Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 127/Tuesday, July 2, 2002/Proposed Rules 44407
Actions Compliance Procedures
(4) If cracks are found during any inspection re- Obtain and incorporate the repair scheme In accordance with the repair scheme ob-
quired in paragraph (d)(3) of this AD, accom- prior to further flight after the inspection in tained from APEX Aircraft, Direction Tech-
plish the following:. which the cracks are found. Continue to in- nique, 1 b Route de Troyes, F21121 , Darois,
(i) Obtain a repair scheme from the manufac- spect as specified in paragraph (d)(3) of France. Obtain this repair scheme through
turer through the FAA at the address speci- this AD. the FAA at the address specified in para-
fied in paragraph (f) of this AD;. graph (f) of this AD.
(ii) Incorporate this repair scheme; and (iii) The repair scheme will indicate whether or
not you may raise the load factor limits.
(5) If no cracks are found during the initial in- Prior to further flight after the initial inspection Not applicable.
spection required in paragraph (d)(3) of this required in paragraph (d)(3) of this AD in
AD, you may raise load factor limits back to which no cracks were found.
+6 & -4.5 G's.
Note 1: The service infonnation specified Darois, France; telephone: +33 (380) 356510; comment on the need for limited and
in paragraph (d)(3) of this AD is available on facsimile: +33 (380) 356515. You may specific changes or guidance on what
CD-ROM from the manufacturer. You may ex~ine th~se document.s at FAA, Central such changes or guidance should be.
contact them at the address and phone RegIon, Office of the RegIonal Counsel, 9ol ..
number in paragraph (h) of this AD. Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri DAT.ES. Comments on thIS a~vance
(e) Can I comply with this AD in anyother 64106. notI~e of proposed rulemakIllg must be
way? (i) Does this AD action affect anyexisting receIved by September 3, 2002.
(1) You may use an alternative method of AD actions? This amendment supersedes AD ADDRESSES: Address all comments
compliance or adjust the compliance time if: 98-12-10, Amendment 39-10566 and AD regarding this advance notice of
(i).Your altern.ative method of compliance 99-21-23, Amen~ent 3~1136~. proposed rulemaking to David Kaiser,
provIdes an equIvalent level of safety; and Note 3: The subject of thlS AD IS addressed F~deral Consistency Coordinator
.(ii) The S.tandards Office Manager, Small in French AD Number 2001-616(A) R1, dated Coastal Programs Division Offic~ of
AIrplane Directorate, approves your May 29, 2002. ,
alternative. Submit your request through an Ocean and Coastal Resource
FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who Issued ill Kansas CIty, MIssoun, on June M.anagement, NOAA, 1~05 East~West
may add comments and then send it to the 25, 2002. HIghway, 11th Floor, SIlver Spnng, MD
Standards Office Manager. Michael Gallagher, 20910. Attention: Federal Consistency
(2) Alte~ative methods ?f compliance Manager, Small Airplane Directomte, Aircraft Energy Review Comments.
approved ill accordan~e WIth AD 98-12-10 Certification Service. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
and AD 99-21-23 WhICh are superseded by
[.
ldD.dK.
FdI.
th.ADt'dlttiFR Doc. 02-16533 FI e 7-1-02; 8:45 am1 avl alSer, e era COnsIstenc
yIS, are no approve as a erna ve ..
methods of compliance with this AD. BILLING CODE 491D-13-P CoordIllator, Office of Ocean and
Nte2Th.
ADl.th.1Coastal Resource Management, NOAA,
o : IS app Ies o eac aIrp ane
identified in paragraph (a) of this AD, 301-713-3155 ext. 144.
regardless of whether it has been modified, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that National Oceanic Atmospheric I. Background
have been modified, altered, or repaired so Administration For nearly 30 years the Coastal Zone
th?t the perfonnance of the requirements of Management Act (CZMA) has met the
thIS AD IS affected, the owner/operator must 15 CFR Part 930 needs of coastal States and Territories
request approval for an alternative method of (referred to as States) Federal a enci
compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) [Docket No.020422093-20931 .
dtrydthbl' .bI9
hes,
of this AD. The request should include an III us. an e pu IC to a ance t e
assessment of the effect of the modification RIN 0648-AP98 protectIon of coastal resources with
alteration, or repair on the unsafe conditio~ coastal development, including energy
addressed by this AD; and, if you have not Proc~dural Changes to the Federal development. The CZMA requires States
eliminated the unsafe condition, specific Consistency Process to adequately consider the national
actions you propose to address it. AGENCY: Office of Coastal Resource interest in the siting of energy facilities
(f) Where can I get infor~ation about any Management (OCRM), National Ocean in the coastal zone through the
alreadr-appz;oved alternatIve met~ods of Service (NOS), National Oceanic development and implementation of
comphance. Contact S.M. Nagarajan, At h .Ad. .tr t. (NOAA) their federally approved State Coastal
Aerospace Engineer, F AA, Small Airplane mosp enc mIllls a Ion ,
MPr(CMP)SD.
tt9olLtR301KDepartment of Commerce (Commerce). anagement ograms s .tates
Irec ora e, ocus , oom , ansas
hIIbd.h.
dCity, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329- ACTION: Advance notice of proposed a~e co a orate w~t, !n ';lStry °~ a .
4145; facsimile: (816) 329-4090. rulemaking. varIety of,ene,rgy faclhtIes, IllcludIllg 011
(g) What if I need to fly the airplane to and gas Plpehnes, nuclear power plants,
another location to comply with this AD? The SUMMARY: NOAA is evaluating whether hydroelectric facilities, and alternative
FAA can issue a special flight permit under limited and specific procedural changes energy development. States have
sec~io?s 21.197 a:nd 21.199 of the Federal or guidance to the existing Federal reviewed and approved thousands of
AvIation RegulatIons (14.CFR 21.197 and. consistency regulations are needed to offshore oil and gas facilities and related
21.199) to operate your ?Irplane to ~ locatIon improve efficiencies in the Federal onshore support facilities, On December
where you can accomphsh the requIrements '
dd'
I.,
of this AD. COnsIstency proce u~es an Secretana 8, 2,0?0, NOAA Issued a co~prehenSIVe
(h) How do I get copies of the documents appeals process, partIcularly fo~ energy reVISIO? to the ~ederal COnsIstency,
referenced in this AD? You may obtain copies development on the Outer ContInental regulatIons, whIch reflected substantIal
of the documents referenced in this AD from Shelf (OCS), This advance notice of effort and participation by Federal
APEX AIRCRAFT, 1 Route de Troyes, 21121 proposed rulemaking requests public agencies, States, industry , and the
"
44408 Federal Register/Vol. 67, No, 127/Tuesday, July 2, 2002/Proposed Rules
public, over a five year period, Given operated well for the Federal and State Management Service (MMS) within the
this recent broad-based review, NOAA agencies and permit applicants and Department of the Interior (DOl), are
is not re-evaluating the 2000 final rule, provided a reasonable interpretation of specifically mentioned, Energy, Report at
rath,er it is considering whether limited the CZMA's broad requirements, When 5-7 ,
mod~fications are n~eded to ?ddr~ss the ~ongr~s~ amended the CZMA i.n 1990, This advance notice is part ofNOAA's
specIfic con~erns dIscussed ill thIs 1! sp~clf1cally endo~sed NOAA s evaluation of the Energy Report and
advance nonce, ~onslstenc':f regulatIons and NOAA's ongoing responsibility to
II. History of the CZMA and NOAA's illterpretanon of the C:ZMA, However, address the national interest in effective
Federal Consistency Regulations. changes to the CZ~,,: ill 1990 and 1996 coastal management, When States
.made c~ear that revIsIons to the develop and amend their CMPs, and
The CZMA was enacted ill :97,2 to regulatIons were needed, when making coastal management
encourage States to be proactIve ill In late 1996, OCRM began a process decisions the CZMA requires State
managing natural resources for their to revise the regulations by informally CMPs to ~dequately consider the
benefit and the be~efit of th? Nation, consulting an~ collaborating with national interest in the CZMA objectives
!he CZ~A recogmzes a nanonal Federal agencIes, States, industry, and to give priority consideration to
illterest In. the resource,s of the coast~1 Congress, an~ other interested parties, coastal dependant uses and processes
zone and ill the balancillg of competIng NOAA submItted two sets of draft rules I:
£.
I't'
Itdtt.
IdI:
, lor acl I les re a e o na lona elense,
uses Qf those resources, The CZMA IS a to States, Federal agencies and others energy fisheries recreation ports and
voluntary program for States. If a State for comments and produced written
tr'rtt' ' ,
Ittart' ,t'ttdIdanspo a Ion,
e ec s o p Iclpa e I mus eve op an responses to comments to each draft,
ThC"
ZMAdthOCSLA.t'
ItCMPttI:dIbI: .I' 'Ie an e ill eract
Imp emen a pursuan O le era elore proposillg a ru e ill Apn 2000,
bthbI' '
tf.
hguidelines, State CMPs are NOAA evaluated comments on the o yexp ICI cross-re.erence ill t e
comprehensive management plans that proposed rule and published a final rule ~tatutes and ~hrough theIr regulatory
describe the uses subject to the on December 8, 2000, which became Impleme~tanon, Both.statutes mandate
management program, the authorities effective on January 8,2001. State rev~ew ofOCS oIl and gas
and enforceable policies of the Most of the changes in the revised ExploratIon Plans (EPs) an,d
management program, the boundaries of regulations were dictated by changes in Development and productIon. Plans
the State's coastal zone, the organization the CZMA or by specific statements in (DPPs), Bot~ statutes ~nd theIr .
of the management program, and other the accompanying legislative history .cOrreSp?ndillg r~gulanons provIde a
State coastal management concerns, The For instance, the new regulations added compatIble ~nd illterrelated process for
State CMPs are developed with the language concerning the scope of the States to revle,,:, EPs, and DPPs. !he
participation of Federal agencies, Federal Consistency "effects test." Prior Energy ~eport I~ennfies potentIal lack
industry , other interested groups and to the 1990 amendments, Federal ?f effect!veness I~ the CZMA-OCSLA
the public. Once the Secretary of agency activities "directly affecting" the illteracnon resultIng, from a lack of
Commerce approves a State's CMP, then coastal zone were subject to Federal ~Iearly d~fined requIrements and
the CZMA Federal Consistency Consistency. The amendments illformat~o.n needs from Federal,and
provision applies, Federal Consistency broadened this language by dropping State ?n tItles, as well ?S uncertaill
is a limited waiver of federal supremacy the word "directly" to include projects deadlilles for completIng the procedures
and authority, Federal agency activities with "effects" on any land or water use of both statutes, Energy Report at 5-7.
that have coastal effects must be or natural resource of the coastal zone, The CZMA requires that when a
consistent to the maximum extent Other changes in the 2000 final rule lessee seeks MMS appro,:al for its EP or
practicable with the federally approved improved and clarified procedural DPP, the lessee must cer:tl~ to the
enforceable policies of the State's CMP. efficiencies and processes and made affected State(s) that actIvItIes covered
In addition, non-Federal applicants for changes based on long-standing in the plans are, ~lly consistent with the
federal approvals and funding must be interpretive practice by NOAA, enforceable p~hcles of the State's CMP ,
fully consistent with the enforceable. If the State obJects to the consistency
policies of State CMPs. The Federal III. The Role of the CZMA ill OCS certification, then MMS is prohibited
Consistency provision is a cornerstone Energy Development from approving the activities described
of the CZMA program and a primary In February 2001, the Administration in detail in the EP orDPP. The lessee
incentive for States to participate. While established the National Energy Policy may appeal to the Secretary of
States have negotiated changes to Development Group to bring together Commerce to override the State
thousands of federal actions over the business, government, local objection and allow MMS to issue the
years, States have concurred with communities and citizens to promote a approval, When deciding an appeal, the
approximately 93% of all federal actions dependable, affordable, and Secretary balances the national interest
reviewed. Thirty-five States, Great Lake environmentally sound National Energy of the energy development against
States and United States Trust Policy, Vice-President Cheney adverse effects on coastal resources and
Territories and Commonwealths submitted the Group's Report (Energy coastal uses. When MMS offers an OCS
(collectively referred to as "coastal Report) to President Bush on May 16, lease sale, it is considered a federal
States" or "States") are eligible to 2001. agency activity. If MMS determines that
participate, Thirty-three of the eligible The Energy Report contains numerous the lease sale will have reasonably
coastal States have federally approved recommendations for obtaining a long- foreseeable coastal effects, then MMS
CMPs, Indiana is developing a program term, comprehensive energy strategy to must provide a CZMA consistency
and Illinois is not currently advance new, environmentally determination to the affected State(s)
participating, beneficial technologies to increase stating whether the lease sale is
NOAA's Federal Consistency energy supplies and encourage less "consistent to the maximum extent
regulations, first promulgated in 1979, polluting, more efficient energy use, The practicable" with the enforceable
provide reliable procedures and CZMA and the Outer Continental Shelf policies of the State's CMP, If the State
predictability to the implementation of Lands Act (OCSLA), a statute objects, MMS may still proceed with the
Federal Consistency. The regulations administered by the Minerals lease sale if MMS can show that it is
44408 Federal Register/Vol. 67, No, 127/Tuesday, July 2, 2002/Proposed Rules
public, over a five year period, Given operated well for the Federal and State Management Service (MMS) within the
this recent broad-based review, NOAA agencies and permit applicants and Department of the Interior (DOl), are
is not re-evaluating the 2000 final rule, provided a reasonable interpretation of specifically mentioned, Energy, Report at
rath,er it is considering whether limited the CZMA's broad requirements, When 5-7 ,
mod~fications are n~eded to ?ddr~ss the ~ongr~s~ amended the CZMA i.n 1990, This advance notice is part ofNOAA's
specIfic con~erns dIscussed ill thIs 1! sp~clf1cally endo~sed NOAA s evaluation of the Energy Report and
advance nonce, ~onslstenc':f regulatIons and NOAA's ongoing responsibility to
II. History of the CZMA and NOAA's illterpretanon of the C:ZMA, However, address the national interest in effective
Federal Consistency Regulations. changes to the CZ~,,: ill 1990 and 1996 coastal management, When States
.made c~ear that revIsIons to the develop and amend their CMPs, and
The CZMA was enacted ill :97,2 to regulatIons were needed, when making coastal management
encourage States to be proactIve ill In late 1996, OCRM began a process decisions the CZMA requires State
managing natural resources for their to revise the regulations by informally CMPs to ~dequately consider the
benefit and the be~efit of th? Nation, consulting an~ collaborating with national interest in the CZMA objectives
!he CZ~A recogmzes a nanonal Federal agencIes, States, industry, and to give priority consideration to
illterest In. the resource,s of the coast~1 Congress, an~ other interested parties, coastal dependant uses and processes
zone and ill the balancillg of competIng NOAA submItted two sets of draft rules I:
£.
I't'
Itdtt.
IdI:
, lor acl I les re a e o na lona elense,
uses Qf those resources, The CZMA IS a to States, Federal agencies and others energy fisheries recreation ports and
voluntary program for States. If a State for comments and produced written
tr'rtt' ' ,
Ittart' ,t'ttdIdanspo a Ion,
e ec s o p Iclpa e I mus eve op an responses to comments to each draft,
ThC"
ZMAdthOCSLA.t'
ItCMPttI:dIbI: .I' 'Ie an e ill eract
Imp emen a pursuan O le era elore proposillg a ru e ill Apn 2000,
bthbI' '
tf.
hguidelines, State CMPs are NOAA evaluated comments on the o yexp ICI cross-re.erence ill t e
comprehensive management plans that proposed rule and published a final rule ~tatutes and ~hrough theIr regulatory
describe the uses subject to the on December 8, 2000, which became Impleme~tanon, Both.statutes mandate
management program, the authorities effective on January 8,2001. State rev~ew ofOCS oIl and gas
and enforceable policies of the Most of the changes in the revised ExploratIon Plans (EPs) an,d
management program, the boundaries of regulations were dictated by changes in Development and productIon. Plans
the State's coastal zone, the organization the CZMA or by specific statements in (DPPs), Bot~ statutes ~nd theIr .
of the management program, and other the accompanying legislative history .cOrreSp?ndillg r~gulanons provIde a
State coastal management concerns, The For instance, the new regulations added compatIble ~nd illterrelated process for
State CMPs are developed with the language concerning the scope of the States to revle,,:, EPs, and DPPs. !he
participation of Federal agencies, Federal Consistency "effects test." Prior Energy ~eport I~ennfies potentIal lack
industry , other interested groups and to the 1990 amendments, Federal ?f effect!veness I~ the CZMA-OCSLA
the public. Once the Secretary of agency activities "directly affecting" the illteracnon resultIng, from a lack of
Commerce approves a State's CMP, then coastal zone were subject to Federal ~Iearly d~fined requIrements and
the CZMA Federal Consistency Consistency. The amendments illformat~o.n needs from Federal,and
provision applies, Federal Consistency broadened this language by dropping State ?n tItles, as well ?S uncertaill
is a limited waiver of federal supremacy the word "directly" to include projects deadlilles for completIng the procedures
and authority, Federal agency activities with "effects" on any land or water use of both statutes, Energy Report at 5-7.
that have coastal effects must be or natural resource of the coastal zone, The CZMA requires that when a
consistent to the maximum extent Other changes in the 2000 final rule lessee seeks MMS appro,:al for its EP or
practicable with the federally approved improved and clarified procedural DPP, the lessee must cer:tl~ to the
enforceable policies of the State's CMP. efficiencies and processes and made affected State(s) that actIvItIes covered
In addition, non-Federal applicants for changes based on long-standing in the plans are, ~lly consistent with the
federal approvals and funding must be interpretive practice by NOAA, enforceable p~hcles of the State's CMP ,
fully consistent with the enforceable. If the State obJects to the consistency
policies of State CMPs. The Federal III. The Role of the CZMA ill OCS certification, then MMS is prohibited
Consistency provision is a cornerstone Energy Development from approving the activities described
of the CZMA program and a primary In February 2001, the Administration in detail in the EP orDPP. The lessee
incentive for States to participate. While established the National Energy Policy may appeal to the Secretary of
States have negotiated changes to Development Group to bring together Commerce to override the State
thousands of federal actions over the business, government, local objection and allow MMS to issue the
years, States have concurred with communities and citizens to promote a approval, When deciding an appeal, the
approximately 93% of all federal actions dependable, affordable, and Secretary balances the national interest
reviewed. Thirty-five States, Great Lake environmentally sound National Energy of the energy development against
States and United States Trust Policy, Vice-President Cheney adverse effects on coastal resources and
Territories and Commonwealths submitted the Group's Report (Energy coastal uses. When MMS offers an OCS
(collectively referred to as "coastal Report) to President Bush on May 16, lease sale, it is considered a federal
States" or "States") are eligible to 2001. agency activity. If MMS determines that
participate, Thirty-three of the eligible The Energy Report contains numerous the lease sale will have reasonably
coastal States have federally approved recommendations for obtaining a long- foreseeable coastal effects, then MMS
CMPs, Indiana is developing a program term, comprehensive energy strategy to must provide a CZMA consistency
and Illinois is not currently advance new, environmentally determination to the affected State(s)
participating, beneficial technologies to increase stating whether the lease sale is
NOAA's Federal Consistency energy supplies and encourage less "consistent to the maximum extent
regulations, first promulgated in 1979, polluting, more efficient energy use, The practicable" with the enforceable
provide reliable procedures and CZMA and the Outer Continental Shelf policies of the State's CMP, If the State
predictability to the implementation of Lands Act (OCSLA), a statute objects, MMS may still proceed with the
Federal Consistency. The regulations administered by the Minerals lease sale if MMS can show that it is
44410 Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 127/Tuesday, July 2, 2002/Proposed Rules
the State agency receives the applicant'$ federal environmental review ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
consistency certification, the OCS plan, documents, the information needs of the AGENCY
and the necessary data and information States, MMS and the Secretary within
described in 15 CFR 930,58, The the various statutory time frames of the 40 CFR Part 52
necessary data and information includes CZMA and OCSLA, [LA-49-1-7400. FRL-7240-1]
a detailed description of the activity , .Whether a re ulato rovision for' ..
coastal effects, etc., and an evaluatIon "
1t' 9dtry ~
t." Approval and Promulgation of Air
,
1ha genera nega Ive e ermma IOn, ..
relatIng the coasta effects to t e , 'I t th ' t' 1 t' £ Quality State Implementation Plans
enforceable policies of a State's CMP, ~,Iml ar O e ~XIS mg regu a,IOn, or " (SIP); Louisiana: Motor Vehicle
This information is usually contained in general COnsistency deter~.matlOns, Inspection and Maintenance (I/M)
the OCS plan and accompanying 15 CFR 93?,~~(c), for repetItIve Federal Program
information, In addition, the necessary agency actIvitIes that a Federal agency, ,
data and information can include determines will not have reasonably AGENCY: Environmental ProtectIon
information that is specifically foreseeable coastal effects individually Agency (EP A),
identified in the State's CMP, NOM's or cumulatively, would improve the ACTION: Proposed approval,
Federal Consistency regulations, 15 CFR efficiency of the Federal consistency
ThEPA' ,
, , , SUMMARY: e IS proposmg
930,77(a)(2), specify the mformatlon process.
1fVh'1It'
d' , ' approva o a e IC e nspec Ion an
a,:aIlable for the State s review of OCS .Whether guidance or regulatory Maintenance (I/M) Program adopted by
oIl and gas plans: action is needed to assist Federal the State of Louisiana as part of the
Tht; State agency shall use the information agencies and State CMPs in determining Louisiana SIP, This proposed action is
submitted pursuant to the Department of the when activities undertaken far offshore taken under section 110 of the Clean Air
Interior's OCS operating regulations (see 30 from State waters have reasonably Act as amended in 1990 (the Act)
CFR 250.203 and 250,204) and OCS ,
information program (see 30 CFR part 252) fore~e,ea?le,?oast~~ effects a~d whe~he~, DATES: Comments must be received on
regulations and necessary data and the listIng and geographic locatIon or before August 1, 2002,
information (see 15 CFR 930.58). descriptions in 15 CFR 930.53 should be ADDRESSES: Written comments should
Despite this direction for information modified.to p~o,vide addition~l cl'd;f.ity b,e addressed to Mr, Thomas H. Diggs,
requirements, issues continue to arise as and predlctabIlIty to the applIcabIlity of Chief, Air Planning Section, at the EPA
to the adequacy and types of State CZMA Federal Consistency review Region 6 Office listed below, Copies of
information requested by and/or for activities located far offshore, the documents relevant to this action
provided to the States, There are also. Whether multiple federal approvals are available for public inspection
instances where the State asks for needed for an OCS EP or DPP should be during normal business hours at the
additional information late in the CZMA or can be consolidated into a single following locations, Persons interested
review period, Frequently there is a consistency review For instance in in examining these documents should
time delay between the time a Federal dd'f t the pe~its described in make an appointment with the
agency or applicant for federal license a
dt1,
II~nEopdDPPhthrthrappropriate office at least 24 hours
, '
dIS'theal ill san s,we e O e
b..h' , ,
dor permIt pro VI es a coasta tate WI ,
td1'dtelore t e vlsltlng ay,
, .
f.,dhassocla e approva s, air an wa er , ,
a consistency certl Icatlon an t e '
tt"d'
bd'dt'I" .Environmental ProtectIon Agency,
b'
Ib'l'f' perml s no escrI e ill e al ill an ., .,
su sequent aval a I Ity O routIne EP DPP h Id b Region 6, Air Planmng SectIon (6PD-
environmental review documents such or, ' ca~ or s. ou e L), 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700,
as National Environmental Policy Act cons?lIdated m,a smgle State Dallas, Texas 75202-2733
(NEPA) compliance documents, reviews consistency review of the EP or DPP, Louisiana Department of Environmental
required under the Endangered Species Comments received by NOAA will Quality, Air Quality Compliance
Act (ESA) and related Clean Water Act help to determine its next steps, i,e" Division, 7290 Bluebonnet, 2nd Floor,
(CWA) and/or Clean Air Act (CM) whether the Federal Consistency Baton Rouge, Louisiana
reviews, regulations should be amended to Louisiana Department of Environmental
, To address these and other procedural clarify data and information Q~a~ity C~pital Regional Office, 11720
ISSUe,S, NOM ~eeks commen~s from the requirements in the State consistency Alrlme Highway, Baton Rouge,
publIc concernmg the followmg: review process or during the Secretarial Louisiana
.Whether NOM needs to further
hhdd' .
1d'bhdtfappeal process or wet er a Itlona
FORFURTHER INF
ORMATION CONTACT" Ms
escrI e t e scope an na ure o .,
hd1d" ,
, ..
t'fSttCMPpolIcy guidance on t ese an re ate
SandraGRennie Air Plannin
gSection mlorma Ion necessary or a a e , , , ' ,
and the Secretary to complete their Issues IS more apprOprIate, Any (6PD-L), EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross
CZMA reviews and the best way of prop~sed changes t~ the Federal Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733,
informing Federal agencies and the Cons,lstenc;v regulatIons woul.d be telephone (214) 665-7367 ,
industry of the information publIs?ed ill the.Feder~ Register SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
requirements. followmg complIance wIth the. .
.Whether a definitive date by which Administrative Procedures Act and What ActIon Is EP A Taking Today?
the Secretary must issue a decision in a other relevant statutes and executive We, the EPA, are proposing approval
consistency appeal under CZMA orders, Any proposed policy statement of Louisiana's I/M program.
sections 307(c)(3)(A), (B) and 307(d) can would be published in the Federal
WhtAthCIA.
Athdk' , '
d.R.ta re e ean Ir c
be establis e ta mg mto, c?nsl ,eratlon egis er, Requirements?
the standards of the Admmlstratlve Dated: June 25, 2002. , .,
Procedures Act and which if any, .An I/M program IS required ill the
Federal environmental reviews should Jamlson Hawkms, Baton Rouge area because of its
be included in the administrative record Deputy, Assistant Administrator for Oceans classification as a nonattainment area
to meet those standards, and Coastal Zone Management. for ozone and the population exceeds
.Whether there is a more effective [FR Doc. 02-16417 Filed 7-1-02; 8:45 am] 200,000, The SIP credits are not taken
way to coordinate the completion of BILLING CODE 351D-08-P for the I/M plan in the 15% Rate-of-