skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100031  
Title: Arbitration, the Trilogy, and Individual Rights - Developments Since Alexander v Gardner-Denver
Journal: Labor Law Journal  Volume:36  Issue:3  Dated:(March 1985)  Pages:173-182
Author(s): A R Fowler
Publication Date: 1985
Pages: 10
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This article reviews the U.S. Supreme Court decisions concerning judicial review of arbitration awards under collective bargaining contracts.
Abstract: In the Steelworkers Trilogy, the Court exempted such awards from review, thus establishing arbitration as a final and binding means of settling unionized employees' grievances. However, in Alexander v. Gardner-Denver, the Court partially relaxed the binding nature of awards, ruling that the grievant has independently created rights to freedom from discrimination that may be pursued in arbitration and in court concurrently, separately, or consecutively. A review of cases brought since Alexander indicates that there have been relatively few cases in which the courts have chosen to exercise authority to review arbitrated discrimination grievances. In those cases where such review was conducted, the courts have generally supported the arbitrator's award. Furthermore, Alexander has been given a rather narrow construction in those cases. This response has served to reaffirm the effectiveness of arbitration as a means of settling labor grievances, while recognizing that collective bargaining will not always protect the legal rights of the individual. 32 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Personality/
Index Term(s): Discrimination ; Arbitration ; Judicial decisions/ ; Constitutional rights and civil lib/ ; US Supreme Court decisions ; Collective bargaining
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100031

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder