skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100186  
Title: Correctional Privatization in Perspective
Journal: Prison Journal  Volume:65  Issue:2  Dated:(Autumn-Winter 1985)  Pages:14-31
Author(s): C Camp ; G Camp
Sale: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States
Publication Date: 1985
Pages: 18
Origin: United States
Language: English
Note: For microfiche, see NCJ-100185.
Annotation: An analysis of the use of private contracting for providing correctional services concludes that contracting can improve both costs and quality and presents guidelines for use by correctional administrators in planning and carrying out contracts.
Abstract: Data came from a survey mailed to 54 jurisdictions. The 52 responding agencies each had at least 1 contract with the private sector. The respondents included 21 adult agencies, 15 juvenile agencies, and 12 agencies responsible for both adult and juvenile services. The benefits of contracting were improvements in administrative operations, cost savings, and improved services and conditions. Problems included the possibility that the contract would cost more than providing the services within the agency, poor service, process difficulties, and poor contracting relationships. Other problems were legal issues relating to authority, responsibility, and liability and political concerns relating to control over the agency operations. Nevertheless, contracting is usually cost-effective and can improve quality. Administrators are considering expanding contracting. The two potential roles of the private sector are as direct service provider and as assistant to the agency in delivering a service. Guidelines are presented that list when correctional administrators should consider contracting, planning strategies, the selection process, contracting activities, and postcontracting activities. Increased private sector contracting is predicted. 2 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Contract corrections services
Index Term(s): Corrections management ; Government contracting ; Privatization
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100186

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder