skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100196  
Title: Response to Griswold - A More Valid Test of the Justifiability of Police Actions
Journal: American Journal of Police  Volume:4  Issue:2  Dated:(Fall 1985)  Pages:110-132
Author(s): J J Fyfe ; M Blumberg
Publication Date: 1985
Pages: 23
Type: Issue overviews
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: In response to D. B. Griswold's (1985) proposed defense-of-life law, the authors examine existing legal and administrative controls on police use of deadly force and propose a test of the justifiability of the use of deadly force.
Abstract: It is argued that the major controls on occupational behavior are professional standards and the civil courts. The most sweeping reform of police use of deadly force came from a civil case before the U. S. Supreme Court which ruled current laws permitting use of deadly force in the apprehension of nonviolent fleeing felons unconstitutional. Further, police have instituted their own policies limiting the use of deadly force, and these have been effective in reducing its use. The courts have placed further limits by finding municipalities liable for deprivations involving deadly force. It is argued that no criminal law can adequately cover all the situations in which use of deadly force may or may not be justified. Further, a defense-of-life law, such as proposed by Griswold, would hamper police in the execution of their duties. Because of these and tactical considerations in police work, it is proposed that a test of justifiability of deadly force should be based on a determination of whether the action is consistent with the police responsibility to protect life. Such a test, no less lenient than Griswold's law, is more useful because it can be applied to virtually every police action. 16 footnotes and 14 references.
Main Term(s): Police use of deadly force
Index Term(s): Police responsibilities ; Police command and control ; Police policies and procedures
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100196

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder