skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100252  
Title: Effectiveness of the Biased Mediator
Journal: Negotiation Journal  Volume:1  Issue:4  Dated:(October 1985)  Pages:363-372
Author(s): W P Smith
Publication Date: 1985
Pages: 10
Type: Issue overviews
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This article compares the role of mediator bias in traditional and international mediation.
Abstract: Discussions of traditional mediation typically emphasize the importance of mediator impartiality, and this has also been noted in the mediation of international conflicts. However, mediators of international conflicts usually intervene because of international conflicts usually intervene because of their interest in the outcome of the conflict. Such biased mediation can still be effective as long as the mediator has some significant interests in the welfare of both parties and some power over each. Mediators of international conflicts must also clearly acknowledge their own vital interests in the resolution of the conflict and specify the implications of such interests for the parameters of an agreement. A mediator who claims impartiality while having an interest in the outcome may do more harm than good. Although analyses of traditional mediation emphasize mediator impartiality, mediator bias is also present, notably in attempting to facilitate the framing of an agreement that reflects community standards of justice. As in the international arena, any mediator biases must be clearly stated in traditional mediation if it is to be effective. The importance of stating mediator bias is illustrated in United States mediation in the Middle East and the 1982 Falkland Islands crisis. 10 references.
Main Term(s): Mediation
Index Term(s): Conflict resolution ; International dispute settlement
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100252

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder