skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100253  
Title: Do Managers Mediate, or Even Arbitrate?
Journal: Negotiation Journal  Volume:1  Issue:4  Dated:(October 1985)  Pages:379-388
Author(s): D M Kolb ; B H Sheppard
Publication Date: 1985
Pages: 10
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This article contrasts the nature of institutional third-party dispute resolution through mediation and arbitration with the nature of conflict resolution by organizational managers.
Abstract: Contrary to institutionalized dispute resolution, managers do not perceive organizational conflicts as disputes but rather as problems embedded in ongoing organizational activity to be resolved through rational decisionmaking. The organizational and self-perception of managers regarding managerial roles in resolving such problems is not typically that of a mediator or arbitrator but as a problemsolver who has wide-ranging authority to address the problem according to personal or organizational standards. Mediation, which requires a third party to act as a neutral facilitator for disputants to resolve a conflict, is not the typical posture of a manager, who usually has a stake in and an opinion about how the conflict or problem should be resolved. Neither can the managerial role be strictly compared to that of an arbitrator, since arbitration is typically restricted to the issues presented by the disputing parties and involves a strong respect for procedure. Managers, whose roles are multifaceted and loosely defined, do not restrict their agendas to the issues as presented nor do they follow specific procedures. They view contended issues as part of a broader agenda and act to solve the problem as they perceive it. Before knowledge and skills associated with institutional dispute resolution can be transferred to the managerial role, it must be adapted to and integrated with the existing role. 29 references.
Main Term(s): Conflict resolution
Index Term(s): Arbitration ; Management/ ; Mediation
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100253

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder