632 14% 18% 129,470 15% 19% 87,749 210%
Virginia * ** 231,197 172,204 33,363 14% 19% 39,613 17% 23% NA NA NA 23,948 10% 14% 25,289 11% 15% 27,113 12% 16% NA NA
Washington 207,889 216,571 42,070 20% 19% 51,520 25% 24% 57,966 28% 27% 68,653 33% 32% 74,318 36% 34% 77,453 37% 36% 35,383 84%
Median       15% 16%   18% 22%   22% 24%   22% 25%   25% 25%   24% 26%    
*Data were unavailable for one or more years.
**Data provided by Virginia for FY1997 through 2000 could not be reproduced at later periods.
Estimate was computed by a simulation model by the Urban Institute using data from the combined March 2000, 2001, and 20002 Current Population Surveys.

 

Appendix Table 3-B: Child Care Subsidy Usage in the Study Counties, 2000-2002
State County 2000 Subsidy
Usage		 2001 Subsidy
Usage		 2002 Subsidy
Usage		 2000-2002
Percentage
Change, Count
Level
Alabama MOBILE 6,641 6,102 7,342 11%
Illinois COOK 125,124 124,424 127,590 2%
Indiana MADISON 801 854 644 -20%
Louisiana OUCHITA 1,875 1,686   NA
Massachusetts FRANKLIN 554 393 403 -27%
Michigan WAYNE 49,544 48,769 52,027 5%
Minnesota HENNEPIN
ITASCA, KOOCHICHING,		 8,357 9,429 10,443 25%
Minnesota PENNINGTON 496 485 456 -8%
New Jersey UNION 2,910 2,823 2,865 -2%
New Mexico DONA ANA 4,280 5,519 5,687 33%
New Mexico GRANT, HIDALGO, LUNA 695 946 1,041 50%
New York ORANGE NA NA 1,636 NA
North Carolina ALAMANCE 1,068 997 1,177 10%
North Carolina JOHNSTON 1,426 1,247 1,232 -14%
North Carolina MECKLENBURG 11,060 11,909 11,271 2%
Ohio HAMILTON
11,019 NA 12,866 17%
Tennessee FAYETTE, HARDEMAN, HAYWOOD,
LAKE, LAUDERDALE		 777 NA 774 0%
Tennessee BEDFORD, COFFEE, MARSHALL 536 NA 616 15%
Tennessee SHELBY 31,174 NA 27,343 -12%
Texas HARRIS 16,799 16,401 21,108 26%
Virginia ARLINGTON 483 388 387 -20%
Washington KING 14,138 14,633 14,545 3%

 

Appendix 3-C: Composition of the Child Care Subsidy Caseload by TANF Status
  Year Receiving
TANF		 Percent
Receiving
TANF		 Former
TANF
Receipt		 Percent
Former
TANF
Receipt		 All Others Percent All
Others 		 Total
Recipients
ALABAMA 1997 4,365 20% 2,648 12% 14,862 68% 21,875
2002 3,189 8% 4,687 12% 31,182 80% 39,058
% Change -37% -144% 44% -1% 52% 15% 44%
ILLINOIS 1997 43,090 44% 17,142 17% 38,545 39% 98,777
2002 29,713 16% NA NA 161,597 84% 191,310
% Change -45% -181% NA NA 76% 54% 48%
INDIANA 1997 NA NA NA NA NA NA 18,000
2002 NA NA NA NA NA NA 52,510
% Change NA NA NA NA NA NA  
LOUISIANA 1997 5,320 34% NA NA 10,155 66% 15,475
2002 4,780 12% NA NA 34,910 88% 39,690
% Change -11% -185% NA NA 71% 25% 61%
MASSACHUSETTS 1997 13,372 26% 10,045 19% 28,387 55% 51,804
2002 9,295 13% 17,832 24% 45,904 63% 73,031
% Change -44% -103% 44% 21% 38% 13% 29%
MICHIGAN 1997 20,544 29% 11,125 16% 39,643 56% 71,312
2002 NA NA NA NA NA NA 136,947
% Change NA NA NA NA NA NA 48%
MINNESOTA 1997 6,695 27% 3,404 14% 14,386 59% 24,485
2002 13,795 36% 3,621 10% 20,396 54% 37,812
% Change 51% 25% 6% -45% 29% -9% 35%
NEW MEXICO 1997 NA NA NA NA NA NA 7,950
2002 5,447 23% 1,026 4% 16,813 72% 23,286
% Change NA NA NA NA NA NA 66%
NEW YORK 1997 45,410 56% 5,921 7% 29,670 37% 81,001
2002 36,321 19% NA NA 150,159 81% 186,480
% Change -25% -188% NA NA 80% 55% 57%
NORTH CAROLINA 1997 17,671 24% NA NA 54,861 76% 72,532
2002 11,547 12% NA NA 84,739 88% 96,286
% Change -53% -103% NA NA 35% 14% 25%
OHIO 1997 23,841 40% 7,180 12% 29,032 48% 60,053
2002 16,981 17% 6,113 6% 77,024 77% 100,118
% Change -40% -134% -17% -96% 62% 37% 40%
TENESSEE 1997 27,464 53% 10,825 21% 13,319 26% 51,608
2002 34,001 56% 14,524 24% 11,942 20% 60,467
% Change 19% 5% 25% 13% -12% -31% 15%
TEXAS 1997 12,256 29% 12,287 29% 17,178 41% 41,721
2002 33,087 26% 12,227 9% 84,156 65% 129,470
% Change 63% -15% 0% -212% 80% 37% 68%
VIRGINIA 1997 24,787 74% 3,757 11% 4,819 14% 33,363
2002 7,281 27% 3,062 11% 16,770 62% 27,113
% Change -240% -177% -23% 0% 71% 77% -23%
WASHINGTON 1997 18,435 44% 6,479 15% 17,156 41% 42,070
2002 14,686 19% NA NA 62,767 81% 77,453
% Change -26% -131% NA NA 73% 50% 46%

 

Appendix 3-D: TANF Child Caseload Trends 1997-2002
  Number of Families Receiving TANF, January 1997 Average Number of Children Per TANF Family, 1997 or 1998 Estimate Number of Children in TANF Families, January 1997 Number of TANF Children Receiving Subsidies, April 1997 Percentage of Children in TANF Families Receiving Subsidies in Average Month, 1997 Average Monthly Number of Families Receiving TANF, 2002 Average # of Children Per Family, 2001 Estimate of Number of Children in TANF Families, 2002 Number of TANF Children Receiving Subsidies, April 2002 Percentage of Children in TANF Families Receiving Subsidies in Average Month, 2002 Percentage Change in TANF Caseload, 1997-2002 Percentage Change in Number of TANF Children Receiving Subsidies, 1997-2002
Alabama 37,972 2.1 79,741 4,365 5% 18,041 2.6 46,907 3,189 7% -52% 24%
California 839,860 1.9 1,595,734 NA NA 462,328 2 924,656 NA NA -45% NA
Illinois 206,316 2.2 453,895 43,090 9% 48,091 2.3 110,609 29,713 27% -77% 183%
Indiana 46,215 1.98 91,506 NA NA 49,265 2 98,530 NA NA 7% NA
Louisiana 60,226 2.5 150,565 5,320 4% 23,700 2 47,400 4,780 10% -61% 185%
Massachusetts 80,675 1.9 153,283 13,372 9% 47,264 1.7 80,349 9,295 12% -41% 33%
Michigan 156,077 2 312,154 20,544 7% 74,338 2.1 156,110 NA NA -52% NA
Minnesota 54,608 2.1 114,677 6,695 6% 35,859 2.1 75,304 13,795 18% -34% 214%
New Jersey 102,378 1.9 194,518 NA NA 41,690 1.9 79,211 7,655 10% -59% NA
New Mexico 29,984 2.1 62,966 NA NA 17,015 2 34,030 5,447 16% -43% NA
New York 393,424 2 786,848 45,410 6% 170,430 2 340,860 36,321 11% -57% 85%
North Carolina 103,300 1.9 196,270 17,671 9% 42,872 1.7 72,882 11,547 16% -58% 76%
Ohio 92,747 1.9 176,219 23,841 14% 84,031 1.8 151,256 16,981 11% -9% -17%
Tennessee 74,820 2 149,640 27,464 18% 63,088 2 126,176 34,001 27% -16% 47%
Texas 228,882 1.9 434,876 12,256 3% 129,937 2 259,874 33,087 13% -43% 352%
Virginia 56,018 1.8 100,832 24,787 25% 30,051 1.7 51,087 7,281 14% -46% -42%
Washington 95,982 1.8 172,768 18,435 11% 54,188 1.9 102,957 14,686 14% -44% 34%

 

 

Appendix Table 3-E Types of Subsidized Child Care
Percent of Children Receiving Subsidies by Type of Child Care April 2002 and April 1997
STATE 2002 1997 CHANGE BETWEEN 1997 AND 2002
Center Family
child care		 Relative In-Home Center Family
child care		 Relative In-Home Center Family
child care		 Relative In-Home
Alabama 79% 14% 7% 0% 74% 17% 10% 0% 7% -19% -24% -30%
Illinois 29% 14% 35% 22% 38% 15% 30% 17% -25% -6% 16% 32%
Indiana 38% 38% 21% 3% 36% 38% 21% 6% 7% 1% 0% -52%
Louisiana 67% 0% 33% 0% 52% 11% 15% 23% 29% -100% 125% -100%
Massachusetts 62% 25% 8% 6% 61% 25% 5% 9% 1% -3% 65% -34%
Michigan 16% 18% 51% 15% 23% 28% 36% 13% -30% -36% 43% 13%
Minnesota 30% 51% 15% 3% 27% 56% 14% 3% 12% -9% 7% 22%
New Jersey 70% 24% 5% 0% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
New Mexico 41% 19% 40% 0% 38% 28% 34% 0% 10% -33% 17% -53%
New York 37% 36% 19% 9% 52% 36% 10% 3% -29% 1% 93% 186%
North Carolina 85% 11% 3% 0% 81% 12% 7% 0% 5% -4% -55% 122%
Ohio 61% 39% 0% 0% 65% 35% 0% 0% -6% 10% -100% NA
Tennessee 78% 21% 1% 0% 77% 13% 9% 1% 1% 66% -93% -87%
Texas 79% 7% 15% 0% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Virginia 60% 31% 9% 0% 54% 39% 17% 0% 11% -21% -47% NA
Washington 41% 26% 23% 10% 45% 25% 19% 11% -9% 7% 18% -8%


 

 

Table of Contents | Previous | Next