skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 213124  
Title: Uses and Abuses of Eyewitness Identification Confidence
Journal: Legal and Criminological Psychology  Volume:11  Issue:1  Dated:February 2006  Pages:3 to 23
Author(s): Neil Brewer
Sponsoring Agency: Australian Research Council
Australia
Publisher Url*: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpsoc/lcp 
Publication Date: 02/2006
Pages: 21
Type: Studies/research reports
Origin: United Kingdom
Language: English
Grant No.: DP0556876;DPO343548
Annotation: This literature review examines theories and empirical evidence that bear upon the usefulness to an investigation of an eyewitness's confidence in his/her ability to identify the person he/she saw commit a crime if he/she were to see that person again.
Abstract: The author concludes that research to date suggests that investigators and prosecutors should not base the strength of their cases on confidence levels of eyewitnesses due to the multiple factors that can influence these levels, other than the eyewitness's actual ability to make a correct identification. He also concludes that a high confidence level at the time of the initial identification is sufficiently related to accuracy that it can be useful in targeting the selected suspect for further investigation. Although research in this area is in its early stages, there is no clear evidence that an eyewitness's expression of his/her level of confidence in his/her ability to identify a suspect prior to being presented with a line-up or "mug shots" is related to accuracy of a choice when exposed to these identification procedures. On the other hand, when eyewitnesses express strong confidence that they have correctly picked from a line-up or mug shots the person they previously saw at the crime scene, research indicates that the confidence level is likely to be related to the accuracy of the choice. This is a variable finding, however, suggesting that a number of factors, other than the actual ability of the eyewitness to accurately identify the suspect, may influence the confidence level of the eyewitness. Research that has examined variations in eyewitness confidence levels between the initial identification and the trial show that various factors can influence whether confidence levels change and in which direction. 62 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Suspect identification ; Line-up ; Mug shots ; Investigative techniques ; Eyewitness testimony ; Foreign criminal justice research ; Eyewitness memory ; Australia
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=234618

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder