Home > Nuclear > Tuba City Mill Site

Tuba City Mill Site
                                         

Tuba City Mill Site  
Coconino County, Arizona


Current Owner: Navajo Nation
Years of Operation Status of Mill
or Plant Site
Uranium Ore
Processed
(Million Short Tons)
Production
(Million Pounds U3O8)
1956-1962, 1963-1966 Decommissioned 0.80 4.70
Mill/Plant Area
(Acres)
Disposal Cell
Area
(Acres)
Disposal Cell
Radioactive
Waste
Volume
(Million Cubic Yards)
Disposal Cell
Total Radioactivity
(Ci, 226Ra)
Disposal Cell
Average Tailings
Radioactivity
(pCi/g, 226Ra)
UMTRA Project
Final Cost
(Million Dollars)
145 50 1.40 940 441 34.14
   Notes:  Uranium Ore Processing and Production are estimated based on historical data. Radioactivity from radium-226 in the stabilized mill tailings is stated as total curies (Ci) and as average picocuries per gram (pCi/g) of tailings. A picocurie is 0.037 radioactive disintegrations per second. Radium-226 (1620 year half-life) is a decay product in the uranium-238 series. It undergoes radioactive decay to produce radon-222, which is a noble gas, an alpha emitter, and the longest-lived isotope of radon (half-life of 3.8 days).



Map of Arizona showing the location of Tuba City Mill. Having trouble? Call 202 586-8800 for help.

Location:   The former Tuba City mill site is located approximately 5 miles east of Tuba City, Coconino County, Arizona, south of U.S. Highway 160 on the Navajo Indian Reservation. It is 85 miles north of Flagstaff, Arizona, and near the Hopi Indian Reservation.

Background:   The uranium ores processed at the Tuba City mill came largely from sites in Arizona: the Orphan Lode mine within the Grand Canyon National Park, mines in the Cameron area and adjacent areas, mines in the Monument Valley district, and ores purchased by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) at the Tuba City ore buying station and at other AEC ore buying stations1, including the Globe ore buying station, Gila County, Arizona.2 3

Orphan Lode mine - Uranium mineralization was identified by a U.S. Geological Survey geologist in April 1951 in old copper mine workings at the Orphan mining claim, a lode claim located in 1893 and patented as a copper prospect in 1906. 4 5The mine site is near Grand Canyon Village and about 1,100 feet below the south rim of the Grand Canyon of the Colorado River. Private exploration drilling in 1955 confirmed a high-grade uranium-copper deposit on the claim. The Orphan Lode deposit was in the upper reaches of a vertical, nearly circular, solution-collapse breccia-pipe structure. It is exposed on the canyon wall near the Coconino Sandstone-Hermit Shale (Permian) contact. 6 The pipe structure extends downward from outcrop through sedimentary rocks of Permian and Pennsylvanian ages and bottoms near the middle of the Redwall Limestone (Mississippian age), a vertical distance of about 1,660 feet. 7 The collapse material in the pipe consists of poorly consolidated sand fill, sandstone and claystone breccias with varying calcite cementation, and limey siltstone. 8 9 Uranium ore bodies associated with the pipe occurred as irregular masses in the collapsed material that fills the pipe and in rocks associated with the pipe's peripheral, annular-ring shear zone that defines the border of the pipe. 10 11 Some ore also extended outside the lode claim boundary and onto land belonging to the National Park Service.12 The ore was mined to a depth of about 585 feet, but uranium mineralization associated with the pipe structure is present below that mine level.

Development work at the Orphan Lode mine began in 1953. A three-tower, aerial tramway was completed in March 1955 from the canyon rim to service the mine site. A new 1,800-foot tramway with eight-towers replaced the old one in May 1956. The tramways had limited capability for moving materials to and from the mine. To expand ore production, a 1,590-foot, 2˝ compartment mine shaft was sunk on the claim behind the canyon rim from May 1958-January 1959. The shaft was connected to the mine through a 1,200-foot crosscut at the 400 level. Mine development costs at the Orphan were high, as all mined materials had to be transported off site. Cut and fill methods, which involved handling and rehanding waste rock in the underground mine, were used when possible to save on costs for hoisting and surface storage. Mine waste rock could not be stored on National Park Service (NPS) land. Some waste rock excavated during mine-shaft and crosscut construction was used by the NPS for road projects in the park.

The first shipment of Orphan Lode ore went to the AEC's ore buying station at the Tuba City mill in April 1956. Most of the ore mined from the Orphan was hauled to the Tuba City mill for processing. Some ore was shipped in 1958-1960 to mills in Utah and New Mexico, when the Tuba City mill could not take the ore. In 1959 and 1960, some Orphan Lode ore was also shipped to an Ambrosia Lake, New Mexico, alkaline-leach mill that could treat the high-lime ore. 13

Throughout its life the Orphan Lode mine was operated by several owners.14 Cotter Corporation, the last owner, shipped and processed ore from the mine at its Canon City, Colorado, mill from late 1967-early 1969. In April 1969 the Orphan Lode mine was permanently closed due to the high cost of shipping the ore to the Canon City mill. 15

The total Orphan Lode mine ore production (April 1956-April 1969) was 500,432 tons ore containing 4,286,254 pounds U3O8. 16 About 32 percent of the total uranium produced was recovered from ore mined on National Park Service land. The highest grade monthly ore shipment was 726 tons that averaged 2.29 percent U3O8. 17 Some 6.68 million pounds of copper and about 107,000 ounces of silver also were recovered from the Orphan Lode ore .18

Cameron uranium area - Uranium deposits occur in the Cameron area in an area that extends about 30 miles north-south and 12 miles east-west near the town of Cameron, Arizona. 19 The area extends across parts of the Painted Desert and Ward Terrace in the western part of the Navajo Reservation. In the Ward Terrace area east of Cameron, uranium minerals were discovered in 1950 on an outcrop of the Kayenta Formation (Lower Jurassic). 20 From mid 1951 to the spring of 1952, several shipments of uranium ore from small deposits in this area were sent to the AEC ore buying station at Monticello, Utah. In early 1952 ore was also shipped to the AEC buying station at Shiprock, New Mexico. 21

In 1952, uranium was discovered on Chinle Formation (Upper Triassic) outcrops near Cameron by a Navajo prospector who was conducting surface radiometric reconnaissance on behalf of the AEC. 22 Other discoveries were soon made at sites on Chinle outcrops. In 1952, shipments of uranium ore from Cameron deposits were sent to the AEC's ore buying station at Bluewater, New Mexico. 23 By 1954, six operators were shipping ore from several Cameron area mines. 24

In December 1954, the Navajo uranium leases held by the Arrowhead Uranium Company, which had become a major player in the Cameron area, were acquired the Rare Metals Corporation of America.25

The deposits in the Cameron area occurred mainly in the lower 60 feet of the Petrified Forest Member and the upper 30 feet of the underlying Shinarump Member of the Chinle Formation. 26 The ore occurred mainly in poorly consolidated sandstone and in clay-pellet sandstone and conglomerate beds in intraformational channel and scour structures. 27 Ore-grade material occurred in pod- and lens-shaped tabular bodies up to 10-15 feet thick at depressions and bends along ‘channel and scour' trends and was often associated with bentonitic clay. Higher grade ore was associated with carbonaceous trash. 28 Uranium-mineralized fossil logs were mined in some deposits. The deepest open pit mine was 130 feet deep. The average depth for mines in the area ore was about 60 feet. The largest ore body mined contained about 40,000 tons of ore, and the average size for the mined deposits was reported to be about 7,000 tons of ore. The ‘channel and scour' environment accounted for over 95 percent of the ore mined from the Cameron area.

During 1951-1963 about 289,300 tons of ore mined in the Cameron area averaged 0.21 percent U3O8and 0.04 percent V2O5. 29 The ore was classified as ‘low vanadium and low lime.' At depth the ore consisted of uraninite with some sulfide minerals. Ore nearer the surface was oxidized.

In the Cameron area, the deposits generally were of small size, which limited the depth for economical stripping of the ore. Mines were mainly open pits: some underground mining was done via adits driven into pit walls to follow ore trends. The deepest open pit mine was 130 feet deep. The average depth for mines in the area ore was about 60 feet. Four vertical mine shafts were dug to reach deposits. The largest ore body mined contained about 40,000 tons of ore, and the average size for mined deposits was reported to be about 7,000 tons of ore. The small mines depended on the AEC production bonus for profitable operation. 30 At the Riverview mine, uranium ore was mined from down-dropped blocks of sandstone found in a solution-collapse breccia-pipe structure that penetrated the Moenkopi Formation (Upper Triassic). 31

Tuba City ore buying station and uranium mill - In July 1955 Rare Metals Corp. signed a contract with the AEC to produce uranium concentrate at a new mill to be built near Tuba City, Arizona. Construction of the mill began in August 1955. 32 The Tuba City mill operated from June 1956-November 1966. 33

In February 1956, the AEC opened a uranium ore buying station at the mill construction site. 34 Rare Metals leased the mill's ore sampling plant to the AEC pending the mill's completion. The AEC purchased ores at the Tuba City site through June 1957, when Rare Metals began buying the ore. From February 1956 to June 1957, 40,782 tons of uranium ore averaging 0.22 percent U3O8and 0.05 percent V2O5were purchased at the buying station. Rare Metals purchased the AEC's ore stockpiled at Tuba City as well as ore from other AEC ore-buying stations. 35

The original Tuba City mill was designed to process the clayey, low-lime, high-slime, ores obtained from Cameron area mines. 36 After its initial startup period, the mill was rated at 300 tons of ore per day. The milling process for the low-lime ores included ore crushing and grinding, sulfuric-acid leaching, sand-slime separation, and the basket resin-in-pulp ion exchange process for uranium recovery. 37

By the early 1960s, many mines in the Cameron area that had shipped low-lime ores to the Tuba City mill were depleted, and the area’s ore production was in decline. Shipment of Orphan Lode ore to the Tuba City mill began in early 1956. The Orphan ore had higher lime content than Cameron-type ores, and for the mill’s acid-leach process the Orphan ore was blended at the mill with lower lime ores. Cameron area mine production had fallen to only a few hundred tons per year by 1962, and Orphan Lode ore was then set to become the main feed for the mill.38

After an accident closed the Orphan Lode mine in December1961, the Tuba City mill was forced to temporarily suspend operations. At the Orphan mine, hoisted ore was stored in an ore bin attached to the head frame, which was erected over the 2˝-compartment mine shaft. The ore bin collapsed in late December 1961 and dumped ore back down the mine shaft. The mine was forced to shut down for several months for repairs. By January 1962, the ore on hand at the mine at the time of the accident was shipped to the Tuba City mill. With Orphan Lode ore temporarily not available and declining ore production in the Cameron area (less than 300 tons of ore in 1962), there was not enough ore feed to keep the mill supplied. In May 1962 the mill closed.39

In July 1962 Rare Metals Corporation was merged into the El Paso Natural Gas Company (EPNG). EPNG signed a new contract in November 1962 with the AEC for the sale of uranium concentrates produced from Orphan Lode ore at the Tuba City mill through December 1966. 40

The need to convert the milling process at the Tuba City mill to handle the higher lime Orphan Lode ore was foreseen as early as 1961, and planning was begun for an alkaline-leach capability at the mill. 41 Addition of the new circuit was completed during the 1962 mill-closure period. Some ‘used' equipment obtained for the conversion was purchased under competitive bidding when the AEC's Monticello, Utah, mill was dismantled. 42 In April 1963, the Tuba City mill was again operational with a new design capacity of 200 tons ore per day. 43

The conversion to alkaline-leach included installation of new ore grinding equipment, a flotation circuit to separate sulfides after grinding, pressure-leach vessels, liquid-solids separation equipment, precipitation tanks, and re-carbonation equipment for leach-solution recycle. 44 Sulfide flotation tailings were sent to the alkaline circuit and the bulk flotation concentrate was processed in an acid-leach circuit. 45 Uranium was recovered from the flotation concentrate by ion exchange. 46

From June 1956-September 1966 the Tuba City mill processed a total of 796,489 tons of uranium ore with an average grade of 0.33 percent U3O8. 47 The mill recovered 4,696,402 pounds U3O8in concentrates, a 90 percent recovery rate. 48 All uranium concentrate produced was delivered under contract to the AEC.

Copper products from the Tuba City mill were shipped to the smelter at Inspiration, Arizona. 49

When the Tuba City mill was closed in September 1966 control of the mill site reverted to the Navajo Nation. Three connected mill-tailings piles containing some 800,000 tons of material and three evaporation ponds remained on the mill site. 50 Earthen dikes protected the tailings510 piles from surface water runoff.

In 1968, under a cooperative program with the U.S. Bureau of Mines, the surface of the tailings piles was treated with a chemical-binder material to prevent the wind transport of fine tailings materials onto the surrounding grazing lands. By 1974, the crust formed on the piles by the binding agent had become damaged, and it was no longer effective.51

A gamma-radiation survey of the Tuba City mill site and adjacent area was made in 1972 by an AEC contractor under an interagency agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Anomalous gamma radioactivity was identified at 14 sites. Seven of these were found to have uranium tailings materials. The contamination was attributed to dispersal of tailings material by wind action rather than by human intervention. Anomalous gamma radiation was found to decrease to background levels at a distance of 0.25 miles from the piles. Along the prevailing wind direction, the gamma radiation decreased to background levels 0.7 miles from the piles. 52

The former Tuba City mill site is situated on a natural terrace about 5,100 feet above sea level. The natural soil cover is unconsolidated sand and gravel overlying the Navajo Sandstone (Lower Jurassic). Natural vegetation is sparse in the area. Southward from the site, the ground surface descends about 400 feet in elevation over a distance of about 1.5 miles towards the Moenkopi Wash drainage. This stream provides some water for livestock and agricultural use. Occasional livestock grazing is the main land use nearby the mill site, and some land nearby is used for dry and irrigation farming. The supply of surface water available from natural precipitation in the area is limited and highly variable. The Navajo Sandstone contains an extensive multiple aquifer system that is an important regional water resource. The aquifer system is vast and encompasses all of the Navajo Sandstone units. 53

UMTRA Surface Remediation:   DOE began the surface remediation work at the former Tuba City mill site in 1988 and it was completed by December 1990. Demolition of the remaining buildings and site preparation began in 1986. All of the residual radioactive materials at the mill site, the contaminated windblown materials from surrounding properties, and debris from the demolished buildings were placed in a disposal cell over the existing uranium mill tailings materials and stabilized by compaction. 54

Disposal Cell:   The disposal cell covers an area of about 50 acres, is generally triangular in shape, and rises to a height of about 45 feet above the surrounding ground. About 2.3 million tons of contaminated materials with a total activity of 940 curies of 226 Ra are entombed in the cell. 55 The cover encapsulating the disposal cell is an engineered, multiple-layer structure. A low-permeability radon barrier composed of clayey soil was placed directly on the contaminated, radioactive cell contents. The 42-inch thick soil layer is designed to minimize the emission of radon to the air and the downward percolation of water through the cell and potentially into the underlying aquifer. A layer of granular bedding material overlies the radon barrier and is designed to promote the rapid runoff from any precipitation that falls on the cell structure. Two layers of rip-rap material totaling 18 inches in thickness cap the disposal cell to protect it against erosion from wind and storm water. A rock apron surrounds the cell to control runoff water that is shed from the encapsulating cover. On its up-slope sides, the cell is protected by a drainage ditch that collects surface-runoff water and directs it away from the completed cell structure. 56

Responsibility for Remediation:  U.S Department of Energy, 100 percent

Stewardship:
  The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for long-term stewardship at the former Tuba City mill site, including the groundwater cleanup program and the subsequent long-term site monitoring. In 1996, the NRC included the Tuba City Disposal Cell under a general license. Under this license, the DOE has long-term custody, monitoring, and maintenance responsibilities at the remediated site. The DOE maintains data relating to site characterization, design parameters for site restoration, and historical and current site monitoring. The Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Program at the DOE's Grand Junction Office will assure the disposal site's safety and integrity.57 The Navajo Nation retains title to the land and tailings.58

Ground Water Program: Groundwater contamination in the Navajo Sandstone aquifer at the Tuba City site resulted from the milling of uranium ores. The water used by the mill to process uranium ore was discharged with the tailings slurry into the original tailings impoundment structures at the Tuba City mill site. The water contained high concentrations of dissolved materials, such as nitrate, sulfate, sodium, calcium, and low amounts of uranium resulting from the ore-milling process. The original tailings impoundment structures were not lined with an impermeable material to prevent the downward percolation of pore water from the pile, and the tailings materials are directly in contact with the natural soil cover. The soil cover is composed mainly of permeable eolian sand that formed on the underlying strata of the Navajo Sandstone.

The contaminated groundwater plume identified by the DOE covers an area of about 320 acres and extends downgradient to the south and southwest from the former mill site. It is estimated that some 3.8 million cubic yards of groundwater are contaminated. 59 Of 18 contaminants identified in the groundwater at the Tuba City mill site, the concentrations for 13 do not exceed the maximum limits established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and do not pose a risk to human health or the environment. No remediation for these 13 is planned by the DOE. The groundwater concentrations for four contaminants (molybdenum, nitrate, selenium, and uranium) exceed the respective EPA maximum concentration limits. In addition, the contaminant sulfate is present in the groundwater plume at levels that can cause a potential health risk. The DOE groundwater remediation strategy includes active remediation to reduce the concentrations of these five contaminants in the groundwater plume. 60

The DOE designed program for clean-up of the Navajo Sandstone aquifer at the former Tuba City mill site includes the extraction of contaminated groundwater from the plume and removal of the contaminants by distillation. About 90 percent of the treated groundwater will be returned to the aquifer via injection wells and infiltration ditches. The extraction of contaminated water from the aquifer and re-injection of clean water will contain the further spreading of the five contaminants. A monitoring program will continue throughout the groundwater cleanup phase to assure that the aquifer restoration standards established for the project are met. 61

 


 1 W.L. Chenoweth, personal communication, February 2003.
2 For a description of the Monument Valley uranium district, see the Monument Valley Upgrader Site. Online: U.S. Uranium Production Facilities: Operating History and Remediation Costs Under Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project as of 2000.
3 Online: http://www.eh.doe.gov/advocacy/faclist/showfacility.cfm The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission uranium ore buying station at Globe, Arizona, operated from 1955 to 1957. About 23, 900 tons of ore averaging 0.20 percent U3O8 were purchased at the Globe buying station. The uranium ore from the Dripping Spring Formation (Upper Precambrian) siltstone to hornfels host rock contained carbon and sulfides and required blending to prevent excess acid consumption and sliming problems during processing at the Tuba City, Arizona, mill.
4 APN Media, LLC , Grand Canyon History. Online : http://www.nps.gov/grca/publications/orphan.pdf (December 16, 2004). In 1908, President Roosevelt, using authorization under the Preservation of American Antiquities Act, changed the Grand Canyon's status from a national forest and game reserve to a national monument. At that time, the Orphan mining claim became a single, isolated, patented mining claim surrounded by national monument lands on which prospecting and mining were no longer permitted. In 1919, the Congress authorized the expansion and upgrading of the Grand Canyon National Monument to become a national park, the Grand Canyon National Park.
5 W.L. Chenoweth, The Orphan Lode, Grand Canyon, Arizona, A Case History of a Mineralized, Collapse-Breccia Pipe , U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 86-510, 1986, p. 1.
6Vivien Gornitz and Paul F. Kerr, Uranium Mineralization and Alteration, Orphan mine, Grand Canyon, Arizona , Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists, Vol. 65, No. 7, November 1970, pp. 753-754.
7 Chenoweth, 1992, p. 2.
8Gornitz and Kerr, 1970, p. 751 .
9 Chenoweth, 1992, pp. 48-49.
10Gornitz and Kerr, 1970, p. 751. The “annular ring” that borders the pipe structure consists of a set of concentric, circular fractures that formed in the rocks as the result of tension stresses during subsidence of material within the pipe.
11 Chenoweth, 1992, pp. 50-51.
12 Ibid, p. 2 and National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Community Fact Sheet, Orphan Mine Site , Online: http://www.nps.gov/grca/publications/orphan.pdf Production of ore at the Orphan mine ceased in 1969. The NPS has determined that the Orphan site may be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
13 Chenoweth, 1986, pp. 25, 33-33.
14 Ibid: see Chronology on pages A-1 through A-4. In early 1966, Westec Corp acquired the Orphan claim. When the firm declared bankruptcy in August 1966, the Orphan Lode mine was closed. The mine was at that time the only supplier of uranium ore to the Tuba City mill. In September 1966, the mill was permanently closed down by El Paso Natural Gas due to the lack of uranium ore. The El Paso Natural Gas Company had acquired Rare Metals Corp. by merger in July 1962.
15 Ibid, p. A-4.
16 Ibid, p. 44. The production totals includes ore mined by Cotter Corp., the final owner of the Orphan Lode mine.
17 Ibid, p. 22.
18 Ibid, p.2.
19 Pierce, et al., 1970, p. 118.
20 W. L. Chenoweth, Geology and Production History of the Uranium Deposits in the Cameron Area, Coconino County, Arizona , Arizona Geological Survey, Contributed Report CR-93-B, August 1993, pp. 1, 4. The report provides a detailed account of the discovery and mining of uranium ores in the Cameron area.
21 Ibid, p 6.
22 Ibid, p. 5. See also H. W. Pierce, S. B. Keith, and J. C. Wilt, Coal, Oil, Natural Gas, Helium, and Uranium in Arizona , Bulletin 182, Arizona Bureau of Mines, 1970, p. 111.
23 Chenoweth, 1993, p. 6.
24 Ibid, p. 7.
25 Ibid, p. 7.
26 Ibid.
27 Chenoweth, 1993, p. 3
28 Y .W. Isachsen and C.G. Evensen, Geology of Uranium Deposits of the Shinarump and Chinle Formations on the Colorado Plateau , in L.R. Page, H.T. Stocking, and H.B. Smith, compilers, Contributions to the Geology of Uranium and Thorium by the United States Geological Survey and Atomic Energy Commission for the United Nations International Conference on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, Switzerland, 1955 , Geological Survey Professional Paper 300, United State Government Printing Office, Washington, 1956, p. 278.
29Chenoweth, 1993, p. 13.
30 U.S Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), Guidebook to Uranium Deposits of the Western United States , U.S. AEC, Grand Junction Operations Office, Grand Junction, Colorado, October 1959, 359 p. The Cameron Area is described on pages 3-48 and 3-49 and the Orphan Lode mine on pages 3-44 and 3-45.
31 Chenoweth, 1993, pp. 4-5.
32 Ibid, p. 8.
33 Ibid, pp. A3-A5.
34 H. Albrethsen, Jr., and Frank E. McGinley, Summary History of Domestic Uranium Procurement Under U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Contracts, Final Report , GJBX-220(82), U.S. Department of Energy, Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy, Grand Junction Area Office and Bendix Field Engineering Corp, Grand Junction, Colorado, September 1982, p. A-3. (The reference also provides information about uranium ore procurement by the AEC on pages 6 and 7 and the AEC's ore buying stations on pages B-3 and B-4.)
35Ibid, pp. A-3 and B-3. The total of uranium ore sold by the AEC to Rare Metals was 58, 093 tons.
36 R.C. Merritt, The Extractive Metallurgy of Uranium , Colorado School of Mines Research Institute, Prepared under contract with the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1971, pp. 531-533. Low-lime uranium ores generally contain less than 6 percent CaCO 3 .
37 Ibid, p. 48.
38 Note: Some Orphan Lode ore could contain up to 25 percent lime.
39 Chenoweth, 1993, p. A-3. The Orphan Lode’s production allocation (see also Albrethsen and McGinley, 1982, p. 10) from the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) was nearly filled in 1961, when the mine closed due to the ore-bin collapse incident. In part to assure the supply of ore for the Tuba City mill, the Congress in 1962 under Public Law 87-457 concurred to give Western Equities, Inc., a lease for the uranium ore that extended from the Orphan Lode patented claim onto National Park Service land. The bill also assured the purchase by AEC of additional U3O8 milled from Orphan Lode ore. Western Equities, in exchange, agreed to end mining activities at the Orphan mine by 1987 and to give title to the patented claim to the Federal Government.
40 Ibid, p. A-3.
41 Merritt, 1971, p.531.
42Albrethsen and McGinley, 1982, p. A-4. The Monticello, Utah, mill was operated under contract by the Atomic Energy Commission from 1949-1960. Built by the Government, the mill supplied vanadium from 1941-1944 during World War II.
43 Ibid, p. A-3.
44 Ibid, p. A-4. Some Orphan Lode ore contained up to 15 percent sulfide minerals, which complicated treatment of the ore.
45Merritt, 1971, p. 532.
46Albrethsen and McGinley, 1982, p. A-4.
47 Ibid, p. A-5.
48 Ibid.
49 Ibid.
50 Mill tailings are the finely ground product consisting largely of fine sand to clay-size particles that result from the grinding of uranium ore during the milling process. Along with trace amounts of uranium, the tailings typically contain the radioactive daughter elements that are naturally present in the uranium ore but are not recovered, the residue of chemicals used in the milling process, and water.
51 U.S. Department of Energy, Background Report for the Uranium-Mill-Tailings Site Remediation Action Program , DOE/EP-0011, April 1981, pp. 20-23.
52 Ibid, p. 22.
53 Description of the Tuba City site is from: U.S. Department of Energy, Phase I Ground Water Compliance Action Plan for the Tuba City, Arizona, UMTRA Site , Project Number UGW-511-0023-05-000, Document Number U0027401, Grand Junction Office, Grand Junction, Colorado, June 1999, p. 2-5.
54 U.S. Department of Energy, Report to Congress on Long-Term Stewardship , Release No. R-01-025, January 19, 2001, A Tuba City Site @ , p. 7. Online: http://lts.apps.em.doe.gov/center/ndaareport.html and http://www.gjo.doe.gov/LM/documents/tuba/ltsp/tc-ch2.html  
55 Ibid.
56 Ibid
57Online: http://www.gjo.doe.gov/LM/sites/maps/az/tuba/tuba.htm
58 Ibid.
59 U.S. Department of Energy, Release No. R-01-025, January 2001, A Tuba City Site @ , p. 8
60 Ibid.
61 Online: http://web.em.doe.gov/bemr96/tuci.html
U.S. Department of Energy, Project Number UGW-511-0023-05-000, Document Number U0027401, June 1999, p. 1-1.


Back to Main Page     Summary Table     Glossary     References