skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100189  
Title: Civil Liberties View of Private Prisons
Journal: Prison Journal  Volume:65  Issue:2  Dated:(Autumn-Winter 1985)  Pages:48-52
Author(s): J Elvin
Sale: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States
Publication Date: 1985
Pages: 5
Origin: United States
Language: English
Note: For microfiche, see NCJ-100185.
Annotation: An official of the American Civil Liberties Union presents the view of an ACLU committee that privatization of corrections should not occur unless and until adequate measures are in place to protect the rights of the inmate population.
Abstract: The profit motive may be inappropriate and unethical in a correctional setting. Promises to reduce costs may in fact reduce staffing ratios and due process for inmates. Prisoners confined in private facilities must retain all the rights and protections of those in public facilities. State legislatures should therefore enact appropriate legislation. A further issue is the potential for serious abuse in the delegation of the control and custody of prisoners. The government, not the private contractor, must make all decisions affecting the duration of confinement, because contractors would be paid per prisoner. A final issue is the reduction in public scrutiny of the inmate population if new financing methods that do not need voter approval are used. Only an informed public can put pressure on elected officials to change. Prison officials have the absolute responsibility to protect those in their custody from harm. This responsibility must not be diluted. 6 references.
Main Term(s): Contract corrections services
Index Term(s): Prisoners rights ; Accountability ; Privatization
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100189

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder