skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100027  
Title: Constitutionality of the Death Penalty in New Jersey
Journal: Rutgers Law Journal  Volume:15  Issue:2  Dated:(Winter 1984)  Pages:261-511
Author(s): E Devine ; M Feldman ; L Giles-Klein ; C A Ingram ; R F Williams
Publication Date: 1984
Pages: 246
Type: Legislation/policy analysis
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This article examines the constitutionality of the death penalty in the context of State constitutional law, using New Jersey as a focal point because challenges to the State's 1982 law reinstating capital punishment are now before the New Jersey Supreme Court.
Abstract: Following a historical review of the death penalty in New Jersey, the paper describes the shifting minimum Federal constitutional standards for imposing the death penalty as set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in major post-Furman cases. A discussion of the evolution of independent State constitutional doctrine concludes that, due to institutional factors differentiating State and Federal courts, U.S. Supreme Court interpretations of the Federal constitution may be inappropriate guides for States. The paper then addresses two major stages in a capital trial: prosecutorial discretion in the charging process and constitutional challenges to the death qualification of juries. In conclusion, the authors argue that provisions in the New Jersey constitution which protect human dignity and autonomy and prohibit cruel and unusual punishment require the State to demonstrate a compelling need to impose the death penalty beyond mere revenge or retribution. Tables, 87 footnotes, and text of 1982 death penalty law.
Index Term(s): Capital punishment ; State laws ; State supreme courts ; US Supreme Court decisions ; New Jersey
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100027

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder