skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100103  
Title: Multi-Criterion decision Procedures and the Assessment of Police Department Performance
Author(s): J M Greiner
Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States
Sponsoring Agency: US Dept of Justice
National Institute of Justice
United States

US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
United States
Sale: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States
Publication Date: Unknown
Pages: 63
Type: Measurement/evaluation devices
Origin: United States
Language: English
Grant No.: 82-IJ-CX-0032
Annotation: This paper is designed to acquaint police administrators with the range of procedures that have been developed to deal with multicriterion decision problems and their applicability to decisionmaking involved in the assessment of overall police department performance.
Abstract: Following a review of the wide range of performance measures available and the difficulties of combining multiple measures, three broad categories of systematic procedures for dealing with multicriteria decisions are delineated. These include unidimensional approaches, nonmathematical group techniques, and formal (mathematical) procedures. Emphasis is placed on the formal procedures and their potential in police and other public-sector applications. A large variety of these procedures are described in three major groups: purely formal procedures, such as vector maximum programming and multiobjective linear programming; iterative interactive procedures, such as the Zionts-Wallenius method and Steuer's interactive procedure; and mixed procedures which include both purely formal data and individual decisionmaker preference. On the basis of an analysis of both formal and user considerations, four of the mixed procedures are viewed as most appropriate for use in police performance assessment: social judgment theory, multiattribute utility technology, the analytic hierarchy process, and compromise programming. It is suggested that these four procedures be pilot tested to examine their relative effectiveness, utility, and acceptance by police managers. 53 references and footnotes.
Main Term(s): Police performance evaluation
Index Term(s): Statistical analysis/ ; Personnel shortages ; Police decisionmaking
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100103

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder