skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100248  
Title: Court-Appointed Masters as Mediators
Journal: Negotiation Journal  Volume:1  Issue:4  Dated:(October 1985)  Pages:295-300
Author(s): L E Susskind
Publication Date: 1985
Pages: 6
Type: Issue overviews
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This article presents reasons why judges might use special masters to mediate complex public policy issues, discusses the powers and drawbacks of special masters in such cases, and proposes guidelines for the use of special masters.
Abstract: A judge might use a special master (1) because the judicial process may be too constraining to resolve the complex interplay of technical issues and competing economic interests, (2) to narrow the range of issues the court must address, and (3) to generate new ideas for the parties to consider. A special master has the power to use the threat of the formal discovery process to encourage parties to reveal technical information. The master can ask the judge to require the parties to indicate in writing that they have considered certain options proposed by the mediator or the other party. The court can monitor implementation of an agreement and guarantee that an agreement can be reopened if circumstances change. The major drawback in using a special master is that the involuntariness of the process encourages the parties to be more adversarial. Courts should allow sufficient time for fruitful mediation, since this may save time in the appeals process. The master should report mediation developments to the media. The parties should participate in the design of the mediation process and have veto power over the master's selection. Finally, the judge should ask the parties to improve the mediator's proposed agreements when they are in draft form. 1 note.
Main Term(s): Mediation
Index Term(s): Alternative dispute settlement ; Alternative court procedures ; Mediators
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100248

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder