skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 087102  
Title: Eyewitness Identification - Problems and Pitfalls (From Criminal Justice System - A Social-Psychological Analysis, P 99-127, 1982, Vladimir J Konecni and Ebbe B Ebbesen, ed. - See NCJ-87097)
Author(s): F J Levine ; J L Tapp
Sale: W H Freeman and Co
660 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
United States
Publication Date: 1982
Pages: 29
Type: Studies/research reports
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: Research in general and social psychology as well as legal psychology provides overwhelming evidence that the fallible sense perception and memory as well as suggestive influences undermine the reliability of eyewitness identification.
Abstract: The heavy reliance on eyewitness identification suggests that such identifications are mechanical reproductions of an objective reality. Research in general and social psychology, however, indicates that perceptual and memory processes do not yield photographic or exact records of events. Research has found that memory, cognition, and information processing are active rather than passive abilities that involve the organization of discrete elements of a situation. Individual factors affecting perceptions of persons and events are emotional and motivational states, prior experience, and stereotypes and prejudice. The social-psychological context of eyewitness identification at a lineup bears the particular distorting influences of social conformity, the legitimacy of authority, evaluation apprehension and expectancy, and self-persuasion. Contemporary research in legal psychology indicates that the manner of questioning of an eyewitness affects the nature of the information provided, suggesting that investigatory procedures may influence witnesses in subtle and unintentional ways. Other factors found to influence eyewitness identifications are the type of identification process, the timing of the identification, bias in explicit instructions given to the eyewitness, and nonverbal communication of expectancies from the presiding police officer. Every effort should be made to identify and reduce or eliminate those contextual influences that would tend to distort eyewitness identifications. A total of 142 references are provided.
Index Term(s): Witnesses ; Behavioral science research/ ; Suspect identification ; Interview and interrogation ; Line-up
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=87102

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder