skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100190  
Title: Private Presentence Report - Issues for Consideration
Journal: Prison Journal  Volume:65  Issue:2  Dated:(Autumn-Winter 1985)  Pages:53-59
Author(s): H Hoelter
Sale: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States
Publication Date: 1985
Pages: 7
Type: Studies/research reports
Origin: United States
Language: English
Note: For microfiche, see NCJ-100185.
Annotation: The director of the Nation's largest agency that prepares private presentence reports argues that bringing private enterprise and its accompanying values and practices into the corrections system has many advantages.
Abstract: The current trend toward privatization differs from previous trends in two ways. The system is now privatizing essential services like custodial and presentence tasks that have traditionally been performed by the public sector. In addition, many profit-making organizations are now providing these services. The use of the private sector for preparing presentence reports offers the advantages of fewer constraints on the quality of information provided and higher standards because of the full disclosure required of the private reports. It may also promote reform and greater use of alternatives to incarceration. The profit motive is unlikely to reduce concern for quality. Using business practices is actually beneficial. Staff must be totally accountable for their time, must adhere to high quality control standards, and must be concerned with the organization's overall performance. Introducing the private sector into corrections produces some competitive pressure that should benefit the public system. 6 references.
Main Term(s): Presentence studies
Index Term(s): Presentence investigations ; Contract corrections services ; Privatization
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100190

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder