CAMMICE Operations
The following are e-mail messages regarding the operation
of the CAMMICE instrument.
Most recent messages are at the top. Older messages are down below.
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 13:07:35 -0800
From: "Patricia Lew"
Subject: Upcoming Mics RS Table Chan
To: "Cammice Team"
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Subject: Time: 12:54 PM
Upcoming Mics RS Table Change Date: 03/05/97
FYI:
The normal MICS rate scaler table will be changed between 065:05:00:00 and
065:05:45:00 (about an hour before the radiation belts). I will give you
exact execution times tomorrow. The complete change requires about 40 minutes
and contains two table calculations at 15 minutes a piece. During this time
data will not be transmitted by the DPU.
For details on the new "normal" MICS rate scaler table see the
following:
ftp://leadbelly.lanl.gov/pub/CCR/AERO/mics_rate_scalers_v2_970228.gif
Happy Analyzing,
Patty Lew
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 12:59:21 -0800
From: "Patricia Lew"
Subject: HIT Rate Scaler Table Chang
To: "Cammice Team"
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Subject: Time: 12:37 PM
HIT Rate Scaler Table Change Date: 03/05/97
FYI:
FYI:
As of 064:20:29:35 HIT is now using the A-Bar rate scaler table. The previous
and current rate scaler bin definitions can be found in:
ftp://leadbelly.lanl.gov/pub/CCR/AERO/hit_rate_scaler_tbl_v1.gif
The bins are defined below for your convenience (all values in MeV):
R0 (0.48-0.96)
R1 (0.96-1.44)
R2 (1.44-1.92)
R3 (1.92-2.88)
R4 (2.88-3.84)
R5 (3.84-4.80)
R6 (4.80-5.80)
R7 (5.80-7.70)
R8 (7.70-9.60)
R9 (9.60-11.5)
R10 (11.5-15.4)
R11 (15.4-19.2) Typo in web doc at address listed previously.
R12 (19.2-23.0)
R13 (23.0-92.0)
R14 (0.0-0.48)
R15 Everything else
Regards,
Patty Lew
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 12:28:58 -0800
From: "Patricia Lew"
Subject: HIT state change
To: "Cammice Team"
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Subject: Time: 12:28 PM
HIT state change Date: 02/14/97
FYI:
As of 97:045:20:20:32 GMT Hit is now in the following state:
Cal off, Pileup On, ABar=A, IgnoreA threshold, AntiC Off,
Mux 0, E' on, dE on, ABC Slope low, CBar=CBar, B/C=B, Bite 0
Patty Lew
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 09:52:07 -0800
From: "Patricia Lew"
Subject: New HIT Sensor State
To: "Cammice Team"
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Subject: Time: 9:51 AM
New HIT Sensor State Date: 02/03/97
FYI:
As per Ted's request the HIT sensor is now in the following mode as of
031:04:02:39:
Cal off, Pileup On, ABar=A, IgnoreA threshold, AntiC Off,
Mux 0, E' on, dE on, ABC Slope low, CBar=CBar, B/C=B, Bite 0
Patty
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 11:12:51 -0800
From: "Patricia Lew"
Subject: HIT sensor cal
To: "Cammice Team"
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Subject: Time: 11:03 AM
HIT sensor cal Date: 02/09/97
FYI:
The HIT sensor cal which consists of an hour long cal test, a six minute
noise
test, and a 2 hour + 5 min gain test will start on 97:043:17:00:00 (that's
Wednesday 2/12/97). At the end of these tests the HIT sensor will be in
the
following mode:
Cal off, Pileup off, ABar=A, IgnoreA threshold, AntiC off,
Mux 0, E' On, dE on, ABC Slope low, CBar=C, B/C=B, Bite 0
On Friday, 2/14/97, Hit will be put back into the following mode:
Cal off, Pileup On, ABar=A, IgnoreA threshold, AntiC Off,
Mux 0, E' on, dE on, ABC Slope low, CBar=CBar, B/C=B, Bite 0
Patty Lew
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 15:02:46 -0800
From: "Patricia Lew" <patricia_lew@qmail2.aero.org>
Subject: Cammice Command Lists
To: "Cammice Team" <cammice-team@lanl.gov>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Subject: Time: 3:01 PM
Cammice Command Lists Date: 01/29/97
FYI:
There are updates for the MICS and HIT command summaries in the following
directory:
ftp://leadbelly.lanl.gov/pub/CCR/command_histories/.
The files are ASCII tab-delimited files and are titled: HitCmd_012697.Txt
and
MicsCmd_012697.Txt. As the filenames indicate, the summaries are valid
through 1/26/97 (inclusive).
Questions regarding the summaries should be sent to
patricia_lew@qmail2.aero.org.
Patty Lew
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 09:55:18 -0800
From: "Patricia Lew" <patricia_lew@qmail2.aero.org>
Subject: New Hit Sensor State
To: "Cammice Team" <cammice-team@lanl.gov>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Subject: Time: 9:52 AM
New Hit Sensor State Date: 01/29/97
FYI:
As per Ted's request the HIT sensor is now in the following mode as of
029:05:26:37:
Cal off, Pileup On, ABar=A, IgnoreA threshold, AntiC Off,
Mux 0, E' on, dE on, ABC Slope low, CBar=C, B/C=B, Bite 0
Patty
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 12:55:10 -0800
From: "Patricia Lew" <patricia_lew@qmail2.aero.org>
Subject: HIT in new mode
To: "Cammice Team" <cammice-team@lanl.gov>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Subject: Time: 12:53 PM
HIT in new mode Date: 01/22/97
As per Ted's request the HIT sensor is now in the following mode as of
022:20:20:49.
Cal off, Pileup On, ABar=A, IgnoreA threshold, AntiC Off,
Mux 0, E' on, dE on, ABC Slope low, CBar=CBar, B/C=B, Bite 0
Patty
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 15:13:49 -0800
From: "Patricia Lew" <patricia_lew@qmail2.aero.org>
Subject: Hit back on
To: "Cammice Team" <cammice-team@lanl.gov>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Subject: Time: 3:05 PM
Hit back on Date: 11/22/96
FYI:
With Jim looking at the MICS data while in the radiation belts, it appears
that the MICS boundary changes look good. Events were falling into RS0,
RS9,
RS10, and RS11 (though very few in 9,10,11) We saw RS0 go up to 1005, RS9
from 1-3, RS10 from 1-5, and RS11 from 1-2.
MICS cross off was executed at 327:22:24:21. HIT was turned on at 22:26:06.
Bad news for HIT though. The rates were as follows:
HID5: 50-70
A0: 450559-466943
A1: 943-1119
B1: 15103 - 13516
C: 11-40
Rst: 11263 - 12031
Err: 3775-4198
Vld: 171
A2: 32
St: 19251-24063
A3: 32
A4: 32
I did get some information from Wainwright. As of 11/18/96 the sun angle
was
at 113.9 degrees relative to the z axis. So with a nominal HIT 22 degrees
field of view, HIT may still be seeing the sun.
Patty
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 10:48:17 -0800
From: "Patricia Lew" <patricia_lew@qmail2.aero.org>
Subject: Cammice commands
To: "Cammice Team" <cammice-team@lanl.gov>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Subject: Time: 10:44 AM
Cammice commands Date: 11/18/96
FYI:
There are updates for the MICS and HIT command summaries in the following
directory:
ftp://leadbelly.lanl.gov/pub/CCR/command_histories/.
The files are ASCII tab-delimited files and are titled: HitCmd_111096.Txt
and
MicsCmd_111096.Txt. As the filenames indicate, the summaries are valid
through 11/10/96 (inclusive).
Questions regarding the summaries should be sent to
patricia_lew@qmail2.aero.org.
Patty Lew
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 1996 12:25:16 -0800
From: "Joe Fennell" <joe_fennell@qmail2.aero.org>
Subject: HIT/HDPU OFF; MICS in CROSS
To: "Ted Fritz" <fritz@buasta.bu.edu>
Cc: "CAMMICE_Sci Team @CCR" <CAMMICE-team@lanl.gov>,
"Stefano @ APL Livi" <livi@livwst.jhuapl.edu>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Ted, team:
The HIT/HDPU was turned off around 1948 UT on 11/9/96 and MICS was put in
cross mode.
This will give us time to evaluate some unusual outputs we have been getting.
Patty will put exact command times in the history file shewill be updating.
We had the POCC bring up the GSE and I verified that the MICS was indeed
in
cross mode.
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 09:26:55 -0800
From: "Joe Fennell" <joe_fennell@qmail2.aero.org>
Subject: MICS back on the air
To: "CAMMICE_Sci Team @CCR" <CAMMICE-team@lanl.gov>,
"Stefano @ APL Livi" <livi@livwst.jhuapl.edu>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Team:
The MICS/MDPU is back on the air as of ~0400 UT 1/6/96. The stepping HV
for
the ESA is limited to a maximum of step 24. There were some problems at
higher
step levels so we will keep it in this mode. We are still analyzing what
has
happened and will keep everyone informed. Thanks go to Stefano Livi for
going
to Goddard and running the recovery process.
Regards, Joe Fennell
From: livi@livwst.jhuapl.edu
To: CAMMICE-team@lanl.gov
Cc: cammice@livwst.jhuapl.edu
Subject: MICS restarted
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 96 16:14:45 +0000
X-Mts: smtp
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Dear fellows,
MICS is again operational!
It has been restarted today (Nov 6th, day 311) at about 4 AM UT.
During the restart procedure, a new "latch up" event was observed,
and the procedure was started anew. For safety reasons, I decided
to limit the HV at step 24 ("Normal mode"). During the next days,
Joe, Norm, Patty, and me will try to identify the causes of the
problem and to figure out counterreactions. Needless to say that
any comment/suggestion/contribution/idea will be most welcome!
Regards
Stefano
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 08:19:33 -0800
From: "Joe Fennell" <joe_fennell@qmail2.aero.org>
Subject: Another MICS/MDPU Event - M
To: "CAMMICE_Sci Team @CCR" <CAMMICE-team@lanl.gov>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Status: O
Team:
The MICS/MDPU had another episode last night (0920UT Day 310). This one
occurred when satellite was not being monitored so we have no information
on
what happened until the tape recorded data is dumped. Patty Lew turned the
MDPU/MICS off and we plan to turn things back on later today. Hydra, again
,
had gone into an eprom write protect mode. The symptoms for MICS/MDPU were
the same. The DPU voltage monitor was at 4.5 volts and no TM was coming
out.
Patty turned off the keep alive power to flush the RAM because if we power
cycled the DPU with keep-alive on the unit would come up in its previous
state
with all high voltages on. We will keep you informed of what we learn and
what we are planning to do.
Regards, Joe F.
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 16:15:50 GMT
From: Stefano Livi <livi@livwst.jhuapl.edu>
Apparently-To: cammice-team@nis.lanl.gov
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Dear Fellows,
I am happy to report that MICS was succesfully turned on on Oct. 19 14:00
UT. Post acceleration is nominal (22.5 kV), Channelplates at step 4, and
ESA voltage stepping with the new proposed sequence (max at step 29).
Let us go for some more exciting data!
Cheers
Stefano
From: IN%"patricia_lew@qmail2.aero.org" "Patricia
Lew" 17-OCT-1996 15:40
Subj: Cammice maneuver
FYI:
Everything went smoothly last night turning the MICS HV ramp down, MICS
turn
off, and HIT cross mode on.
MICS was commanded off at 291:02:54:13.
HIT cross mode was commanded on at 291:02:56:23
As of now MICS is scheduled to go back on at 293:12:10:00 (Saturday, 10/19/96
at 5:10 am PDT). I've heard that the maneuver is taking longer than expected,
but Lock-Mart has a 24 hour leeway before the instruments get turned on.
We'll know better tomorrow as to when the actual turn on is. It may even
slip
into Sunday. [Is this a problem for you Stefano???]
Patty
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 12:06:38 -0700
From: "Joe Fennell" <joe_fennell@qmail2.aero.org>
Subject: CAMMICE MDPU/MICS Update
To: "CAMMICE_Sci Team @CCR" <CAMMICE-team@lanl.gov>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cammice-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Team:
We have the MICS nearly to its pre event configuration. With Stefano manning
the consol at Goddard, we stepped the MICS ESA HV up step by step to step
29
and then then back down to step 15 where we commanded it into auto stepping
mode. The present step sequence covers the ESA steps 0 through 24 (VVHV
step
0 - 24 = 1 - 193 keV/q). We raised the post acceleration back to its maximum
(PAHV step 7 = 22.5 kV) and have enabled the corresponding M and M/q tables.
Everything looks great!
We, Livi, Grand and I, have discussed defining a new VVHV stepping sequence
that covers the range step 0 - 29. It will empasize the steps around step
16
and spend less time at steps > 22 than did the previous sequence. This
is in
response to concerns that have been voiced about temperature stress on the
VVHV power supply. We will keep everyone informed about all such changes
as
they are implemented.
Regards Joe Fennell
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 04:20:29 +0100
From: Stefano Livi <livi@livwst.jhuapl.edu>
Apparently-To: ccr-team@lanl.gov
Precedence: bulk
Sender: ccr-team-request@nis.lanl.gov
Dear fellows,
on Sep 18, 9h 8m 20s MICS DPU stopped sending telemetry to
Polar. The 5V voltage, monitored by the satellite itself
showed 4.6 V, showing that our DPU was drawing more current than
it should have been.
At about the same time, Polar had a telemetry drop out, that lasted
only a few (9 ?) seconds, and Hydra went in a protected mode of
operation, like it did on Wind when SMS had a high voltage discarge.
Polar recovered, as well as Hydra, but MICS did not, and Patty
correctly turned the power off Feb 18, ~ 9h 40m,
(NB less that 40 minutes after the alarm was set!).
Joe and me had long discussions about what had happened, but
evidence pointed into a direction, we could simply not believe:
after more than eight months of flawless operations, we had a
hig voltage discharge that killed the instrument.
On Sep 19, 21h 40m we send commands to MICS, and to our great
reliev, DPU turned on, the various high voltages switch up to nominal
values, and the DPU algorithm started functioning as if nothing
had happened! Particles (most protons) get through the ESA,
produce coincidences, and get sorted into the appropriate
scaler, as they have done in the past months.
You can hardly immagine our joy.
We still do not understand, what happened. But, as I said to
Joe, "better have an instrument that works, and we do not know
what happened, than have a good explanation and no data!"
Plans are to go back to normal operation tomorrow, Sep 20, 17h 10m,
I will keep you informed about.
Go, MICS go
Stefano
P.S. Times are UT
From: IN%"joe_fennell@qmail2.aero.org" "Joe
Fennell" 9-AUG-1996 15:05
Subj: HIT Thermistor readings in
Ted:
Now that I have looked at the correct period, I have a totally different
concept. Try this one:
1.) There is a heater on the HIT near the point the thermistor is mounted.
2.) The heater is set to com on at about -18 deg C.
3.) The thermistor is more tightly coupled to the heater element (closer)
than
is the controlling thermostat. Thus the rapid rise in temperature reported
by thermistor. Not knowing what the thermostat hysterises is, assume about
15
deg C. The exponential drop is what you would expect for an object that
is
coming back to equilibrium temperature.
Does any of that make sense? I note, based on the other experiments'
temperatures that around July 22 the coldest temperatures were reached for
Polar and then it startedwarming up again. What was your heater thresholds
set for and were they tested?
Regards, Joe F.
Produced and Maintains the CCR Web Pages.