skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100232  
Title: Case Studies of Attempts to Revive the Memory of Highly Susceptible Eyewitnesses With Hypnosis (From Advances in Forensic Psychology and Psychiatry, V 1, P 65-85, 1984, by Robert W Rieber, ed. - See NCJ-100229)
Author(s): R Buckhout ; T H Kramer ; T Licitra ; L Oliver ; M Debenedetto ; L Horn ; A Gordon
Sale: Ablex Publishing Corporation
355 Chestnut Street
Norwood, NJ 07648
United States
Publication Date: 1984
Pages: 21
Type: Studies/research reports
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This research conducted with six subjects in 1982 indicates that hypnosis does not improve an eyewitness' memory of offender features even when the witnesses are good hypnotic subjects.
Abstract: Subjects with clinically established high hypnotic susceptibility were shown slides of a staged assault in a simulated prison setting. Later they were told that researchers wanted to probe their memory of the crime events with and without hypnosis. Questions probing initial and subsequent recall were put by a researcher unfamiliar with the simulated crime events. Hypnosis did not expand the number of facts recalled nor the accuracy of detail when compared with initial unaided recollection of the people and events in the crime. Only two subjects showed a positive memory change after initial recall, and this occurred before hypnosis. No subject correctly identified the perpetrator in the lineup. Although the subjects attempted to increase recall under hypnosis, this produced incorrect information. Recall of a perpetrator's appearance is apparently a function of how well the perpetrator was observed by the witness. 9 references and tabular data.
Main Term(s): Questioning under hypnosis
Index Term(s): Suspect identification ; Eyewitness testimony
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100232

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder