WASHINGTON, DC – A group of House Democrats today again called for an immediate Congressional hearing and investigation into reported unethical activities at the Bush Administration’s Department of Interior, including efforts by senior Interior Department officials to allow oil and gas companies to cheat American taxpayers out of royalty payments.

Representatives Ed Markey (D-MA), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), George Miller (D-CA), Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), and other House Democrats wrote today to House Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo (R-CA) reiterating the need for an oversight hearing on the matter before Congress adjourns at the end of the week.

Chairman Pombo said on Friday that oversight hearings were not needed, even though his committee has not held any and it has jurisdiction over the Interior Department. Attached is Representative Pombo’s letter in response to the Democrats first letter last week.

The Democrats’ letter to Pombo states, “It was reported over the weekend that you indicated that you believe that Congress has already fulfilled its oversight responsibilities and that you might, instead of holding an official hearing, decide to call the Department’s Inspector General to make an inquiry. We are writing to make clear that this response is entirely inadequate and we would like to reiterate our urgent request for an oversight hearing this week before Congress adjourns.”

Reprsentative Markey (D-MA) said, “The Republican-led Congress continues to put special interests over the public interest, and as a result American taxpayers are getting shortchanged by billions of dollars. Until meaningful oversight and possibly even investigations are undertaken by Rep. Pombo and others Republican Chairmen, big oil and gas and the Interior officials they’ve held hands with will continue to make out like bandits.”

Representative Miller (D-CA), former chairman of the Resources Committee, said, “As chairman of this committee, Rep. Pombo has a responsibility to the taxpayers to solve the oil royalty underpayment problem and investigate corruption at the Interior Department, and he has done neither. He is not being an effective leader on these important issues but he should not blame anyone but himself for it.”

Representative Hinchey (D-NY) said, "Chairman Pombo seems far more interested in playing political games than holding hearings and opening investigations to determine why the Interior Department was actively allowing oil and gas companies to cheat the American taxpayers out of tens of millions of dollars. It seems quite likely that we've only seen the tip of the iceberg as far as corruption and unethical behavior goes at the Interior Department. Congressional hearings and investigations would help shed light on all of the cronyism and backroom deals being made at the Interior Department to benefit the oil and gas industry. Instead of highlighting his own faulty legislation, I hope that Chairman Pombo actually gives legitimate consideration to holding hearings instead of writing back an angry letter that accomplishes nothing."

Representative Maloney (D-NY) said, "Typical -- the do-nothing Congress continues to do basically nothing for taxpayers who are getting their pockets picked. The oil companies have the American taxpayer over a barrel to begin with, and administration officials apparently are helping them in this shakedown. Congress has the responsibility to investigate, but the chairman of the committee would rather continue doing nothing.”

“This is about Congress restoring its oversight responsibilities, and putting sound policy before politics,” said Representative DeLauro (D-CT). “Chairman Pombo’s response is nothing short of political posturing – forcing a vote on controversial drilling legislation in order to restore billions of the taxpayers’ dollars. We all know that drilling off our shores is not only bad for the environment, but will generate billions more for the oil and gas companies. And this at a time when families face everything from high gas prices to rising health care costs and stagnant wages.”

This recent revelation of impropriety at the Interior Department is on top of the agency's Inspector General, Earl Devaney, testifying before Congress, "Simply stated, short of a crime, anything goes at the highest levels of the Department of the Interior."

Last week House Democrats urged Chairmen Pombo and Charles Taylor, who presides over the House Appropriations subcommittee with jurisdiction over the Department of Interior, to hold congressional investigations and hearings to examine whistleblowers at DoI, I.G. Devaney’s testimony on the effect of DoI corruption on the royalty collection program, and effects of budget cuts on DoI ensuring that oil and gas companies are making correct payments to the federal government.

According to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) the Interior Department clerical error will end up costing the federal government as much as $10-$20 billion over 25 years in lost revenue, including a potential loss from a newly discovered oil field in the Gulf of Mexico, the Jack Field, which could shortchange taxpayers by another $1.5 billion. The GAO estimates lost revenues could be as high as $80 billion if oil companies win a lawsuit that would expand royalty relief.

The letter to Chairman Pombo is below:

Honorable Richard Pombo
Chairman, House Resources Committee
1324 Longworth Building
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Chairman Pombo,

According to news accounts, you have not yet decided whether to conduct an oversight hearing, as we requested in our letter of September 21, 2006, regarding possible corruption within the Bush Administration’s Department of the Interior and the impact that unethical or illegal activities have had on the taxpayer.[1]

It was reported over the weekend that you indicated that you believe that Congress has already fulfilled its oversight responsibilities and that you might, instead of holding an official hearing, decide to call the Department’s Inspector General to make an inquiry. We are writing to make clear that this response is entirely inadequate and we would like to reiterate our urgent request for an oversight hearing this week before Congress adjourns.

Simply “plan[ning] to speak” on your own with the Inspector General about corruption allegations does not in any way constitute full and proper congressional oversight. A private conversation with the Inspector General, though no doubt instructive, is not sufficient to inform Congress and the public about serious ethical problems at the Department. An oversight hearing concerning ethical lapses by the Administration, such as those held by other committees but almost never by the Resources Committee under your chairmanship, would allow all members of the Committee to pose questions, examine evidence, and help formulate policy.

As you will recall, we asked you to address three areas of great concern to us and to our constituents:

1) The recent revelations that the Department of the Interior has suppressed efforts to recover millions of dollars from oil and gas companies allegedly cheating the government and the public;

2) The effect of the culture of corruption on the royalty program at Interior, beyond just the 1998-1999 deepwater leases “bungling”; and

3) The concerns raised by State and Tribal auditors that Interior has been underfunding their audit programs, possibly in retaliation for their criticisms of Interior’s mismanagement of the royalty program.

Your letter of September 22, 2006, did not address any of these substantive issues.

In addition, Interior’s Inspector General Earl Devaney testified before the Government Reform Committee two weeks ago that “short of a crime, anything goes” at the Department of the Interior, referring to activities that include – but go well beyond – the issue of royalty collection. To our knowledge, you have had no official response to this serious allegation of unethical practices at the Department over which the Resources Committee has jurisdiction.

Accordingly, we are reiterating our request for a bi-partisan committee oversight hearing this week. We strongly urge you to act on behalf of the members of this Committee and our constituents by honoring our request so that we can protect the interests of American taxpayers and help end corrupt practices at the Department of the Interior.

Specifically, we urge you to invite Inspector General Devaney to testify to the extremely serious matter of oil royalty underpayments and possible corruption within the Department. We also believe that the Committee and the public would benefit from hearing from the former Interior auditors whose work on behalf of the taxpayers allegedly led to their termination from the Department. In addition, representatives from the State and Tribal Royalty Audit Committee could help inform the Committee as to the extent of Interior’s failure to advocate on behalf of the taxpayer.

As you know, the oil and gas industry has a history of defrauding the American public through the royalty program, and Interior’s track record on auditing and enforcement is poor. It is incumbent on the Resources Committee to take recent allegations of corruption seriously, and for you to act in your official capacity to conduct oversight. Again, we believe an oversight hearing needs to be scheduled this week.

In addition, we must take issue with the claim made in your letter to us that you have actively addressed the issue of royalty underpayments by oil companies to the taxpayer. In your response dated September 22, 2006, you state that H.R. 4761, which you moved through the Resources Committee, included language requiring companies holding leases which do not include market-based price thresholds for the suspension of royalty relief to either renegotiate or be subject to a fee.

However, you fail to state that this language is one small section of a much larger bill that would roll back 25 years of protections and open up all of our coastlines to oil and gas drilling. In fact, H.R. 4761 is one of the most anti-environmental bills this Congress has ever seen. While it narrowly passed the House, it has not been agreed to by the Senate and there is no indication that this bill will be enacted into law this year.

It is completely inappropriate to hold a legislative attempt to recoup some of the billions of dollars that the American people stand to lose from these leases hostage to a massive giveaway of public land to big oil companies. Far from being a “solution to this problem,” as you termed it in your letter, your bill would have undone one massive giveaway to the oil industry only to replace it with another.

We would remind you that Mr. Markey offered an amendment, both during the Resources Committee consideration of the bill and on the House floor, that would have struck from the bill all of the language opening our coastlines to drilling and left in place only the provisions that you mention in your letter, addressing the problem of these leases. You voted against the Markey Amendment in Committee and on the House floor.

We would think that if you were truly serious about fixing this problem, you would not have twice voted against decoupling it from a rollback of longstanding coastal protections. We would further remind you that Arnold Schwarzenegger, the Republican governor of your state, has stated his clear opposition to H.R. 4761 due to its repeal of the moratorium on drilling off of California’s coasts. In a letter to you dated June 26, 2006, Governor Schwarzenegger stated that the drilling provisions in the bill would have “significant adverse impacts on our ocean and coastal resources.”

Furthermore, H.R. 4761 also included a provision that could have significantly decreased the royalties that big oil companies pay when drilling in shallow water. The version of H.R. 4761 that passed the Resources Committee, and which you supported, included language that could have allowed oil companies to pay the same lower royalty rate when drilling in shallow water that they pay in deep water. This provision, which the Congressional Budget Office estimated would cost the federal government $500 million over 10 years, was only removed from your manager’s amendment to the bill after Mr. Markey submitted an amendment that would have deleted it prior to floor consideration.

By contrast, the amendment that we offered to the Interior appropriations bill, which passed the House in an overwhelming bipartisan vote of 252-165, would provide a stand-alone solution to the problem of these leases. Our amendment provided a strong incentive for oil companies to renegotiate these leases, by preventing those who do not renegotiate from purchasing new leases from the federal government. If you are truly serious about correcting this problem and ensuring that big oil companies pay their fair share to drill on public land, we suggest that you use your position as Chairman to immediately call on the Bush Administration to drop its objections to our amendment, which you voted for on the House Floor.

Your leadership is needed to end the unfair giveaway of oil royalties owed to the taxpayer and to help stop corruption at the Department of the Interior.

We appreciate your attention to this request and eagerly await your reply.

Sincerely,

HOUSE DEMOCRATS

We post many documents in .pdf format. Please visit Adobe to download the free viewer if you do not already have this capability.