skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100054  
Title: New Look at Officers' Role Ambiguity (From Correctional Officers - Power, Pressure and Responsibility, P 11-16, 1983, Julie N Tucker, ed. - See NCJ-100052)
Author(s): F E Cheek ; M D S Miller
Sale: American Correctional Assoc
206 N. Washington St., Suite 200
Alexandria, VA 22314
United States
Publication Date: 1983
Pages: 6
Type: Applied research
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This article examines role ambiguities stemming from the correctional officers' dual responsibilities as enforcers of rules and regulations and as managers.
Abstract: A pilot study of 24 New Jersey county correctional officers found that the officer/manager role ambiguity was a greater source of stress than was the duality of custodial/treatment responsibilities. A subsequent study of 143 correctional officers clarified this role ambiguity. Officers reported that there were countless rules and regulations covering the custodial aspects of their jobs, but little recognition of the managerial aspects. In securing compliance and control of inmates, officers reported using flexibility and negotiation in applying custodial rules. This, in turn, led to differential enforcement of rules, provided opportunities for inmates to manipulate officers, and complicated job performance. Because of this double bind and resultant vulnerability, administrative support becomes critical. However, lack of administrative support, lack of participation in decisionmaking, and the management structure were identified as major stressors by the officers. While officers have traditionally been viewed as having a custodial role, officers are in fact responsible for negotiating rules within an informal network of interpersonal relations with inmates. Through these managerial practices, officers serve a rehabilitative function that encourages inmate self-respect, self-control, and responsibility. Recognition of this role through administrative support and appropriate training is suggested. 18 references.
Main Term(s): Correctional officer stress
Index Term(s): Inmate staff relations ; Role conflict ; Stress management ; Correctional staff management
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100054

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder