skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100024  
Title: Remands in the Absence of the Accused
Author(s): C May
Corporate Author: Great Britain Home Office
United Kingdom
Sale: Great Britain Home Office
Research and Planning Unit
50 Queen Anne's Gate, Room 278
Information Section
London, SW1H 9AT, United Kingdom
Publication Date: 1985
Pages: 46
Type: Legislation/policy analysis
Origin: United Kingdom
Language: English
Note: Research and Planning Unit Paper 34
Annotation: This study examines the cost-savings impact of a 1983 British law that permits remand hearings in the absence of the accused.
Abstract: Prior to the implementation of the 1982 Criminal Justice Act, a person remanded by a magistrates' court was required to attend hearings for bail and remand extensions at intervals of not more than 8 days. The act permits remand prisoners to opt not to attend up to three consecutive hearings. The law's intent is to reduce the cost of prisoner escorts. This study determined the rate at which inmates have exercised this option and estimated the resulting savings. Data were obtained from the court appearances of inmates from three detention facilities during the period September through November 1983, accompanied by data covering a 4-week period from all remanding institutions. An average of 21 percent of the hearings were held with the accused absent. The savings in staff time and vehicular costs were modest but significant. There were significant differences among courts in the proportion of remands in absentia. Courts with a low proportion of remands in absentia could increase the number by encouraging attorneys not to use hearings as occasions to meet with their clients and by encouraging remand facilities to increase the attractiveness of institutional activities as an incentive for inmates to remain at the prison rather than opt for attendance at hearings. 4 references and 85 Home Office research reports.
Main Term(s): Remand procedures
Index Term(s): Prisoner transport ; Pretrial detention ; Legislative impact ; England ; Wales
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100024

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder