skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100040  
Title: Attachments in Aid of International Arbitration - The American Position
Journal: Arbitration International  Volume:1  Issue:1  Dated:(April 1985)  Pages:40-48
Author(s): J D Becker
Publication Date: 1985
Pages: 9
Type: Legislation/policy analysis
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: After examining the remedy of attachment as applied in New York State, this article critically examines the prohibition of this remedy under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
Abstract: Article II(3) of the convention provides that a court of a contracting State, when seized of an action involving a written arbitration agreement, 'shall at the request of one of the parties, refer the parties to arbitration.' American courts, including the New York Supreme Court, have interpreted the obligation to 'refer' as an implicit prohibition of the power to grant provisional orders of attachment in aid of arbitration agreements falling under the convention. An analysis of the New York court's reasoning in this prohibition suggests the prohibition is unwarranted. It is argued that while voluntary compliance with arbitral awards is the rule, in some cases there is need for the security provided by attachment. Further, other security devices are rarely available; and while the convention does make provision for requiring security of a party opposing the award, this is left to the discretion of the court. In addition, many States with commercial interests are not party to the convention, nor is attachment incompatible with standards for international arbitration. Finally, the Federal Arbitration Act specifically provides for attaching a promisor's property in the face of an arbitration clause. 39 footnotes.
Main Term(s): International dispute settlement
Index Term(s): Judicial decisions/ ; Critiques/ ; Contract law enforcement ; Commercial arbitration
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100040

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder