skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100028  
Title: Executions Under the Post-Furman Capital Punishment Statutes The Halting Progress From 'Let's Do It' to 'Hey, There Ain't No Point in Pulling So Tight'
Journal: Rutgers Law Journal  Volume:15  Issue:2  Dated:(Winter 1984)  Pages:443-487
Author(s): V L Streib
Publication Date: 1984
Pages: 44
Type: Surveys
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This paper analyzes cases of the 11 offenders executed under capital punishment statutes between 1977 and 1983 and concludes that, because no distinguishing factors can be identified to place these cases in a unique category, the death penalty is being freakishly imposed and carried out.
Abstract: While approximately 200 death sentences are imposed annually, executions are very few. The primary means of opposing capital punishment today is challenging case-specific errors in the proceedings. Where the courts have not found alleged errors to be reversible or where prisoners did not vigorously raise these claims, death sentences have resulted in executions. A comparative analysis of the 11 offenders who were executed, out of 3,000 death sentences imposed between 1977 and 1983, covers their demographic and personal characteristics, the criminal process which resulted in conviction, and time spent on death row. While all 11 men committed murder, 6 of the homicides were fairly ordinary killings that occurred during armed robberies. Only one homicide was carefully contemplated and planned over a long period during which the deterrent effect of the death penalty could have been significant. This analysis suggests that the death penalty is not being reserved exclusively for particularly heinous crimes and that its deterrent value is questionable. Tables and 436 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Capital punishment
Index Term(s): Sentencing disparity ; Death row inmates ; Abolishment of capital punishment
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100028

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder