The Spotlight Newsletter
Volume VI, Issue 1
Quarters I & II, 2005
Rural America Struggles with Meth
From Join Together On Line—1/27/2005
Rural communities across the U.S. are struggling to cope with the
growing problems of methamphetamine production, sales, and use, Reuters
reported Jan. 27.
California, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Texas, Oklahoma,
and Missouri lead the nation in meth-lab seizures, according to federal
officials. Local officials are dealing with a drug problem unlike
any previous, where $100 in chemicals can quickly and easily be turned
into $1,000 of meth.
"It's the first drug in the history of the United States we can
make, distribute, sell, take, all here in the Midwest," said
Detective Jason Grellner, of the Franklin County (Mo.) Sheriff's Department.
"You can't grow a coca plantation or an opium plantation here
to get your heroin or cocaine, and marijuana takes four or five months
to grow a good plant. With methamphetamine you can go out and for
a couple hundred dollars you can make your drugs that day."
The meth problem in rural America has exploded over the past five
years. In Clay County, Iowa, for instance, no meth labs were found
in 1999. By 2001, county police had seized and destroyed 56. Nationwide,
16,800 meth labs were uncovered between September 2003 and September
2004, up from 15,300 in 2001-02.
"This is the most serious law-enforcement problem we've ever
faced in the history of our state, because this substance is so addictive
and so easy and cheap to make," said North Dakota Attorney General
Wayne Stenehjem.
"When we look at our prison popula-
tion, 10 years ago nobody had even heard of it. Now, 60 percent of
our male inmates are users, and we're building a brand new prison
for female users." Few rural states have the facilities or money
needed to provide treatment for their meth-addicted population, however.
Mom-and-pop meth operations are common, but the DEA estimates that
most meth sold in the U.S. comes from "super labs" in Mexico
and California, run by organized-crime groups.
In addition to addiction and crime, rural states also are grappling
with the cleanup of toxic meth-lab sites. Each pound of meth produced
yields up to six pounds of toxic waste.
Rural states are trying to address the meth problem by better controlling
the precursor chemicals used to create meth, notably cold tablets.
$500,000 TO HELP COUNSEL CHILDREN EXPOSED TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
December 8, 2004– Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
The Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services
has implemented a $500,000 legislative appropriation to provide trauma
counseling for children being served through domestic violence programs.
The appropriation is being used to fund child trauma counseling through
10 programs statewide, said Jackie Shipp, ODMHSAS director of children’s
services.
The programs are:
-
Ardmore – Family Shelter of Southern Oklahoma
-
Clinton – ACTION Association
-
-
-
Guymon – Northwest Domestic Crisis Services,
Inc.
-
Hugo and Idabel – Carl Albert Community
Mental Health Center, partnering with Southeastern Oklahoma Services
for Family Violence Intervention, Inc.
-
Muskogee – Women in Safe Home (WISH),
Inc., which is partnering with Green Country Behavioral Health Services,
also based in Muskogee.
-
Oklahoma City – Latino Community Development
Agency
-
Ponca City – Domestic Violence Program
of North Central Oklahoma
-
Tulsa – Domestic Violence Intervention
Services, Inc.
“This is a huge step forward in our domestic violence program
offerings,” said Julie Young, ODMHSAS Deputy Commissioner for
Domestic Violence/Sexual Assault Services. “Children exposed
to domestic violence have trauma issues specific to witnessing violence
in the home and, in some cases, being victims of violence themselves.
By contracting with programs in various parts of the state, we will
be able to address an issue that previously has not been addressed.
As additional funding becomes available, we want to expand these services
to even more programs statewide.”
Shipp said counseling services will extend to family counseling, focusing
on the needs of children, with an emphasis on parenting skills. All
services will be provided by licensed professionals trained in trauma
work with children.
“Domestic violence programs also will work with local child
abuse programs to provide trauma counseling for abused children,”she
added.
For more information, contact Shipp at (405) 522-4142.
Top New York Court Limits Removing Child When Mother Is Abuse Victim
New York Times- October 27, 2004, By LESLIE KAUFMAN
New York State's highest court ruled yesterday that child welfare
authorities cannot take children from parents and place them in foster
care merely because they have been exposed to domestic abuse at home.
The court formalized specific standards for removing children from
homes where domestic abuse occurs, requiring that authorities exhaust
alternatives and insisting that the possible threat to the child's
health or welfare be imminent.
The seven-member New York State Court of Appeals, in a unanimous decision,
said it simply was not acceptable to take children out of their homes
solely because they had seen the mother being beaten, suggesting that
it would unfairly punish innocent women and even harm the children
themselves. Instead, it said the authorities would have to show that
the mother was indifferent to the psychological harm that repeated
exposure to beatings caused the child in order to justify asking the
courts to consider a removal.
Further, it ruled that removing children from such homes without prior
court approval - emergency actions that a federal court found the
city had used for years - should be contemplated only in the rarest
of instances.
City child welfare officials called yesterday's ruling thoughtful,
but said it would have little effect on day-to-day practice. John
B. Mattingly, the city's commissioner for children's services, said
the city stuck by the argument it had made in federal court—that
its practice for dealing with children in violent households was already
"nuanced and very sound," and already met the standards
set by the court.
City officials said they regarded the court's determination that,
at least in some domestic violence cases, emotional trauma could be
severe enough to warrant removal of children as a validation of the
city's position.
But some child welfare experts, as well as many lawyers with experience
in the state's Family Court system, quickly predicted that the ruling
could have profound implications for how the city handles the full
range of child welfare cases, even those not directly involving domestic
violence. They said that the court's standard for when children can
be taken into foster care, as laid out in its decision, might be applied
in a wide array of other instances.
In particular, they pointed to language in the ruling saying that
child welfare officials would have to balance the risk of leaving
children in potentially dangerous homes with the possible trauma caused
by being separated from their parents. Many said it was the first
time such a standard had been spelled out by a court.
"I definitely think this will go beyond the context of domestic
violence," said Karen Freedman, executive director of Lawyers
for Children, a local nonprofit group that represents children in
foster care.
A spokesman for the Court of Appeals would not comment on whether
the ruling might be applied in cases not involving domestic violence.
The ruling, written by Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye, grew out of a federal
class action suit, Nicholson v. Scoppetta that has challenged the
city's practice of removing children from homes where there is domestic
violence. A district court found in 2002 that the city, by placing
children in foster care, routinely violated the rights of mothers
whose only crime had been to be beaten by their husband or lover.
Judge Jack B. Weinstein wrote that the city's failure to train its
child welfare caseworkers in domestic violence matters, and the inappropriate
placements in foster care that resulted, amounted to "widespread
and unnecessary cruelty by agencies of the city."
The city appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit. Before ruling, the circuit court asked the state's top court
to clarify New York law on removing children from possibly dangerous
homes, especially as it pertained to witnessing domestic violence.
The question of how to deal with children in homes where domestic
violence exists has bedeviled experts, social workers and city officials
for years. And the Court of Appeals decision broadly acknowledged
that caring for children who live in homes with domestic violence
is fraught with perils; such homes are extremely volatile and children
in such homes can wind up being killed.
But in yesterday's decision, the court spelled out what child welfare
workers and the state's family courts must do in deciding whether
to remove children from such homes.
In response to the request from the circuit court, the Court of Appeals
ruled that a parent's inability to prevent a child from witnessing
domestic abuse did not amount to formal neglect, a standard used for
taking a child into foster care. To conclude that a mother had been
neglectful, the court held, the authorities would have to prove that
the mother had failed to exercise a basic level of care in shielding
the child as best she could from the scenes of abuse.
The court ruled that there could be no "blanket presumption"
favoring removing a child who had merely witnessed a parent being
abused.
The court did say there could be instances in which city officials
could seek to remove a child from an abusive household. But it listed
specific stages that would have to be followed before the removal
was allowed, including seeking approval of a family court judge.
The judge "must do more than identify the existence of risk of
serious harm," the decision said, adding that the court "must
balance that risk against the harm removal might bring, and it must
determine factually which course is in the child's best interest."
"Additionally, the court must specifically consider whether imminent
risk to the child might be eliminated by other means, such as issuing
a temporary order of protection or providing security services to
the victim."
As for the city, the court said, it could remove a child without a
court order only in circumstances so dire they were hard to imagine.
"While we cannot say, for all future time, that the possibility
can never exist, in the case of emotional injury caused by witnessing
domestic violence," the court wrote, "it must be a rare
circumstance."
Lawyers who represent children in foster cases said that they would
use the court's language dealing with emergency removals to mount
challenges in cases not involving domestic violence where children
had been removed.
Of the 2,651 child removals the city says it did in the first nine
months of the year, 54 percent were done on an emergency basis without
a court order, something the lawyers say they would like to stop.
"It is now routine practice to do emergency field removals,"
said Ms. Freedman, "and that practice needs to change to be consistent
with this ruling."
Now that the Court of Appeals has answered its inquiries, the Second
Circuit is expected to swiftly formulate its own decision on the federal
lawsuit. Potentially, the court could find a constitutional violation
in New York's practices that would immediately affect cases involving
domestic violence in other states, including Vermont and Connecticut.
But Jill Zuccardy, a lawyer involved in the suit against the city,
said progress for victims of domestic violence and their children
had already been achieved. She said the federal lawsuit, and yesterday's
state ruling, amounted to a wake-up call for child welfare agencies
across the country.
"It says you'd better listen to domestic violence agencies or
you will wind up being sued," she said.
Local Coalition Formed to Fight Human Trafficking
October 23, 2004, -Seattle Post-Intelligencer
A campaign to help identify human-trafficking victims kicked off
yesterday with federal officials announcing the creation of a local
coalition of social service groups and law enforcement agencies devoted
to combating the problem.
"All of us should be reaching out to rescue and restore victims,"
said Wade Horn, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service's
assistant secretary for children and families.
Federal officials estimate that between 14,500 and 17,500 victims
are brought into the United States each year to become forced laborers
or sex slaves.
But few victims have so far been identified despite new laws that
allow trafficking victims to apply for special immigration visas and
despite assurances from President Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft
that this is a national priority.
In this state, about 14 victims have obtained special visas from the
Department of Homeland Security, Horn said.
About 550 have qualified for those visas nationwide.
Seattle is one of 10 cities in the country targeted for the public
awareness campaign because as a port city it is believed to be a potential
hot spot for trafficking.
The federal government has set up a 24-hour toll-free hot line to
assist victims. That number is 888-3737-888, and operators can arrange
for translators in up to 150 languages.
The Refugee Women's Alliance in Seattle will coordinate the local
anti-trafficking coalition, which includes 19 social service organizations
that work with immigrants.
Federal financing for four other programs was also announced yesterday:
$50,000 to the Refugee Women's Alliance to help Russian and Somali
domestic violence survivors; $75,000 to Seattle Children's Home to
work with street youths who are victims of abuse; and nearly $50,000
to the Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence, to help
disabled victims of domestic violence.
The fourth grant of $1 million was awarded to Pioneer Human Services
of Seattle to pay for a 16-bed secure shelter for children who are
detained by immigration officials because they are illegal aliens
and have no adult supervision.
SEDAPA Awards for Drug Abuse Awareness
May 13, 2005 - From Join Together OnLine
The National Institute on Drug Abuse's (NIDA) Science and Education
Drug Abuse Partnership Awards (SEDAPA) encourage alliances between
educators, scientists, and health-care professionals to develop model
programs for raising awareness and generating interest in the science
and biology of drug-abuse addiction. Partnerships should be formed
within the K-12 school system, among healthcare practitioners, and
with the community at large.
Maximum funding is $250,000 per year for four years. Applications
are expected to vary widely in range and scope, but should focus on
unaddressed or underdeveloped areas within the field. Non-profit and
for-profit organizations, institutes of higher learning, and state
and local governments are eligible to apply.
Due to the flexible nature of this funding opportunity, deadlines
vary. For more information on application and eligibility, view the
full announcement online. (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-05-105.htm)
Public-Private Partnership to Fight the Domestic Violence Epidemic:
Mary Kay, Dallas County DA Join to Combat Domestic Abuse
DALLAS – Jan. 25, 2005 – Press Release
Mary Kay Inc. has underwritten a landmark grant designed to enhance
efforts to prosecute domestic violence cases in Dallas County.
The two-year grant – the first of its kind in the nation –
will fund the addition of a fourth felony investigator for the family
violence section of the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office
and will combine with other funds to create an additional caseworker
position for the section. The positions will allow better quality
handling of each case. Dallas County commissioners were briefed about
the $200,000 grant this morning during their regular meeting.
“We are very grateful to Mary Kay Inc. for this generous grant
that will provide us with key tools in the fight against domestic
violence – a crime that has reached epidemic proportions in
Dallas County,” said District Attorney Bill Hill. “We
hope this pioneering step will encourage other corporations throughout
the nation to consider new ways to help their local law enforcement
agencies combat domestic violence.”
One woman in three will experience at least one physical assault by
a partner during her lifetime. The case volume for felony prosecutors
and investigators in the Dallas County DA’s family violence
section has more than doubled since 1999, with prosecutors now handling
about 325 cases per year and investigators handling about 542 cases
per year. These cases include murder, sexual assault, kidnapping,
and aggravated assault.
“Mary Kay is making this grant as part of our overall efforts
to enrich women’s lives,” said Anne Crews, vice president
of government relations for Mary Kay Inc. “We think it’s
time for businesses to partner with law enforcement in prosecuting
violence against women and children, so we’re making this grant
to the exemplary program developed by the Dallas County District Attorney.
We hope companies in other jurisdictions around the nation will do
likewise.”
The Mary Kay grant is the first to focus on enhancing prosecution
of family violence offenders. In receiving it, the Dallas County DA’s
Office joins those in San Diego, CA and Kings-Brooklyn County, NY
as pioneers in forging partnerships with corporate and community citizens
against domestic violence.
Family violence has long been a priority for Dallas County, which
began a unique program in 1994 to represent victims of family violence
in securing protective orders – a project that has helped the
county issue more protective orders than any other county in the state.
Dallas County was also among the first in the U.S. to prosecute domestic
violence cases even if victims recanted.
The contribution from Mary Kay Inc. will be paired with a 2-year,
$700,000 federal grant awarded to Dallas County effective this month.
This is the second time the Dallas County DA’s Office has secured
the competitive federal grant, which will fund the addition of a felony
prosecutor and a caseworker in the family violence section. The federal
grant will also pay for a Dallas police detective who will be housed
at Frank Crowley Courts Building, a case manager for The Family Place
in Dallas, and a legal aid attorney for the Lawyers Against Domestic
Violence program of Legal Aid of North West Texas.
Mary Kay Inc. funds will support an additional felony investigator
and combine with money from the federal grant to support an additional
caseworker. The additional positions will enable Dallas County to
continue building on the collaboration between law enforcement and
non-profit organizations that has long served as a model for family
violence programs in Dallas and throughout the nation.
Curbing family violence is a crucial element of building safer communities
because family violence engenders other types of crimes, said Cindy
Dyer, chief of the family violence section and a leading national
authority on domestic violence prosecution and prevention.
“Violence in the home begets violence in the street,”
said Dyer, who wrote both the 1997 and 2004 federal grants. “Children
who grow up witnessing domestic violence are more likely to become
abusers themselves. Removing batterers from the home can have a staggering
effect in stifling the crime rate.”
About Mary Kay
Mary Kay Inc., one of the largest direct sellers of skin care and
color cosmetics in the world, achieved another year of record results
in 2004, exceeding $1.8 billion in wholesale sales. The company’s
independent sales force includes more than 1.3 million Mary Kay Independent
sales force includes more than 1.3 million Mary Kay Independent Beauty
Consultants in more than 30 markets worldwide. Mary Kay Inc. has averaged
double-digit annual growth since the company’s founding in 1963
and celebrates 41 years of enriching women’s lives.
WHEN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND CHILD MALTREATMENT CO-OCCUR
From The Children’s Bureau Express-May 2005
When families experience child maltreatment and domestic violence,
child welfare agencies, domestic violence service providers, and dependency
courts typically respond to individual victims in isolation. The Greenbook
initiative, however, provides communities with guidelines and recommendations
that focus on collaboration among these three entities to address
these problems in a systemic way.
Federal funding was provided to six communities to implement the Greenbook
recommendations. Now at the halfway point of the 5-year funding cycle,
the Greenbook National Evaluation Team has published an interim report
on the demonstration initiative. The participating communities have
identified activities that both promote collaboration among agencies
and treat the entire family, not just individual victims. These include:
-
Strengthening collaborations through activities
such as cross-training
-
Identifying co-occurring issues
-
Sharing information among agencies and courts
-
Ensuring batterer accountability
-
Improving access to services, including multidisciplinary
case planning
-
Improving advocacy, including co-located advocates
in multiple systems
Interim results showed that systems changes were occurring in several
areas. For instance, child welfare agencies were beginning to implement
new screening procedures that allowed them to screen for domestic
violence. To further their advocacy efforts, some communities had
begun to work on changing State-level policies. Overall, staff at
all levels reported that the changes had raised community awareness
about child maltreatment and domestic violence, and staff were beginning
to think about their cases in the context of all family members and
all family strengths and needs.
The next phase of the project will focus on quantitative evaluations
to determine system changes. It is expected that such changes will
result in improved safety and well-being for children and families.
The full interim report, The Greenbook Demonstration Initiative: Interim
Evaluation Report, was prepared by the Greenbook National Evaluation
Team (Caliber Associates, Education Development Center, Inc., and
the National Center for State Courts) and funded by the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Justice. The
report is available at www.thegreenbook.info/documents/Greenbook_Interim_Evaluation_Re-port-2_05.pdf.
Reaching Freedom From Addiction
Lee Ann Prescott -Smyth County News (Va.), Wednesday, January
26, 2005
Treating methamphetamine addiction may be one of the most difficult
challenges in the field of substance abuse recovery. The drug’s
complex array of severe effects, coupled with a changing health care
industry, have left treatment professionals seeking new answers.
Health insurance providers have rejected the 28-day Minnesota Model
programs originally designed for alcohol treatment, according to 1999
Methamphetamine and Cocaine Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP).
Some insurance companies cover inpatient programs lasting up to seven
days, but only for initial detox.
“Meth users need at least 90 days to six months [for withdrawal],”
according to Dr. Edmund Cavazos III, network medical director of Rivendell
Behavioral Health Services in Bowling Green, Ky. “We can’t
keep them in treatment long enough. … They relapse 100 percent
of the time without long-term treatment.”
Joe Jones, a substance abuse counselor and treatment program manager
with The Laurels in Lebanon, agrees with Cavazos. True recovery, Jones
said, takes about two years for the addict “to get well enough
to function and begin making good decisions.”
Getting into treatment that works may take even longer. According
to Lloyd Sheets, program manager for The Laurels, “It usually
takes an average of eight treatment contacts before someone decides
to change their life.” He said people who are trying to leave
domestic abuse situations and people with addiction problems tend
to average the same number of attempts at recovery before
succeeding.
The Laurels is a 24-bed state-supported facility within the Cumberland
Community Services Board (CSB) region. It cannot always accommodate
the numbers of people the Mount Rogers CSB would like to send from
Smyth County. If The Laurels is full, Mount Rogers CSB counselors
attempt to find space for clients at a treatment center in Galax,
Jones said.
Smyth County has no inpatient treatment center for methamphetamine
addicts. Transitions, an outpatient counseling center in Marion, offers
individual and group therapy through the Mount Rogers CSB.
“Transitions is fully outpatient substance abuse [treatment],”
said Kris Payne, a Certified Substance Abuse Counselor with Mount
Rogers CSB. “It formerly was inpatient.” The Transitions
building occupies a former house across from the Smyth County Courthouse.
The only inpatient detox facility in Smyth County is within the Southwest
Virginia Mental Health Institute; however, the hospital provides detox
only when a patient arrives for mental health treatment and substance
abuse appears to be a factor in that mental illness.
Sheets said The Laurels is designed to provide crisis intervention
and stabilization. “Then we refer back onto community services,
AA and NA [Narcotics Anonymous], … other resources in the community.
If they don’t do something after they leave us, we don’t
expect a whole lot. This is just a start. Detox usually takes seven
to 10 days. We offer everybody an opportunity to stay up to 14 days.
[With] those who stay a little bit longer – it takes six or
seven days before you’re talking to the person rather than talking
to the drug.”
“It takes a while to get their head clear,” Jones said.
“When you’re looking at people on meth, you’re looking
at being malnourished, lack of sleep. I think that’s even greater
in that population with meth than cocaine, or any type of [stimulant],
because they’re just running, they’re not eating, they’re
not sleeping, and they’re using this drug. They’re fogged
in for three to five days and sometimes even longer than that. You’re
looking at general health and who knows what other things are in the
product they’re using. There are so many impurities they have
in their system.”
“It’s not uncommon for people to sleep for three to four
days at a time because the body can only go so long,” Payne
said. “Once you take the drug away, the body’s going to
crash on you. The withdrawal is from 30 to 90 days – a long
time.”
Withdrawing users experience “suicidal and homicidal ideations
… a lot of depression, anhedonia – anhedonia is the inability
to experience pleasure,” Payne said. “It’s hard
for folks to get excited about anything. …That feeling of emptiness
– if you don’t find any way to deal with that in a healthy
way, you’re going to return to using.”
Payne said 93 percent of the people who use methamphetamine “will
return to using if they don’t treat it somehow.
Traditional treatment typically does not work. There are so many other
things in this other than ‘stop drinking’ or ‘stop
using the drug.’ There’s the environment (drug-using friends
or family members); most people have legal problems, occupational
problems, lost relationships – there’s just so many other
things. It takes a lot of wrap-around services with this population.
Most folks, by the time they get to the treatment stage, have lost
everything.”
Jones said The Laurels is beginning to see more clients who need meth
addiction services. When they arrive, he said, they are exhausted
and “very malnourished” with a “sunken face, black
rings around the eyes. … Usually they come into our place, [and
the] first three days, we don’t see them. They just go get their
meds and go back to bed, wrung out. Just completely wrung out.”
He said addicts spend about a week before they can tolerate a regular
schedule of nutritious meals. “It takes them a while to get
their stomach back,” he said.
“Our goal is to keep them alive until they’re ready to
change their lives,” Sheets said. “It all depends on what
people do when they leave here.”
Jones said he sometimes tells people,
“Recovery is simple. All you’ve got to do is change everything.”
While his statement may appear to oversimplify the problem, he said,
by no means is it an exaggeration.
“[Drug addiction is] the first thing you do in the morning and
the last thing you do at night, 24-seven, all day long,” he
said. “That becomes your life. That’s it. Nothing else.
The day in the life of an alcoholic or drug addict … consists
of getting high, acting like you’re not, and getting high again.
That’s just a day in the life.”
Once a person succumbs to addiction, he said, “[You are] trying
to find who you’ve got to get money off of, who you’ve
conned, who you can manipulate, who you’ve got to get away from,
who you ripped off last night, who ripped you off, and all this other
stuff that’s going on. … [The addict thought process deteriorates
to] ‘I’ve got to stay away from my mom, I can stay over
here, I know some furniture we can steal’ – then it gets
really sad. It’s unfortunate to see people get caught up in
that stuff. That’s what they do every day, all day long.”
When addicts enter treatment, Jones said, “Their families are
alienated, they’ve got legal stuff hanging over their head,
their kids are taken out of the whole picture, abusive relationships
– whatever. They come here and the first thing we have to do
is get them to stay here long enough to get them detoxed and thinking
a little bit. …
They’ve got such a good defense system set up, all this denial.”
He said addicts tell themselves, “It’s not that bad. I
can quit any time I want to. I just don’t want to quit.”
But the truth about addiction is obvious, he said. “People come
to treatment when everything goes wrong. Nobody ever comes to a place
like this when things are going good.”
Most of the people who enter addiction treatment, Jones said, still
carry beliefs that sabotage recovery. He said they often believe they
can still find a way to use the drug and function. As soon as they
begin feeling better, they minimize the problem, telling themselves
and counselors, “It’s not that bad.” Many have unrealistic
expectations that they can “just go home and everything will
be fine,” and that all the problems associated with addiction
will magically disappear.
Instead, treatment begins with 10 to 14 days of inpatient withdrawal,
then addicts can begin attending outpatient counseling. During the
first few days, Jones said, counselors work to establish the idea,
“Let’s try to make a safe, sane, reasonable thing you
can do to get better. Stay away from people who use drugs. We sit
and rehearse what you’re going to say when you see these people
on the street.”
With meth, often the first thing a female addict must accomplish is
“telling [her] boyfriend not to come around anymore,”
Jones said, because their partners may be the drug sources.
“We try to get them into NA and AA Meetings, we try to get them
where sober people, or recovering people, are going to be,”
he said. “It’s a problem in small communities [because]
everybody knows you use drugs. So you’re going to have to go
right back out and face these people.”
Establishing new habits, a new environment with new friends can be
a huge undertaking, Jones said. “You kind of climb out of the
nest like a bird,” breaking off drug-oriented relationships
and starting fresh.
Once a person finishes the first week or two of initial withdrawal
and sets up support services within his or her community, someone
like Kris Payne can begin providing counseling. He said most of his
new clients are referrals from probation officers who must secure
substance abuse treatment for people convicted of drug-related crimes.
“We found, over the years, that group therapy is the best way
to treat addicts and alcoholics,” said Payne, who has 22 years
of experience in the field. “If you were my therapist and I
saw you once a month, or once a week, I could show up at your office,
look good, talk good, sound good, smell good, give you a story a mile
long, tell you: ‘Man, I’m doing great! I’m sick
and tired of being sick and tired! I don’t drink and drug anymore,
I’m working every day.’ And I could walk out of your office,
jump in my car, roll up a joint and fire it up, and you’d never
know the difference. I can’t come in here with a group of my
peers and pull that off. Because somebody’s going to call me
to task on it. Because I’m going to see it. Because we’re
both addicts.”
Payne said group therapy offers positive peer pressure, especially
when “some folks get irate when they find out someone’s
been showing up high. It’s like it’s a violation. It’s
like, ‘Here I am putting out all this effort and you’re
just skirting in here and you’re not taking it serious!’”
The paranoia meth can generate in users creates yet another hurdle
for the group therapy process. Payne said every alcoholic and addict
shares a common concern: “Who’s going to know about this?”
For meth users, the worry can be even more prominent.
“One of the group rules is anonymity,” he said. “What’s
said here, stays here. Who you see here, stays here.”
Meth has pushed the substance abuse treatment industry to find new
ways to address addiction. The collapse of the 28-day model and the
reluctance of health insurance providers to cover sufficient treatment
for meth addiction are tough enough to handle. But medical researchers
have begun questioning whether meth causes permanent damage to the
human body.
“Methamphetamine causes increased heart rate and blood pressure
and can cause irreversible damage to blood vessels in the brain, producing
strokes,” according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
“Other effects of methamphetamine include respiratory problems,
irregular heartbeat, and extreme anorexia. Its use can result in cardiovascular
collapse and death. … Animal research going back more than 20
years shows that high doses of methamphetamine damage neuron cell-endings.
Dopamine- and serotonin-containing neurons do not die after methamphetamine
use, but their nerve endings ‘terminals’) are cut back
and re-growth appears to be limited.”
“Psychotic symptoms may sometimes persist for months or years
after use has ceased,” according to the meth treatment protocol.
“Some of the most frightening research findings about MA [methamphetamine]
suggest that its prolonged use not only modifies behaviors, but literally
changes the brain in fundamental and long-lasting ways.
Animal studies have shown that chronic use of MA can significantly
reduce brain dopamine levels for up to [six] months after last use,
with less significant reductions persisting for up to [four] years.
… There is some speculation that some types of damage may be
permanent. Finally, these impairments may underlie the cognitive (thinking)
and emotional deficits seen in many MA users. … One of the outcomes
of chronic MA use is psychosis.”
Payne said traditional treatment does not work very well with meth
addicts because the drug affects all the senses. “We’re
finding that, in treatment, you almost have to include all the senses
in your treatment process, too,” he said.
After relying on meth to trigger dopamine release in the brain, users
have stopped experiencing pleasure in natural ways. He said therapy
must include re-learning how to experience life with enjoyment.
“Music and art therapy are very effective,” he said. “Progressive
relaxation, where you’re involving all of the senses”
also works for some clients.
“You’ve got to somehow experience it. It can’t be
a spectator thing.”
According to the TIP, effective meth treatment must include the development
of new activities for the former user.
“Many stimulant users have spent a good portion of the years
leading up to treatment entry with their lives revolving around substance
use,” the treatment protocol says. “Frequently, during
the initial [six] to 12 months of abstinence they have little idea
what to do with their lives. In particular, they often have very poor
social and recreational behavior repertories. The creation of new,
positively reinforcing activities and interests is an important part
of this period of treatment.”
Jones said a person’s quality of life after addiction depends
on “how much energy and effort they put into the recovery process.
One of the things you’ll see when they get out: If it’s
not the drug, it’s going to be work, food, gambling or sex.
It’s going to be one of those things replacing [drug addiction],
usually. They’ll overcompensate and work all the time instead
of balancing [different parts of their lives]. We talk about some
balance – so much work, so much rest, and so much play.
“We’ll see some who go out and work for six months, nine
months, even a year, just work, work, work,” he said. “Then
they’ll hit a point where they’ll say, ‘Oh, I’m
exhausted.’ Then you’re a prime candidate for relapse
because what you’ve done is keep yourself busy, tried to stay
ahead of it. And you’re gaining money and feeling good about
yourself, but then you ask, ‘Is this all there is to life?’
You get paid on Friday and you see your buddies, you have a pocketful
of money …. Some people get out and they just want to work,
but that’s not it. It’s part of the solution, but it’s
not the whole solution.”
Like anyone recovering from a health crisis, addicts complain, Jones
said. The most common complaints, he said, are:
“I’m bored.” -“It’s too hard.”
- “It’s not exciting.” - “It takes all the
fun out of life.”
But Jones responds by saying, “You’ll have to work as
hard at staying straight as you did at getting high
Meth’s dirty little secret
“It’s the sleeping tiger. ... that tiger’s clawing
at your back.”
– meth user
Police officers know it, but hesitate to say it publicly: many
people begin using methamphetamine because they like what it does
to their sexuality.
“Women follow meth,” a local police officer admitted,
asking to keep his name private.
Earlier this month, a public official called meth an aphrodisiac.
At a Chattanooga meeting of a Tennessee drug task force, Assistant
U.S. Attorney Paul Laymon said people are drawn to the drug because
it causes weight loss and boosts sex drive.
Smyth County resident John Smyth (not his real name) agreed to talk
about the experience of using methamphetamine, under condition of
anonymity.
“I’ve been dry three weeks,” he said during the
interview. The last time he used meth, he said, “I didn’t
sleep for 10 days.”
The impact upon a user’s sex drive during the early stages of
use, Smyth said, is nearly impossible to describe. Because methamphetamine
is a powerful stimulant, it keeps the user awake. The sexual arousal
can last for a day or two at a time.
“A man can go eight hours without [climaxing],” Smyth
said. “But she will. Oh, boy, will she! It turns her sex drive
into maximum overdrive. … If you start messing around [foreplay]
when you first take it, it’s [prolonged intercourse] for hours.”
Doctors familiar with meth’s effects have said intravenous (IV)
users are more likely to experience the unmatched sexual high, but
all users are subject to it. Female users may experience overpowering
orgasms lasting 30 minutes or more. Meth works by creating extreme
feelings of pleasure and power by releasing the brain’s neurological
pleasure transmitters. The process exacts a high price, however. After
meth uses chemicals to artificially rob dopamine from the brain’s
supply, the user ends up unable to experience
pleasure.
“If you’ve been on [meth] for days, [the human sexual
response] won’t work,” Smyth said. “It’s just
limp. You could [stimulate the genitals] until you get blisters and
it won’t do anything.”
According to the Crystal Meth Recovery Treatment Improvement Protocol
(TIP), “Some clients with stimulant use disorders develop significant
stimulant-induced compulsive sexual behaviors. These can include compulsive
masturbation, compulsive or impulsive sex with prostitutes, and compulsive
pornographic viewing.”
Treating compulsive sexual behaviors, the TIP says, “involves
asking clients to agree to a temporary sex abstinence plan for [two
to four] weeks. Next, clients should be made aware that sexual feelings,
thoughts, and fantasies are conceptualized as very high-risk triggers
that will be acted out if they are not talked out. For people who
have this problem, even normal, routine sexual thoughts and contacts
can quickly become major triggers.
Also, clients should be educated about reciprocal relapse, in which
one compulsive behavior is inextricably involved with another, and
therefore, engaging in the behaviors associated with one condition
can cause one to act out behaviors associated with the other condition.”
Withdrawal from meth is unlike withdrawal from opiates, alcohol and
other pain-dulling substances, the TIP says. Coming down from meth
usually involves sleeping for several days.
“For stimulant users, the trick is not in stopping, but in staying
off, or avoiding relapse,” the treatment protocol says.
“Clinical observations show that there are significant biological
and psychological symptoms that continue to hamper the functioning
of stimulant users 90 to 120 days after discontinuation of substance
use. The symptoms described include … difficulty concentrating,
anhedonia (inability to experience pleasure), lack of energy, short-term
memory disturbance, and irritability.”
“It’s the sleeping tiger,” John Smyth said. “You
can put it down, but if someone cuts a line out in front of you, that
tiger’s clawing at your back. … I’ve done it; I’ve
put it down.”
Once the user begins taking meth again, Smyth said, “You can’t
sleep. If you lay down, all you do is listen to your heart beat and
stare at the ceiling. Then the next night you lay down and listen
to your heart beat and stare at the cracks in the ceiling again.”
When the drug finally begins wearing off, he said.
“Then you sleep 14 hours, and when you get up tired, the first
thing you think about is getting through the day, so you think, ‘Take
some more.’”
At first, the user enjoys the high, he said. But days of sleeplessness
combined with frenetic energy can lead to hallucinations. The hallucinations
begin mildly, he said.
“It’s like you see something out of the corner of your
eye,” he said, and turn your head to see it more clearly, but
can’t quite catch it. “When you’re on [meth], you’re
not in your right mind.”
Within six months of the first dose, most meth users are firmly hooked,
according to several substance abuse counselors. In fact, most are
hooked within a month or two of taking that first experimental hit.
At that point, Smyth said, “You sell things, decide what you
can sell and what you want to keep just to get 50 bucks to get the
stuff. … Everything needed to make it is legal.
You can make it in your kitchen. You don’t have to depend on
Columbians to bring it across the border.”
He said the ease of manufacturing meth has let illegal drug users
become their own suppliers in numbers lawmakers never imagined possible
before meth labs became almost commonplace in Southwest Virginia.
“[Police] haven’t found 10 percent of them yet,”
he said. “Some are just small, making it for personal use, but
a few are making a lot of it to sell.” He said fighting meth
is an uphill battle for law enforcement because Internet access has
put drug recipes and other subversive materials into the hands of
“anyone who knows how to surf the net. … But I could build
a bomb from stuff I could get from Wal-Mart that’d blow half
of Marion up. There’s always going to be a way to make it. I
mean, think about [convicted domestic terrorist Timothy] McVey. What
did he use? Fertilizer.”
lprescot@wythenews.com | 276-783-5121
STARS BACK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WEBSITE FOR CHILDREN
BYLINE: David Barrett, PA Home Affairs Correspondent (UK)
Pop Idol Will Young will launch the first national domestic violence
website for children today.
The singer is backing the project - called The Hideout - which helps
children spot if domestic violence is taking place in their own home
and offers advice.
It also aims to help youngsters who have been victims of domestic
violence themselves, whether at home or by boyfriends or girlfriends.
Developed by domestic violence charity Women's Aid, the website has
special security features so young people can read it more safely
at home.
There is a "panic button" which instantly switches the computer's
web browser to another site - such as the BBC's CBeebies or MTV.com
- if youngsters are disturbed while looking at The Hideout.
The site also explains how they can delete the history of visited
pages on their browser, in case an abusive relative tries to follow
their tracks.
Will, who works as an ambassador for the Women's Aid charity, said:
"Violence needs to stop.
"All of us - men and women - need to speak up and teach our children
that violence is never the solution.
"Together we can all make a difference."
The launch was also backed by celebrity chef and Hell's Kitchen star
Gordon Ramsay, whose mother Helen became a victim of domestic violence
at the hands of his late father.
"It is shocking that so many children still live in fear as a
result of violence in the home, and don't know who to turn to for
support," he said.
"As a child survivor of domestic violence I can remember the
fear and isolation.
"I am delighted to support The Hideout. I know it could have
made a real difference to me and will provide great comfort and support
to thousands of children."
The website, which is supported by BT and Children in Need, has also
been backed by Cold Feet star Fay Ripley, author of the Tracey Beaker
children's stories Jacqueline Wilson, singer Beverley Knight and TV
presenters June Sarpong and Fearne Cotton.
Research published last month revealed nearly one in five teenage
girls had been hit by a boyfriend and a third had experienced domestic
abuse at home.
The survey of 2,000 girls with an average age of 15 by Sugar magazine
and the NSPCC also found more than 40% said they would "consider
giving a boy a second chance" if he hit them.
Women's Aid chief executive Nicola Harwin said: "Last year over
20,000 children stayed in refuges in England and we know that many
more live with the daily fear of domestic violence.
"Children and young people can be enormously affected by domestic
violence, whether as witnesses of violence in the home, direct abuse
from a parent or in their very first relationships.
Children and young people often feel powerless or guilty at being
unable to stop domestic violence and The Hideout will play a vital
role in providing information and helping them find the support that
they desperately need."
The website is at www.thehideout.org.uk.
Pregnant Drug Users Face Sanctions Under Ark. Bill
From Join Together Online-February 15, 2005
A bill under consideration in the Arkansas legislature would require
doctors to report mothers who give birth to drug-addicted babies as
neglect cases, the Arkansas News reported Feb. 15.
The Senate Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee this week approved
the measure introduced by Sen. Tim Wooldridge (D-Paragould) after
hearing testimony both for and against the bill. Supporters claimed
that illicit-drug users are more likely to abuse their children than
individuals who use alcohol or tobacco at home.
A woman with two grandchildren born addicted to drugs spoke in favor
of the legislation. "This is not about revenge," said Betty
Stahl. "This is about other babies who are out there."
But David Deere of the Pulaski County Community Action Group said,
"My heart wants to support this bill. My head says we have to
be careful about the unintended consequences." Deere said the
fear of neglect charges might frighten addicted mothers away from
seeking health care.
"You're giving them the alternative to either stop using drugs
or stop going to get health care," said Rita Sklar of the Arkansas
chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. "Do we really
want babies born in homes, alleys and hotel rooms?"
The bill passed and has become law. Editor
Meth labs are risk to child advocates
Aiken, S.C. - Gas cans with hoses. Shredded lithium batteries. Mason
jars filled with thousands of cold tablets. They are a few telltale
signs of clandestine methamphetamine labs.
Michelle Prince knows that because she has seen it firsthand.
Mrs. Prince, a child protective service worker for Aiken County's
Department of Social Services, removed children from two Aiken County
households this year after authorities discovered their parents cooking
meth.
Unlike Mrs. Prince, many social service workers don't know how to
identify meth labs because they've never been trained to.
Michael Miller, the director of Anderson-Oconee's Regional Forensics
Laboratory, is working to change that.
On Wednesday afternoon, he was in Aiken training social workers from
around the region to identify home-based meth-manufacturing operations.
The number of workshops he conducts is growing, as is South Carolina's
methamphetamine epidemic. Authorities raided 254 meth labs in South
Carolina last year, up from six in 2000.
Many of those drug labs were operating within reach of children who
were malnourished, physically abused or exposed to toxic meth ingredients,
he said.
"Momma's cooking meth under the baby's crib, and they're even
using the baby's bottle to cook the meth." he said. "(The
children) also have the mental abuse from living in an area where
there is no love."
The purpose of Mr. Miller's workshops is twofold. While he wants to
see children rescued from meth homes, he also hopes the education
will prevent social workers from putting themselves at risk.
"When you're walking up to a house with one of these meth labs,
the first breath you take could kill you," he said. "Don't
become a victim due to your curiosity."
Social workers also may be endangered by meth addicts who are paranoid
and delusional under the influence of the drug.
"It sets off unprovoked violence," he said. "You knock
on the door and say hello, and they're looking for a baseball bat
to take your head off with."
OPA Produces FIPV Resource Guide
The CDC estimates almost 5.3 million intimate partner victimizations
occurs each year among U.S. women aged 18 and over. In 2000, the Office
of Population Affairs (OPA) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control
(CDC) in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) began
a collaboration to address family and intimate partner violence (FIPV)
through Title X family planning clinics. Providing reproductive health
services to almost 5 million women each year (many of whom because
of age and economic status are at greater risk of victimization),
Title X clinics could play a key role in identifying and assisting
victims of FIPV.
Based on advisory panel recommendations, OPA compiled a resource guide
of materials and training information on FIPV for Title X grantees,
delegates, and clinics. The guide was designed to support a multi-faceted
approach to FIPV, including staff education and training, clinic protocols
and policies, screening and response strategies, clinic environment,
and referral.
Developed to meet the reader's individualized needs, each section
includes a key that outlines the specific materials and tools contained
in the chapter, allowing tools to be selected according to current
needs.
John Snow Inc. (JSI) produced the guide under a grant from OPA and
pro- vided copies to all Title X grantees as well as the Title X regional
offices. A limited number of copies may be available from the Region
VI Office of the Regional Health Administrator/Office of Family Planning.
Interested parties can also request a copy from Reesa Webb (rwebb@jsi.com)
at JSI Research and Training Institute, Inc., 1860 Blake Street, Suite
320, Denver, CO 80202, 303-262-4313.
Liese Sherwood-Fabre, PhD
Public Health Advisor
Office of Family Planning, Region VI
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Dallas, TX 75202
Indiana Child Protective Services to Screen for Addiction
From Join Together Online—1/14/2005
On January 1, case managers with the Indiana Child Protective Services
started screening children at risk for addiction or mental health
problems, Tri-State Media reported on January 5.
The Indiana Family and Social Services Administration expanded a nine-county
pilot project to all 92 counties. Case managers were trained to recognize
behavioral health and addiction risk factors in youth and are partnered
with local agencies to coordinate assessment and treatment. They will
screen children who are in foster care or identified as children in
need of services.
"This early screening, assessment, and treatment initiative supports
our goal of protecting the welfare of all Indiana children and facilitating
positive social outcomes for them and their families," said Jane
Bisbee, Deputy Director of FSSA's Division of Family and Children,
Bureau of Family Protection and Preservation.
The program will be monitored by CPS and evaluated by Indiana University's
Department of Sociology. For more information, visit Indiana Family
and Social Services Administration at: www.IN.gov/fssa.
Online tool helps women assess domestic-violence risk
By Jan Jarvis-Ft. Worth Star Telegram, Ft. Worth, Texas -March
29, 2005
Many of the more than 1,200 women who are killed by their intimate
partners each year are unaware that their lives are in danger.
Based on information from people who knew the victims, only 47 percent
of women accurately predicted their risk, according to Dr. Jacquelyn
Campbell, associate dean of the Johns Hopkins University School of
Nursing.
But a newly revised online tool can help women measure their domestic-abuse
risks. Campbell created the system in 1986 to help law enforcement,
health care professionals and others identify women who are in the
most danger. She recently updated it to include new research.
The online tool gives women a calendar and asks them to mark the days
when they are physically abused. The women are also asked to rank
the severity of each incident. Next, a series of questions helps women
identify danger in the relationship. Women are asked, for example,
if the man owns a gun.
Women are encouraged to take the test results to a nurse, counselor
or victim-abuse expert. The results are best interpreted by someone
who is certified to use the system. But the questions can help women
better understand their risks.
You can download the free measurement tool by going to www.dangerassessment.org.
If you feel you're in danger, you can also call the National Domestic
Violence Hotline at (800) 799-7233 or go to www.ndvh.org to find a
shelter.
Study links childhood stress and health
Ann Arbor, Mich., March 8, 2005
A Michigan study finds children who suffer post-traumatic stress
disorder after exposure to violence are more likely to have other
health problems.
Two researchers from the University of Michigan interviewed the mothers
and teachers of 160 children in Head Start programs.
They found 65 percent of the children had been exposed to violence
in the community and 47 percent within their family.
Most of the children who had witnessed at least one violent incident
were found to have likely shown signs of trauma, such as bed-wetting
and thumb-sucking, while 20 percent appeared to be at risk of PTSD.
The study found children with stress reactions were more likely to
suffer asthma, allergies or attention deficit disorder.
Researchers Sandra Graham-Bermann and Julia Seng say it is not clear
whether PTSD causes health problems or vice versa. But they suggest
helping low-income mothers protect their children and early treatment
for children with stress disorders is likely to improve their physical
health.
The study was published in the March issue of the Journal of Pediatrics.
AS TEEN PREGNANCY DROPPED, SO DID CHILD POVERTY
Study Looks At Decline Over 10-Year Period
By Ceci Connolly-Washington Post Staff Writer-April 14, 2005
A decade of declining teenage birth rates has led to a notable reduction
in the number of U.S. children living in poverty, according to a new
analysis.
Building on research by two congressional committees, the National
Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy released a state-by-state report
this week identifying how many more children would be living in poverty
or growing up in a household with one parent in 2002 if the teenage
pregnancy rate had remained at 1991 levels.
Nationally, the teenage birth rate fell 30 percent from 1991 to 2002,
the most recent year for which such statistics are available.
If the rate had not dropped during the decade, 1.2 million more children
would have been born to teenage mothers in the United States. Of those,
460,000 would have been living in poverty and 700,000 would have grown
up in a single-parent household, according to the analysis. The federal
poverty level in 2002 was a $14,494 gross annual income for a parent
and two children.
“The data show the power of prevention and how prevention can
make a measurable contribution to reducing poverty in children,”
said Sarah S. Brown, director of the campaign, a nonpartisan, nonprofit
research organization.
But at least one advocacy group cautioned that it may be an oversimplification
to credit the decline in teenage pregnancy for improvements in poverty
levels.
“During the economic boom of the 1990s, there was more opportunity
for teens and others to improve their economic situation through employment,”
said Deborah Cutler-Ortiz, director of the family income division
at the Children’s Defense Fund. Additionally, government initiatives
such as job training, tax credits and health care helped lift some
families out of poverty during the period, she said.
Researchers at the teenage pregnancy group agreed that many factors
contribute to poverty rates, saying their study was intended only
to compute the numbers of poor youngsters who would have been born
if pregnancy rates had not decreased.
“People love to argue about how to prevent teen pregnancy, but
sometimes we fail to shine enough light on the basic problem,”
Brown said. “Teen pregnancy is a major contributor to poverty,
single parenthood, and limited futures for adolescents and their children.”
Not every teenage mother is poor, “but bearing a child as a
teenager increases the chances of a mother and child living in poverty,”
she said.
Adolescents who become pregnant are more likely to drop out of school,
which in turn leads to lower-paying jobs. And often young mothers
are less likely to marry, which means their children are raised in
a home with one income. All those factors mean teenage mothers and
their infants are “not finding a way out from what is often
a low-income community to begin with,” she said.
Locally, the positive impact was seen most dramatically in the District.
Were it not for the 10-year reduction in teenage birth rates, the
number of children living in poverty in the city would have been 21
percent higher than it was in 2002. In Maryland, the poverty rate
for children would have been nearly 13 percent higher, and in Virginia
it would have been about 8 percent higher.
Despite the encouraging developments, Brown and Cutler-Ortiz warned
that the nation still faces enormous challenges. “Even with
all these declines — in every single state — the U.S.
still has the highest teen pregnancy rates in the fully developed
world,” Brown said. One in three American women conceives by
the time she is 20.
And although pregnancy data were available only through 2002, Cutler-Ortiz
noted that poverty rates have been increasing since 2000, raising
concern the improvements may be short-lived.
Attorney General Abbott Applauds Protective Order Kit for Domestic
Violence Victims
Step-by-step materials improve access to legal services for crime
victims News release April 12, 2005
Austin—Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott today joined First
Lady Anita Perry, Texas Supreme Court Justice Harriet O’Neill
and the Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation in unveiling a new
kit that will enable victims of domestic violence to better access
the court system by filing their own applications for protective orders.
The self-help protective order kit, created by a Texas Supreme Court
task force, was announced today as part of National Crime Victims’
Rights Week, which is observed April 10-16. The kit will make it possible
for victims to better access the legal system so they can protect
themselves and their children, including compelling the abuser to
leave the home, if necessary.
"Domestic violence has reached alarming levels in Texas, and
often victims are too frightened or too financially strapped to get
the help they need,” Attorney General Abbott said. “This
kit addresses both of those problems by empowering victims to file
their own court papers and get out of danger as quickly as possible.”
The free, step-by-step protective order kit comes with detailed instructions
for filling out the paperwork, having a temporary order signed by
a judge and requesting a hearing date to grant the protective order.
The kit also provides tips for victims on how to prepare for the hearing.
The protective order kit can be accessed at the Attorney General’s
Web site (www.oag.state.tx.us). Materials will also be available through
law enforcement agencies, domestic violence shelters and hospital
emergency rooms.
At a news conference to announce the kits, Attorney General Abbott
and the other participants were joined by Thomasina Olaniyi-Oke, a
survivor of domestic violence. Her husband physically abused her often
during their 13-year marriage. Ms. Olaniyi-Oke obtained a temporary
protective order against her husband, but after the order expired
he started harassing her again.
“I was so frustrated after the temporary order lapsed,”
she said. “I didn’t know what to do.”
Finally, with the help of Legal Aid services Ms. Olaniyi-Oke was able
to obtain a permanent protective order against her husband. She said
if the protective order kit had been available when she was being
abused, she would have used it.
“If I had had more information, I would have filed for a permanent
protective order myself,” she said.
The Attorney General’s Crime Victim Services Division serves
victims of crime by administering the Crime Victims’ Compensation
Fund and related grants, as well as offering training and outreach
programs.
Last year, the Attorney General provided almost $73 million from the
Fund to help many of these victims shoulder medical and other expenses
related to the crimes committed against them.
The Attorney General also provides $2.5 million annually to the Texas
Equal Access to Justice Foundation to help provide civil legal aid
to victims of crime.
More than 185,000 incidents of domestic violence were reported in
Texas in 2003.
More information about the Attorney General’s Crime Victim Services
Division is available at the Attorney General’s Web site: www.oag.state.tx.us.
Abortion and Domestic Violence Closely Linked Canadian Study Shows
Same study also reveals contraceptive mentality contributes to abortion
rates - LifeSiteNews.com
LONDON, March 21, 2005 - A new survey by researchers from the University
of Western Ontario, the London (Ontario) Health Sciences Centre and
the University of Colorado have again shown a link between abortion
and domestic violence. The new research coincides with findings from
the US and Britain that have consistently shown a strong correlation
between violence and abortion and between the use of contraceptives
and repeat abortion.
1127 women completed a 65-item questionnaire at a hospital abortion
facility in London, Ontario. The results showed that overall 20% had
experienced physical abuse by a male partner, and 27% had a history
of sexual abuse.
Similar research in the US has shown that 31% of women seeking an
abortion have experienced physical or sexual abuse at some time in
their lives and, of these, more than half have witnessed domestic
violence as children. The British study showed that the risk of domestic
violence more than doubled during pregnancy. The authors of the Canadian
research suggest that a motive for some women who abort in a situation
of violence do so out of a misguided desire to protect future children
from living in the disrupted or violent environments that they themselves
face.
The study also revealed that a significant percentage of the women
who were seeking second or repeated abortions were using artificial
contraception at the time they became pregnant. 90% of women seeking
repeat abortions had used contraception sometime in their lives and
at the time of the current conception 60% were using condoms and 40%
were using an oral contraceptive.
Pro-life activists have for many years pointed out the danger of widespread
chemical contraceptive use and its relation to high incidences of
abortion. Their argument is that a woman engaging in sexual relations
and using the pill is more disposed to using abortion as a 'back-up'
form of birth control should it fail.
The British survey cited above also found that despite the high incidence
of abuse only 2% of the women seeking abortion were pregnant as a
result of rape. This is despite the fact that the so-called 'rape
exception' is often cited as a justification for legal abortion-on-demand.
The effect of the widespread use of contraception in creating what
is called the 'contraceptive mentality' and the evidence that such
a mentality leads to abortion has been documented more than once by
the medical community.
Read the article from the Canadian Medical Association Journal:
http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/172/5/653?etoc
Substance Abuse Voucher Program Opens Doors to Faith-Based Providers
Publisher: The Roundtable on Religion and Social Welfare Policy—By:
Claire Hughes, Roundtable Correspondent– March 29, 2005
With $100 million in federal funding, several states and a tribal
organization have begun implementing President Bush's plan to let
drug addicts use public dollars to seek treatment from a variety of
sources, including religious organizations.
In all, 14 states and the California Rural Indian Health Board have
received a total of $100 million in federal funding to implement the
Access to Recovery program, which allows people to use government
vouchers to seek treatment for substance abuse. Treatment providers
range from those in clinical settings with a purely medical perspective,
to faith-based organizations that consider religious conversion part
of the cure for addiction.
The program was first announced by President Bush in his 2003 State
of the Union address, and he has proposed increasing funding for the
program by $50 million next year to expand the program to seven additional
states or tribal organizations.
In mid-December, Wisconsin became the first state to launch the new
federal program. However, the concept is not entirely new there. For
a decade, people seeking treatment for substance abuse in Milwaukee
have been able to use public vouchers to pay for services through
a state-sponsored program.
Like the federal program, it has also allowed clients to choose among
an array of providers -- including large, faith-based organizations
(FBOs) like Lutheran Social Services and Catholic Social Services.
But state officials in charge of the program said those large, long-standing
FBOs -- which provide substance abuse treatment in a largely secular
environment -- weren't meeting the needs of everyone in the city who
needed service. So the state applied for, and received, a federal
grant to expand its offerings to a wider variety of groups, including
smaller churches and church-affiliated organizations that wanted to
provide support services for people seeking substance abuse treatment.
"In the past, the choices were limited," said John Easterday,
Wisconsin's associate administrator for Mental Health and Substance
Abuse Services, and the Access to Recovery project director. He said
Wisconsin hopes to serve some 8,000 state residents over the next
three years using the $22.8 million dollar federal grant it received.
Meanwhile, Connecticut, Florida, Louisiana, New Jersey, New Mexico
and Washington have also started Access to Recovery programs. The
other eight grantees now in the process of doing so are California,
Idaho, Illinois, Missouri, Tennessee, Texas, Wyoming and the California
Rural Indian Health Board. All are expected to have their programs
up and running by May, said Stephenie Colston of the federal Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Many other states have also shown intense interest in re-applying
for the next round of grants according to Colston, who serves as the
primary adviser on the program to SAMHSA Administrator Charles Curie.
The 15 initial grantees are among 60 states and tribal organizations
that applied for the first block of funding under the Access to Recovery
program.
Among those states that were not selected in the first round of funding
was Alabama. Terri Hasdorff, executive director of the Governor's
Office of Faith-Based & Community Initiatives said the need for
Access to Recovery in Alabama is "huge" and that the state
will reapply -- especially since many faith-based organizations are
operating programs with proven success, but don't have the resources
to expand their work. She said the state itself is unable to offer
additional funding because it is operating under budget constraints.
"We're very interested in trying to go after that [funding] for
Alabama this year," Hasdorff said.
Opponents of Access to Recovery, including civil liberties groups
and some medical professionals, have raised concerns that drug rehabilitation
programs operated by religious organizations might be lacking in the
quality of their care or effectiveness. Some also object that such
programs may cross the constitutional line separating church and state.
Theresa Thompson, senior legislative analyst for Americans United
for Separation of Church and State, said she is concerned that people
seeking treatment services may not receive all the information they
need before choosing an approved service provider. She said that could
result in clients being forced to experience religious indoctrination
in order to get treatment.
"Beneficiaries should have the right to know that they have the
right not to be discriminated against, that they have the right not
to participate in religious exercises, they have the right to choose
their provider, and get their voucher back," Thompson said.
Easterday said he didn't think Thompson's concerns would be an issue
in his state.
"What they're describing as a possible problem with the program
is something we wouldn't tolerate," he said.
Treatment providers in Wisconsin, including faith-based organizations,
must meet requirements including that they refrain from proselytizing,
Easterday noted. And he added that clients can always quit the program
and use the amount remaining on their vouchers elsewhere.
Nationwide, SAMHSA requires that states and tribal organizations that
implement Access to Recovery follow strict guidelines, Colston said.
They include establishing standards that apply to both faith-based
and secular providers, and approving only providers that are qualified
to offer treatment. In addition, she stated that grantees must make
detailed quarterly reports to the federal government to ensure the
rules are being followed.
"Our standards are broad so that we can work with grantees,"
Colston said, "but they're very clear."
The President and other Bush administration officials have emphasized
that consumers will have true, independent, and genuine choice under
the program. Those points were critical elements in a U.S. Supreme
Court decision that upheld the use of publicly-funded vouchers for
private, religious schools.
"The idea in the Access to Recovery program was to direct resources
to the individual - there's some 100,000 a year who aren't able to
get help for their alcohol and drug issues - to let them make the
choice about the program that suits their needs," President Bush
told an audience at the White House Faith-Based and Community Initiatives
Leadership Conference on March 1.
"See, that's how it works. It says, we will fund you. And you
choose," the President continued. "If you think a kind of
the classical clinical approach will work for you, give it a shot.
If you think the corner synagogue will work for you - like the synagogue
I saw in Los Angeles that's saving life after life because of a belief
in the Almighty -- give it a shot. But you get to make the choice.”
Federal officials have also stressed that states and tribal organizations
will maintain flexibility in how they design and implement Access
to Recovery - including who is eligible for the vouchers, and whether
a public or private agency operates the programs in partnership with
the state. In Louisiana, the program will focus on women with dependent
children, while in Texas it will be on drug offenders. Meanwhile,
the California Rural Indian Health Board will include traditional
native spiritual services among its Access to Recovery treatment choices.
All states will be required to provide the federal government with
data on their results, SAMHSA Administrator Charles Curie told White
House Faith-Based and Community Initiatives Leadership Conference
attendees. States are to use seven outcome measures to assess effectiveness,
rather than reporting the numbers of people that have been helped
or cured, as in the past, Curie said. Those measures include abstinence,
access to services, retention of service, sustaining treatment, education,
employment, crime reduction, housing and community connectiveness.
Attempting to meet the performance tracking requirements of the federal
grant has been the biggest challenge in implementing Access to Recovery,
Wisconsin officials said. They cited technological hurdles, as well
as the fact that the federal government continues to change what data
it wants and how it wants it.
"It's still a challenge for us," Easterday said. "And
for other states that never had it (a voucher program), it's huge."
President Bush has also indicated he wants to expand the use of vouchers
in the future for services other than just substance abuse treatment.
"What I want to do is apply this concept of individual choice
beyond just the alcohol and drug rehabilitation programs - such as
mentoring programs, or housing counseling, or ... transitional housing
programs or after-school programs or homeless services," President
Bush said at the White House Faith-Based and Community Initiatives
Leadership Conference earlier this month.
"And so I've asked the Cabinet officers and their Faith-Based
and Community Offices to come up with ways to expand individual choice
into how their departments can implement this philosophy," he
said.
Roundtable Washington Correspondent Anne Farris contributed to this
report.
SNAPSHOTS FROM THE FRONT LINES
From the Spring 2005 newsletter of The National Campaign to Prevent
Teen Pregnancy
There is lots of exciting teen pregnancy prevention work going on
around the country. Here we highlight just a few examples of new resources
and initiatives.
The Louisiana State Department of Education used TANF funds to begin
a $6.5 million teen pregnancy prevention program in 2003 and awarded
performance-based contracts to over 30 organizations serving more
than 17,000 teens statewide. A recent evaluation report contains interesting
data on the characteristics, attitudes, and experiences of program
participants. The report also contains needs assessment results from
program administrators and teen pregnancy program information. Evaluation
of the State of Louisiana TANF Initiatives Teen Prevention Program
was written by Berkeley Policy Associates for the Louisiana Department
of Education and is available online at http://www.berkeleypolicyassociates.com.
New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson has proposed doubling the number
of school-based health care centers from 34 sites to 68 throughout
the state. These centers will provide services to prevent teen pregnancy
in addition to screenings and treatment for substance abuse, depression
and risk of suicide, diabetes, obesity, asthma, and immunization services.
Some centers may provide services and education for parents. Find
out more at http://www.governor.state.nm.us/press2004/dec/120904_1.pdf.
The United Way of Central Oklahoma has a new research brief on older
teens and teen pregnancy. The six page fact sheet reviews the negative
consequences of teenage childbearing, presenting data on health, poverty,
education, and local teen births, as well as information on current
programs in the state. The brief makes a strong case for focusing
energy and resources on 18-19 year-olds in order to make additional
progress in reducing teen pregnancy rates. The research brief is available
online at http://www.unitedwayokc.org/RESEARCH/research_briefs.htm.
The South Carolina Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy conducted a
poll of registered voters asking their opinions about sex education
and program messages. The report, South Carolina Speaks 2004, is available
online at http://www.teenpregnancysc.org/pdf/SC_Speaks.pdg.
If you have news on teen pregnancy prevention that you would like
to share with the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, please
contact Kristen Tertzakian at 202-478-8556 or ktertzakian@teenpregnancy.org.
Mental Health Patients To Be Treated For Substance Abuse
By TEDDYE SNELL, Press Staff Writer –Tahlequah Daily Press,
Talequah, Ok.– May 26, 2005
Tahlequah area mental health and substance abuse providers may be
well on their way to offering a better form of treatment to their
clients.
Staff from Bill Willis Community Mental Health and Substance Abuse
Center in Tahlequah attended a workshop Tuesday on the topic of co-occurring
disorders, which involves people who suffer from both mental health
and substance abuse problems.
The full-day workshop featured two nationally recognized speakers,
Dr. Christie Cline and Dr. Kenneth Minkoff, as well as Oklahoma Department
of Mental Health Services and Substance Abuse Services co-occurring
Program Specialist L.D. Barney. Barney was enthused about the implementation
of the grant program in Oklahoma.
"I think we're doing some innovative things with the grant,"
said Barney. "The model services the infrastructure already in
place in Oklahoma. We're not adding new programs on top of old programs;
we're improving the programs already in place, using the personnel
already working within the system."
The five-year grant totaled a little more than $3 million, and services
three sites in Oklahoma.
"The first year of the grant is being used to kick off the program
in Norman, which has six service centers," said Barney. "The
second year, we will implement the program in Tulsa, which includes
five agencies, followed by the third year in which northeast, rural
Oklahoma areas based in Vinita will begin service."
Barney said the training was being conducted in advance to prepare
each area for implementation.
"I encourage everyone attending the training today to begin integrating
this model into their normal practices immediately," said Barney.
"Once the grant funding becomes available in this area, providers
will already have a solid background in the program."
Minkoff is a board-certified addiction psychiatrist who has provided
teaching, training, program development, clinical treatment and system
consultation in the area of co-occurring disorders since the mid-1980s.
He has experience in both the public and private sectors, and inpatient,
residential, intensive outpatient and outpatient treatment, with all
types of people - both adults and adolescents - with co-occurring
disorders.
"The Comprehensive, Continuous, Integrated System of Care model
for organizing services for people with co-occurring psychiatric and
substance disorders is designed to improve treatment in systems of
any size and complexity, ranging from entire states, to regions or
counties, networks of agencies, individual complex agencies or even
programs within agencies," said Minkoff. "What we're trying
to do with the CCISC model is, quite simply, change the world."
The model includes four basic characteristics: system level change,
efficient use of existing resources, incorporation of best practices
and an integrated treatment philosophy.
According to Minkoff, dual diagnosis within care agencies should be
an expectation, not an exception.
"People with co-occurring psychiatric and substance abuse disorders
are frequently treated in both substance abuse and mental health service
systems, and are associated with poorer outcomes and higher costs
in number of treatment situations," said Minkoff. "These
individuals have historically been poorly served in both systems,
both because of a lack of information on effective treatment programs
and because of significant systemic barriers in both systems. These
system barriers are alarming in that these individuals - in spite
of poor outcomes and high costs - are not only not prioritized and
specifically welcomed, they are treated as misfits at every level
in terms of regulations, information systems, funding mechanisms and
clinical credentialing and certification. Which is why we're here
today, to help change that."
Minkoff has described a "12-step Program for Implementation of
a CCISC," defining the process sequentially. In collaboration
with Dr. Christie Cline, he has organized a CCISC Implementation Toolkit
that promotes the successful accomplishment of many specific steps.
"Implementation of the CCISC happens gradually, over time, in
complex systems and is characterized by the establishment of program
objectives reflecting fidelity to the overall model," said Minkoff.
Minkoff said the state of Oklahoma is committed to completing CCISC
model implementation as an overall system change for mental health
and substance abuse care.
"It's a lot of work and it takes time, but it is a proven model
with a long track record," said Minkoff.
Cline, doing business as ZiaLogic, a professional corporation in Albuquerque,
N.M., is a board-certified psychiatrist who served as the medical
director of the Behavioral Health Services Division of the New Mexico
Department of Health from 1998-2003. She is largely responsible during
her tenure for strategic planning and implementation of the New Mexico
Co-occurring Disorders Services Enhancement Initiative, along with
other best practice initiatives such as the New Mexico Pharmacotherapy
Initiative, built on the Texas Medication Algorithm Project.
During the past four years, she and Minkoff have worked as a team
on statewide co-occurring disorder program enhancement, curriculum
development and staff and trainer training.
"We travel all over the country," said Cline. "We have
helped train people in over 30 different systems in the CCISC Model,
which is quickly becoming recognized as a national phenomenon. The
federal government is finally helping states in a different way, by
allotting the grant money to fund training for model implementation
rather than creating new, unnecessary programs."
Cline was impressed at Oklahoma's level of commitment in the area
of mental health.
"Oklahoma has positioned itself nicely," said Cline. "The
state has substantial resources earmarked for the improvement of mental
health services, as well as the personnel to see successful implementation
of the model."
To find out more about co-occurring disorders, visit the National
Mental Health Association's Web site at www.nmha.org/substance/factsheet.cfm.
To learn more about Dr. Kenneth Minkoff, visit www.kenminkoff.com.
For information about Dr. Christie Cline and ZiaLogic, visit www.zialogic.com.
CONFERENCES
-
Building Bridges from Victim to Survivor–
Oklahoma Coalition Against Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault-Dates:
June 8-10, 2005-Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma-Holiday Inn Select-www.selecttulsa.com/ocadvsa-Phone:
918-622-7000; Contact: Oklahoma Coalition Against Domestic Violence
and Sexual Assault-Phone: 405-524-0700.
-
Real-Life Heroes: Rebuilding Attachments
with Traumatized Children– Richard Kagan, Ph. D.
Training provides tools that practitioners can use to help parents
and children rebuild fragile or disrupted attachments, change patterns
of destructive behavior and implement safety plans to prevent neglect,
abuse and trauma. Date: Friday, June 10, 2005—Location: Los
Angeles, CA.; Date: Saturday and Sunday, June 11-12, 2005—Location:
San Diego, CA. Additional presenter: Robert Geffner, Ph.D. Contact:
Carolyn Smyth-csmyth@alliant.edu
-
Multi-disciplinary Training Institute
on Serious Physical Child Abuse and SIDS—Topics covered:
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome; Medical aspects of burn injuries,
broken bones, abdominal injuries & head injuries; Investigative
aspects of a SIDS or Serious Physical Child Abuse Investigation;
Legal aspects of Serious Physical Child abuse. No registration fee.
Funded by grant from the Children’s Justice Act Program. Coordinated
in partnership by the following agencies: Tarrant County College
Child Abuse Intervention Training Project; The Shaken Baby Alliance;
Children’s Justice Act of the Texas Department of Family and
Protective Services; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services—Administration
for Children and Families; Tarrant County Child Fatality Review
Team; Children’s Advocacy Centers of Texas; Grapevine Police
Department; Tarrant County District Attorney’s Office; Cook
Children’s Medical Center; Crossroads Consulting. Location
and Dates: June 10, 2005 in Houston, Tx.; July 8, 2005 in Abilene,
Tx.; August 5, 2005 in Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx. Contact: http://www.shakenbaby.com.
-
Moving Towards Violence Prevention
- This workshop will define and introduce concept of violence prevention
as well as introducing program planning and evaluation technique
to approach the work. Date: June 21-23, 2005-Location: Chapell Hill,
NC. Contact: Email:prevent@unc.edu
-
Family Violence Conference– Postpartum
Emotional Disorders: Intervention, Treatment, & Risk Assessment-A
Training Designed for Family Violence Professionals, Mental Health
Providers, CPS, Medical/Legal Personnel, Social Workers & Educators-Date:
June 24, 2005-Location Highland Oaks Church of Christ-10805 Kingsley
Road, Dallas, Texas 75238– Contact: www.galaxycounseling.org.
Phone: 972-272-4429.
-
Smart Marriages-Happy Families-Date:
June 23-26, 2005—Location: Adams Mark Hotel, Dallas, Texas.
Conference will include workshops on domestic violence. Contact:
smartmarriages.com.
-
Infant Mortality Prevention Education:
Understanding SIDS & Shaken Baby Syndrome—Sponsored
by The Shaken Baby Alliance and Parkland Health & Hospital System’s
Dallas Healthy Start Program & Dept. of Nursing Education. Date:
June 24, 2005; Location: Dallas, Texas—Center for Community
Cooperation, 2900 Live Oak. Time: 8:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Contact:
Dept. Nursing Education at 214-590-8535,
-
Domestic Violence: Current Issues in
Research and Treatment—Dates: June 24, 2005-Location:
Los Angeles, CA; June 25, 2005– San Diego, CA. Workshop focuses
on dynamics of spouse/partner abuse, assessment techniques and intervention
approaches. Presented by Rebecca Gaba and Robert Geffner. Contact:
Carolyn Smyth– csmyth@alliant.edu.
9th International Family Violence Research Conference –Date:
July 10-13, 2005; Location: Portsmouth, NH. Contact: Carolyn Smyth-smyth@alliant.edu.
-
Building Bridges to Safety: Tools for
the Task—New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence—Date:
July 27-29, 2005—Location—Marriott Hotel, Albuquerque,
NM. Contact: www.nmcadv.org/events.htm.
Phone: 505-246-9240
-
Texas Council on Family Violence Annual
Conference– Date: September 11-14, 2005; Location:
Westin Galleria, Houston, Tx. Contact: www.tcfv.org/training_calendar.htm.
-
Policy Academy on Improving Services
for Youth with Mental Health and Co-Occurring Substance Use Disorders
Involved with the Juvenile Justice System—Dates:
September 13-15, 2005– Location: Bethesda, MD. Contact: Dana
Herbert—866-962-6455, ext. 244—email: ncmhjj@prainc.com.http://www.ncmhjj.com/pdfs/PA2_Announcement.pdf.
Download application at http://www.ncmhjj.com/Application.doc—due
June 24, 2005.
-
10th International Conference on Family
Violence—Date: September 16-21, 2005 Location: San
Diego, CA. Contact: Family Violence & Sexual Assault Institute
at: http://www.fvsai.org
-
Expert Witness Training—National
Center on Domestic and Sexual Violence—For domestic violence
service providers and professionals with advanced degrees who are
interested in being considered as expert witnesses in
court cases involving domestic violence. Contact: www.ncdsv.org
or email Vickie Smith at vsmith@ncdsv.org. Date: October 6-7, 2005–
Location: Austin, Texas.
-
Fifth Annual Trapped by Poverty/Trapped
by Abuse Conference—Sponsored by University of Texas
at Austin School of Social Work, Institute on Domestic Violence
and Sexual Assault; the University of Michigan School of Social
Work; and the DePaul College of Law, Schiller, DuCanto & Fleck
Family Law Center. Date: October 7-9, 2005; Location: Austin, Texas.
Contact: www.utexas.edu/ssw/ceu/trapped.
-
Second Annual SBA Ride to Action—All
proceeds will benefit the Shaken Baby Alliance’s mission to
fight child abuse and serve the fictims and family members who are
affected. Date: Saturday, October 15, 2005, 8:00 a.m. Location:
Albuquerque, NM. Contact: http://www.shakenbaby.com/aboutride.html.
-
A Community Problem. A Community Solution—CCCFV’s
3rd Annual Facing Family Violence Conference– Date:
October 20 & 21, 2005- Location: Plano, Texas. Contact: Collin
County Council on Family Violence at: www.ccc-fv.org; Phone: 972-769-1142.
-
Nuestras Voces/Our Voices: Empowerment
and Healing in la Communidad-National 2 day capacity-building
institute for improving outreach and promoting partnerships with
marginalized Latina/o victims of sexual and intimate partner violence.
Dates:
November 3 & 4, 2005 Location: St. Edward’s University-Austin,
Tx. Contact: artesanando@yahoo.com.
-
U.S. Department of Justice Violence Against
Women Office: http://www.usdoj.gov/vawo.
-
Office of Women’s Health: http://www.healthfinder.gov/justforyou/women/default.htm.
-
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: http://www.cdc.gov/od/owh/home.htm.
-
Family Violence Prevention Fund: http://www.Endabuse.org.
-
National Coalition Against Domestic Violence:
http://www.ncadv.org/
-
National Center for Victims of Crime: http://www.ncvc.org/
-
State Domestic Violence Coalitions: http://www.usdoj.gov/vawo.state.htm.
-
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:
http://www.hhs.gov.
-
Federal grants: http://www.fedgrants.gov.
-
National Training Center on Domestic and Sexual
Violence—www.ncdsv.org.
-
Oklahoma Coalition Against Domestic Violence
and Sexual Assault—www.ocadvsa.org.
-
Family Violence and Sexual Assault Institute—www.
Fvsai.org.
-
Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violence—www.domesticpeace.com
-
New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence—www.nmcadv.org
-
Texas Council on Family Violence—www.tcfv.org.
-
Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence—www.
Lcadv.org.
-
Family Violence Prevention Fund—www.fvpf.org.
-
National Center for Victims of Crime—www.ncvc.org.
-
American Bar Association—www.abanet.org/domviol/home.html,
-
Minnesota Center Against Violence & Abuse:
www. Mincava.umn.edu.
-
Toolkit to End Violence Against Women—toolkit.ncjrs.org.
-
FEDERAL GRANTS: All Federal Grants, including
Hispanic Healthy Marriage; African-American Healthy Marriage; http://www.fedgrants.gov.
THE SPOTLIGHT is a quarterly publication of the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families,
Region VI, Dallas, Texas. THE SPOTLIGHT communicates information
on Domestic Violence, Substance Abuse and Teen Pregnancy Prevention
programs, services, conferences and other activities to our Region
VI State, Tribal, local and federal partners. Region VI is comprised
of the States of Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas.
Please send articles or items of interest to:
Carol Beth Sedanko
Administration for Children and Families
1301 Young Street, Room 945
Dallas, Texas 75202
Fax: (214) 767-8890
Email: csedanko@acf.hhs.gov
Phone: (214) 767-1833.
|