skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100226  
Title: Balancing Power Through Law - The State v the Juvenile in Delinquency Proceedings
Journal: Justice Quarterly  Volume:2  Issue:4  Dated:(December 1985)  Pages:535-551
Author(s): K J Block
Publication Date: 1985
Pages: 17
Type: Legislation/policy analysis
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: A content analysis of Maryland's juvenile court law spanning 1947-78 examines the extent to which changes in juvenile court procedures have balanced the power resources of the juvenile and the State.
Abstract: The study analyzed seven codes from the Annotated Code of Maryland and explored three power components: power base (resources that can be used to influence the other party in a conflict, such as personnel and information resources), power means (actions that translate abstract power resources into decisionmaking effects), and power scope (acts which one party can require another to perform). The codes were analyzed according to eight variables related to law specifications about who can do what, to whom, when, and with what consequences. Results showed that during the 1960's, attorneys for both the juvenile and the State were mandated; formal hearings were introduced at major decisionmaking points; and rights to notice, to transcripts, and to challenge the evidence were accompanied by a shift of the burden of proof onto the State. Although these developments appeared to increase juvenile power resources, these were offset by power resources granted to the court. The overall gap in resources between the juvenile and the State was not eliminated by code reform. Tabular data and 16 references.
Main Term(s): Juvenile due process
Index Term(s): Juvenile court procedures ; Juvenile codes ; Law reform ; Legislative impact ; Maryland
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100226

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder