skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 100017  
Title: English Criminal Justice - Is It Better Than Ours?
Journal: Arizona Law Review  Volume:26  Issue:3  Dated:(1984)  Pages:507-614
Author(s): G Hughes
Publication Date: 1984
Pages: 108
Type: Overview texts
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This comparative analysis surveys the English criminal justice system and discusses the relative advantages of both the English and U.S. systems with respect to police powers, trial procedures, and courtroom styles.
Abstract: Following a review of organizational aspects, English police powers are examined in the areas of search and seizure, interrogation, and detention of defendants and suspects. The pretrial review of charges is then discussed, together with the division of responsibility among police, the Director of Public Prosecutions, and the private barrister. The role of the Magistrates' and Crown Courts also is discussed, as is the use of the summary disposition and summary jury trials as mechanisms to lighten court caseloads. Also reviewed are inducements to disposition via a guilty plea. Finally, the English courtroom style is examined with emphasis on its nonadversarial nature and the strong role of the judge. Recent legislative changes in police powers and the courts (including the abolishment of the superior court system and the preliminary hearing) are discussed. Comparisons with the U.S. focus on differences in the rights of suspects and defendants, the bureaucratic nature of the English system, and the styles of advocacy and judicial behavior. 451 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Federal criminal justice system
Index Term(s): Police legal limitations ; Pretrial procedures ; Comparative analysis ; Court procedures ; Criminal justice system analysis ; Criminal justice system policy ; Case processing ; England
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=100017

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder