skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100036  
Title: Negotiator Judgment - A Critical Look at the Rationality Assumption
Journal: American Behavioral Scientist  Volume:27  Issue:2  Dated:(November-December 1983)  Pages:211-228
Author(s): M H Bazerman
Publication Date: 1983
Pages: 18
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This article describes five deviations from rationality that mar negotiator judgment and suggests that attention to such deviations be included in negotiator training and be integrated with prescriptive research on negotiation techniques.
Abstract: Eliminating deficient patterns in negotiator judgment is necessary before the negotiator is free to comply with advice derived from prescriptive research. One such deficiency is the framing of negotiation issues in negative language such that the parties are more aware of potential losses than potential gains. Another deficiency in judgment is the assumption that what one party gains the other loses. Mutual gains appropriate for the differing needs of the parties should be the negotiation aim. A nonrational escalation of conflict is also deficient judgment. Negotiators must be careful not to make an irreversible commitment to a 'no-win' position. Negotiators must also guard against overconfidence in achieving the other party's compliance without compromise. Finally, negotiators must guard against the 'winner's curse' which involves having second thoughts about one's proposal when the other party immediately accepts it. This can be remedied by thorough appraisals of one's proposals before they are offered. The concluding section suggests a process for changing deficient judgment patterns. Twenty-six references are listed.
Main Term(s): Negotiation
Index Term(s): Conflict resolution ; Techniques
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100036

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder