skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100270  
Title: Fifth Conference on the Judiciary - Delegate Recommendations, June 1985
Corporate Author: Laws at Work
United States
Publication Date: 1985
Pages: 34
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: These five proceedings reports examine appeal procedures, career criminal programs, false identification, and the exclusionary rule.
Abstract: The first report discusses the costs and delays associated with criminal appeals and proposes 11 strategies for more efficient case processing that would still provide protection of defendants' constitutional rights. The next paper describes various career criminal programs and their advantages, such as early identification of career criminals, reductions in plea bargaining, speedier trials, and selective incapacitation. It concludes that vertical prosecution programs are working well. The third paper examines the costs associated with the use of falsified identification documents (e.g., birth certificates, immigration documents, social security cards) and recommends greater emphasis on the investigation and prosecution of false-identification crimes. The final paper recommends the abolishment of the exclusionary rule, which permits criminals to go free in cases involving procedural defects, and suggests legislative action that would aid in effecting such an end. Proposed legislation and U.S. Supreme and State court decisions on the exclusionary rule are appended.
Main Term(s): Policy analysis
Index Term(s): Appeal procedures ; Judicial decisions/ ; Exclusionary rule ; Law reform ; False identification ; Career criminal programs ; Court procedures
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100270

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder