skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100021  
Title: Constitutional Limits on the Power To Restrict Access to Prisons - An Historical Re-Examination
Journal: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review  Volume:18  Issue:2  Dated:(Summer 1983)  Pages:409-455
Author(s): L G Leverson
Publication Date: 1983
Pages: 46
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This historical analysis of the modern penitentiary's development and U.S. Supreme Court decisions in cases concerning access to criminal trials (Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia and Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court) argues that the first amendment also creates a right of public access to prisons.
Abstract: The holdings of Richmond Newspapers and Globe are in tension with Supreme Court cases decided in the 1970's that restricted public access to prisons. Historical analysis, however, shows that the first amendment was adopted against a backdrop of public access to English and American jails. The founders of the American penitentiary were aware of the importance of publicity in preventing abuse and made specific provision for public inspections. This historical openness of the penal system fulfills the first element of the Richmond/Globe test for a right of access which states that access to criminal trials is constitutionally mandated because trials historically have been open. The paper contends that the demonstrated value of access to prisons in facilitating the exercise of prisoners' rights to petition meets the second element of the Richmond/Globe test, that access preserves the fairness and integrity of the judicial process. The paper also discusses the Court's treatment of prison access cases; development of the right to petition; and principles for formulating procedures to govern prison access while protecting prison security, rehabilitation, and inmate privacy. 196 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Correctional reform
Index Term(s): Prisoners rights ; Freedom of the press ; US Supreme Court decisions ; Public attitudes toward corrections
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100021

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder