Electronic Code of Federal Regulations:

(1) The role of the City of Chicago as a local agent was defined in a letter from the State Environmental Protection Agency on March 13, 1972.

(2) Copies of the Illinois Pollution Control Board Regulations, Chapter 2, Parts I, II and III were submitted May 4, 1972, by the Governor.

(3) A document describing the role of the Chicago Department of Environmental Control was submitted July 28, 1972, by the State Environmental Protection Agency.

(4) Copies of the revisions to the State air episode regulations were submitted on August 29, 1972, by the Governor.

(5) Compliance schedules submitted on March 13, 1973, by the Pollution Control Board.

(6) Compliance schedules submitted on April 3, 1973, by the Pollution Control Board.

(7) Transportation control plan submitted on April 17, 1973, by the Pollution Control Board.

(8) Compliance schedules submitted on May 3, 1973, by the Pollution Control Board.

(9) Compliance schedules submitted on June 15, 1973, by the Pollution Control Board.

(10) Compliance schedules submitted on August 7, 1973, by the Pollution Control Board.

(11) Information concerning the coal ban in the Chicago area was submitted on October 22, 1973, by Governor Walker.

(12) On July 22, 1976, the Director of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted revised emergency episode regulations.

(13) On November 29, 1977, the Director of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted grain handling and drying emission limitations as revisions to Rule 203.

(14) Revision consisting of an Illinois Pollution Control Board Order issued on July 20, 1978 to Commonwealth Edison Company, Christian County, Illinois and submitted on August 14, 1978 by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.

(15) Revision consisting of an Illinois Pollution Control Board Order issued to Shell Oil Company's Wood River refinery on December 14, 1978 by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.

(16) On April 4, 1979, the State submitted its draft nonattainment area plan for all areas designated nonattainment as of March 3, 1978 and as revised on October 5, 1978. This submittal contained a request for extensions of the statutory attainment deadline for CO and 03. The submittal also included a vehicle emission inspection and maintenance program and a new source review plan. Although the State submittal also included the following provisions, U.S. EPA is taking no action to include them in the federally approved SIP at this time: the portions of Rules 101, 103 and 105 relating to the provisions addressing malfunctions, general requirements of the Clean Air Act which are not Part D requirements, and the provisions covering open burning, mobile source emission standards, diesel locomotive emission standards, sulfur dioxide emissions for certain fuel combustion sources located outside major metropolitan areas, compliance dates for organic emission limitations, particulate emissions from low carbon waste incinerators, and adoption of Federal New Source Performance Standards. In addition, U.S. EPA is not rulemaking at this time on those portions of the following rules which contain specified changes made between the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking and the final rulemaking action:

(iv) The new materials in Section 4.11 of the Rules for Issuance of Permits to New or Modified Air Pollution Sources;

(v) The addition of a definition of “reconstruction” in Section 4.7 of the Rules for Issuance of Permits;

(vi) The procedure allowing external offsets contained in Section 10 of the Rules for Issuance of Permits.

(17) On August 29, 1979, the State submitted additional information and clarification for the nonattainment area plan in response to USEPA's July 2, 1979 notice of proposed rulemaking.

(18) On September 20, 1979, the State submitted a summary of public hearing comments on the plan.

(19) On October 30, 1979, the State submitted copies of Illinois Pollution Control Board final orders for control of VOC emissions from stationary sources (Rule 205), sources of fugitive particulate (Rule 203(f)), and particulate emissions from iron and steel sources (Rule 203(d)).

(20) On December 20, 1979, the State submitted a letter containing the dates that most of the regulatory and nonregulatory portions of the nonattainment area plans were finally adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board. Rule 205 containing RACT controls for stationary sources of VOC was effective in the State on July 18, 1979. Rule 203(f) governing fugitive dust emissions was effective in the State on September 18, 1979.

(21) On January 25, 1980, the State submitted a copy of finally enacted “Rules for the Issuance of Permits to New or Modified Air Pollution Sources Affecting Nonattainment Areas.” Sections 5.1(a)(2)(ii) and 5.1(a)(2)(iii) of these rules were reserved by the State. The effective date of these Rules was January 16, 1980.

(22) On March 21, 1979, the State of Illinois submitted to the USEPA revised regulations for control of sulfur dioxide emissions. On September 19, 1979, the State submitted additional information on these revised regulations to the USEPA.

(23) On January 17, 1980 and on February 7, 1980 the State submitted further information and clarifications to Rule 204.

(24) On September 19, 1979, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to Rule 204(e)(1) for the Commonwealth Edison Company. The revision approves an emission limitation of 105,162 lbs SO₂/hour for the Kincaid Generating Station in Christian County, Illinois.

(25) On April 30, 1980, the State submitted revisions to the transportation control plan for northeast Illinois (Chicago).

(26) On December 20, 1979, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to provide for modification of the existing air quality surveillance network.

(27) On January 8, 1980, the State submitted an Opinion and Final Order of the Pollution Control Board (dated November 19, 1979) which deletes Rule 206(d) of Chapter 2 from the Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulations.

(28) On September 18, 1979, the State submitted a Final Order of the Pollution Control Board (dated April 12, 1979) which amended Rule 205(g)(1) of Chapter 2 of the Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulations.

(29) On July 21, 1981, the State submitted Volume 9 Lead, of the Illinois State Implementation Plan for Air Pollution Control for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation Plan. This plan covers all areas in Illinois except for Granite City in the St. Louis Interstate AQCR.

(30) On July 29, 1980, the State submitted a May 29, 1980, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board granting a variance from the requirements Rule 203(d)(8)(B) of Chapter 2 of the Air Pollution Control Regulations to Continental Grain Company's grain elevator located in Crossville, White County, Illinois. This variance expired July 1, 1980.

(31) On April 4, 1980, the State submitted a November 29, 1979, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) and Supplementary IPCB Orders dated January 24, 1980, and February 7, 1980. These Orders grant 13 Caterpillar Tractor Company boilers a variance from the requirements of IPCB (A), Rule 203(g)(1)(C)(i) and/or Rule 203(g)(1)(D) which regulate particulate emissions from new and existing sources. No action is taken at this time on variance provisions for Mapleton facility boilers #2, 3, 4, and 5. This variance expired on October 8, 1981.

(32) On August 31, 1981, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of a July 9, 1981, Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (R–77–15). This Order creates Rule 204(c)(1)(E) which establishes sulfur dioxide (SO₂) emission limitations of 5.5 lbs/SO/MMBTU for solid fuel combustion sources having actual heat input not greater than 250 million BTU's per hour owned or operated by Bemis Company, Inc., Celotex Corporation or Sherex Corporation. On November 17, 1981, the State submitted additional information in support of this revision.

(33) On August 20, 1980, and March 20, 1981, the State submitted additional information on the transportation control plans for the Northeast Illinois (Chicago) Area.

(34) On October 15, 1980, the State submitted additional information on the transportation control plans for the Peoria Metropolitan Area.

(35) On April 1, 1981, the State submitted additional information on the transportation control plans for the St. Louis Metropolitan (Illinois) Area.

(36) On December 10, 1980, the State submitted a July 24, 1980, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board and a September 18, 1980, Order of the Board granting Bunge Corporation's Cairo, Illinois soybean processing plant and grain elevator variance from Illinois Pollution Control Board's particulate emission standards under Rules 203(g)(1)(D) and 103(b)(1) of Chapter 2 of the Air Pollution Control Regulations through October 15, 1981.

(37) On July 17, 1980, the State submitted an April 3, 1980, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board adopting a December 13, 1979, Proposed Opinion and Order of the Board which exempted certain small explosive waste incinerators from the requirements of Rule 203(e) Particulate Emission Standards and Limitations for incinerators and Rule 206(b) Carbon Monoxide Emissions Standards and Limitations for incinerators.

(38) On May 10, 1982, the State submitted a February 4, 1982, Illinois Pollution Control Board Opinion and Order (PCB 81–184) granting a variance from the requirements of Rules 205(m)(1)(B) and 204(n)(1)(G) of Chapter 2 of the Air Pollution Control Regulations to the Lyon Metal Products, Incorporated, Montgomery, Illinois facility. This variance expires on May 31, 1985.

(39) On October 1, 1981, the State submitted a report in satisfaction of the Total Suspended Particulate Control Strategy approval condition in which the State agreed to conduct an analysis of the potential air quality impact from storage piles with uncontrolled emissions of less than 50 tons per year, to submit the results of any analysis to EPA, to submit any necessary regulations to the Illinois Pollution Control Board, and promulgate and submit any necessary regulations to EPA. This report concluded that no further regulations were needed.

(40) EPA Study Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Solvent Cleaning Operations in the State of Illinois (EPA 905/4–80–008) was prepared to satisfy the Ozone Control Strategy approval condition in which the State agreed to conduct a study to demonstrate that the three pound per hour, 15 pound per day exemption for solvent metal cleaners contained in Rule 205(k) represents RACT, to submit the results of the study to EPA, to submit the necessary regulations to the Illinois Pollution Control Board and promulgate and submit any necessary regulations to EPA. The State reviewed this report and in a February 11, 1981, letter to EPA noted their agreement with the findings of the report and indicated that because there was no need for further regulations, this condition is satisfied.

(41) On December 7, 1981, the State submitted a October 8, 1981, Illinois Pollution Control Board Final Order (R79–11). This Final Order amends Rule 203(g)(1) by adding subsection (E).

(42) On January 4, 1983, the State submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of an October 27, 1982, Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) Opinion and Order (PCB 82–88). This Opinion and Order grants a variance from the requirements of Rule 203(a) of Chapter 2 of the Air Pollution Control Regulations to a proposed fluidized bed combustion boiler at B.F. Goodrich's Henry County, Illinois facility. This variance continues until October 1, 1987, or until the facility is no longer subject to Rule 206(a), whichever comes first.

(43) On July 29, 1982, the State submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of a May 28, 1981, Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) Final Opinion of the Board (R78–17). This Final Opinion deletes Rule 204(c)(1)(D) and the reference to it in Rule 204(h) from the IPCB Air Pollution Control Regulations.

(44) On March 17, 1983, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a revision to its ozone SIP for Chrysler's Belvidere facility. The revision request contains an alternative compliance time schedule with interim emission limitations which is in the form of a variance for prime coating and prime surface coating operations. Final compliance is changed from December 31, 1982 to December 31, 1987.

(45) On August 19, 1983, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of a July 26, 1983, Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (R82–12). This Order creates Rule 313 which establishes 1.5 micrograms per cubic meter, maximum arithmetic mean, averaged over a calendar quarter as the State's ambient air quality standard for lead. The Board also adopted, as part of Rule 313, a measurement method for determining compliance with the standard.

(46) On August 15, 1983, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a May 19, 1983, Opinion and Order (PCB–82–147) of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) granting Del Monte Corporation's Can Manufacturing Plant No. 115 located in Rochelle, Ogle County, Illinois, a variance from the IPCB volatile organic compound emission standards under Rule 205(n)(1)(B)(i) and Rule 205(n)(1)(B)(vi) of Chapter 2: Air Pollution Regulations. The variance expires on December 31, 1984.

(47) On March 24, 1983, and May 3, 1983, the State submitted information that indicated that a February 21, 1980 (45 FR 11472), conditional approval of the incorporation of a revised Part D sulfur dioxide control strategy into the Illinois State Implementation Plan has been satisfied for Cincinnati, Pekin and Elm Grove Townships in Tazewell County and for Logan and Limestone Townships in Peoria County. This approval condition required that the SIP include a reanalysis of the Pekin, Illinois area; a submittal of the analysis results to USEPA; the proposal of any necessary regulations to the Illinois Pollution Control Board necessary to insure attainment and maintenance of the sulfur dioxide standard; and the promulgation of any necessary regulations. Any promulgated regulations must be submitted to USEPA.

(50) On May 3, 1983, the State requested that USEPA incorporate IPCB Rule 204 (f)(2) into the Illinois SIP. Rule 204(f)(2) was adopted by Illinois as part of a February 24, 1983, Order of the Board (R80–22). USEPA approves the incorporation of Rule 204(f)(2) as it pertains to Pekin Energy, a source in the Peoria major metropolitan area.

(51) On January 30, 1984, the State submitted Rule 204(f) as contained in a February 24, 1983, Order of the IPCB (R80–22) as it applies to sources in the Peoria Major Metropolitan area for incorporation in the SIP. USEPA approves the incorporation of Rule 204(f) into the SIP as it applies to all sources in Peoria and Tazewell Counties except Caterpillar Tractor Mapleton and East Peoria Plants. No action is taken on Rule 204(f) as it applies to the Chicago or St. Louis (Illinois—portion) Major Metropolitan Areas or on Rule 204(f) (1) and (2).

(53) On September 30, 1983, the State submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of a lead plan to assure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS in the Granite City area. The Illinois plan includes a discussion of air quality data measured since 1978, an emission inventory of three source categories capable of emitting lead, atmospheric modeling analyses and proposed necessary control strategies. On March 19, 1984, the State submitted five consent decrees entered by the State of Illinois with the Circuit Court for the Third Judicial Circuit of Madison County and filed March 16, 1984, for incorporation in the lead plan. These include People of the State of Illinois vs. Taracorp, Inc.; People of the State of Illinois vs. St. Louis Lead Recyclers; People of the State of Illinois vs. First Granite City National Bank; People of the State of Illinois, vs. Stackorp Inc.; and People of the State of Illinois vs. B.V. and G.V. Transport Company.

(55) On November 14, 1985, the State of Illinois submitted a negative declaration for natural gas/gasoline processing plants.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Letter dated November 14, 1985, from Michael J. Hayes, Manager, Division of Air Pollution Control, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.

(56) On June 19, 1984, the State submitted Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Rule 252 entitled, “Rules for Governing Public Participation in the Air Pollution Permit Program for Major Source in Nonattainment Areas.”

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Rule 252 entitled, “Rule for Governing Public Participation in the Air Pollution Permit Program for Major Sources in Nonattainment Areas,” published on June 8, 1984.

(61) On March 15, 1984 and June 14, 1984 the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted commitments for satisfying several outstanding conditions to the sulfur dioxide [52.724(a)(1)] State Implementation Plan.

(62) On January 16, 1985, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a variance from Illinois Rule 206(a).

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) June 14, 1984, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB), PCB 84–19. This is a variance from Illinois Rule 206(a) until June 14, 1987, for CO emissions from a fluidized bed combustion boiler at Midwest Solvents Company's facility in Tazewell County, Illinois.

(63) On February 6, 1985, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a site-specific revision to its total suspended particulates State Implementation Plan for Villa Grove's “Dump and Boot Pit” emissions in Champaign County, Illinois.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board, Opinion and Order of the Board, PCB 84–53, Villa Grove's “Dump and Boot Pit” site-specific TSP revision. This revision extends the compliance date for control requirements on these emissions until September 1, 1987, and was adopted on July 14, 1984.

(64) On May 13, 1985, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a variance from Illinois Rule 202(b) for a Brule pathological waste incinerator (BPWI) at NPWC's facility located at the Great Lakes Naval Base, Great Lakes, Shields Township, Illinois, as a revision to its TSP SIP. Shields Township is an attainment area for both the primary and secondary national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for TSP.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board 84–156 adopted on March 22, 1985.

(65) Submitted from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) dated July 22, 1985, requesting an extended compliance schedule for Precision Coatings Incorporated (PCI) coating Machine Number 2.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Opinion and Order of the Board, PCB 84–117, which was adopted on February 20, 1985, and a modification to PCB 84–117 which was adopted on April 14, 1985.

(66) On March 27, 1985, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a site-specific revision to its Carbon Monoxide State Implementation Plan for Anderson Clayton Foods, Inc. (ACF), a variance from 35 Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) 216.121 which governs Carbon Monoxide emissions from the Fluidized Bed Combuster retrofitted boiler at ACF's Jacksonville, Illinois facility. IAC 216.121 was incorporated in the Illinois SIP on May 31, 1972 (37 FR 10862), as Illinois Pollution Control Board Rule 206(a).

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Opinion and Order of the Board, PCB 84–147, which was adopted on January 24, 1985.

(67) On April 18, 1983, the State of Illinois submitted a 0.60 lb TSP/MMBTU emission limit for the City of Rochelle Municipal Steam Power Plant. On May 24, 1985, it submitted a revised modeling analysis.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Pollution Control Board Order (R78–15), Rule 203(g)(1)(C)(iii) which is dated February 24, 1983.

(68) On May 8, 1985, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a variance until December 31, 1987, from Illinois Rule 205(n)(1)(b)(v) and Rule 205(n)(1)(b)(vi), for American Can Corporation's Hoopeston, Illinois facility in the form of a January 24, 1985, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (PCB 84–106).

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) A January 24, 1985, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (ICPB), PCB 84–106. This is a variance until December 31, 1987, for the coating reformulation programs at American Can Corporation's Hoopeston facility located in Hoopeston, Illinois.

(69) On January 28, 1983, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a December 30, 1982, Illinois Pollution Control Board Order (R80–5). Illinois Pollution Control Board Rules 205(l) (4) through (10), 205(t) and 205(u) are approved.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Ilinois Pollution Control Board Rules 205(l)(4) through (10), 205(t) and 205(u) as contained in December 30, 1982, Illinois Pollution Control Board Order R80–5.

(70) On February 13, 1986, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a revision to its ozone SIP for the Fedders-USA's facility located in Effingham, Effingham County, Illinois. It grants Fedders-USA a compliance date extension for control requirements from October 1, 1982, to April 1, 1986, and provides for a legally enforceable compliance program.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) A January 9, 1986, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB), PCB 83–47.

(71) On October 20, 1983, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a site-specific revision to Illinois' sulfur dioxide plan for Illinois Power Company's Baldwin Power Station. The revised SO₂emission limitations are 101,966 lbs/hour, in the aggregate, and 6 lbs/MMBTU.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Emission limits within Paragraph 1 of Illinois Pollution Control Board Final Order PCB 79–7, which was adopted September 8, 1983.

(73) On May 6, 1985, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, requested an extended compliance schedule for National Can Corporation's Rockford facility.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board, April 1, 1982, Opinion and Order of the Board, PCB 81–189 and a January 24, 1985, Opinion and Order PCB 84–108. These orders grant National Can Corporation (Rockford Plant) a variance from the existing VOC SIP requirements from December 31, 1982, until December 31, 1983, and from December 31, 1983, until December 31, 1985, respectively.

(74) On October 30, 1986, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a September 25, 1986, Final Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board R85–33 revises the State's coke oven pushing and charging rules and recodifies some related rules.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board R85–33, which was adopted September 25, 1986.

(78) On January 28, 1983, June 25, 1987, August 21, 1987, September 28, 1987, October 2, 1987, December 22, 1987, January 8, 1988, March 29, 1988, and May 2, 1988 the State submitted stationary source control measures for incorporation in the ozone plan.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) The following sections of title 35, Environmental Protection; subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board of the Illinois Administrative Code, (June 1989): section 211.122 (definitions of bead-dipping; component; dry cleaning facility; external floating roof; gas service; green tire spraying; green tires; heavy liquid; liquid mounted seal; liquid service; pneumatic rubber tire manufacture; refinery unit, process unit, or unit; tread end cementing; undertread cementing; valves not externally regulated; vapor collection system; vapor mounted primary seal; volatile organic liquid; and volatile organic material) of subpart B (part 211); section 215.104 (definitions of continuous process; in vacuum service; material recovery section; open-ended valve; polystyrene plant; polystyrene resin; repaired; styrene devolatilizer unit; and styrene recovery unit) of subpart A (part 215); sections 215.124, 215.125, and 215.126 of subpart B (part 215); section 215.205 of subpart F (part 215); sections 215.240, 215.241, and 215.249 of subpart H (part 215); section 215.408 of subpart P (part 215); sections 215.420 through 215.431, 215.433, 215.434, 215.435, 215.437, and 215.438, all of subpart Q (part 215); section 215.453 of subpart R (part 215); sections 215.465 and 215.466 of subpart S (part 215); sections 215.520, 215.521, 215.525, 215.526, and 215.527 all of subpart V (part 215); sections 215.582, 215,583, and 215.584 of subpart Y (part 215); sections 215.607 through 215.613 of subpart Z (part 215); and sections 215.875, 215.877, 215.879, 215.881, 215.883, and 215.886 all of subpart BB (part 215) are approved.

(ii) Additional material. (79) On March 20, 1986, November 17, 1986, and July 1, 1987, Illinois submitted its vehicle inspection and maintenance plan for the Chicago and East St. Louis areas.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter II: Environmental Protection Agency, Part 276, Procedures To Be Followed in the Performance of Annual Inspections of Motor Vehicle Exhaust Emissions, Adopted at 10 Illinois Register 13954, effective August 13, 1986.

(ii) Additional material. (A) “Technical Procedures Memorandum—Enforcement” between the Illinois Secretary of State and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, as submitted by Michael J. Hayes, Manager, Division of Air Pollution Control on July 1, 1987.

(81) On April 6, 1990, and May 4, 1990, Illinois submitted a regulation which reduced the maximum allowable volatility for gasoline sold in Illinois during July and August 1990 to 9.5 pounds per square inch.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental protection, Subtitle B: Air pollution, Chapter I: Pollution control board, Part 215, Organic material emission standards and limitations, §215.585, Gasoline volatility standards, Adopted at 14 Illinois register 6434, effective April 11, 1990.

(84) On September 18, 1991, and November 18, 1991, the State submitted documents intended to satisfy federal requirements for an operating permit program which can issue federally enforceable operating permits.

(i) Incorporation in reference. (A) Public Act 87–555, an Act to amend the Environmental Protection Act by changing section 9.1, effective September 17, 1991. (Ch. 111 1/2, par. 1009.1) par. 1009.1(a), (b), (c), (d) and (f).

(85) On March 24, 1988, the State submitted rules for issuance of construction permits to new and modified air pollution sources located in or affecting nonattainment areas (New Source Review rules).

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35 Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Part 203: Major Stationary Sources.

(86) On February 8, 1991, the State submitted revisions to its sulfur dioxide measurement methodology.

(87) On March 13, 1985, the State submitted revisions to its sulfur dioxide limitations.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Part 214 Sulfur Limitations, Subpart C: Existing Solid Fuel Combustion Emission Sources, Section 214.141 Sources Located in Metropolitan Areas, through paragraph (a) only, effective March 28, 1983; Subpart F: Alternative Standards for Sources Inside Metropolitan Areas, Section 214.201 Alternative Standards for Sources in Metropolitan Areas and Section 214.202 Dispersion Enhancement Techniques, effective March 28, 1983.

(88) On June 9, 1986, the State submitted revisions to its sulfur dioxide limitations in the form of a April 24, 1986, opinion and order of the Illinois Pollution Board in proceeding R84–28.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board Part 214 Sulfur Limitations, Subpart C: Existing Solid Fuel Combustion Emission Sources, §214.141 Sources Located in Metropolitan Areas, paragraphs b), c) and d), and Subpart X: Utilities, §214.560 Scope and §214.561 E.D. Edwards Electric Generating Station effective May 20, 1986.

(89) On March 17, 1989, and August 28, 1990, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan. The revision is contained in subpart J, §201.281 and subpart L, §§201.401-.408 of part 210 of title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code. This revision provides a legally enforceable procedure for continuously monitoring and recording emissions to determine the status of compliance of certain stationary source categories and complies with 40 CFR 51.214 and part 51, appendix P. The rules were adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board on December 15, 1988, published (13 Ill. Reg. 2066) and became effective February 3, 1989. The rules were corrected for an omission, published on November 15, 1989, (13 Ill Reg. 19444), and became effective December 5, 1989. In a November 18, 1991, letter from Bharat Mathur, then Manager, Division of Air Pollution Control, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) to Stephen Rothblatt, Chief, Regulation Development Branch, Region 5, USEPA, Illinois committed to notify USEPA of any pending construction or operating permit application during the 30 day public comment period which is part of Illinois' permit issuance process (Section 203.150). This commitment is part of the administrative record of USEPA's approval of the Illinois' operating permit program for the purpose of issuing federally enforceable operating permits at 40 CFR 52.720 (c) (84) and 52.737 on December 17, 1992 (57 FR 59928). USEPA may deem a permit not federally enforceable if monitoring provisions do not comply with the requirements of 40 CFR 51.214, part 51, appendix P or §51.165.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection; Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution Control Board; Subchapter a: Permits and General Provisions; Part 201: Permits and General Provisions, Subpart J: Monitoring and Testing, Section 201.281; and Subpart L: Continuous Monitoring, Sections 201.401 through 201.408, adopted at Ill. Reg. 2066, effective February 3, 1989.

(90) On June 11, 1991, Illinois submitted regulations concerning the emission of volatile organic compounds from pharmaceutical manufacturing.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter C: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 215: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations, Subpart T: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing, Subpart A: General Provisions: Amendments to sections 215.102 and 215.105 and Creation of section 215.108. Adopted at 15Illinois Register80 18, effective May 14, 1991.

(B) Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter C: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions. Adopted at 15Illinois Register79 01, effective May 14, 1991.

(92) On June 4, 1992, the State submitted particulate matter regulations adopted as part of Pollution Control Board Proceeding R91–35. These regulations concern particulate matter ambient limits and episode regulations.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board

(A) Part 212 Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions: Section 212.113 Incorporations by Reference; section 212.424 Fugitive Particulate Matter Control for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Plant and Associated Quarry Operations located in LaSalle County, South of the Illinois River; section 212.443 Coke Plants; section 212.445 Blast Furnace Cast Houses; adopted at 16 Illinois Register 8204, effective May 15, 1992.

(B) Part 243 Air Quality Standards: Section 243.108 Incorporations by Reference; section 243.120 PM₋₁₀; section 243.121 Repealed; adopted at 16 Illinois Register 8185, effective May 15, 1992.

(C) Part 244 Episodes: Section 244.101 Definitions; section 244.106 Monitoring; section 244.107 Determination of Areas Affected; section 244.121 Local Agency Responsibilities; section 244.161 Advisory Alert and Emergency Levels; section 244.162 Criteria for Declaring and Advisory; section 244.163 Criteria for Declaring a Yellow Alert; section 244.166 Criteria for Terminating Advisory, Alert and Emergency; section 244.167 Episode Stage Notification; section 244.168 Contents of Episode Stage Notification; section 244.169 Actions During Episode Stages Adopted; section 244 appendix D; adopted at 16 Illinois Register 8191, effective May 15, 1992.

(93) On September 30, 1992, the State submitted rules regulating volatile organic compound emissions from gasoline dispensing facilities' motor vehicle fuel operations.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code, title 35 Environmental Protection, subtitle B: Air Pollution, chapter I: Pollution Control Board part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area; subpart Y: Gasoline Distribution; §218.583 Gasoline Dispensing Facilities—Storage Tank Filling Operations, amended at 16 Illinois Register 13864 effective August 24, 1992, and; §218.586 Gasoline Dispensing Facilities—Motor Vehicle Fueling Operations, added at 16 Illinois Register 13864, effective August 24, 1992.

(ii) Additional materials. (A) Stage II Vapor Recovery SIP Program Description dated September 29, 1992.

(94) On July 30, 1986, the State submitted particulate boiler rules intended to replace rule 203(g)(1) which was vacated by the Courts. No action is taken on §212.209 because the variance which it authorized has expired. On July 22, 1988, the State submitted opacity rules intended to replace rule 202(b) which had been vacated by the Courts. Also on July 22, 1988, the State submitted Illinois Pollution Control Board procedural rules for considering Air Adjusted Standard Procedures.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Illinois Administrative Code, Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board; part 212 Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions; subpart E: Particulate Matter Emission from Fuel Combustion Emission Sources; §§212.201, 212.202, 212.203 and 212.204. Amended or added at 10 Ill Reg. 12637, effective July 9, 1986.

(B) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Illinois Administrative Code, Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board; part 212 Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions; subpart B: Visible Emissions. Amended or added at 12 Ill. Reg 12492, effective July 13, 1988.

(C) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Illinois Administrative Code; Subtitle A: General Provisions; Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board; part 106: Hearings Pursuant to Specific Rules; subpart E: Air Adjusted Standards Procedures. Added at 12 Ill. Reg 12484, effective July 13, 1988.

(95) On October 16, 1991, and November 13, 1991, the State submitted particulate matter regulations adopted as part of Pollution Control Board Proceeding R91–6. These regulations concern particulate matter controls for LaSalle County, Illinois.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board.

(A) The addition of definitions for “Condensible PM–10”, “PM–10”, “Portland Cement Manufacturing Process Emission Source”, and the modification of the definition of “Portland Cement Process” to Part 211 Definitions and General Provisions: Section 211.122 Definitions; adopted at 15 Illinois Register 15673, effective October 14, 1991.

(B) Part 212 Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions: Section 212.110 Measurement Methods; the addition of an abbreviation for pounds per hour to Section 212.111 Abbreviations and Units; additions and deletions to Section 212.113 Incorporations by Reference including the addition and/or renumbering of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (h) and the deletion of paragraphs earlier numbered as (a) and (f); Section 212.423 Emission Limits for Portland Cement the Manufacturing Plant Located in LaSalle County, South of the Illinois River; adopted at 15 Illinois Register 15708, effective October 4, 1991.

(96) On November 12, 1992, the State of Illinois submitted a Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Assistance Program for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation Plan as required by section 507 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Included in the State's submittal were a program description, newly adopted enabling legislation including new subsection 20 of section 39.5 of the Environmental Protection Act, Public Act 87–1213, and new subsection 46.13(a) of the Civil Administrative Code, Public Act 87–1177, and a May 4, 1992, State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs (DCCA), Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) Interagency Agreement defining the responsibilities of DCCA and IEPA in developing and implementing the Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program (Program).

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Subsection 20 of section 39.5 of the Environmental Protection Act adopted as Public Act 87–1213 signed into law on September 26, 1992, and effective upon signature.

(B) Subsection 46.13(a) of the Civil Administrative Code adopted as Public Act 87–1177 signed into law on September 21, 1992, and effective upon signature.

(B) May 4, 1992, Interagency Agreement between DCCA and IEPA defining the responsibilities of each agency in developing and implementing the program.

(97) On October 12, 1992, and June 2, 1993, the State of Illinois submitted a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP) intended to satisfy the requirements of section 182(a)(3)(B) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990. Included were State rules establishing procedures for the annual reporting of emissions of volatile organic material (VOM) and oxides of nitrogen (NO_X) as well as other regulated air pollutants by stationary sources in ozone nonattainment areas. Also included was a June 2, 1993, commitment letter from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) to fulfill the reporting requirements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency by performing the following tasks:

(i) Update the AIRS Facility Subsystem using the annual emissions report data. The 1992 data will be updated by December 31, 1993, and subsequent updates will be made by July 1st of each year.

(iii) Develop and submit Emissions Statement Status Reports (ESSR) on a quarterly basis each year until all applicable sources have submitted the required annual emissions reports. The report will show the total number of facilities from which emission statement data was requested, the number of facilities that met the provisions, and the number of facilities that failed to meet the provisions. Sources that are delinquent in submitting their emissions statements will be individually listed if they emit 500 tons per year or more of VOM or 2500 tons per year or more of NO_X. The report will also contain the emission data requested in Appendix F of the July 6, 1992, Draft Guidance on the Implementation of an Emission Statement Program.

(iv) All sources subject to the emission statement requirements must report, at a minimum, the information specified under subpart C of part 254 of chapter II of subtitle B of title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code.

(A) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter II: Environmental Protection Agency, Part 254: Annual Emissions Report, adopted at 17 Illinois Register 7782, effective May 14, 1993.

(98) On July 21, 1986, the State a submitted revision to its particulate matter regulations to incorporate an emission limit for continuous automatic stoking animal pathological waste incinerators.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Part 212 Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions, subpart D: Particulate Matter Emissions from Incinerators, section 212.185 Continuous Automatic Stoking Animal Pathological Waste Incinerators. Adopted December 18, 1986, added at 11 Ill. Reg. 1410, effective December 30, 1986.

(99) On January 4, 1989, the State submitted revisions to its sulfur dioxide rules.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 214 Sulfur Limitations, Subpart A: General Provisions, section 214.102 Abbreviations and Units. Amended at 12 Ill. Reg. 20778, effective December 5, 1988.

(B) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 214 Sulfur Limitations, Subpart A: General Provisions, section 214.104 Incorporations by Reference. Amended at 15 Ill. Reg. 1017, effective January 15, 1991.

(C) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 214 Sulfur Limitations, Subpart O: Petroleum Refining, Petrochemical and Chemical Manufacturing, section 214.382 Petroleum and Petrochemical Processes. Amended at 12 Ill. Reg. 20778, effective December 5, 1988.

(100) On October 21, 1993, the State submitted definitions codified as part of the Illinois Administrative Code for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation Plan.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211 Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart A: General Provisions: Sections 211.101 and 211.102, Subpart B: Definitions, Sections 211.121, 211.130, 211.150, 211.170, 211.210, 211.230, 211.250, 211.290, 211.310, 211.330, 211.350, 211.370, 211.390, 211.410, 211.430, 211.450, 211.470, 211.490, 211.510, 211.530, 211.550, 211.570, 211.590, 211.610, 211.630, 211.650, 211.670, 211.690, 211.710, 211.730, 211.750, 211.770, 211.790, 211.810, 211.830, 211.850, 211.870, 211.890, 211.910, 211.930, 211.950, 211.970, 211.990, 211.1010, 211.1050, 211.1090, 211.1110, 211.1130, 211.1150, 211.1170, 211.1190, 211.1210, 211.1230, 211.1250, 211.1270, 211.1290, 211.1310, 211.1330, 211.1350, 211.1370, 211.1390, 211.1410, 211.1430, 211.1470, 211.1490, 211.1510, 211.1530, 211.1550, 211.1570, 211.1590, 211.1610, 211.1630, 211.1650, 211.1670, 211.1690, 211.1710, 211.1730, 211.1750, 211.1770, 211.1790, 211.1810, 211.1830, 211.1850, 211.1870, 211.1890, 211.1910, 211.1930, 211.1950, 211.1970, 211.1990, 211.2010, 211.2050, 211.2070, 211.2090, 211.2110, 211.2130, 211.2150, 211.2170, 211.2190, 211.2210, 211.2230, 211.2250, 211.2270, 211.2310, 211.2330, 211.2350, 211.2370, 211.2390, 211.2410, 211.2430, 211.2450, 211.2470, 211.2490, 211.2510, 211.2530, 211.2550, 211.2570, 211.2590, 211.2650, 211.2670, 211.2690, 211.2710, 211.2730, 211.2750, 211.2770, 211.2790, 211.2810, 211.2830, 211.2850, 211.2870, 211.2890, 211.2910, 211.2930, 211.2950, 211.2970, 211.2990, 211.3010, 211.3030, 211.3050, 211.3070, 211.3090, 211.3110, 211.3130, 211.3150, 211.3170, 211.3190, 211.3210, 211.3230, 211.3250, 211.3270, 211.3290, 211.3310, 211.3330, 211.3350, 211.3370, 211.3390, 211.3410, 211.3430, 211.3450, 211.3470, 211.3490, 211.3510, 211.3530, 211.3550, 211.3570, 211.3590, 211.3610, 211.3630, 211.3650, 211.3670, 211.3690, 211.3710, 211.3730, 211.3750, 211.3770, 211.3790, 211.3810, 211.3830, 211.3850, 211.3870, 211.3890, 211.3910, 211.3930, 211.3970, 211.3990, 211.4010, 211.4030, 211.4050, 211.4070, 211.4090, 211.4110, 211.4130, 211.4150, 211.4170, 211.4190, 211.4210, 211.4230, 211.4250, 211.4270, 211.4290, 211.4310, 211.4330, 211.4350, 211.4370, 211.4390, 211.4410, 211.4430, 211.4450, 211.4470, 211.4490, 211.4510, 211.4530, 211.4550, 211.4590, 211.4610, 211.4630, 211.4650, 211.4670, 211.4690, 211.4710, 211.4730, 211.4750, 211.4770, 211.4790, 211.4810, 211.4870, 211.4890, 211.4910, 211.4930, 211.4950, 211.4990, 211.5030, 211.5050, 211.5070, 211.5090, 211.5110, 211.5130, 211.5150, 211.5170, 211.5185, 211.5190, 211.5210, 211.5230, 211.5250, 211.5270, 211.5310, 211.5330, 211.5350, 211.5370, 211.5410, 211.5430, 211.5450, 211.5470, 211.5490, 211.5510, 211.5550, 211.5570, 211.5590, 211.5610, 211.5630, 211.5650, 211.5670, 211.5690, 211.5710, 211.5730, 211.5750, 211.5770, 211.5790, 211.5810, 211.5830, 211.5850, 211.5870, 211.5890, 211.5910, 211.5930, 211.5950, 211.5970, 211.5990, 211.6010, 211.6030, 211.6050, 211.6070, 211.6090, 211.6130, 211.6150, 211.6190, 211.6210, 211.6230, 211.6270, 211.6290, 211.6310, 211.6330, 211.6350, 211.6370, 211.6390, 211.6410, 211.6430, 211.6450, 211.6470, 211.6490, 211.6510, 211.6530, 211.6550, 211.6570, 211.6590, 211.6610, 211.6670, 211.6690, 211.6730, 211.6750, 211.6770, 211.6790, 211.6810, 211.6850, 211.6870, 211.6890, 211.6910, 211.6930, 211.6950, 211.6970, 211.6990, 211.7010, 211.7030, 211.7070, 211.7090, 211.7110, 211.7130, 211.7150, 211.7170, 211.7190, 211.7210, 211.7230, 211.7250, 211.7270, 211.7290, 211.7310, 211.7330, 211.7350.

(101) On October 21, 1993, the state submitted volatile organic compound (VOC) control regulations for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation for ozone.

Appendix A, B, C, and D. These regulations were adopted at R91–7 at 15 Ill. Reg. 12231, effective August 16, 1991; amended in R91–23 at Ill. Reg. 13564, effective August 24, 1992; amended in R91–28 and R91–30 at 16 Ill. Reg. 13864, effective August 24, 1992; amended in R93–9 at 17 Ill. Reg. 16636, effective September 27, 1993. The specific adoption and effective dates of the rules incorporated by reference follow.

( 1 ) Adopted at R91–7 at 15 Ill. Reg. 12231, effective August 16, 1991. Subpart A 218.108; Subpart C: 218.142; Subpart R: 218.442, 218.444, 218.448, 218.451; Subpart T: 218.484, 218.488; Subpart V: 218.526; Subpart X: 218.561, 218.563; Subpart Z: 218.607; Subpart AA: 218.625, 218.626 and 218.630.

( 2 ) Amended in R93–9 at 17 Ill. Reg. 16636, effective September 27, 1993. Subpart A: 218.100, 218.101, 218.102, 218.103, 218.104, 218.105, 218.106, 218.107, 218.109, 218.110, 218.111, 218.112; Subpart B: 218.121, 218.122, 218.123, 218.124; Subpart C: 218.141, 218.143, 218.144; Subpart E: 218.181, 218.182, 218.183, 218.184, 218.186; Subpart F: 218.204, 218.205, 218.206, 218.207, 218.208, 218.209, 218.210, 218.211; Subpart G: 218.301, 218.302, 218.303, 218.304; Subpart H: 218.401, 218.402, 218.403, 218.404, 218.405; Subpart Q: 218.421, 218.422, 218.423, 218.424, 218.425, 218.426, 218.427, 218.428, 218.429; Subpart R: 218.441, 218.443, 218.445, 218.446, 218.447, 218.449, 218.450, 218.452; Subpart S: 218.461, 218.462, 218.463, 218.464; Subpart T: 218.480, 218.481, 218.482, 218.483, 218.485, 218.486, 218.487, 218.489; Subpart V: 218.525; Subpart W: 218.541; Subpart X: 218.562; Subpart Y: 218.581, 218.582, 218.583, 218.584, 218.585, 218.586; Subpart Z: 218.601, 218.602, 218.603, 218.608, 218.609, 218.610, 218.611; Subpart AA: 218.620, 218.621, 218.623, 218.624, 218.628, 218.636, 218.637; Subpart BB: 218.640, 218.642, 218.644, Section 218: Appendix A, Appendix B, Appendix C, Appendix D.

(B) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for Metro East Area Subparts A, B, C, E, F, G, H, Q, R, S, T, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, BB and Section 219 Appendix A, B, C, and D. These regulations were adopted at R91–8 at Ill. Reg. 12491, effective August 16, 1991; amended in R91–24 at 16 Ill. Reg. 13597, effective August 24, 1992; amended in R91–30 at 16 Ill. Reg. 13833, effective August 24, 1992, emergency amendment in R93–12 at Ill. Reg. 8295, effective May 24, 1993, for a maximum of 150 days, amended in R93–9 at 17 Ill. Reg. 16918, effective September 27, 1993 and October 21, 1993. The specific adoption and effective dates of the rules incorporated by reference follow.

( 1 ) Adopted at R91–8 at 15 Ill. Reg. 12491, effective August 16, 1991: Subpart A: 219.103, 219.108; Subpart C: 219.142; Subpart R: 219.442, 219.444, 219.448, 219.451; Subpart T: 219.484, 219.488; Subpart V: 219.526; Subpart X: 219.561, 219.563; Subpart Z: 219.607; Subpart AA: 219.625, 219.626, 219.630.

Subpart A: 219.100, 219.101, 219.102, 219.104, 219.105, 219.106, 219.107, 219.109, 219.110, 219.111, 219.112;

Subpart F: 219.204, 219.205, 219.206, 219.207, 219.208, 219.209, 219.210, 219.211;

Subpart Q: 219.421, 219.422, 219.423, 219.424, 219.425, 219.426, 219.427, 219.428, 219.429;

Subpart R: 219.441, 219.443, 219.445, 219.446, 219.447, 219.449, 219.450, 219.452;

Subpart T: 219.480, 219.481, 219.482, 219.483, 219.485, 219.486, 219.487, 219.489;

(102) On October 21, 1993 and March 4, 1994, the State submitted volatile organic compound control regulations for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation Plan for ozone.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Sections 211.270, 211.1070, 211.2030, 211.2610, 211.3950, 211.4050, 211.4830, 211.4850, 211.4970, 211.5390, 211.5530, 211.6110, 211.6170, 211.6250, 211.6630, 211.6650, 211.6710, 211.6830, 211.7050. These sections were adopted on January 6, 1994, Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 1253, and effective January 18, 1994.

(C) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart A: 218.106, 218.108, 218.112, 218.114; Subpart H: 218.402; Subpart Z: 218.602, 218.611; Subpart AA: 218.620, 218.623 (repealed); Subpart CC; Subpart DD; Subpart PP: 218.920, 218.926; Subpart QQ: 218.940, 218.946; Subpart RR: 218.960, 218.966; Subpart TT: 218.980, 218.986; Subpart UU: 218.991. These sections were adopted on January 6, 1994, Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 1945, effective January 24, 1994.

(103) On February 11, 1993, Illinois submitted a site specific revision to its carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan for a General Motors Corporation iron foundry located adjacent to Interstate 74 at G Street in Vermilion County, Illinois.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code; Title 35 Environmental Protection; Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution Control Board; Subchapter C: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources; P 216: Carbon Monoxide Emissions; Subpart O: Primary and Fabricated Metal Products; Section 216.382 Exception, General Motors Ferris Foundry in Vermilion County. Added at 16 Illinois Register 18075, effective November 13, 1992.

(105) On February 7, 1994, the State submitted revisions intended to create a permit program for small sources. The purpose of these revisions is to lessen the permitting burden on small sources and the permitting authority by reducing the frequency and/or the requirement of operating permit renewal for sources emitting a total of less than 25 tons per year of regulated air pollutants. A permit obtained through these procedures is intended to continue as a legally binding State document until the source modifies its operations, withdraws its permit or becomes subject to a new applicable requirement. At that time, the State will determine whether the small source procedures continue to be appropriate and issue a revised small source permit or direct the source in following the correct permit procedures. Since small source permits are not subject to a public comment period or review by USEPA, they are not federally enforceable and cannot be used to limit sources' potential to emit and thereby exempt them from the requirements of the title v operating permit program.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board.

(A) Subchapter a: Permits and General Provisions, Part 201: Permits and General Provisions.

( 1 ) Subpart D: Permit Applications and Review Process, Section 201.162 Duration and Section 201.163 Joint Construction and Operating Permits. Amended at 17 Ill. Reg., effective December 7, 1993.

( 2 ) Subpart E: Special Provisions for Operating Permits for Certain Smaller Sources, Section 201.180 Applicability, Section 201.181 Expiration and Renewal and Section 201.187 Requirement for a Revised Permit Added at 17 Ill. Reg., effective December 7, 1993.

(B) Subchapter C: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.5500 Regulated Air Pollutant. Adopted at 17 Ill. Reg., effective December 7, 1993.

(106) On November 23, 1994, the State submitted amended marine vessel loading rules which consisted of revised definitions, and revisions to the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis areas.

(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Sections 211.3480 Loading Event and 211.3660 Marine Vessel added at 18 Ill. Reg. 166769, effective October 25, 1994; Sections 211.3650 Marine Terminal, and 211.6970 Vapor Collection System, and Section 211.6990 Vapor Control System amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 16769, effective October 25, 1994.

(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart A; General Provisions, Sections 218.101 Savings Clause and 218.106 Compliance Dates amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 16392, effective October 25, 1994; Subpart GG: Marine Terminals, Sections 218.760 Applicability, 218.762 Control Requirements, 218.764 Compliance Certification, 218.766 Leaks, 218.768 Testing and Monitoring, and 218.770 Recordkeeping and Reporting added at 18 Ill. Reg. 16392, effective October 25, 1994; Appendix E: List of Affected Marine Terminals amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 16392, effective October 25, 1994.

(C) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart A; General Provisions, Sections 219.101 Savings Clause and 219.106 Compliance Dates amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 16415, effective October 25, 1994; Subpart GG: Marine Terminals, Sections 219.760 Applicability, 219.762 Control Requirements, 219.764 Compliance Certification, 219.766 Leaks, 219.768 Testing and Monitoring, and 219.770 Recordkeeping and Reporting added at 18 Ill. Reg. 16415, effective October 25, 1994.

(D) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Appendix E: List of affected Marine Terminals amended at 20 Ill. Reg. 3848. Effective February 15, 1996.

(107) On October 25, 1994, Illinois submitted a regulation which requires gasoline dispensing operations in the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis ozone nonattainment areas that have storage tanks of at least 575 gallons to install pressure/vacuum relief valves on storage tank vent pipes. Tanks installed before January 1, 1979, are exempt from the rule if they have a capacity of less than 2000 gallons, as are tanks that are equipped with floating roofs or equivalent control devices that have been approved by the State and USEPA.

(A) Part 201 Permits and General Provisions, Section 201.302 Reports. Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 15002. Effective September 21, 1994.

(B) Part 211 Definitions and General Provisions, Section 211.5060 Pressure/Vacuum Relief Valve. Added at 18 Ill. Reg. 14962. Effective September 21, 1994.

(C) Part 218 Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for Chicago Area, Section 218.583 Gasoline Dispensing Operations-Storage Tank Filling Operations. Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 14973. Effective September 21, 1994.

(D) Part 219 Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for Metro East Area, Section 219.583 Gasoline Dispensing Operations-Storage Tank Filling Operations. Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 14987. Effective September 21, 1994.

(108) On January 25, 1994, the State submitted a revision to its ozone State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Quantum Chemical Corporation's facility located in Morris, Aux Sable Township, Grundy County, Illinois. It grants an adjusted standard from Parts 35 Illinois Administration Code (IAC) 218.966 and 218.986 as they apply to specific units or plants within this facility.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Final Opinion and Order, AS 92–14, adopted on October 7, 1993, and effective on October 7, 1993.

(109) On October 25, 1994, Illinois submitted a regulation that reduces the maximum allowable volatility for gasoline sold in the Metro-East St. Louis ozone nonattainment area, which includes Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair Counties, to 7.2 pounds per square inch Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) during the summer control period. On May 14, 1996, Illinois submitted an amendment to its RVP rule which changes the summer regulatory control period of the program. The summer control period for the Illinois RVP program is June 1 to September 15.

(A) Section 219.112 Incorporation by Reference. Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 14987. Effective September 21, 1994.

(110) On September 26, 1994, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to its ozone State Implementation Plan for the J. M. Sweeney Company located in Cicero, Cook County, Illinois. It grants a compliance date extension from Stage II vapor control requirements (35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.586) from November 1, 1993, to March 31, 1995.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Final Opinion and Order, PCB 93–257, adopted on September 1, 1994, and effective on September 1, 1994. Certification dated 9/23/94 of Acceptance by J. M. Sweeney.

(111) On July 29, 1994, Illinois submitted regulations which require adoption and implementation of particulate matter contingency measures for Illinois' four moderate particulate matter nonattainment areas. Sources in the nonattainment areas which emit at least 15 tons of particulate matter must submit two levels of contingency measures, which will then become Federally enforceable. Sources will be required to implement the contingency measures if an exceedance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Particulate Matter is measured, or if the United States Environmental Protection Agency finds that an area has failed to attain the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board;

(A) Part 106 Hearings Pursuant to Specific Rules, Section 106.930—Applicability, Section 106.931—Petition for Review, Section 106.932—Response and Reply, Section 106.933—Notice and Hearing, Section 106.934—Opinion and Order. Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 11579–11586. Effective July 11, 1994.

(B) Part 212 Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions, Section 212.700—Applicability, Section 212.701—Contingency Measure Plans, Submittal and Compliance Date, Section 212.702—Determination of Contributing Sources, Section 212.703—Contingency Measure Plan Elements, Section 212.704—Implementation, Section 212.705—Alternative Implementation. Added at 18 Ill. Reg. 11587–11606. Effective July 11, 1994.

(112) On March 28, 1995, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to its ozone State Implementation Plan for P & S, Incorporated's facility located in Wood Dale, Du Page County, Illinois. It grants a compliance date extension from Stage II vapor control requirements (35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.586) from November 1, 1994 until April 1, 1996, or 60 days after notification to P & S, Incorporated that the roadway construction complicating the installation of Stage II equipment will be abandoned for any reason, whichever is sooner.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Final Opinion and Order, PCB 94–299, adopted on February 16, 1995, and effective on February 16, 1995. Certification dated March 1, 1995 of Acceptance by P & S, Incorporated.

(113) On April 27, 1995, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency requested a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of revisions to the State's New Source Review rules for sources in the Chicago and metropolitan East St. Louis ozone nonattainment areas and are intended to satisfy Federal requirements of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990. The State's New Source Review provisions are codified at Title 35: Environmental Protection Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter a: Permits and General Provisions. Part 203 Major Stationary Sources Construction and Modification is amended as follows:

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subpart A: General Provisions, Section 203.101 Definitions, Section 203.107 Allowable Emissions, Section 203.110 Available Growth Margin, Section 203.112 Building, Structure and Facility, Section 203.121 Emission Offset, Section 203.122 Emissions Unit, Section 203.123 federally Enforceable, Section 203.126 Lowest Achievable Emission Rate, Section 203.128 Potential to Emit, Section 203.145 Volatile Organic Material, Section 203.150 Public Participation. Effective April 30, 1993.

(B) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subpart B: Major Stationary Sources in Nonattainment Areas, Section 203.201 Prohibition, Section 203.203 Construction Permit Requirement and Application, Section 203.206 Major Stationary Source, Section 203.207 Major Modification of a Source, Section 203.208 Net Emission Determination, Section 203.209 Significant Emissions Determination. Effective April 30, 1993.

(C) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subpart C: Requirements for Major Stationary Sources in Nonattainment Areas, Section 203.301 Lowest Achievable Emission Rate, Section 203.302 Maintenance of Reasonable Further Progress and Emission Offsets, Section 203.303 Baseline and Emission Offsets Determination, Section 203.306 Analysis of Alternatives. Effective April 30, 1993.

(D) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subpart H: Offsets for Emission Increases From Rocket Engines and Motor Firing, Section 203.801 Offsetting by Alternative or Innovative Means. Effective April 30, 1993. Published in the Illinois Register, Volume 17, Issue 20, May 14, 1993.

(114) On November 30, 1994, the State submitted an amended Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry Air Oxidation Process rule which consisted of extended applicability and tightened control measures to the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis areas.

(A) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart V; Air Oxidation Processes, Sections 218.520 Emission Limitations for Air Oxidation Processes, 218.522 Savings Clause, 218.523 Compliance, 218.524 Determination of Applicability, and 218.525 Emission Limitations for Air Oxidation Processes (Renumbered) at 18 Ill. Reg. 16972, effective November 15, 1994.

(B) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart V; Air Oxidation Processes, Sections 219.520 Emission Limitations for Air Oxidation Processes, 219.522 Savings Clause, 219.523 Compliance, 219.524 Determination of Applicability, and 219.525 Emission Limitations for Air Oxidation Processes (Renumbered) at 18 Ill. Reg. 17001, effective November 15, 1994.

(115) On May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, the State submitted an amended coating rule which consisted of a tightened applicability cut-off level for wood furniture coating operations to the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis areas.

(A) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart F; Coating Operations, Sections 218.208 Exemptions from Emission Limitations, Subsection (b), amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.

(B) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart F; Coating Operations, Section 219.208 Exemptions from Emission Limitations, Subsection (b), amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.

(116) On May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, the State submitted a rule for automotive/transportation and business machine plastic parts coating operations, which consisted of new volatile organic compound emission limitations to the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis areas.

(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B; Definitions, Sections 211.660 Automotive/Transportation Plastic Parts, 211.670 Baked Coatings, 211.820 Business Machine Plastic Parts, 211.1880 Electromagnetic Interference/Radio Frequency Interference Shielding Coatings, 211.1900 Electrostatic Prep Coat, 211.2360 Flexible Coatings, 211.2630 Gloss Reducers, 211.4055 Non-Flexible Coating, 211.4740 Plastic Part, 211.5480 Reflective Argent Coating, 211.5600 Resist Coat, 211.6060 Soft Coat, 211.6140 Specialty Coatings, 211.6400 Stencil Coat, 211.6580 Texture Coat, and 211.6880 Vacuum Metallizing, amended at 19 Ill. 6823, effective May 9, 1995.

(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart F; Coating Operations, Sections 218.204 Emission Limitations, Subsection (n) Plastic Parts Coating: Automotive/Transportation and (o) Plastic Parts Coating: Business Machine, 218.205 Daily-Weighted Average Limitations, Subsection (g), and 218.207 Alternative Emission Limitations, Subsection (i), amended at 19 Ill. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.

(C) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart F; Coating Operations, Section 219.204 Emission Limitations, Subsection (m) Plastic Parts Coating: Automotive/Transportation and (n) Plastic Parts Coating: Business Machine, 219.205 Daily-Weighted Average Limitations, Subsection (f), and 219.207 Alternative Emission Limitations, Subsection (h), amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.

(117) On May 31, 1995, the State submitted amended lithographic printing rules which consisted of revised definitions, and revisions to the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis areas.

(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Sections 211.474 Alcohol, 211.560 As-Applied Fountain Solution, 211.2850 Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Printing Line, 211.4065 Non-Heatset, 211.5980 Sheet-Fed added at 19 Ill. Reg. 6823, effective May 9, 1995.

(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart H; Printing and Publishing, Sections 218.405 Lithographic Printing: Applicability, 218.406 Provisions Applying to Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Printing Prior to March 15, 1996, 218.407 Emissions Limitations and Control Requirements for Lithographic Printing Lines On and After March 15, 1996, 218.408 Compliance Schedule for Lithographic Printing on and After March 15, 1996, 218.409 Testing for Lithographic Printing On and After March 15, 1996, 218.410 Monitoring Requirements for Lithographic Printing, 218.411 Recordkeeping and Reporting for Lithographic Printing added at 19 Ill. Reg. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.

(C) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart H; Printing and Publishing, Sections 219.405 Lithographic Printing: Applicability, 219.406 Provisions Applying to Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Printing Prior to March 15, 1996, 219.407 Emissions Limitations and Control Requirements for Lithographic Printing Lines On and After March 15, 1996, 219.408 Compliance Schedule for Lithographic Printing on and After March 15, 1996, 219.409 Testing for Lithographic Printing On and After March 15, 1996, 219.410 Monitoring Requirements for Lithographic Printing, 219.411 Recordkeeping and Reporting for Lithographic Printing added at 19 Ill. Reg. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.

(118) On October 24, 1994, the State submitted a site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan establishing lubricant selection and temperature control requirements for Alumax Incorporated, Morris, Illinois facility's hot and cold aluminum rolling mills, as part of the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago area.

(i) Incorporation by reference. September 1, 1994, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board AS 92–13, effective September 1, 1994.

(119) On May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, the State submitted a revised rule tightening volatile organic compound emission limitations for certain surface coating operations in the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis areas.

(A) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart F; Coating Operations, Sections 218.204 Emission Limitations, 218.205 Daily-Weighted Average Limitations, 218.207 Alternative Emission Limitations, 218.208 Exemptions From Emission Limitations, 218.210 Compliance Schedule, 218.212 Cross-line Averaging to Establish Compliance for Coating Lines, 218.213 Recordkeeping and Reporting for Cross-line Averaging Participating Coating Lines, 218.214 Changing Compliance Methods, 218 Appendix H Baseline VOM Content Limitations for Subpart F, Section 218.212 Cross-Line Averaging, amended at 19 Ill. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.

(B) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart F; Coating Operations, Sections 219.204 Emission Limitations, 219.205 Daily-Weighted Average Limitations, 219.207 Alternative Emission Limitations, 219.208 Exemptions From Emission Limitations, 219.210 Compliance Schedule, 219.212 Cross-line Averaging to Establish Compliance for Coating Lines, 219.213 Recordkeeping and Reporting for Cross-line Averaging Participating Coating Lines, 219.214 Changing Compliance Methods, 219 Appendix H Baseline VOM Content Limitations for Subpart F, Section 219.212 Cross-line Averaging, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.

(120) On May 5, 1995, and May 31, 1995, the State of Illinois submitted a rule for motor vehicle refinishing operations, which consisted of new volatile organic material (VOM) emission limitations to the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago and Metro East St. Louis areas. This State Implementation Plan revision contains rules which establish VOM content limits for certain coatings and surface preparation products used in automobile and mobile equipment refinishing operations in the Chicago and Metro-East area, as well as requires these operations to meet certain equipment and work practice standards to further reduce VOM.

(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B; Definitions, Sections 211.240 Adhesion Promoter, 211.495 Anti-Glare/Safety Coating, 211.685 Basecoat/Clearcoat System, 211.1875 Elastomeric Materials, 211.3915 Mobile Equipment, 211.3960 Motor Vehicles, 211.3965 Motor Vehicle Refinishing, 211.5010 Precoat, 211.5061 Pretreatment Wash Primer, 211.5080 Primer Sealer, 211.5090 Primer Surfacer Coat, 211.6145 Specialty Coatings for Motor Vehicles, 211.6540 Surface Preparation Materials, 211.6620 Three or Four Stage Coating System, 211.6695 Topcoat System, 211.6720 Touch-Up Coating, 211.6860 Uniform Finish Blender, amended at 19 Ill. 6823, effective May 9, 1995.

(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart HH; Motor Vehicle Refinishing, Sections 218.780 Emission Limitations, 218.782 Alternative Control Requirements, 218.784 Equipment Specifications, 218.786 Surface Preparation Materials, 218.787 Work Practices, 218.788 Testing, 218.789 Monitoring and Record keeping for Control Devices, 218.790 General Record keeping and Reporting, 218.791 Compliance Date, 218.792 Registration, amended at 19 Ill. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.

(C) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart HH; Motor Vehicle Refinishing, Sections 219.780 Emission Limitations, 219.782 Alternative Control Requirements, 219.784 Equipment Specifications, 219.786 Surface Preparation Materials, 219.787 Work Practices, 219.788 Testing, 219.789 Monitoring and Record keeping for Control Devices, 219.790 General Record keeping and Reporting, 219.791 Compliance Date 219.792 Registration, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.

(121) On May 23, 1995, and June 7, 1995, the State submitted volatile organic compound control regulations for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation Plan for ozone.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Sections 211.695, 211.696, 211.5245, 211.6025. These sections were adopted on May 4, 1995, Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 7344, and effective May 22, 1995.

(B) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart V: 218.500, 218.501, 218.502, 218.503, 218.504, 218.505, 218.506. These sections were adopted on May 4, 1995, Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 7359, and effective May 22, 1995.

(C) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart V: 219.500, 219.501, 219.502, 219.503, 219.504, 219.505, 219.506. These sections were adopted on May 4, 1995, Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 7385, and effective May 22, 1995.

(122) On June 26, 1995, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision containing the 1992 enhancements to the Illinois vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program. Such enhancements were originally developed to meet the I/M performance standard as called for in the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA's) proposed `post-1987' I/M SIP policy and specified in the settlement agreement entered into by the parties in Wisconsin v. Reilly, Case No. 87–C–0395, E.D. Wis. The submittal includes authorizing legislation P.A. 86–1433, signed into law on September 12, 1990 and procedural rules published in the Illinois Register on June 26, 1992 at Volume 16, Issue #16.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 35 Illinois Administrative Code 276; Sections 276.101, 276.102, 276.204, 276.206, 276.301, 276.303, 276.304, 276.307, 276.308, 276.309, 276.310, 276.311, 276.401, 276.402, 276.701, 276.702, and 276.703 amended or added at 16 Ill. Reg. 10230, effective June 15, 1992.

(ii) Other material. (A) Public Act 86–1433 adopted by the Illinois General Assembly on June 29, 1990, signed into law by Governor Edgar on September 12, 1990 effective September 12, 1990 (Sections 2,3, and 4) and January 1, 1991 (Section 1). (B) June 26, 1995 letter and attachments from the IEPA's Bureau of Air Chief to the USEPA's Regional Air and Radiation Division Director submitting Illinois' revision to the ozone SIP.

(123) On May 5, 1995, May 26, 1995, and May 31, 1995, the State of Illinois submitted miscellaneous revisions to its Volatile Organic Material (VOM) Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) rules contained in 35 Illinois Administrative Code Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, and Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area. These amendments clarify certain applicability provisions, control requirements, and compliance dates contained within these regulations. Also included in these amendments is an exemption for certain polyethylene foam packaging operations from VOM RACT requirements.

(A) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart A: General Provisions, Section 218.106; Subpart T: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing, Section 218.480; Subpart DD: Aerosol Can Filling, Section 218.686; Subpart RR: Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Process, Section 218.966; Subpart TT: Other Emission Units, Section 218.980. Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6848; effective May 9, 1995.

(B) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart T: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing, Section 219.480; Subpart TT: Other Emission Units, Section 219.980. Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.

(124) The State of Illinois requested a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision is for the purpose of establishing and implementing a Clean-Fuel Fleet Program in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area, which includes Cook, DuPage, Grundy (Aux Sable and Goose Lake townships only), Kane, Kendall (Oswego township only), Lake, McHenry, and Will counties, to satisfy the federal requirements for a Clean Fuel Fleet Program to be part of the SIP for Illinois.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 35 Illinois Administrative Code 241; Sections 241.101, 241.102, 241.103, 241.104, 241.110, 241.111, 241.112, 241.113, 241.114, 241.115, 241.130, 241.131, 241.140, 241.141, 241.142, 241. Appendix A, 241. Appendix B adopted in R95–12 at 19 Ill. Reg. 13265, effective September 11, 1995.

(ii) Other material. (A) September 29, 1995 letter and attachments from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's Bureau of Air Chief to the USEPA's Regional Air and Radiation Division Director submitting Illinois' revision to the ozone SIP.

(125) On November 14, 1995 the State submitted requested revisions to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of revisions to the definitions of Organic Material and Organic Materials, Organic Solvent, Petroleum Liquid and Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) intended to exempt acetone from regulation as a VOC.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.4250 Organic Material and Organic Materials, Section 211.4260 Organic Solvent, Section 211.4610 Petroleum Liquid, Section 211.7150 Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 15176, effective October 19, 1995.

(126) On November 15, 1995 the State submitted a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of a revision to the definition Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) intended to exempt parachlorobenzotrifluoride and cyclic, branched or linear completely methylated siloxanes from the definition of VOM or VOC and thereby, from regulation as a VOC.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.7150 Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 11066, effective July 12, 1995.

(127) On October 21, 1993, and May 26, 1995, Illinois submitted volatile organic compound control regulations for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation Plan for ozone.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for Metro East Area, Subpart PP: 219.920, 219.923, 219.927, 219.928; Subpart QQ: 219.940, 219.943, 219.947, 219.948; Subpart RR: 219.960, 219.963, 219.967, 219.968; Subpart TT: 219.980, 219.983, 219.987, 219.988; and Subpart UU. These Subparts were adopted on September 9, 1993, Amended at 17 Ill. Reg. 16918, effective September 27, 1993.

(128) On November 30, 1994, the State submitted volatile organic compound control regulations for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation Plan for ozone.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Sections 211.2300, 211.3695. These sections were adopted on October 20, 1994, Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 16929, and effective November 15, 1994.

(B) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart B: 218.119, 218.120, 218.125, 218.127, 218.128, 218.129. These sections were adopted on October 20, 1994, Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 16950, and effective November 15, 1994.

(C) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart B: 219.119, 219.120, 219.125, 219.127, 219.128, 219.129. These sections were adopted on October 20, 1994, Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 16980, and effective November 15, 1994.

(130) On June 29, 1995, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the implementation of an enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in the Chicago and East St. Louis ozone nonattainment areas. This revision included the Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law of 1995 (625 ILCS 5/13B), P.A. 88–533, effective January 18, 1995; I/M regulations (R94–19 and R94–20) adopted on December 1, 1994, by the Illinois Pollution Control Board; February 29, 1996, Request-For-Proposals; April 22, 1996, letter of commitment; plus additional support documentation including modeling demonstration.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law of 1995 (625 ILCS 5/13B), Public Act 88–533, signed into law by Governor Edgar on January 18, 1995 effective January 18, 1995.

(B) 35 Illinois Administrative Code 240; Sections 240.101, 240.102, 240.104, 240.105, 240.106, 240.107, 240.124, 240.125, 240.151, 240.152, 240.153, 240.161, 240.162, 240.163, 240.164, 240.171, 240.Table A, 240.Table B amended or added in R94–19 at 18 Ill. Reg. 18228, effective December 14, 1994.

(C) 35 Illinois Administrative Code 240; Sections 240.172, 240.173 amended in R94–20 at 18 Ill. Reg. 18013, effective December 12, 1994.

(ii) Additional materials. (A) February 29, 1996, Request-For-Proposals submitted on April 22, 1996.

(B) April 22, 1996, letter of commitment and attachments from IEPA's Bureau of Air Chief to the USEPA's Regional Air and Radiation Division Director.

(131) On January 10, 1996, the State of Illinois submitted a site-specific State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision request for ozone, which extends the required deadline for the Rexam Medical Packaging Inc. facility in Mundelein, Lake County, Illinois (Rexam), to comply with 35 Illinois Administrative Code, part 218, subpart H, as it applies to its Inline Press Number No.105, Inline Press No. 111, Offline 32-inch Press, Offline 36-inch Press, and Offline 42-inch press. The compliance date is extended from March 15, 1995, until June 15, 1996, or upon submittal of the “certificate of compliance” required under section 218.404 of subpart H, whichever occurs first. The variance includes a compliance plan requiring the installation and use of a catalytic oxidizer to control emissions from Inline Press No. 105, Inline Press No. 111, Offline 32-inch Press, and Offline 42-inch Press. The Offline 36-inch Press is required to convert to water-based ink, or be controlled by the oxidizer if the press is not converted by March 1, 1996. The variance is contingent upon certain compliance milestone conditions.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Final Opinion and Order, PCB 95–99, adopted on October 19, 1995, and effective March 15, 1995. Certification of Acceptance dated November 29, 1996, by Rexam.

(132) On January 8, 1996, Illinois submitted a site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan establishing lubricant selection and temperature control requirements for the hot and cold aluminum operations at Reynolds Metals Company's McCook Sheet and Plate Plant in McCook, Illinois (in Cook County), as part of the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago area.

(i) Incorporation by reference. September 21, 1995, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board AS 91–8, effective September 21, 1995.

(133) On July 23, 1996, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a site-specific State Implementation Plan revision request for the Chase Products Company's Broadview (Cook County), Illinois facility located at 19th Street and Gardner Road, as part of the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago area. The resulting revision revises the control requirements codified at 35 Illinois Administrative Code Part 218 Subpart DD Section 218.686 as they apply to the Chase Products Company's Broadview facility.

(i) Incorporation by reference. May 16, 1996, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board AS 94–4, effective May 16, 1996.

(134) On May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, the State of Illinois submitted a State Implementation Plan revision request to the United States Environmental Protection Agency for reactor processes and distillation operation processes in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry as part of the State's control measures for Volatile Organic Material (VOM) emissions for the Chicago and Metro-East (East St. Louis) areas. VOM, as defined by the State of Illinois, is identical to “volatile organic compounds” (VOC), as defined by EPA. This plan was submitted to meet the Clean Air Act requirement for States to adopt Reasonably Available Control Technology rules for sources that are covered by Control Techniques Guideline documents. The EPA approves the State Implementation Plan revision request as it applies to Stepan Company's Millsdale Facility.

(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B; Definitions, 211.980 Chemical Manufacturing Process Unit, 211.1780 Distillation Unit, 211.2365 Flexible Operation Unit, 211.5065 Primary Product.

(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart Q: Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing Plant, Sections 218.431 Applicability, 218.432 Control Requirements, 218.433 Performance and Testing Requirements, 218.434 Monitoring Requirements, 218.435 Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, 218.436 Compliance Date, 218 Appendix G, TRE Index Measurement for SOCMI Reactors and Distillation Units, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.

(135) On January 23, 1996, Illinois submitted a site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan which relaxes the volatile organic material (VOM) content limit for fabricated product adhesive operations at Solar Corporation's Libertyville, Illinois facility from 3.5 pounds VOM per gallon to 5.75 pounds VOM per gallon.

(i) Incorporation by reference. July 20, 1995, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 94–2, effective July 20, 1995.

(136) On January 9, 1997, Illinois submitted a site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan which grants a temporary variance from certain automotive plastic parts coating volatile organic material requirements at Solar Corporation's Libertyville, Illinois facility.

(i) Incorporation by reference. September 5, 1996, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, PCB 96–239, effective September 13, 1996. Certificate of Acceptance signed September 13, 1996.

(137) Approval—On April 25, 1997, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a revision to the State Implementation Plan for general conformity rules. The general conformity rules enable the State of Illinois to implement the general conformity requirements in the nonattainment or maintenance areas at the State or local level in accordance with 40 CFR part 93, subpart B—Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plans.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 2: Environmental Protection Agency, Part 255 General Conformity: Criteria and Procedures. Adopted at 21 Ill. Reg. effective March 6, 1997.

(138) On May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, the State of Illinois submitted State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision requests for reactor processes and distillation operation processes in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry as part of the State's control measures for Volatile Organic Material emissions for the Metro-East (East St. Louis) area. This State Implementation Plan revision request is approved as it applies to Monsanto Chemical Group's Sauget Facility.

(B) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart Q: Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing Plant, Sections 219.431 Applicability, 219.432 Control Requirements, 219.433 Performance and Testing Requirements, 219.434 Monitoring Requirements, 219.435 Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, 219.436 Compliance Date, 219.Appendix G, TRE Index Measurement for SOCMI Reactors and Distillation Units, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.

(139) On September 8, 1997, the State of Illinois submitted tightened volatile organic material rules for cold cleaning degreasing operations in the Chicago and the Metro-East ozone nonattainment areas.

(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.1885, amended at 21 Ill. 7695, effective June 9, 1997.

(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart E: Solvent Cleaning, Section 218.182, amended at 21 Ill. 7708, effective June 9, 1997.

(C) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart E: Solvent Cleaning, Section 219.182, amended at 21 Ill. 7721, effective June 9, 1997.

(140) On March 5, 1998, the State of Illinois submitted amended rules for the control of volatile organic material emissions from wood furniture coating operations in the Chicago and Metro-East (East St. Louis) ozone nonattainment areas, as a requested revision to the ozone State Implementation Plan. This plan was submitted to meet the Clean Air Act requirement for States to adopt Reasonably Available Control Technology rules for sources that are covered by Control Techniques Guideline documents.

(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B; Definitions, 211.1467 Continuous Coater, 211.1520 Conventional Air Spray, 211.6420 Strippable Spray Booth Coating, 211.7200 Washoff Operations, amended at 22 Ill. Reg. 3497, effective February 2, 1998.

(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart F: Coating Operations 218.204 Emission Limitations, 218.205 Daily-weighted Average Limitations, 218.210 Compliance Schedule, 218.211 Recordkeeping and Reporting, 218.215 Wood Furniture Coating Averaging Approach, 218.216 Wood Furniture Coating Add-On Control Use, 218.217 Wood Furniture Coating Work Practice Standards, amended at 22 Ill. Reg. 3556, effective February 2, 1998.

(C) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart F: Coating Operations 219.204 Emission Limitations, 219.205 Daily-weighted Average Limitations, 219.210 Compliance Schedule, 219.211 Recordkeeping and Reporting, 219.215 Wood Furniture Coating Averaging Approach, 219.216 Wood Furniture Coating Add-On Control Use, 219.217 Wood Furniture Coating Work Practice Standards, amended at 22 Ill. Reg. 3517, effective February 2, 1998.

(141) On November 14, 1995, May 9, 1996, June 14, 1996, and February 3, 1997, October 16, 1997, and October 21, 1997, the State of Illinois submitted State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision requests to meet commitments related to the conditional approval of Illinois' May 15, 1992, SIP submittal for the Lake Calumet (SE Chicago), McCook, and Granite City, Illinois, Particulate Matter (PM) nonattainment areas. The EPA is approving the portion of the SIP revision request that applies to the Granite City area. The SIP revision request corrects, for the Granite City PM nonattainment area, all of the deficiencies of the May 15, 1992, submittal.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 212: Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions, Subpart A: General, Sections 212.107, 212.108, 212.109, 212.110; Subpart L: Particulate Matter from Process Emission Sources, Section 212.324; Subpart N: Food Manufacturing, Section 212.362; Subpart Q: Stone, Clay, Glass and Concrete Manufacturing, Section 212.425; Subpart R: Primary and Fabricated Metal Products and Machinery Manufacture, Sections 212.446, 212.458; Subpart S: Agriculture, Section 212.464. Adopted at 20 Illinois Register 7605, effective May 22, 1996.

(B) Joint Construction and Operating Permit: Application Number 95010005, Issued on October 21, 1997, to Granite City Division of National Steel Corporation.

(142) On May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, the State of Illinois submitted State Implementation Plan revision requests for reactor processes and distillation operations in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry as part of the State's control measures for Volatile Organic Material emissions for the Chicago and Metro-East (East St. Louis) areas. This plan was submitted to meet the Clean Air Act requirement for States to adopt Reasonably Available Control Technology rules for sources that are covered by Control Techniques Guideline documents.

(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart Q: Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing Plant, Sections 218.431 Applicability, 218.432 Control Requirements, 218.433 Performance and Testing Requirements, 218.434 Monitoring Requirements, 218.435 Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, 218.436 Compliance Date, 218.Appendix G, TRE Index Measurement for SOCMI Reactors and Distillation Units, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.

(C) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart Q: Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing Plant, Sections 219.431 Applicability, 219.432 Control Requirements, 219.433 Performance and Testing Requirements, 219.434 Monitoring Requirements, 219.435 Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, 219.436 Compliance Date, 219.Appendix G, TRE Index Measurement for SOCMI Reactors and Distillation Units, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.

(144) On September 3, 1997, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a temporary, site specific State Implementation Plan revision request for the D.B. Hess Company, Incorporated's (DB Hess) lithographic printing operations located in Woodstock (McHenry County), Illinois. This variance took the form of a March 20, 1997, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board issued in PCB 96–194 (Variance—Air). The variance which will expire on March 30, 1999, grants DB Hess a variance from 35 Illinois Administrative Code Sections 218.407(a)(1)(C),(D),(E) and 218.411(b)(1), (2)and (3) for heatset web offset presses 3, 4, and 5 which are located at the Woodstock (McHenry County), Illinois facility.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) March 20, 1997, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in PCB 96–194 (Variance—Air) which was effective on March 20, 1997 and expires on March 30, 1999.

(ii) The variance is subject to the following conditions (the dates specified indicate the latest start dates of compliance periods terminating on March 30, 1999, when presses 3, 4, and 5 must be replaced by complying presses or must be brought into compliance with the rules from which DB Hess seeks the variance):

(A) On or before March 20, 1997, the combined actual volatile organic material (VOM) emissions from all of the presses in the Woodstock plant shall not exceed 18 tons per year or 1.5 tons per month.

(B) On or before March 20, 1997, DB Hess shall use only cleaning solutions with VOM concentrations less than or equal to 30 percent by weight.

(C) On or before March 20, 1997, DB Hess shall use cleaning solutions on presses 3, 4, and 5 that have a VOM composite partial vapor pressure of less than 10 millimeters (mm) of Mercury (Hg) at 20 degrees Celsius. These cleaning solutions must comply with the requirements of 35 IAC 218.407(a)(4).

(D) On or before March 20, 1997, DB Hess shall store and dispose of all cleaning towels in closed containers.

(E) On or before May 5, 1997, DB Hess shall monitor presses 3, 4, and 5 pursuant to 35 IAC 218.410 (b), (c), and (e).

(F) On or before May 5, 1997, DB Hess shall use fountain solutions on presses 3, 4, and 5 that are less than 5 percent VOM by volume, as applied, and which contain no alcohol.

(G) On or before May 5, 1997, DB Hess shall prepare and maintain records pursuant to 35 IAC 218.411 (b), (c), and (d) for presses 3, 4, and 5 and must show compliance with the requirements of 35 IAC 218.407(a)(1) (C), (D), and (E) and with the requirements of 35 IAC 218.411(b) (1), (2), and (3) for these presses.

(H) On or before May 5, 1997, DB Hess shall submit quarterly reports to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's (IEPA's) Compliance and Systems Management Section demonstrating compliance with the terms of the Illinois Pollution Control Board Order.

( 1 ) Cease operation of presses 4 and 5, and notify the IEPA of such cessation; or

( 2 ) Retrofit presses 4 and 5 or replace presses 4 and 5 in compliance with 35 IAC 218.407 (a)(1) (C), (D), and (E) and with 35 IAC 218.411(b) (1), (2), and(3). In this case:

( i ) DB Hess must apply for and obtain necessary construction permits by March 30, 1998, or six months before retrofitting or replacing presses 4 and 5, whichever is earlier.

( ii ) DB Hess must send monthly status reports, due the 15th day of each month, to the IEPA, covering the progress of the installation of the presses and control equipment and testing of the control equipment.

(K) On or before March 30, 1999, DB Hess shall cease operations at presses 3, 4, and 5 except for those presses for which it has obtained permits and installed controls, which have been tested and demonstrated to be in compliance with applicable rules.

(145) On September 16, 1998, the State of Illinois submitted amendments to Volatile Organic Material (VOM) rules affecting Illinois' ozone attainment area (the area of the State not including the Chicago and Metro-East ozone nonattainment areas). The amendments contain various deletions of obsolete provisions, changes of some word usage to comport Part 215 with other Illinois VOM regulations, and the addition of certain exemptions from VOM coating requirements.

(A) Part 215: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations; Subpart A: General Provisions, 215.104 Definitions, 215.109 Monitoring for Negligibly-Reactive Compounds; Subpart F: Coating Operations, 215.204 Emission Limitations for Manufacturing Plants, 215.205 Alternative Emission Limitations, 215.206 Exemptions from Emission Limitations, 215.207 Compliance by Aggregation of Emissions Units, 215.211 Compliance Dates and Geographical Areas, 215.212 Compliance Plan, and 215.214 Roadmaster Emissions Limitations (Repealed); Subpart Z: Dry Cleaners, 215.601 Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaners (Repealed), 215.602 Exemptions (Repealed), 215.603 Leaks (Repealed), 215.604 Compliance Dates and Geographical areas (Repealed), 215.605 Compliance Plan (Repealed), and 215.606 Exception to Compliance Plan (Repealed), amended at 22 Ill. Reg. 11427, effective June 19, 1998.

(146) On February 13, 1998, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision amends certain sections of the Clean-Fuel Fleet Program (CFFP) in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area to reflect that fleet owners and operators will have an additional year to meet the purchase requirements of the CFFP. The amendment changes the first date by which owners or operators of fleets must submit annual reports to IEPA from November 1, 1998 to November 1, 1999. In addition, this revision corrects two credit values in the CFFP credit program.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 35 Illinois Administrative Code 241; Sections 241.113, 241.130, 241.140, 241.Appendix B.Table A, 241.Appendix B.Table D adopted in R95–12 at 19 Ill. Reg. 13265, effective September 11, 1995; amended in R98–8, at 21 Ill. Reg. 15767, effective November 25, 1997.

(ii) Other material. (A) February 13, 1998, letter and attachments from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's Bureau of Air Chief to the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Regional Air and Radiation Division Director submitting Illinois' amendments to the Clean Fuel Fleet regulations as a revision to the ozone State Implementation Plan.

(147) On June 21, 1997, and December 9, 1998, the State of Illinois submitted regulations adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and legislation adopted by the General Assembly and signed by the Governor related to Illinois' vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program. The purpose of these submittals was to change the existing program from a basic I/M program to a fully enhanced I/M program. These changes modify the program in both the Chicago and Saint Louis (Illinois Portion) Ozone nonattainment areas.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter k: Emission Standards and Limitations for Mobile sources, Part 240 Mobile Sources, Except for Section 240. Table C. Adopted at 22 Ill. Reg. 13723, effective July 13, 1998.

(B) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter k: Emission Standards and Limitations for Mobile sources, Part 240 Mobile Sources, Section 240. Table C. Corrected at 22 Ill. Reg. 21120, effective July 13, 1998.

(C) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter II: Environmental Protection Agency, Part 276 Procedures to be Followed in the Performance of Inspections of Motor Vehicle Emissions. Amended at 22 Ill. Reg. 18867, effective September 28, 1998.

(ii) Other materials. (A) Transmittal letters dated June 21, 1997, and December 9, 1998.

(B) Public Act 90–475, effective August 17, 1997. This Act amends the Illinois Environmental Protection Act by changing Sections 3.32, 3.78, 21, and 22.15 and adding Sections 3.78a and 22.38.

(148) On October 13, 1998, the State of Illinois submitted a site-specific State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision affecting Volatile Organic Material controls at Central Can Company (CCC), located in Chicago, Illinois. The SIP revision allows CCC to apply can coating control rules to pail coating operations limited to certain conditions.

(i) Incorporation by reference. August 6, 1998, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 94–18, effective July 1, 1991.

(149) On September 17, 1998, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a site specific State Implementation Plan revision request for W.R. Grace and Company's facility, which manufactures container sealants, lubricant fluids, and concrete additives, and is located at 6050 West 51st Street in Chicago, Illinois (Cook County). This rule revision is contained in R98–16, the July 8, 1998, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, and consists of new Section 218.940(h), which exempts W.R. Grace's facility from the control requirements in 35 Illinois Administrative Code Part 218 Subpart QQ.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218 Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart QQ: Miscellaneous Formulation Manufacturing Processes, Section 218.940 Applicability, paragraph (h) which was amended in R98–16 at 22 Ill. Reg. 14282, effective July 16, 1998.

(150) On November 14, 1995, May 9, 1996, June 14, 1996, February 1, 1999, and May 19, 1999, the State of Illinois submitted State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision requests to meet commitments related to the conditional approval of Illinois' May 15, 1992, SIP submittal for the Lake Calumet (Southeast Chicago), McCook, and Granite City, Illinois, Particulate Matter (PM) nonattainment areas. The EPA is approving the SIP revision request as it applies to the Lake Calumet area. The SIP revision request corrects, for the Lake Calumet PM nonattainment area, all of the deficiencies of the May 15, 1992, submittal.

(A) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 212: Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions, Subpart A: General, Section 212.113; Subpart E: Particulate Matter from Fuel Combustion Sources, Section 212.210; Subpart K: Fugitive Particulate Matter, Sections 212.302, 212.309, and 212.316. Adopted at 20 Illinois Register 7605, effective May 22, 1996.

(B) Federally Enforceable State Operating Permit—Special: Application Number 98120091, Issued on May 14, 1999, to LTV Steel Company, Inc.

(151) On July 23, 1998, the State of Illinois submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision that included certain “clean-up” amendments to the State's permitting rules.

Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board.

(A) Subchapter A: Permits and General Provisions, Part 201: Permits and General Provisions.

(1) Subpart D: Permit Applications and Review Process, Section 201.152 Contents of Application for Construction Permit, 201.153 Incomplete Applications (Repealed), Section 201.154 Signatures (Repealed), Section 201.155 Standards for Issuance (Repealed), Section 201.157 Contents of Application for Operating Permit, Section 201.158 Incomplete Applications, Section 201.159 Signatures, 201.160 Standards for Issuance, Section 201.162 Duration, Section 201.163 Joint Construction and Operating Permits, and Section 201.164 Design Criteria. Amended at 22 Ill. Reg. 11451, effective June 23, 1998.

(2) Subpart E: Special Provisions for Operating Permits for Certain Smaller Sources, Section 201.180 Applicability (Repealed), Section 201.181 Expiration and Renewal (Repealed), Section 201.187 Requirement for a Revised Permit (Repealed), Repealed at 22 Ill. Reg. 11451, effective June 23, 1998.

(3) Subpart F: CAAPP Permits, Section 201.207 Applicability, Amended at 22 Ill. Reg. 11451, effective June 23, 1998.

(152) On February 5, 1998, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan. This revision provided additional exemptions from State of Illinois permit requirements codified by the State at Part 201 of Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code (35 IAC Part 201). The revision also added a definition of “Feed Mill” to Part 211 of 35 IAC (35 IAC Part 211).

(A) Part 211 Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.2285 Feed Mill. Added at 21 Ill. Reg. 7856, effective June 17, 1997.

(B) Part 201 Permits and General Conditions, Subpart C: Prohibitions, Section 201.146 Exemptions from State Permit Requirements. Amended at 21 Ill. Reg. 7878, effective June 17, 1997.

(153) On July 9, 1999, the State of Illinois submitted a site-specific State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision affecting Volatile Organic Material control requirements at Sun Chemical Corporation (Sun) in Northlake, Illinois. The SIP revision changes requirements for 17 resin storage tanks operated by Sun. Specifically, the SIP revision exempts the 17 tanks from the bottom or submerged fill pipe requirements, provided that no odor nuisance exists at the Sun Northlake facility, and that the vapor pressures of materials stored in the tanks remain less the 0.5 pounds per square inch absolute at 70 degrees Fahrenheit.

May 20, 1999, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 99–4, effective May 20, 1999.

(155) On May 21, 1999, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a temporary, site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for sulfur dioxide (SO₂) for the Central Illinois Light Company's E.D. Edwards Generating Station in Peoria County, Illinois (CILCO Edwards). The SIP revision took the form of an April 15, 1999, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (PCB 99–80, Variance-Air). In this Opinion and Order, the IPCB granted CILCO Edwards a variance from 35 Illinois Administrative Code 214.141, and provided for a relaxation in the fuel quality limit for one of the facility's three boilers, but added an overall fuel quality limit and retained an overall SO₂emissions cap for the three CILCO Edwards boilers. The variance will expire on February 28, 2002, unless CILCO applies to Illinois for a permanent SIP revision.

(i) Incorporation by reference. An April 15, 1999, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in PCB 99–80 (Variance-Air), granting a variance from 35 IAC 214.141 for Boiler No. 2 at the Central Illinois Light Company's E.D. Edwards Generating Station near Peoria, Illinois. The variance expires on February 28, 2002, unless CILCO applies to Illinois for a permanent SIP revision. If CILCO applies for a permanent SIP revision, and the IPCB allows CILCO Edwards' variance to continue unamended through July 31, 2003, as stated in the Opinion and Order, then federal approval of the variance will continue until EPA approves alternate SO₂limits for CILCO Edwards, or until July 31, 2003, whichever is earlier.

(156) On May 8, 2001, the State submitted rules to control Oxides of Nitrogen emissions from electric generating units.

( i ) Incorporation by reference. Title 35: Environmental Protection; Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution Control Board; Subchapter C: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources; Part 217 Nitrogen Oxides Emissions; Subpart V: Electric Power Generation. Adopted at 25 Ill. Reg. 5914, effective April 17, 2001.

(157) On May 8, 2001, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted revisions to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 217, Subpart W: NO[x] Trading Program for Electrical Generating Units with a request that these rules be incorporated into the Illinois State Implementation Plan. On June 11, 2001, the Illinois EPA submitted Section 9.9(f) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act as revised by Public Act 92–012 (formerly House Bill 1599) which was approved by both Houses of the Illinois General Assembly on June 7, 2001, approved by the Governor on June 22, 2001, and became effective on July 1, 2001. Section 9.9(f) requires a May 31, 2004 final compliance date for 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215, Subparts T, U and W. This compliance date replaces the compliance date contained in Section 217.756(d)(3).

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 217 Nitrogen Oxides Emissions, Subpart W: NO[x] Trading Program for Electrical Generating Units except for 217.756(d)(3) which has been superseded by Section 9.9(f) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act. Added at 25 Ill. Reg. 128, January 25, 2001, effective December 26, 2000.

(B) Section 9.9(f) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act. Adopted by both Houses of the Illinois General Assembly as part of Public Act 92–0012 (previously House Bill 1599) on May 31, 2001, approved by the Governor of Illinois on June 22, 2001, effective July 1, 2001.

(158) On December 16, 1997, Bharat Mathur, Chief, Bureau of Air, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, submitted rules for a cap and trade program regulating volatile organic compound emissions in the Chicago area. By letter dated August 23, 2001, the state requested that USEPA defer rulemaking on section 205.150(e), which exempts new and modified sources obtaining offsets under the trading program from the requirements for traditional, full year offsets.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35, Subtitle B, Chapter I, subchapter b, Part 205, entitled Emissions Reduction Market System, adopted November 20, 1997, effective November 25, 1997, except section 205.150(e).

(159) On April 9, 2001, David Kolaz, Chief, Bureau of Air, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, submitted rules regulating NO_Xemissions from cement kilns. On May 1, 2001, Mr. Kolaz submitted rules regulating NO_Xemissions from industrial boilers and turbines and requesting two minor revisions to the Illinois NO_Xemissions budget. On June 18, 2001, Mr. Kolaz submitted a demonstration that Illinois' regulations were sufficient to assure that NO_Xemissions in Illinois would be reduced to the level budgeted for the state by USEPA. On September 20, 2001, Mr. Kolaz sent a letter clarifying that Illinois' rules for industrial boilers and turbines require compliance on a unit-by-unit basis.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35, Subtitle B, Chapter I, subchapter c, Part 211, Definitions, sections 211.955, 211.960, 211.1120, 211.3483, 211.3485, 211.3487, 211.3780, 211.5015, and 211.5020, published at 25 Ill. Reg. 4582, effective March 15, 2001.

(B) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35, Subtitle B, Chapter I, subchapter c, Part 217, Subpart A, Section 217.104, Incorporations by Reference, published at 25 Ill. Reg. 4597, effective March 15, 2001.

(C) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35, Subtitle B, Chapter I, subchapter c, Part 217, Subpart T, Cement Kilns, sections 217.400, 217.400, 217.402, 217.404, 217.406, 217.408, and 217.410, published at 25 Ill. Reg. 4597, effective March 15, 2001.

(D) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35, Subtitle B, Chapter I, subchapter c, Part 211, Sections 211.4067 and 211.6130, published at 25 Ill. Reg. 5900, effective April 17, 2001.

(E) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35, Subtitle B, Chapter I, subchapter c, Part 217, Subpart U, NO_XControl and Trading Program for Specified NO_XGenerating Units, sections 217.450, 217.452, 217.454, 217.456, 217.458, 217.460, 217.462, 217.464, 217.466, 217.468, 217.470, 217.472, 217.474, 217.476, 217.478, 217.480 and 217.482, published at 25 Ill. Reg. 5914, effective April 17, 2001.

(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter dated June 18, 2001, from David Kolaz, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, to Cheryl Newton, United States Environmental Protection Agency.

(B) Letter dated September 20, 2001, from David Kolaz, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, to Bharat Mathur, United States Environmental Protection Agency.

(160) On March 21, 2001, Illinois submitted revisions to volatile organic compound rules for Formel Industries, Incorporated in Cook County, Illinois. The revisions consist of a January 18, 2001 Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in the Matter of: Petition of Formel Industries, Inc. for an Adjusted Standard from 35 ILL. ADM. CODE 218.401(a),(b) and (c): AS 00–13 (Adjusted Standard Air). This Opinion and Order grants Formel Industries, Incorporated an adjusted standard to the Flexographic Printing Rule. The adjusted standard requirements include participation in a market-based emissions trading system, maintaining daily records, conducting trials of compliant inks, and reviewing alternate control technologies.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Volatile organic compound emissions limits contained in a January 18, 2001 Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in the Matter of: Petition of Formel Industries, Inc. for an Adjusted Standard from 35 ILL. ADM. CODE 218.401(a), (b) and (c): AS 00–13 (Adjusted Standard-Air). This Opinion and Order was adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board on January 18, 2001. It became effective under State law on January 18, 2001.

(161) On March 28, 2001, Illinois submitted revisions to volatile organic compound rules for Bema Film Systems, Incorporated in DuPage County, Illinois. The revisions consist of AS 00–11, an adjusted standard to the Flexographic Printing Rule, 35 IAC 218.401 (a), (b), and (c). The adjusted standard requirements include reducing the allotment baseline for the Illinois market-based emissions trading system, maintaining daily records, conducting trials of compliant inks, and reviewing alternate control technologies.

(i) Incorporation by reference. AS 00–11, an adjusted standard from the Volatile Organic Compound emission limits for Bema Film Systems, Inc. contained in Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Regulations for the State of Illinois, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218.401 (a), (b), and (c). Effective on January 18, 2001.

(ii) Other material. (A) November 14, 2001, letter from Dennis A. Lawler, Manager, Division of Air Pollution Control, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency to Jay Bortzer, Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air and Radiation Division, USEPA, Region 5, indicating that the effective date of the adjusted standard for Bema Film Systems, Inc. AS 00–11, is January 18, 2001, the date that AS 00–11 was adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board.

(162) On March 28, 2001, Illinois submitted revisions to volatile organic compound rules for Vonco Products, Incorporated in Lake County, Illinois. The revisions consist of AS 00–12, an adjusted standard to the Flexographic Printing Rule, 35 IAC 218.401 (a), (b), and (c). The adjusted standard requirements include reducing the allotment baseline for the Illinois market-based emissions trading system, maintaining daily records, conducting trials of compliant inks, and reviewing alternate control technologies.

(i) Incorporation by reference. AS 00–12, an adjusted standard from the Volatile Organic Compound emission limits applicable to Vonco Products, Inc. contained in Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Regulations for the State of Illinois, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218.401 (a), (b), and (c). Effective on January 18, 2001.

(ii) Other material. (A) November 14, 2001, letter from Dennis A. Lawler, Manager, Division of Air Pollution Control, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency to Jay Bortzer, Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air and Radiation Division, USEPA, Region 5, indicating that the effective date of the adjusted standard for Vonco Products, Inc. AS 00–12, is January 18, 2001, the date that AS 00–12 was adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board.

(164) On October 9, 2001, the State of Illinois submitted new rules regarding emission tests.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) New rules of 35 Ill. Admin. Code Part 283, including sections 283.110, 283.120, 283.130, 283.210, 283.220, 283.230, 283.240, and 283.250, effective September 11, 2000, published in the Illinois Register at 24 Ill. Reg. 14428.

(B) Revised section 283.120 of 35 Ill. Admin. Code, correcting two typographical errors, effective September 11, 2000, published in the Illinois Register at 25 Ill. Reg. 9657.

(165) On April 8, 1999, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted revisions to particulate matter control requirements for rural grain elevators in Illinois. The revised requirements exempt rural grain elevators from certain particulate matter control requirements.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Revised grain elevator provisions in Section 9(f) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act. Adopted by both Houses of the Illinois General Assembly as Public Act 89–491 (previously Senate Bill 1633) on April 25, 1996, approved by the Governor of Illinois on May 23, 1996, effective June 21, 1996.

(166) On November 6, 2001, the State of Illinois submitted revisions to its emission reporting rules, restructuring these rules and adding hazardous air pollutant emission reporting for sources in Illinois' Emission Reduction Market System.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revised rules of 35 Ill. Admin. Code Part 254, including new or amended sections 254.101, 254.102, 254.103, 254.120, 254.132, 254.134, 254.135, 254.136, 254.137, 254.138, 254.203, 254.204, 254.303, 254.306, and 254.501, effective July 17, 2001, retention of section 254.133, and the repeal of other previously approved sections of 35 Ill. Admin. Code 254. Amended or adopted at 25 Ill. Reg. 9856. Effective July 17, 2001.

(167) On August 31, 1998, Illinois submitted revisions to its major stationary sources construction and modification rules (NSR Rules) as a State Implementation Plan revision request. These revisions apply only in areas in Illinois that have been designated as being in serious or severe nonattainment with the national ambient air quality standards for ozone.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter A: Permits and General Provisions, Part 203 Major Stationary Sources Construction and Modification, Subpart B: Major Stationary Sources in Nonattainment Areas, Section 203.206 Major Stationary Source and Section 203.207 Major Modification of a Source; and, Subpart C: Requirements for Major Stationary Sources in Nonattainment Areas, Section 203.301 Lowest Achievable Emissions Rate. Amended in R98–10 at 22 Ill. Reg. 5674, effective March 10, 1998.

(168) On October 31, 2003, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted revisions to the Illinois State Implementation Plan for ozone. The submittal revises the definition for volatile organic material (VOM) or volatile organic compound (VOC) contained in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 211.7150 to incorporate an exemption for perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene); 3,3-dichloro-1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoropropane (HCFC–225ca); 1,3-dichloro-1,1,2,2,3-pentafluoropropane (HCFC–225cb); decafluoropentane (HFC 43–10mee); difluoromethane (HFC–32); ethylfluoride (HFC–161); 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoropropane (HFC–236fa); 1,1,2,2,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC–245ca); 1,1,2,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC–245ea); 1,1,1,2,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC–245eb); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC–245fa); 1,1,1,2,3,3-hexafluoropropane (HFC–236ea); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (HFC–365mfc); chlorofluoromethane (HCFC–31); 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2-trifluoroethane (HCFC–123a); 1-chloro-1-fluoroethane (HCFC–151a); 1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4-nonafluoro-4-methoxybutane (C₄F₉OCH₃); 2-(difluoromethoxymethyl)-1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane ((CF₃)₂CFCF₂OCH₃); 1-ethoxy-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4-nonafluorobutane (C₄F₉OC₂H₅); 2-(ethoxydifluoromethyl)-1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane ((CF₃)₂CFCF₂OC₂H₅); and methyl acetate from the definition of VOM or VOC and thereby, from regulation as ozone precursors.

(169) On June 20, 2003, Illinois submitted an Adjusted Standard for Ford Motor Company's Chicago Assembly Plant. This Adjusted Standard from 35 Ill.Adm. Code 218.986 replaces those requirements with the control requirements in the Illinois Pollution Control Board's November 21, 2002, Order.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) The Illinois Pollution Control Board's November 21, 2002, Opinion and Order which granted the Ford Motor Company's Chicago Assembly Plant an adjusted standard (AS 02–3) from 35 Ill. ADM. Code 218.986. The requirements in 35 Ill. ADM. Code 218.986 have been replaced by the requirements in the Illinois Pollution Control Board's November 21, 2002, Order.

(170) On May 28, 2003, Illinois submitted an amendment to its leather coating rules for the Horween Leather Company's Chicago leather manufacturing facility. This adds a test method in Section 218.112(a)(26) and a new Section 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.929. These amendments were incorporated in the Illinois Pollution Control Board's February 20, 2003, Final Order R02–20.

(A) Subpart A: General Provisions, Section 218.112 Incorporations by Reference, (a) American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428–9555, 26) ASTM D2099–00. Amended at 27 Ill. Reg. 7283, effective April 8, 2003.

(B) Subpart PP: Miscellaneous Fabricated Product Manufacturing Processes, Section 218.929 Cementable and Dress or Performance Shoe Leather. Added at 27 Ill. Reg. 7283, effective April 8, 2003.

(171) On July 29, 2003, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for sulfur dioxide (SO₂) for the Central Illinois Light Company's E.D. Edwards Generating Station, now known as AmerenEnergy Resources Generating Company, Edwards Power Plant, in Bartonville, Peoria County, Illinois.

Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 214: Sulfur Limitations, Subpart X: Utilities Section 214.561 E.D. Edwards Electric Generating Station which was amended at 27 Illinois Register 12101, effective July 11, 2003.

(172) On September 19, 2003, Illinois submitted a site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan which relaxes the volatile organic material (VOM) content limit for the coating operations at Louis Berkman Company, d/b/a/ the Swenson Spreader Company's Lindenwood, Ogle County, Illinois facility from 3.5 pounds VOM per gallon to a monthly average of 4.75 pounds VOM per gallon until May 7, 2008.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Order contained in a May 7, 1998, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 97–5, effective May 7, 1998.

(173) On March 11, 2004, Illinois submitted an Adjusted Standard for Argonne National Laboratory's degreasing operations. Pursuant to this Adjusted Standard from 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.182, the applicable vapor pressure and other associated requirements of 35 Ill. Code 218.182 do not apply to cold cleaning involving the preparation of sample materials and associated apparatus used for research and development testing and analysis at Argonne. These revised requirements were adopted in the Illinois Pollution Control Board's December 18, 2003, Adjusted Standard AS 03–4.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) The Illinois Pollution Control Board's December 18, 2003, Opinion and Order which granted the Argonne National Laboratory's degreasing operations an Adjusted Standard (AS 03–4) from 35 Ill. Code 218.182 for its cold cleaning involving the preparation of sample materials and associated apparatus used for research and development testing and analysis at Argonne.

(175) On January 4, 2006, Illinois submitted a site-specific State Implementation Plan revision for the Ford Motor Company (Ford) Chicago Assembly Plant. The revision allows Ford to discontinue use of its Stage II vapor recovery system and requires instead that Ford comply with federal onboard refueling vapor recovery regulations and other conditions.

(A) September 1, 2005, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 05–5, effective September 1, 2005.

(176) On June 14, 2004, Illinois submitted revisions to volatile organic compound rules for Formel Industries, Incorporated in Cook County, Illinois. The revisions consist of withdrawing an adjusted standard to the Flexographic Printing Rule. Formel Industries has installed a control device and is complying with the Flexographic Printing Rule.

(i) Incorporation by reference. An April 15, 2004, Supplemental Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board AS 00–13, terminating Formel's previously issued (January 18, 2001) adjusted standard from the Flexographic Printing Rule, effective April 15, 2004.

(177) On May 31, 2006, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan. This revision provides additional exemptions from State of Illinois permit requirements codified by the State at Part 201 of Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code (35 IAC Part 201).

Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter a: Permits and General Provisions, Part 201 Permits and General Provisions, Subpart C: Prohibitions, Section 201.146 Exemptions from State Permit Requirements paragraphs (hhh), (iii), (jjj), (kkk), and (lll). Amended at 30 Ill. Reg. 4901, effective March 3, 2006.

(178) On September 14, 2007, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted rules and related material to address requirements under the Clean Air Interstate Rule. These rules mandate participation of electric generating units in EPA-run trading programs for annual emissions of sulfur dioxide, annual emissions of nitrogen oxides, and ozone season emissions of nitrogen oxides. These rules provide a methodology for allocating allowances to subject sources and require these sources to hold sufficient allowances to accommodate their emissions and to meet various monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements. EPA is approving the submitted provisions of Subparts A, C, D, and E of Part 225 of Title 35 of Illinois Administrative Code; EPA is deferring action on Subpart F.

(A) Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Part 225: Control of Emissions from Large Combustion Sources, effective August 31, 2007, including Subpart A: General Provisions, Subpart C: Clean Air Act Interstate Rule (CAIR) SO2Trading Program, Subpart D: CAIR NO_XAnnual Trading Program, and Subpart E: CAIR NO_XOzone Season Trading Program.

(179) On October 31, 2003, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted rules and related materials to address site-specific requirements for Cromwell-Phoenix, Incorporated, located in Alsip, Illinois. These rules establish an adjusted standard for the corrosion inhibiting packaging production facility of Cromwell-Phoenix, Incorporated located at this source site. These rules provide a site-specific adjusted standard for this source facility for volume 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code subpart F section 218.204(c). The adjusted standard gives the corrosion inhibiting paper coating lines at the Alsip facility an adjusted volatile organic material (volatile organic compounds) content limit for paper coatings, and places an annual limit on the volatile organic material emissions from the Alsip facility as a whole. The adjusted standard also establishes source administration and reporting requirements for Cromwell-Phoenix, Incorporated Alsip facility. EPA is approving this site-specific adjusted standard as a revision of the Illinois state implementation plan.

(A) September 18, 2003, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 03–5, effective September 18, 2003.

(180) On January 10, 2007, Illinois submitted revisions to its rules for the Emission Reduction Market System. These revisions assure that sources in the Chicago area with potential emissions of VOC between 25 and 100 tons per year will remain subject to the program, irrespective of changes in the area's ozone nonattainment classification or designation and any associated changes in whether such sources are defined to be major sources. EPA is again deferring action on section 205.150(e).

(A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter b: Alternative Reduction Program, Part 205 Emissions Reduction Market System, Sections:

205.337 Changes in Emissions Determination Methods and Sampling, Testing, Monitoring and Recordkeeping Practices

(181) On August 17, 2005 and January 29, 2008, Illinois submitted revised regulations that are consistent with 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1), as amended by 69 FR 69298. The compounds 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-methoxypropane (n-C₃F₇OCH₃), 3-ethoxy 1,1,1,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-dodecafluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl)hexane (HFE-7500), 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (HFC-227ea), and methyl formate were added to the list of negligibly reactive compounds excluded from the definition of VOM in 35 IAC 211.7150(a). Tertiary-butyl acetate is also listed in 35 IAC 211.7150(a) with a notation that it must also meet the requirements of 35 IAC 211.7150(e), which state that tertiary-butyl acetate is considered a VOC for recordkeeping, emissions reporting, modeling, and inventory requirements, but is not considered a VOC for emission limits or content requirements.

(A) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.7150: Volatile Organic Matter (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC), Subsections 211.7150(a) and 211.7150(e). Effective January 16, 2008.

(182) On January 29, 2008, Illinois submitted revised regulations that are consistent with 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1), as amended by 72 FR 2193. The compound 1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,5,5-decafluoro-3-methoxy-4-trifluoromethyl-pentane (HFE–7300) was added to the list of negligibly reactive compounds excluded from the definition of VOM in 35 IAC 211.7150(a).

(183) On January 24, 2008, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a revision to its state implementation plan for the packaging production facility of CP–D Acquisition Company, LLC. The revision changes the source name from Cromwell-Phoenix, Incorporated, to CP–D Acquisition Company, LLC.

(A) November 20, 2003, Supplemental Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 03–05, effective November 20, 2003.

Editorial Note: ForFederal Registercitations affecting §52.720, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and on GPO Access.

§ 52.721 Classification of regions.

[37 FR 10862, May 31, 1972, as amended at 39 FR 16346, May 8, 1974; 45 FR 11493, Feb. 21, 1980]

§ 52.722 Approval status.

(a) With the exceptions set forth in this subpart, the Administrator approved Illinois' plan for the attainment and maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. Furthermore, the Administrator finds the plan satisfies all requirements of part D, title I of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977, except as noted below. In addition, continued satisfaction of the requirements of part D for the ozone portion of the SIP depends on the adoption and submittal of RACT requirements by July 1, 1980, for the sources covered by CTGs between January 1978 and January 1979 and adoption and submittal by each subsequent January of additional RACT requirements for sources covered by CTGs issued by the previous January.

(b) The Administrator finds that the transportation control plans for the East St. Louis and Chicago areas submitted on December 3, 1982, satisfy the related requirements of part D, title I of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977.

(c) The Administrator finds that the carbon monoxide control strategy submitted on May 4, 1983, satisfies all requirements of part D, title I of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977, except for section 172(b)(6).

§ 52.723 [Reserved]

§ 52.724 Control strategy: Sulfur dioxide.

(a) Part D—Conditional Approval—The Illinois plan is approved provided that the following condition is satisfied:

(1) The plan includes a reanalysis of the Pekin, Illinois area, a submittal of the analysis results to USEPA, the proposal of any additional regulations to the Illinois Pollution Control Board necessary to insure attainment and maintenance of the sulfur dioxide standard, and the promulgation of any necessary regulations. The State must complete the reanalysis, submit the results to USEPA and submit any necessary, additional regulations to the Illinois Pollution Control Board by September 30, 1980. Any necessary regulation must be finally promulgated by the State and submitted to USEPA by September 30, 1981.

(2) Extension of Condition—USEPA approves the date of July 1, 1984 for submitting the draft sulfur dioxide rule revisions and supporting documentation as required in (a)(1) for Peoria, Hollis and Groveland Townships in Illinois. The State must complete final rule adoption as expeditiously as possible but no later than December 31, 1985.

(b) Part D—Disapproval—USEPA disapproves Rules 204(c)(1)(B), Rule 204(c)(1)(C), Rule 204(e)(1) and Rule 204(e)(2) for those sources for which these rules represent a relaxation of the federally enforceable State Implementation Plan. Rule 204(c)(1)(B), Rule 204(c)(1)(C), Rule 204(e)(1) and Rule 204(e)(2) are approved as not representing relaxations of the State Implementation Plan for the following sources:

Sources of 10 Million Btu per Hour or More Not Increasing Allowable Sulfur Dioxide Emissions as a Result of Record Rules 204(c) and 204(e) Because New Allowable Emissions Rate is Same as or Less Than Old Allowable Rate Pounds per Hour (Pounds per Million Btu)

County	Name	Emissions formerly allowable¹	Emissions now allowable without new permit application²
Boone	Chrysler	1,760 (4.4)	1,760 (4.4)
Champaign	Chanute Air Base	1,317 (3.0)	1,317 (3.0)
Crawford	CIPS	8,242 (5.1)	8,242 (5.1)
Douglas	USI Chemicals	8,022 (5.3)	8,022 (5.3)
Fulton	Freeman Coal	22.2 (1.2)	22.2 (1.2)
La Salle	Del Monte	296 (3.9)	296 (3.9)
Massac	EEI Joppa	36,865 (3.6)	36,865 (3.6)
Montgomery	CIPS	55,555 (5.8)	55,555 (5.8)
Morgan	......do	24,000 (6.0)	20,800 (5.2)
Putnam	Illinois Power	17,051 (5.8)	17,051 (5.8)
Randolph	......do³	81,339 (4.6)	81,339 (4.6)
Rock Island	International Harvester	1,643 (4.35)	1,643 (4.35)
Williamson	Marion Correctional	396 (5.7)	396 (5.7)

¹6.0 lbs/MMBTU of existing coal fired capacity or total 204(e)(2) emissions less actual oil fired and NSPS emissions, whichever is lower.

²Maximum allowable emissions for existing coal fired capacity according to revised rules 204(c) and 204(e) consolidated, usually equally equalling total emissions as given by 204(e)(2) less actual oil fired NSPS emissions. (In the one case wherein the new allowable limit is less than that given by 204(e)(2) the allowable emissions were determined by 204(e)(1) with which the source is required to comply.)

³Source is in compliance per 204(e)(3).

CIPS=Central Illinois Public Service.

EEI=Electric Energy Incorporated.

This disapproval does not in and of itself result in the growth restrictions of section 110(a)(2)(1).

(c) Disapproval—USEPA disapproves Rule 204(e)(4) as not being adequate to protect the NAAQS. This disapproval does not in and of itself result in the growth restrictions of section 110(a)(2)(I).

(d) Disapproval—USEPA disapproves Rule 204(f)(1)(D) as completely deregulating SO₂emissions from existing processes without providing an assessment of the ambient air quality impact or a showing that increasing the allowable emissions from these sources will not cause or contribute to violations of the NAAQS or PSD increments. This disapproval does not in and of itself result in the growth restrictions of section 110(a)(2)(I).

(e) Disapproval—USEPA disapproves Rule 204(h) for those sources for which USEPA has disapproved rules 204(c) and 204(e). This disapproval does not in and of itself result in the growth restrictions of section 110(a)(2)(I).

(f) Approval—USEPA approves rule 204(e)(3) for those sources able to show that the proposed emission rate will not cause or contribute to a violation of the NAAQS. The State must submit these emission limitations, along with the technical support to USEPA for approval.

(g) Part D—Approval—The State plan for Alton Township, Madison County, which consists of a federally Enforceable State Operating Permit controlling sulfur dioxide emissions from the boilers and reheat furnaces at Laclede Steel, which was submitted on November 18, 1993, is approved.

(h) Approval—On November 10, 1994, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a sulfur dioxide redesignation request and maintenance plan for Peoria and Hollis Townships in Peoria County and Groveland Township in Tazewell County to redesignate the townships to attainment for sulfur dioxide. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(d) of the Clean Air Act (Act) as amended in 1990.

[45 FR 62806, 62809, Sept. 22, 1980, as amended at 50 FR 5250, Feb. 7, 1985; 59 FR 18753, Apr. 20, 1994; 60 FR 17001, Apr. 4, 1995]

§ 52.725 Control strategy: Particulates.

(b) Part D—Disapproval. (1) U.S. EPA disapproves the provisions of Rule 203(f) which allow the use of an equivalent method without review and approval of that method. Any source subject to Rule 203(f) which chooses to use an equivalent method must have that equivalent method submitted to U.S. EPA and approved as a SIP revision.

(2) U.S. EPA disapproves the following portions of Rule 203(d)(5) which regulate the control of particulate matter from specific sources within the iron and steel industry: Rule 205(d)(5)(B)(ii), Rule 205(d)(5)(B)(iii), Rule 205(d)(5)(D), and Rule 205(d)(5)(K).

(3) USEPA disapproves a proposed SIP revision submitted by the State on May 12, 1982, in the form of a May 18, 1981 Consent Decree (Civil Action 81–3009) to which USEPA, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and National Steel Corporation are parties and a draft Alternative Control Strategy Permit. This submission was modified by the State, September 30, 1982, with the submission of a separate document embodying the elements of the Alternative Control Strategy. This separate document was intended to become an enforceable part of the SIP.

(c) Approval—On September 28, 1988, the State of Illinois submitted a committal SIP for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter equal to or less than 10 micrometers (PM₁₀) for the Illinois Group II areas of concern in DuPage, Will, Rock Island, Macon, Randolph, and St. Clair Counties. The committal SIP contains all the requirements identified in the July 1, 1987, promulgation of the SIP requirements for PM₁₀at 52 FR 24681.

(d) Approval—On June 2, 1995, and January 9, 1996, the State of Illinois submitted a maintenance plan for the particulate matter nonattainment portion of LaSalle County, and requested that it be redesignated to attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for particulate matter. The redesignation request and maintenance plan satisfy all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act.

(e) Approval—On March 19, 1996, and October 15, 1996, Illinois submitted requests to redesignate the Granite City Particulate Matter (PM) nonattainment area to attainment status for the PM National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), as well as a maintenance plan for the Granite City area to ensure continued attainment of the NAAQS. The redesignation request and maintenance plan satisfy all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act.

(f) On November 14, 1995, May 9, 1996, and June 14, 1996, the State of Illinois submitted State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision requests to meet commitments related to the conditional approval of Illinois' May 15, 1992, SIP submittal for the Lake Calumet (SE Chicago), McCook, and Granite City, Illinois, Particulate Matter (PM) nonattainment areas. The EPA is approving the SIP revision request as it applies to the McCook PM nonattainment area. For the McCook PM nonattainment area, all of the deficiencies of the May 15, 1992, submittal have been corrected.

(g) Approval—On May 5, 1992, November 14, 1995, May 9, 1996, June 14, 1996, February 3, 1997, October 16, 1997, October 21, 1997, February 1, 1999, and May 19, 1999, Illinois submitted SIP revision requests to meet the Part D particulate matter (PM) nonattainment plan requirements for the Lake Calumet, Granite City and McCook moderate PM nonattainment areas. The submittals include federally enforceable construction permit, application number 93040047, issued on January 11, 1999, to Acme Steel Company. The part D plans for these areas are approved.

(h) Approval—On August 2, 2005, the State of Illinois submitted a request to redesignate the Lyons Township (McCook), Cook County particulate matter nonattainment area to attainment of the NAAQS for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers (PM–10). In its submittal, the State also requested that EPA approve the maintenance plan for the area into the Illinois PM SIP. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements of the Clean Air Act.

(i) Approval—On August 2, 2005, and as supplemented on September 8, 2005, the State of Illinois submitted a request to redesignate the Lake Calumet (Southeast Chicago), Cook County particulate matter nonattainment area to attainment of the NAAQS for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers (PM–10). In its submittal, the State also requested that EPA approve the maintenance plan for the area into the Illinois PM SIP. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements of the Clean Air Act.

[45 FR 11493, Feb. 21, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 44185, Sept. 3, 1981; 47 FR 26620, June 21, 1982; 48 FR 45246, Oct. 4, 1983; 49 FR 1905, Jan. 16, 1984; 55 FR 20266, May 16, 1990; 61 FR 41345, Aug. 8, 1996; 63 FR 11846, Mar. 11, 1998; 63 FR 47434, Sept. 8, 1998; 64 FR 37851, July 14, 1999; 70 FR 55545, 55549, Sept. 22, 2005]

§ 52.726 Control strategy: Ozone.

(a) Part D—Conditional Approval—The Illinois plan is approved provided that the following conditions are satisfied:

(2) The State conducts a study to demonstrate that the 75 percent overall control efficiency requirement in Rule 205(n) represents RACT, submits the results of the study to USEPA, and submits any necessary regulations representing RACT to the Illinois Pollution Control Board. The State must comply with these conditions by February 28, 1981. Any necessary regulations must be finally promulgated by the State and submitted to USEPA by February 28, 1982.

(3) Extension of Condition—USEPA approves the date of July 31, 1984 for the State of Illinois to satisfy the condition of approval to the ozone State Implementation Plan listed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.

(b) Disapproval—USEPA disapproves the compliance schedule in Rule 205(j) as it applies to loading rack controls for all emission sources subject to Rule 205(b)(1), as approved by USEPA on May 31, 1972 which were required to be in compliance by December 31, 1973. This disapproval does not in and of itself result in the growth restrictions of section 110(a)(2)(I).

(c) Negative Declarations—Stationary Source Categories. The State of Illinois has certified to the satisfaction of USEPA that no sources are located in the nonattainment areas of the State which are covered by the following Control Technique Guidelines:

(2) Vegetable oil processing sources with volatile organic compound emissions equal to or greater than 100 tons per year.

(d) Part D Disapproval—The Administrator finds that Illinois' ozone plan for Cook, Lake, DuPage and Kane Counties, which was required to be submitted by July 1, 1982, does not satisfy all the requirements of Part D, Title I of the Clean Air Act and, thus, is disapproved. No major new stationary source, of major modification of a stationary source, or volatile organic compounds may be constructed in Cook, Lake, DuPage or Kane Counties, unless the construction permit application is complete on or before November 16, 1988. This disapproval does not affect USEPA's approval (or conditional approval) of individual parts of Illinois' ozone plan, and they remain approved.

(e) Disapproval—The Administrator finds that the following State rules have not been demonstrated to be consistent with the reasonably available control technology requirements of section 172 of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977, and thus, are disapproved: subpart F, section 215.204(c); subpart F, section 215.206(b); subpart F, section 215.204(j)(4); subpart I; subpart AA; subpart PP; subpart QQ; subpart RR; subpart A, section 215.102; subpart T; subpart H, section 215.245; subpart F, section 215.207; and subpart A, section 215.107, all of title 35; Environmental Protection; subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board of the Illinois Administrative Code (June 1989).

(f) On September 30, 1992, the State submitted rules regulating volatile organic compound emissions from gasoline dispensing facilities' motor vehicle fuel operations (Stage II vapor recovery rules) in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Bureau of Air must as part of the program conduct inspections of facilities subject to this rule to ensure compliance with the applicable rules. These inspections will be conducted on an annual basis or an alternative schedule as approved in the USEPA Fiscal Year Inspection Program Plan.

(g) Approval—The Administrator approves the incorporation of the photochemical assessment ambient monitoring system submitted by Illinois on November 4, 1993, into the Illinois State Implementation Plan. This submittal satisfies 40 CFR 58.20(f) which requires the State to provide for the establishment and maintenance of photochemical assessment monitoring stations (PAMS) by November 12, 1993.

(h) Approval—On November 12, 1993, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted an ozone redesignation request and maintenance plan for Jersey County ozone nonattainment area and requested that Jersey County be redesignated to attainment for ozone. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(d) of the Act. The redesignation meets the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as a revision to the Illinois ozone State Implementation Plan for Jersey County.

(i) The base year (1990) ozone emission inventory requirement of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, has been satisfied for the following Illinois ozone nonattainment areas: the Chicago nonattainment area—Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, Will and McHenry Counties, Aux Sable and Gooselake Townships in Grundy County, and Oswego Township in Kendall County; the Metro-East St. Louis nonattainment area—Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair Counties; and Jersey County.

(j) Approval—On July 14, 1994, Illinois submitted two of three elements required by section 182(d)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Amendments of 1990 to be incorporated as part of the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) State Implementation Plan intended to offset any growth in emissions from a growth in vehicle miles traveled. These elements are the offsetting of growth in emissions attributable to growth in VMT which was due November 15, 1992, and, transportation control measures (TCMs) required as part of Illinois' 15 percent reasonable further progress (RFP) plan which was due November 15, 1993. Illinois satisfied the first requirement by projecting emissions from mobile sources and demonstrating that no increase in emissions would take place. Illinois satisfied the second requirement by submitting the TCMs listed in Table 1 which are now approved into the Illinois SIP.

Table 1

Project type	Location description	Completion status	SIP credit
SIG COORD/RS	Crawford Ave. (93rd Street to 127th Street)	Awarded	0.052000
SIG COORD	IL 53 (Briarcliff to South of I–55)	Done	0.030000
SIG COORD	Ogden Ave. (Oakwood Avenue to Fairview Avenue)	Awarded	0.019000
SIG COORD	US 14 (Rohlwing Road to Wilke Road)	Awarded	0.030000
SIG COORD	US 30 (At Cottage Grove, Ellis St)	Awarded	0.030000
SIG COORD	IL 53 (Modonough to Mills)	Done	0.030000
SIG CONN	Ogden Ave. (IL 43 to 31st Street)	Awarded	0.013000
SIG CONN	US 12 (Long Grove—Hicks Road)	Awarded	0.055200
SIG CONN	North Ave. (Oak Park to Ridgeland)	Awarded	0.007000
SIG CONN	Roosevelt Road (Westchester Bl—IL 43)	Awarded	0.137000
SIG CONN	Depster St (Keeler to Crawford Ave.)	Awarded	0.010000
SIG CONN	Arlington Hgts Rd. (Thomas to Central)	Awarded	0.044000
SIG CONN	Palatine Rd. (Shoenbeck to Wolf Roads)	Awarded	0.042500
SIG CONN	Western Ave. (US 30—Lakewood)	Awarded	0.018900
RS/INT IMP	North Ave. (I–290 to IL 43)	Awarded	0.056100
INT IMP	Plum Grove Rd. (At Higgins Road)	Awarded	0.010700
INT IMP	St Street (At Illinois)	Awarded	0.002700
RS/SIG MOD/INT IMP	Illinois/Grand (Kingsbury to Lake Shore Drive)	Done	0.004200
ADD TURN LANES	York Rd. (Industrial to Grand Ave.)	Done	0.003800
SERVICE IMP	SW Route Lane Service	Scheduled	0.005516
SIG INTCONN	Washington Street	Scheduled	0.030370
SIG INTCONN	IL 59	Scheduled	0.068650
ENGR	Citywide—Naperville		0.086230
SIG INTCONN	Washington Street	Scheduled	0.008230
SIG INTCONN	Lewis Ave. (Yorkhousse to ILL 173)	Scheduled	0.034600
SIG INTCONN	Schaumberg Rd. (Barrington to Martingale)	Scheduled	0.078080
Vanpool Program (94 vehicles)	Region-Wide Suburban	Done	0.134000
Transp. Center	North West Cook County	Done	0.032835
Transp. Center	Sears T.F.	Done	0.005805
Station	Clark/Lake	Done	0.010000
Station Recon	18Th Douglas Line	Done	0.001500
Station Recon	Linden	Done	0.001500
Station Recon	Cottage Grove	Done	0.001300
Com. Pkg	Lisle	Done	0.010177
Com. Pkg	Jefferson Park	Done	0.000110
Com. Pkg	Edison Park	Done	0.003614
Com. Pkg	Palatine	Done	0.004336
Com. Pkg	Central Street	Done	0.000519
Com. Pkg	Palatine	Done	0.004890
Com. Pkg	Crystal Lake	Done	0.034948
Com. Pkg	137Th/Riverdale	Done	0.004565
Com. Pkg	River Forest	Done	0.000289
Com. Pkg	115Th/Kensington	Done	0.002795
Com. Pkg	119Th St	Done	0.004483
Com. Pkg	Wilmette	Done	0.001587
Com. Pkg	111Th St	Done	0.000507
Com. Pkg	Edison Park	Done	0.002371
Com. Pkg	Joliet	Done	0.003967
Com. Pkg	Hanover Park	Done	0.021799
Com. Pkg	Bartlett	Done	0.008911
Com. Pkg	Chicago Ridge	Done	0.002159
Com. Pkg	103 Rd St	Done	0.000675
Com. Pkg	Elmhurst	Done	0.003857
Com. Pkg	Bartlett	Done	0.009326
Com. Pkg	Morton Grove	Done	0.001444
Com. Pkg	Palatine	Done	0.003598
Com. Pkg	Harvard	Done	0.006299
Com. Pkg	Willow Springs	Done	0.001200
Com. Pkg	Edgebrook	Done	0.002240
Com. Pkg	Bensenville	Done	0.002010
Com. Pkg	Hanover Park	Done	0.015020
Com. Pkg	Midlothian	Done	0.002570
Com. Pkg	Route 59	Done	0.025020
Com. Pkg	Lake Forest (West)	Done	0.013780
Com. Pkg	Lombard	Done
Com. Pkg	Elmhurst	Done	0.001010
Com. Pkg	Woodstock	Done	0.019000
Com. Pkg	University Park	Done	0.019950
Com. Pkg	Grayslake	Done	0.006210
Com. Pkg	Oak Forest	Done	0.004260
Com. Pkg	91 St St.	Done	0.003380
Com. Pkg	Lockport	Done	0.007360
Com. Pkg	Ravenswood	Done	0.000130
Com. Pkg	Hickory Creek	Done	0.060140
Com. Pkg	Cary	Done	0.005980
Com. Pkg	Blue Island	Done	0.019430
Com. Pkg	Lemont	Done	0.016200
Com. Pkg	Itasca	Done	0.003860
Com. Pkg	Maywood	Done	0.000600
Com. Pkg	Ivanhoe	Done	0.001960
Com. Pkg	Ravinia	Done	0.003210
Com. Pkg	Fox River Grove	Done	0.025170
Com. Pkg	Medinah	Done	0.012250
Com. Pkg	Hanover Park	Done	0.011840
Com. Pkg	Worth	Done	0.003530
Com. Pkg	Roselle	Done	0.007710
Com. Pkg	Crystal Lake	Done	0.015050
Com. Pkg	Gresham	Done	0.000300
Com. Pkg	Barrington	Done	0.002420
Rideshare Prog.	Regionwide	Scheduled	0.040000
Rapid Transit Service	Midway Airport	Done	0.220000
Transp. Center	Deerfield Lake-Cook	Done	0.004160
Station Recon	Davis St.	Done	0.004000
Station Recon	Addison	Done	0.004000
Station Recon	King Drive	Done	0.003000
Station Recon	Washington/Wells	Done	0.003000
Com. Pkg	Cary	Done	0.027910
Com. Pkg	Morton Grove	Done	0.002460
Com. Pkg	80th Ave.	Scheduled	0.043200
Com. Pkg	Round Lake	Done	0.015150
Com. Pkg	Grayslake	Done	0.009170
Com. Pkg	Ingleside	Scheduled	0.005430
Com. Pkg	Schamburg	Scheduled	0.042090
Com. Pkg	Oak Forest	Scheduled	0.004680
Com. Pkg	Lake Cook	Scheduled	0.026390
Com. Pkg	Grayslake	Scheduled	0.035290

(k) Approval—EPA is approving the section 182(f) oxides of nitrogen (NO_X) reasonably available control technology (RACT), new source review (NSR), vehicle inspection/maintenance (I/M), and general conformity exemptions for the Illinois portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County severe ozone nonattainment area as requested by the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin in a July 13, 1994 submittal. This approval does not cover the exemption of NO_Xtransportation conformity requirements of section 176(c) for this area. Approval of these exemptions is contingent on the results of the final ozone attainment demonstration expected to be submitted in mid-1997. The approval will be modified if the final attainment demonstration demonstrates that NO_Xemission controls are needed in the nonattainment area to attain the ozone standard in the Lake Michigan Ozone Study modeling domain.

(l) Approval—The United States Environmental Protection Agency is approving under section 182(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act the exemption of the Chicago severe, ozone nonattainment area from the build/no-build and less than-1990 interim transportation conformity oxides of nitrogen requirements as requested by the State of Illinois in a June 20, 1995 submittal. In light of the modeling completed thus far and considering the importance of the OTAG process and attainment plan modeling efforts, USEPA grants this NO_Xwaiver on a contingent basis. As the OTAG modeling results and control recommendations are completed in 1996, this information will be incorporated into attainment plans being developed by the LADCO States. When these attainment plans are submitted to USEPA in mid-1997, these new modeling analyses will be reviewed to determine if the NO_Xwaiver should be continued, altered, or removed. USEPA's rulemaking action to reconsider the initial NO_Xwaiver may occur simultaneously with rulemaking action on the attainment plans. The USEPA also reserves the right to require NO_Xemission controls for transportation sources under section 110(a)(2)(D) of the Act if future ozone modeling demonstrates that such controls are needed to achieve the ozone standard in downwind areas. The Chicago severe ozone nonattainment area includes the Counties of Cook, DuPage, Grundy (Aux Sable and Gooselake Townships), Kane, Kendall (Oswego Township), Lake, McHenry, and Will.

(n) Negative declaration—Shipbuilding and ship repair industry. On October 11, 1996, the State of Illinois certified to the satisfaction of the United States Environmental Protection Agency that no major sources categorized as part of the shipbuilding and ship repair industry are located in the Chicago, Illinois ozone nonattainment area which is comprised of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, Will Counties and Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships in Grundy County and Oswego Township in Kendall County or the Metro-East, Illinois ozone nonattainment area which is comprised of Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair Counties.

(o) Negative declaration—Aerospace manufacturing and rework industry. On October 11, 1996, the State of Illinois certified to the satisfaction of the United States Environmental Protection Agency that no major sources categorized as part of the Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Industry are located in the Chicago, Illinois ozone nonattainment area which is comprised of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, Will Counties and Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships in Grundy County and Oswego Township in Kendall County or the Metro-East, Illinois ozone nonattainment area which is comprised of Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair Counties.

(p) Approval—On November 15, 1993, Illinois submitted 15 percent rate-of-progress and 3 percent contingency plans for the Chicago ozone nonattainment area as a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan. These plans satisfy sections 182(b)(1), 172(c)(9), and 182(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990.

(q) Approval—On November 15, 1993, Illinois submitted 15 percent rate-of-progress and 3 percent contingency plans for the Metro-East St. Louis ozone nonattainment area as a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan. These plans satisfy sections 182(b)(1) and 172(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990.

(r) Approval—On November 15, 1993, Illinois submitted the following transportation control measures as part of the 15 percent rate-of-progress and 3 percent contingency plans for the Metro-East ozone nonattainment area: Work trip reductions; transit improvements; and traffic flow improvements.

(s) On October 10, 1997, Illinois submitted a site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan, in the form of a letter from Bharat Mathur, Chief, Bureau of Air, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. This October 10, 1997, letter requests a change in regulatory status for Riverside Laboratories, Inc.'s Kane County facility, to reflect that the Federal site-specific rule for Riverside (40 CFR 52.741(e)(10)) has been superseded by the State of Illinois regulations, including the emission limits in 35 Illinois Administrative Code 218.204(c) and the associated control requirements, test methods and recordkeeping requirements in Part 218 and the associated definitions in part 211. These State regulations shall become the federally approved regulations applicable to Riverside on August 31, 1998. The site-specific rule, applicable to Riverside, promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency on August 21, 1995 (40 CFR 52.741(e)(10)), remains in effect and is enforceable after August 31, 1998 for the period before August 31, 1998.

(t) The Illinois volatile organic compound (VOC) rules that apply to the Stepan Company Millsdale Plant for volatile organic liquid storage (35 Ill. Admin. Code Part 218, Subpart B), batch processing (35 Ill. Admin. Code Parts 218 and 219, Subpart V) and continuous reactor and distillation processes (35 Ill. Admin. Code Part 218, Subpart Q) were approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) on August 8, 1996, April 2, 1996, and June 17, 1997, respectively. Because these rules have been approved into the State Implementation Plan and represent reasonably available control technology for VOC, USEPA revokes the June 29, 1990 Federal Implementation Plan as it applies to Stepan and replaces it with Illinois' volatile organic liquid storage, batch process, and continuous reactor and distillation process rules.

(u) Negative declaration—Industrial wastewater category. On October 2, 1998, the State of Illinois certified to the satisfaction of the United States Environmental Protection Agency that no major sources categorized as part of the Industrial wastewater category are located in the Metro-East ozone nonattainment area (Metro-East). The Metro-East area is comprised of Madison, Monroe and St. Clair Counties which are located in southwest Illinois, adjacent to St. Louis, Missouri.

(v) Negative declaration—Industrial cleaning solvents category. On October 2, 1998, the State of Illinois certified to the satisfaction of the United States Environmental Protection Agency that no major sources categorized as part of the Industrial cleaning solvents category are located in the Metro-East ozone nonattainment area (Metro-East). The Metro-East area is comprised of Madison, Monroe and St. Clair Counties which are located in southwest Illinois, adjacent to St. Louis, Missouri.

(w) Approval —On December 18, 1997, December 17, 1999, January 14, 2000, and January 21, 2000, Illinois submitted a post-1996 Rate Of Progress Plan for the Chicago ozone nonattainment area as a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan. This plan reduces ozone precursor emissions by 9 percent from 1990 baseline emissions by November 15, 1999. This plan also supports a mobile source emissions budget of 279.3 tons/day of volatile organic compounds for transportation conformity purposes.

(x) Approval —On December 18, 1997, Illinois submitted a contingency measure plan as part of the Chicago Area post-1996 Rate of Progress Plan. This plan reduces volatile organic compound emissions in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area by 3 percent from 1990 baseline emissions by November 15, 1999.

(y) Approval —On December 18, 1997, Illinois submitted Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) as part of the post-1996 Rate Of Progress Plan for the Chicago ozone nonattainment area. The TCMs being approved are listed in the following documents published by the Chicago Area Transportation Study: “Transportation Control Measures Contribution to the Post-1996 Rate-Of-Progress State Implementation Plan,” March 22, 1996; “Transportation Control Measures Contribution to the 9 percent Control Strategy State Implementation Plan,” June 11, 1998; and “1999 Transportation Control Measures Contribution to the 9 percent Rate of Progress Control Strategy State Implementation Plan,” December 9, 1999.

(z) Negative declaration—Industrial cleaning solvents category. On December 23, 1999, the State of Illinois certified to the satisfaction of the United States Environmental Protection Agency that no major sources categorized as part of the industrial cleaning solvents category are located in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area. The Chicago ozone nonattainment area includes Cook County, DuPage County, Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships in Grundy County, Kane County, Oswego Township in Kendall County, Lake County, McHenry County and Will County.

(aa) Negative declaration—Industrial wastewater category. On December 23, 1999, the State of Illinois certified to the satisfaction of the United States Environmental Protection Agency that no major sources categorized as part of the Industrial Wastewater Category are located in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area. The Chicago ozone nonattainment area includes Cook County, DuPage County, Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships in Grundy County, Kane County, Oswego Township in Kendall County, Lake County, McHenry County and Will County.

(bb) Approval—Revisions to the SIP submitted by Illinois on November 15, 1999; February 10, 2000; April 13, 2001; and April 30, 2001. The revisions are for the purpose of satisfying the attainment demonstration requirements of section 182(c)(2)(A) of the Act for the Metro-East St. Louis area. The revision establishes an attainment date of November 15, 2004, for the St. Louis moderate ozone nonattainment area. This revision establishes MVEBs for 2004 of 26.62 TPD of VOC and 35.52 TPD of NO_Xto be used in transportation conformity in the Metro-East St. Louis area until revised budgets pursuant to MOBILE6 are submitted and found adequate. In the revision, Illinois commits to revise its VOC and NO_Xtransportation conformity budgets within two years of the release of MOBILE6. No conformity determinations will be made during the second year following the release of MOBILE6 unless and until the MVEBs have been recalculated using MOBILE6 and found adequate by EPA. EPA is granting a waiver for the Metro East St. Louis area to the state of Illinois from the NO_XRACT requirements of the Act and disapproving the request for a waiver from the NO_XNSR and NO_Xgeneral conformity requirements. EPA is finding that the Contingency Measures identified by Illinois are adequate to meet the requirements of the Act. EPA finds that the Illinois SIP meets the requirements pertaining to RACM under the Act for the Metro-East St. Louis area.

(cc) Approval—Illinois has adopted and USEPA has approved sufficient NO_Xemission regulations to assure that it will achieve the level of NO_Xemissions budgeted for the State by USEPA. USEPA has made two minor budget revisions requested by Illinois, adding a boiler owned by LTV Steel and deleting a boiler owned by the University of Illinois from the inventory of large NO_Xsources.

(dd) Chicago Ozone Attainment Demonstration Approval—On December 26, 2000, Illinois submitted a one-hour ozone attainment demonstration plan as a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan. This plan includes: A modeled demonstration of attainment and associated attainment year conformity emission budgets; a plan to reduce ozone precursor emissions by 3 percent per year from 2000 to 2007 (a post-1999 rate-of-progress plan), and associated conformity emission budgets; a contingency measures plan for both the ozone attainment demonstration and the post-1999 rate-of-progress plan; a commitment to conduct a Mid-Course Review of the ozone attainment demonstration by the end of 2004; a demonstration that Illinois has implemented all reasonably available control measures; and a commitment to revise motor vehicle emission budgets within two years after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency officially releases the MOBILE6 emission factor model.

(ee) Approval of the Maintenance Plan for the Illinois Portion of the St. Louis Area—On December 30, 2002 Illinois submitted Maintenance Plan for the Illinois portion of the St. Louis Nonattainment Area. The plan includes 2014 On-Road Motor Vehicle Emission Budget of 10.13 tons per ozone season weekday of VOCs and 18.72 tons per ozone season weekday NO_Xto be used in transportation conformity.

(ff) Approval—On April 11, 2003, Illinois submitted a revision to the ozone attainment plan for the Chicago severe 1-hour ozone nonattainment area. This plan revised the 2005 and 2007 Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEB) recalculated using the emissions factor model MOBILE6. The approved motor vehicle emissions budgets are 151.11 tons per day VOC for 2005 and 127.42 tons per day VOC and 280.4 tons per day NO_Xfor 2007.

(gg) Approval—On January 30, 2007, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) requested that EPA find that the Illinois portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, Illinois-Indiana (IL-IN) nonattainment area, attained the revoked 1-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). After review of this submission, EPA approves this finding.

Editorial Note: ForFederal Registercitations affecting §52.726, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and on GPO Access.

§ 52.727 [Reserved]

§ 52.728 Control strategy: Nitrogen dioxide. [Reserved]

§ 52.729 Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.

(a) Approval—On August 15, 1996, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency requested that the Marathon Oil Company in Robinson, Illinois be granted a carbon monoxide (CO) state implementation plan (SIP) revision with specified conditions. This SIP revision limits the Marathon Oil Company's CO emissions from its fluid bed catalytic cracking unit CO boiler to be no more than 300 parts per million of CO corrected for 50 percent excess air beginning January 19, 1996, and ending August 4, 1997. The variance became effective January 19, 1996. The SIP revision request satisfies all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act.

§ 52.730 Compliance schedules.

(a) The requirements of §51.262(a) of this chapter are not met since compliance schedules with adequate increments of progress have not been submitted for every source for which they are required.

(b) Federal compliance schedules. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the owner or operator of any stationary source subject to the following emission limiting regulations in the Illinois implementation plan shall comply with the applicable compliance schedule in paragraph (b)(2) of this section: Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 203(d)(4), 203(d)(6)(B)(ii)(bb), 203(g)(1)(B), 203(g)(2), 203(g)(3), 203(g)(4), 204(c)(1)(A), 204(c)(2), 204(d), and 204(e).

(2) Compliance schedules. (i) The owner or operator of any stationary source subject to Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulation Rule 203(d)(4) shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the date specified.

( a ) September 30, 1973—Advertise for bids for purchase and construction or installation of equipment, or for materials requisite for process modification sufficient to control particulate emissions from the source.

( b ) November 15, 1973—Award contracts for emission control systems or process modification, or issue orders for the purchase of component parts to accomplish emission control or process modification.

( c ) May 31, 1974—Initiate onsite construction or installation of emission control system or process modification.

( d ) March 31, 1975—Complete onsite construction or installation of emission system or process modification.

( e ) May 31, 1975—Complete shakedown operation and performance test on source, submit performance test results to the Administrator; achieve full compliance with State agency regulation.

(ii) The owner or operator of any stationary source subject to Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulation Rule 203(d)(6)(B)(ii)(bb) shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the date specified.

( a ) September 30, 1973—Advertise for bids for purchase and construction or for modification of equipment sufficient to control particulate emissions from the source.

( b ) November 15, 1973—Award contracts for emissions control systems or process modification, or issue orders for the purchase of component parts to accomplish emission control or process modification.

( c ) March 31, 1974—Initiate onsite construction or installation of emission control system.

( d ) October 31, 1974—Complete onsite construction or installation of emission control system.

( e ) December 31, 1974—Achieve final compliance with Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 203(d)(6)(B)(ii)(bb).

(iii) ( a ) The owner or operator of any boiler or furnace of more than 250 million BTU per hour heat input subject to Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulation Rule 204(c)(1)(A), 204(c)(2), 204(d), and 204(e) shall notify the Administrator, no later than October 1, 1973, of his intent to utilize either low-sulfur fuel or stack gas desulfurization to the requirements of said regulation.

( b ) Any owner or operator of a stationary source subject to paragraph (b)(2)(iii)( a ) of this section who elects to utilize low sulfur fuel shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the date specified.

( 1 ) November 1, 1973—Submit to the Administrator a projection of the amount of fuel, by types, that will be substantially adequate to enable compliance with Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 204(c)(1)(A), 204(c)(2), 204(d), and 204(e) on May 31, 1975, and for at least one year thereafter.

( 2 ) December 31, 1973—Sign contracts with fuel suppliers for fuel requirements as projected above.

( 3 ) January 31, 1974—Submit a statement as to whether boiler modifications will be required. If modifications will be required, submit plans for such modifications.

( 4 ) March 15, 1974—Let contracts for necessary boiler modifications, if applicable.

( 7 ) May 31, 1975—Final compliance with the emission limitation of Rules 204(c)(1)(A), 204(c)(2), 204(d), and 204(e).

( c ) Any owner or operator of a fuel combustion source subject to paragraph (b)(2)(iii)( a ) of this section who elects to utilize stack gas desulfurization shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the date specified.

( 4 ) May 31, 1975—Complete shakedown operations and performance test on source, submit performance test results to the Administrator; achieve full compliance with Rule 204(c)(1)(A), 204(c)(2), 204(d), and 204(e).

(iv) ( a ) The owner or operator of any stationary source subject to Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 203(g)(1)(B), 203(g)(2), 203(g)(3), and 203(g)(4) shall notify the Administrator, no later than October 1, 1973, of his intent to utilize either low ash fuel or a stack gas cleaning system to meet the requirements of said regulation.

( b ) Any owner or operator of a stationary source subject to paragraph (b)(2)(iv)( a ) of this section who elects to utilize low ash fuel shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the date specified.

( 1 ) November 1, 1973—Submit to the Administrator a projection of the amount of fuel, by types, that will be substantially adequate to enable compliance with Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 203(g)(1)(B), 203(g)(2), 203(g)(3), and 203(g)(4) on May 31, 1975, and for at least one year thereafter.

( 2 ) December 31, 1973—Sign contracts with fuel suppliers for fuel requirements as projected above.

( 3 ) January 31, 1974—Submit a statement as to whether boiler modifications will be required. If modifications will be required, submit plans for such modifications.

( 4 ) March 15, 1974—Let contracts for necessary boiler modifications, if applicable.

( 7 ) May 31, 1975—Final compliance with the emission limitation of Rule 203(g)(1)(B), 203(g)(2), 203(g)(3), and 203(g)(4).

( c ) Any owner or operator of a stationary source subject to paragraph (b)(2)(iv)( a ) of this section who elects to utilize a stack gas cleaning system shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the date specified.

( 4 ) May 31, 1975—Complete shakedown operations and performance tests on source, submit performance test results to the Administrator; achieve full compliance with Rule 203(g)(1)(B), 203(g)(2), 203(g)(3), and 203(g)(4).

(v) Ten days prior to the conduct of any performance test required by this paragraph, the owner or operator of the affected source shall give notice of such test to the Administrator to afford him the opportunity to have an observer present.

(vi) Any owner or operator subject to a compliance schedule above shall certify to the Administrator, within five days after the deadline for each increment of progress in that schedule, whether or not the increment has been met.

(3)(i) None of the above paragraphs shall apply to a source which is presently in compliance with applicable regulations and which has certified such compliance to the Administrator by October 1, 1973. The Administrator may request whatever supporting information he considers necessary for proper certification.

(ii) Any compliance schedule adopted by the State and approved by the Administrator shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph for the affected source.

(iii) Any owner or operator subject to a compliance schedule in this paragraph may submit to the Administrator no later than October 1, 1973, a proposed alternative compliance schedule. No such compliance schedule may provide for final compliance after the final compliance date in the applicable compliance schedule of this paragraph. If promulgated by the Administrator, such schedule shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph for the affected source.

(4) Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude the Administrator from promulgating a separate schedule for any source to which the application of the compliance schedules in paragraph (b)(2) of this section fail to satisfy the requirements of §§51.261 and 51.262(a) of this chapter.

(d) The compliance schedules for the sources identified below are disapproved as not meeting the requirements of subpart N of this chapter. All regulations cited are air pollution control regulations of the State, unless otherwise noted.

Source	Location	Regulation involved	Date schedule adopted
christian county
Allied Mills, Inc	Taylorville	204(c)	Feb. 28, 1973.
cook county
Harco Aluminum Inc	Chicago	204(c)	Dec. 9, 1973.
J. L. Clark Manufacturing Co	Downers Grove	205(f)	May 4, 1973.
Johnson & Johnson	Bedford Park	205(f)	Jun. 20, 1973.
Lloyd J. Harris Pie, Co. Inc	Chicago	204(c)	Feb. 27, 1973.
Union Oil Co. of California (a) No. 10 boiler	......do	204(c)	Jun. 19, 1973, Dec. 13, 1973.
(b) 11BIA crude heater
W. H. Hutchingson & Son, Inc	......do	205(f)	Aug. 12, 1973.
Western Rust Proof Co	......do	204(c)	Oct. 10, 1973.
Wheeler Uniform Service Inc	......do	204(c)	May 22, 1973.
Wm. Yuenger Manufacturing Co	......do	204(c)	Aug. 16, 1973.
World's Finest Chocolate Inc	......do	204(c)	May 30, 1973.
jackson county
Tuck Industries, Inc	Carbondale	204(c)	Jun. 20, 1973.
kane county
All Steel Equipment Corp	Montgomery	204(f)	July 24, 1973.
Consolidated Food Inc	Aurora	205(f)	May 9, 1973.
lake county
Morton Manufacturing Co	Libertyville	205(f)	Aug. 27, 1973.
la salle county
Allied Mills Inc	Mendota	204(c)	May 28, 1973.
madison county
Clark Oil & Refining Corp	Hartford	204(f)	Feb. 22, 1973.
Granite City Steel Co	Granite City	203(d)(6)	Apr. 25, 1972.
(a) Coke oven pushing operations			as amended.
(b) Charging operations			May 21, 1973.
Illinois Power Company (Wood River Boiler No. 5)	E. Alton	204(c)	May 1, 1973.
Owens-Illinois Inc	Madison	204(c)	May 2, 1973.
Owen-Illinois Inc. (No. 2 Powerhouse)	Alton	204(c)	Mar. 30, 1973.
Shell Oil Co. (Cat. Cracker Units Nos. 1, 2)	Roxana	203(b)	Nov. 27, 1972.
randolf county
Chester Dairy Co	Chester	204(c)	Aug. 6, 1973.
st. clair county
Lock Stove Co	East St. Louis	205(b)	June 11, 1973.
tazewell county
Quaker Oats Co	Pekin	204(c)	May 24, 1973.
vermillion county
Lauhoff Grain Co	Danville	204(c)	Mar. 31, 1973.

[38 FR 16145, June 20, 1973, as amended at 38 FR 22742, Aug. 23, 1973; 38 FR 24342, Sept. 7, 1973; 39 FR 28155, Aug. 5, 1974; 51 FR 40675, 40676, 40677, Nov. 7, 1986; 54 FR 25258, June 14, 1989]

§§ 52.731-52.735 [Reserved]

§ 52.736 Review of new sources and modifications.

(b) The rules submitted by the State on March 24, 1988, to satisfy the requirements of the Clean Air Act are approved. These rules are part 203: Major Stationary Sources Construction and Modification as effective March 22, 1991. The moratorium on construction and modification of new sources in nonattainment areas as provided in section 110(a)(2)(I) of the Clean Air Act is revoked.

§ 52.737 Operating permits.

Emission limitation and other provisions contained in operating permits issued by the State in accordance with the provisions of the federally approved permit program shall be the applicable requirements of the federally approved Illinois SIP for the purpose of section 113 of the Clean Air Act and shall be enforceable by USEPA and by any person in the same manner as other requirements of the SIP. USEPA reserves the right to deem an operating permit not federally enforceable. Such a determination will be made according to appropriate procedures, and be based upon the permit, permit approval procedures or permit requirements which do not conform with the operating permit program requirements or the requirements of USEPA's underlying regulations.

§ 52.738 Significant deterioration of air quality.

(a) The requirements of sections 160 through 165 of the Clean Air Act are not met, since the plan does not include approvable procedures for preventing the significant deterioration of air quality.

(b) Regulations for preventing significant deterioration of air quality. The provisions of §52.21 except paragraph (a)(1) are hereby incorporated and made a part of the applicable State plan for the State of Illinois.

(c) All applications and other information required pursuant to §52.21 from sources located in the State of Illinois shall be submitted to the Director of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, 2200 Churchill Road, Springfield, Illinois 62706 instead of the EPA Region V office.

[45 FR 52741, Aug. 7, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 9584, Jan. 29, 1981; 68 FR 11323, Mar. 10, 2003; 68 FR 74489, Dec. 24, 2003]

§ 52.739 Permit fees.

(a) The requirements of section 110(a)(2)(K) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977 are not met since the state has not submitted to EPA, as a part of its State Implementation Plan, provisions for a permit fee system.

§ 52.740 Interstate pollution.

(a) The requirements of section 126(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977 are not met since the state has not submitted to EPA, as a part of its State Implementation Plan, the procedures on which the state is relying to notify nearby states of any proposed major stationary source which may significantly contribute to levels of air pollution in excess of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards in that state.

§ 52.741 Control strategy: Ozone control measures for Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will Counties.

(a) General Provisions —(1) Abbreviations and conversion factors. (i) The following abbreviations are used in §52.741:

(2) Applicability. (i) Any source that received a stay, as indicated in §218.103(a)(2), remains subject to the stay if still in effect, or (if the stay is no longer in effect) the federally-promulgated or federally-approved rule applicable to such source.

(ii)(A) Effective November 20, 1996 Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, and Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area replace the requirements of 40 CFR 52.741 Control strategy: Ozone control measures for Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will County as the federally enforceable control measures in these counties for the major non-Control Technique Guideline (CTG) sources in the Chicago area, previously subject to paragraph u, v, w, or x because of the applicability criteria in these paragraphs.

(B) In accordance with §218.101(b), for the major non-CTG sources subject to paragraphs u, v, w, or x because of the applicability criteria of those paragraphs, the requirements of paragraphs u, v, w, and x, and the recordkeeping requirements in paragraph y and any related parts of §52.741 necessary to implement these paragraphs (including, but not limited to, those paragraphs containing test methods and definitions), shall remain in effect and are enforceable after November 20, 1996 for the period from July 30, 1990 until November 20, 1996.

(iii)(A) Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(2) (i) and (ii) of this section, effective October 11, 1994, Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, and Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area replace the requirements of this §52.741 Control strategy: Ozone control measures for Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will County as the federally enforceable control measures in these counties.

(B) In accordance with §218.101(b), the requirements of §52.741 shall remain in effect and are enforceable after October 11, 1994, for the period from July 30, 1990, to October 11, 1994.

Note: The Federal definitions supersede the State definitions for these terms, which were previously approved by USEPA as part of the SIP. The federally approved definitions for all other terms remain in effect and applicable to these Federal rules.

Accelacota means a pharmaceutical coating operation which consists of a horizontally rotating perforated drum in which tablets are placed, a coating is applied by spraying, and the coating is dried by the flow of air across the drum through the perforations.

Accumulator means the reservoir of a condensing unit receiving the condensate from a surface condenser.

Actual emissions means the actual quantity of VOM emissions from an emission source during a particular time period.

Adhesive means any substance or mixture of substances intended to serve as a joining compound.

Afterburner means a control device in which materials in gaseous effluent are combusted.

Air contaminant means any solid, liquid, or gaseous matter, any odor, or any form of energy, that is capable of being released into the atmosphere from an emission source.

Air dried coatings means any coatings that dry by use of air or forced air at temperatures up to 363.15 K (194 °F).

Air pollution means the presence in the atmosphere of one or more air contaminants in sufficient quantities and of such characteristics and duration as to be injurious to human, plant, or animal life, to health, or to property, or to unreasonably interfere with the enjoyment of life or property.

Air pollution control equipment means any equipment or facility of a type intended to eliminate, prevent, reduce or control the emission of specified air contaminants to the atmosphere.

Air suspension coater/dryer means a pharmaceutical coating operation which consists of vertical chambers in which tablets or particles are placed, and a coating is applied and then dried while the tablets or particles are kept in a fluidized state by the passage of air upward through the chambers.

Air-assisted airless spray means a spray coating method which combines compressed air with hydraulic pressure to atomize the coating material into finer droplets than is achieved with pure airless spray. Lower hydraulic pressure is used than with airless spray.

Airless spray means a spray coating method in which the coating is atomized by forcing it through a small opening at high pressure. The coating liquid is not mixed with air before exiting from the nozzle.

Allowable emissions means the quantity of VOM emissions during a particular time period from a stationary source calculated using the maximum rated capacity of the source (unless restricted by federally enforceable limitations on operating rate, hours of operation, or both) and the most stringent of:

Ambient air quality standards means those standards designed to protect the public health and welfare codified in 40 CFR part 50 and promulgated from time to time by the USEPA pursuant to authority contained in Section 108 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., as amended from time to time.

As applied means the exact formulation of a coating during application on or impregnation into a substrate.

Asphalt means the dark-brown to black cementitious material (solid, semisolid, or liquid in consistency) of which the main constituents are bitumens which occur naturally or as a residue of petroleum refining.

Automobile means a motor vehicle capable of carrying no more than 12 passengers.

Automobile or light-duty truck assembly plant means a facility where parts are assembled or finished for eventual inclusion into a finished automobile or light-duty truck ready for sale to vehicle dealers, but not including customizers, body shops, and other repainters.

Automobile or light-duty truck refinishing means the repainting of used automobiles and light-duty trucks.

Baked coatings means any coating which is cured or dried in an oven where the oven air temperature exceeds 90 °C (194 °F).

Bituminous coatings means black or brownish coating materials which are soluble in carbon disulfide, which consist mainly of hydrocarbons, and which are obtained from natural deposits or as residues from the distillation of crude oils or of low grades of coal.

Brush or wipe coating means a manual method of applying a coating using a brush, cloth, or similar object.

Bulk gasoline plant means a gasoline storage and distribution facility with an average throughput of 76,000 l (20,000 gal) or less on a 30-day rolling average that distributes gasoline to gasoline dispensing facilities.

Can means any metal container, with or without a top, cover, spout or handles, into which solid or liquid materials are packaged.

Can coating means any coating applied on a single walled container that is manufactured from metal sheets thinner than 29 gauge (0.0141 in.).

Can coating facility means a facility that includes one or more can coating line(s).

Can coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied onto the surface of cans or can components.

Capture means the containment or recovery of emissions from a process for direction into a duct which may be exhausted through a stack or sent to a control device. The overall abatement of emissions from a process with an add-on control device is a function both of the capture efficiency and of the control device.

Capture device means a hood, enclosed room floor sweep or other means of collecting solvent or other pollutants into a duct. The pollutant can then be directed to a pollution control device such as an afterburner or carbon adsorber. Sometimes the term is used loosely to include the control device.

Capture efficiency means the fraction of all VOM generated by a process that are directed to an abatement or recovery device.

Capture system means all equipment (including, but not limited to, hoods, ducts, fans, ovens, dryers, etc.) used to contain, collect and transport an air pollutant to a control device.

Clean Air Act means the Clean Air Act of 1963, as amended, including the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq .).

Clear coating means coatings that lack color and opacity or are transparent using the undercoat as a reflectant base or undertone color.

Clear topcoat means the final coating which contains binders, but not opaque pigments, and is specifically formulated to form a transparent or translucent solid protective film.

Closed vent system means a system that is not open to the atmosphere and is composed of piping, connections, and, if necessary, flow inducing devices that transport gas or vapor from an emission source to a control device.

Coating means a material applied onto or impregnated into a substrate for protective, decorative, or functional purposes. Such materials include, but are not limited to, paints, varnishes, sealers, adhesives, thinners, diluents, and inks.

Coating line means an operation consisting of a series of one or more coating applicators and any associated flash-off areas, drying areas, and ovens wherein a surface coating is applied, dried, or cured. (It is not necessary for an operation to have an oven, or flash-off area, or drying area to be included in this definition.)

Coil means any flat metal sheet or strip that is rolled or wound in concentric rings.

Coil coating means any coating applied on any flat metal sheet or strip that comes in rolls or coils.

Coil coating facility means a facility that includes one or more coil coating line(s).

Coil coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative or functional coating is applied onto the surface of flat metal sheets, strips, rolls, or coils for industrial or commercial use.

Cold cleaning means the process of cleaning and removing soils from surfaces by spraying, brushing, flushing, or immersion while maintaining the organic solvent below its boiling point. Wipe cleaning is not included in this definition.

Component means, with respect to synthetic organic chemical and polymer manufacturing equipment, and petroleum refining and related industries, any piece of equipment which has the potential to leak VOM including, but not limited to, pump seals, compressor seals, seal oil degassing vents, pipeline valves, pressure relief devices, process drains, and open ended pipes. This definition excludes valves which are not externally regulated, flanges, and equipment in heavy liquid service. For purposes of paragraph (i) of this section, this definition also excludes bleed ports of gear pumps in polymer service.

Concrete curing compounds means any coating applied to freshly poured concrete to retard the evaporation of water.

Condensate means volatile organic liquid separated from its associated gases, which condenses due to changes in the temperature or pressure and remains liquid at standard conditions.

Continuous process means, with respect to polystyrene resin, a method of manufacture in which the styrene raw material is delivered on a continuous basis to the reactor in which the styrene is polymerized to polystyrene.

Control device means equipment (such as an afterburner or adsorber) used to remove or prevent the emission of air pollutants from a contaminated exhaust stream.

Control device efficiency means the ratio of pollution prevented by a control device and the pollution introduced to the control device, expressed as a percentage.

Conveyorized degreasing means the continuous process of cleaning and removing soils from surfaces utilizing either cold or vaporized solvents.

Crude oil means a naturally occurring mixture which consists of hydrocarbons and sulfur, nitrogen, or oxygen derivatives of hydrocarbons and which is a liquid at standard conditions.

Crude oil gathering means the transportation of crude oil or condensate after custody transfer between a production facility and a reception point.

Custody transfer means the transfer of produced petroleum and/or condensate after processing and/or treating in the producing operations, from storage tanks or automatic transfer facilities to pipelines or any other forms of transportation.

Daily-weighted average VOM content means the average VOM content of two or more coatings as applied on a coating line during any day, taking into account the fraction of total coating volume that each coating represents, as calculated with the following equation:

VOM_w=The average VOM content of two or more coatings as applied each day on a coating line in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM),

V_i=The volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on a coating line in units of l (gal).

C_i=The VOM content of each coating as applied each day on a coating line in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM), and

V_T=The total volume of all coatings (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on a coating line in units of l (gal).

Day means the consecutive 24 hours beginning at 12 a.m. (midnight) local time.

Delivery vessel means any tank truck or trailer equipped with a storage tank that is used for the transport of gasoline to a stationary storage tank at a gasoline dispensing facility, bulk gasoline plant, or bulk gasoline terminal.

Dip coating means a method of applying coatings in which the part is submerged in a tank filled with the coating.

Drum means any cylindrical metal shipping container of 13- to 110-gallon capacity.

Electrostatic bell or disc spray means an electrostatic spray coating method in which a rapidly-spinning bell- or disc-shaped applicator is used to create a fine mist and apply the coating with high transfer efficiency.

Electrostatic spray means a spray coating method in which opposite electrical charges are applied to the substrate and the coating. The coating is attracted to the object due to the electrostatic potential between them.

Emission source and source mean any facility from which VOM is emitted or capable of being emitted into the atmosphere.

Enamel means a coating that cures by chemical cross-linking of its base resin. Enamels can be distinguished from lacquers because enamels are not readily resoluble in their original solvent.

End sealing compound coat means a compound applied to can ends which functions as a gasket when the end is assembled onto the can.

Excessive release means a discharge of more than 295 g (0.65 lbs) of mercaptans and/or hydrogen sulfide into the atmosphere in any 5-minute period.

Exterior base coat means a coating applied to the exterior of a can body, or flat sheet to provide protection to the metal or to provide background for any lithographic or printing operation.

Exterior end coat means a coating applied to the exterior end of a can to provide protection to the metal.

External-floating roof means a cover over an open top storage tank consisting of a double deck or pontoon single deck which rests upon and is supported by the volatile organic liquid being contained and is equipped with a closure seal or seals to close the space between the roof edge and tank shell.

Extreme environmental conditions means exposure to any or all of the following: ambient weather conditions; temperatures consistently above 95 °C (203 °F); detergents; abrasive and scouring agents; solvents; or corrosive atmospheres.

Extreme performance coating means any coating which during intended use is exposed to extreme environmental conditions.

Fabric coating means any coating applied on textile fabric. Fabric coating includes the application of coatings by impregnation.

Fabric coating facility means a facility that includes one or more fabric coating lines.

Fabric coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating or reinforcing material is applied on or impregnated into a textile fabric.

Federally enforceable means all limitations and conditions which are enforceable by the Administrator including those requirements developed pursuant to 40 CFR parts 60 and 61; requirements within any applicable implementation plan; and any permit requirements established pursuant to 40 CFR 52.21 or under regulations approved pursuant to 40 CFR part 51 subpart I and 40 CFR 51.166.

Final repair coat means the repainting of any topcoat which is damaged during vehicle assembly.

Firebox means the chamber or compartment of a boiler or furnace in which materials are burned, but not the combustion chamber or afterburner of an incinerator.

Flexographic printing means the application of words, designs, and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printing technique in which the pattern to be applied is raised above the printing roll and the image carrier is made of elastomeric materials.

Flexographic printing line means a printing line in which each roll printer uses a roll with raised areas for applying an image such as words, designs, or pictures to a substrate. The image carrier on the roll is made of rubber or other elastome

Floating roof means a roof on a stationary tank, reservoir, or other container which moves vertically upon change in volume of the stored material.

Fountain solution means the solution which is applied to the image plate to maintain hydrophilic properties of the non-image areas.

Fuel combustion emission source means any furnace, boiler, or similar equipment used for the primary purpose of producing heat or power by indirect heat transfer.

Fuel gas system means a system for collection of refinery fuel gas including, but not limited to, piping for collecting tail gas from various process units, mixing drums and controls, and distribution piping.

Gas/gas method means either of two methods for determining capture which rely only on gas phase measurements. The first method requires construction of a temporary total enclosure (TTE) to ensure that all would-be fugitive emissions are measured. The second method uses the building or room which houses the facility as an enclosure. The second method requires that all other VOM sources within the room be shut down while the test is performed, but all fans and blowers within the room must be operated according to normal procedures.

Gas service means that the component contains process fluid that is in the gaseous state at operating conditions.

Gasoline means any petroleum distillate or petroleum distillate/alcohol blend having a Reid vapor pressure of 27.6 kPa or greater which is used as a fuel for internal combustion engines.

Gasoline dispensing facility means any site where gasoline is transferred from a stationary storage tank to a motor vehicle gasoline tank used to provide fuel to the engine of that motor vehicle.

Gross vehicle weight means the manufacturer's gross weight rating for the individual vehicle.

Gross vehicle weight rating means the value specified by the manufacturer as the maximum design loaded weight of a single vehicle.

Heated airless spray means an airless spray coating method in which the coating is heated just prior to application.

Heatset means a class of web-offset lithography which requires a heated dryer to solidify the printing inks.

Heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line means a lithographic printing line in which a blanket cylinder is used to transfer ink from a plate cylinder to a substrate continuously fed from a roll or an extension process and an oven is used to solidify the printing inks.

Heavy liquid means liquid with a true vapor pressure of less than 0.3 kPa (0.04 psi) at 294.3 K (70 °F) established in a standard reference text or as determined by ASTM method D2879–86 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742); or which has 0.1 Reid Vapor Pressure as determined by ASTM method D323–82 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742); or which when distilled requires a temperature of 421.95 K (300 °F) or greater to recover 10 percent of the liquid as determined by ASTM method D86–82 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742).

Heavy off-highway vehicle products means, for the purpose of paragraph (e) of this section, heavy construction, mining, farming, or material handling equipment; heavy industrial engines; diesel-electric locomotives and associated power generation equipment; and the components of such equipment or engines.

Heavy off-highway vehicle products coating facility means a facility that includes one or more heavy off-highway vehicle products coating line(s).

Heavy off-highway vehicle products coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied onto the surface of heavy off-highway vehicle products.

High temperature aluminum coating means a coating that is certified to withstand a temperature of 537.8 °C (1000 °F) for 24 hours.

Hood means a partial enclosure or canopy for capturing and exhausting, by means of a draft, the organic vapors or other fumes rising from a coating process or other source.

Hood capture efficiency means the emissions from a process which are captured by the hood and directed into a control device, expressed as a percentage of all emissions.

Hot well means the reservoir of a condensing unit receiving the condensate from a barometric condenser.

In vacuum service means, for the purpose of paragraph (i) of this section, equipment which is operating at an internal pressure that is at least 5 kPa (0.73 psia) below ambient pressure.

In-process tank means a container used for mixing, blending, heating, reacting, holding, crystallizing, evaporating or cleaning operations in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals.

Indirect heat transfer means transfer of heat in such a way that the source of heat does not come into direct contact with process materials.

Ink means a coating used in printing, impressing, or transferring an image onto a substrate.

Interior body spray coat means a coating applied by spray to the interior of a can body.

Internal-floating roof means a cover or roof in a fixed-roof tank which rests upon and is supported by the volatile organic liquid being contained and is equipped with a closure seal or seals to close the space between the roof edge and tank shell.

Lacquers means any clear wood finishes formulated with nitrocellulose or synthetic resins to dry by evaporation without chemical reaction, including clear lacquer sanding sealers.

Large appliance means any residential and commercial washers, dryers, ranges, refrigerators, freezers, water heaters, dish washers, trash compactors, air conditioners, and other similar products.

Large appliance coating means any coating applied to the component metal parts (including, but not limited to, doors, cases, lids, panels, and interior support parts) of residential and commercial washers, dryers, ranges, refrigerators, freezers, water heaters, dish washers, trash compactors, air conditioners, and other similar products.

Large appliance coating facility means a facility that includes one or more large appliance coating line(s).

Large appliance coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied onto the surface of large appliances.

Light liquid means VOM in the liquid state which is not defined as heavy liquid.

Light-duty truck means any motor vehicle rated at 3,850 kg gross vehicle weight or less, designed mainly to transport property.

Liquid/gas method means either of two methods for determining capture which require both gas phase and liquid phase measurements and analysis. The first method requires construction of a TTE. The second method uses the building or room which houses the facility as an enclosure. The second method requires that all other VOM sources within the room be shut down while the test is performed, but all fans and blowers within the room must be operated according to normal procedures.

Liquid service means that the equipment or component contains process fluid that is in a liquid state at operating conditions.

Lithographic printing line means a printing line, except that the substrate is not necessarily fed from an unwinding roll, in which each roll printer uses a roll where both the image and non-image areas are essentially in the same plane (planographic).

Magnet wire means aluminum or copper wire formed into an electromagnetic coil.

Magnet wire coating means any coating or electrically insulating varnish or enamel applied to magnet wire.

Magnet wire coating facility means a facility that includes one or more magnet wire coating line(s).

Magnet wire coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied onto the surface of a magnet wire.

Malfunction means any sudden and unavoidable failure of air pollution control equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner. Failures that are caused entirely or in part by poor maintenance, careless operation, or any other preventable upset condition or preventable equipment breakdown shall not be considered malfunctions.

Manufacturing process means a method whereby a process emission source or series of process emission sources is used to convert raw materials, feed stocks, subassemblies, or other components into a product, either for sale or for use as a component in a subsequent manufacturing process.

Maximum theoretical emissions means the quantity of volatile organic material emissions that theoretically could be emitted by a stationary source before add-on controls based on the design capacity or maximum production capacity of the source and 8760 hours per year. The design capacity or maximum production capacity includes use of coating(s) or ink(s) with the highest volatile organic material content actually used in practice by the source.

Metal furniture means a furniture piece including, but not limited to, tables, chairs, waste baskets, beds, desks, lockers, benches, shelving, file cabinets, lamps, and room dividers.

Metal furniture coating means any non-adhesive coating applied to any furniture piece made of metal or any metal part which is or will be assembled with other metal, wood, fabric, plastic or glass parts to form a furniture piece including, but not limited to, tables, chairs, waste baskets, beds, desks, lockers, benches, shelving, file cabinets, lamps, and room dividers. This definition shall not apply to any coating line coating miscellaneous metal parts or products.

Metal furniture coating facility means a facility that includes one or more metal furniture coating line(s).

Metal furniture coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied onto the surface of metal furniture.

Metallic shoe-type seal means a primary or secondary seal constructed of metal sheets (shoes) which are joined together to form a ring, springs, or levers which attach the shoes to the floating roof and hold the shoes against the tank wall, and a coated fabric which is suspended from the shoes to the floating roof.

(A) A manufacturing process involving one or more of the following applications, including any drying and curing of formulations, and capable of emitting VOM:

( 8 ) Plastic foam scrap or “fluff” from the manufacture of foam containers and packaging material to form resin pallets.

(B) The storage and handling of formulations associated with the process described above, and the use and handling of organic liquids and other substances for clean-up operations associated with the process described in this definition.

(A) A manufacturing process which compounds one or more of the following and is capable of emitting VOM:

Miscellaneous metal parts or products means any metal part or metal product, even if attached to or combined with a nonmental part or product, except cans, coils, metal furniture, large appliances, magnet wire, automobiles, ships, and airplane bodies.

Miscellaneous metal parts and products coating means any coating applied to any metal part or metal product, even if attached to or combined with a nonmetal part or product, except cans, coils, metal furniture, large appliances, and magnet wire. Prime coat, prime surfacer coat, topcoat, and final repair coat for automobiles and light-duty trucks are not miscellaneous metal parts and products coatings. However, underbody anti-chip ( e.g., underbody plastisol) automobile, and light-duty truck coatings are miscellaneous metal parts and products coatings. Also, automobile or light-duty truck refinishing coatings, coatings applied to the exterior of marine vessels, coatings applied to the exterior of airplanes, and the customized topcoating of automobiles and trucks if production is less than 35 vehicles per day are not miscellaneous metal parts and products coatings.

Miscellaneous metal parts or products coating facility means a facility that includes one or more miscellaneous metal parts or products coating lines.

Miscellaneous metal parts or products coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied onto the surface of miscellaneous metal parts or products.

(A) A manufacturing process which produces by chemical reaction, one or more of the following organic compounds or mixtures of organic compounds and which is capable of emitting VOM:

( 3 ) Cosmetic, detergent, soap, or surfactant intermediaries or specialties and products.

(B) The storage and handling of formulations associated with the process described above and the use and handling of organic liquids and other substances for clean-up operations associated with the process described in this definition.

Multiple package coating means a coating made from more than one different ingredient which must be mixed prior to using and has a limited pot life due to the chemical reaction which occurs upon mixing.

Offset means, with respect to printing and publishing operations, use of a blanket cylinder to transfer ink from the plate cylinder to the surface to be printed.

Open top vapor depressing means the batch process of cleaning and removing soils from surfaces by condensing hot solvent vapor on the colder metal parts.

Open-ended valve means any valve, except pressure relief devices, having one side of the valve in contact with process fluid and one side open to the atmosphere, either directly or through open piping.

Organic compound means any compound of carbon, excluding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate.

Organic material means any chemical compound of carbon including diluents and thinners which are liquids at standard conditions and which are used as dissolvers, viscosity reducers, or cleaning agents, but excluding methane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbonic acid, metallic carbide, metallic carbonates, and ammonium carbonate.

Organic vapor means the gaseous phase of an organic material or a mixture of organic materials present in the atmosphere.

Oven means a chamber within which heat is used for one or more of the following purposes: Dry, bake, cure, or polymerize a coating or ink.

Overall control means the product of the capture efficiency and the control device efficiency.

Owner or operator means any person who owns, operates, leases, controls, or supervises an emission source or air pollution control equipment.

Packaging rotogravure printing means rotogravure printing upon paper, paper board, metal foil, plastic film, and other substrates, which are, in subsequent operations, formed into packaging products or labels for articles to be sold.

Packaging rotogravure printing line means a rotogravure printing line in which surface coatings are applied to paper, paperboard, foil, film, or other substrates which are to be used to produce containers, packaging products, or labels for articles.

Pail means any cylindrical metal shipping container of 1- to 12-gallon capacity and constructed of 29-gauge and heavier metal.

Paint manufacturing plant means a plant that mixes, blends, or compounds enamels, lacquers, sealers, shellacs, stains, varnishes, or pigmented surface coatings.

Paper coating means any coating applied on paper, plastic film, or metallic foil to make certain products, including (but not limited to) adhesive tapes and labels, book covers, post cards, office copier paper, drafting paper, or pressure sensitive tapes. Paper coating includes the application of coatings by impregnation and/or saturation.

Paper coating facility means a facility that includes one or more paper coating lines.

Paper coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied on, saturated into, or impregnated into paper, plastic film, or metallic foil to make certain products, including (but not limited to) adhesive tapes and labels, book covers, post cards, office copier paper, drafting paper, and pressure sensitive tapes.

Parts per million (volume) means a volume/volume ratio which expresses the volumetric concentration of gaseous air contaminant in a million unit volume of gas.

Person means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, State, municipality, political subdivision of a State; any agency, department, or instrumentality of the United States; and any officer, agent, or employee thereof.

Petroleum means the crude oil removed from the earth and the oils derived from tar sands, shale, and coal.

Petroleum refinery means any facility engaged in producing gasoline, kerosene, distillate fuel oils, residual fuel oils, lubricants, or other products through distillation of petroleum, or through redistillation, cracking, or reforming of unfinished petroleum derivatives.

Pharmaceutical means any compound or mixture, other than food, used in the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation, treatment, or cure of disease in man and animal.

Pharmaceutical coating operation means a device in which a coating is applied to a pharmaceutical, including air drying or curing of the coating.

Pigmented coatings means opaque coatings containing binders and colored pigments which are formulated to conceal the wood surface either as an undercoat or topcoat.

Plant means all of the pollutant-emitting activities which belong to the same industrial grouping, are located on one or more contiguous or adjacent properties, and are under the control of the same person (or persons under common control), except the activities of any marine vessel. Pollutant-emitting activities shall be considered as part of the same industrial grouping if they belong to the same “Major Group” ( i.e., which have the same two-digit code) as described in the “Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987” (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742).

Plasticizers means a substance added to a polymer composition to soften and add flexibility to the product.

Prime surfacer coat means a coating used to touch up areas on the surface of automobile or light-duty truck bodies not adequately covered by the prime coat before application of the top coat. The prime surfacer coat is applied between the prime coat and topcoat. An anti-chip coating applied to main body parts ( e.g., rocker panels, bottom of doors and fenders, and leading edge of roof) is a prime surfacer coat.

Primers means any coatings formulated and applied to substrates to provide a firm bond between the substrate and subsequent coats.

Printing means the application of words, designs, and pictures to a substrate using ink.

Printing line means an operation consisting of a series of one or more roll printers and any associated roll coaters, drying areas, and ovens wherein one or more coatings are applied, dried, and/or cured.

Process means any stationary emission source other than a fuel combustion emission source or an incinerator.

Production equipment exhaust system means a system for collecting and directing into the atmosphere emissions of volatile organic material from reactors, centrifuges, and other process emission sources.

Publication rotogravure printing line means a rotogravure printing line in which coatings are applied to paper which is subsequently formed into books, magazines, catalogues, brochures, directories, newspaper supplements, or other types of printed material.

Reactor means a vat, vessel, or other device in which chemical reactions take place.

Refiner means any person who owns, leases operates, controls, or supervises a refinery.

Refinery unit, process unit or unit means a set of components which are a part of a basic process operation such as distillation, hydrotreating, cracking, or reforming of hydrocarbons.

Refrigerated condenser means a surface condenser in which the coolant supplied to the condenser has been cooled by a mechanical device, other than by a cooling tower or evaporative spray cooling, such as refrigeration unit or steam chiller unit.

Repair coatings means coatings used to correct imperfections or damage to furniture surface.

Repaired means, for the purpose of paragraph (i) of this section, that equipment component has been adjusted, or otherwise altered, to eliminate a leak.

Roll coater means an apparatus in which a uniform layer of coating is applied by means of one or more rolls across the entire width of a moving substrate.

Roll printer means an apparatus used in the application of words, designs, or pictures to a substrate, usually by means of one or more rolls each with only partial coverage.

Roll printing means the application of words, designs, and pictures to a substrate usually by means of a series of hard rubber or metal rolls each with only partial coverage.

Roller coating means a method of applying a coating to a sheet or strip in which the coating is transferred by a roller or series of rollers.

Rotogravure printing means the application of words, designs, and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printing technique in which the pattern to be applied is recessed relative to the non-image area.

Rotogravure printing line means a printing line in which each roll printer uses a roll with recessed areas for applying an image to a substrate.

Safety relief valve means a valve which is normally closed and which is designed to open in order to relieve excessive pressures within a vessel or pipe.

Sanding sealers means any coatings formulated for and applied to bare wood for sanding and to seal the wood for subsequent application of varnish. To be considered a sanding sealer a coating must be clearly labelled as such.

Sealer means a coating containing binders which seals wood prior to the application of the subsequent coatings.

Semi-transparent stains means stains containing dyes or semi-transparent pigments which are formulated to enhance wood grain and change the color of the surface but not to conceal the surface, including, but not limited to, sap stain, toner, non-grain raising stains, pad stain, or spatter stain.

Set of safety relief valves means one or more safety relief valves designed to open in order to relieve excessive pressures in the same vessel or pipe.

Sheet basecoat means a coating applied to metal when the metal is in sheet form to serve as either the exterior or interior of a can for either two-piece or three-piece cans.

Side-seam spray coat means a coating applied to the seam of a three-piece can.

Solvent means a liquid substance that is used to dissolve or dilute another substance.

Solvent cleaning means the process of cleaning soils from surfaces by cold cleaning, open top vapor degreasing, or conveyorized degreasing.

Specified air contaminant means any air contaminant as to which this Section contains emission standards or other specific limitations.

Splash loading means a method of loading a tank, railroad tank car, tank truck, or trailer by use of other than a submerged loading pipe.

Standard conditions means a temperature of 70 °F and a pressure of 14.7 psia.

Standard cubic foot (scf) means the volume of one cubic foot of gas at standard conditions.

Standard Industrial Classification Manual means the Standard Industrial Classification Manual (1987), Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742).

Start-up means the setting in operation of an emission source for any purpose.

Stationary emission source and Stationary source mean an emission source which is not self-propelled.

Storage tank or storage vessel means any stationary tank, reservoir or container used for the storage of VOL's.

Submerged loading pipe means any discharge pipe or nozzle which meets either of the following conditions:

(A) Where the tank is filled from the top, the end of the discharge pipe or nozzle must be totally submerged when the liquid level is 15 cm (6 in.) above the bottom of the tank.

(B) Where the tank is filled from the side, the discharge pipe or nozzle must be totally submerged when the liquid level is 46 cm (18 in.) above the bottom of the tank.

Substrate means the surface onto which a coating is applied or into which a coating is impregnated.

Surface condenser means a device which removes a substance from a gas stream by reducing the temperature of the stream, without direct contact between the coolant and the stream.

Tablet coating operation means a pharmaceutical coating operation in which tablets are coated.

Thirty-day rolling average means any value arithmetically averaged over any consecutive thirty-days.

Three-piece can means a can which is made from a rectangular sheet and two circular ends.

Topcoat means a coating applied in a multiple coat operation other than prime coat, final repair coat, or prime surfacer coat.

Topcoat operation means all topcoat spray booths, flash-off areas, and bake ovens at a facility which are used to apply, dry, or cure the final coatings (except final off-line repair) on components of automobile or light-duty truck bodies.

Transfer efficiency means the ratio of the amount of coating solids deposited onto a part or product to the total amount of coating solids used.

True vapor pressure means the equilibrium partial pressure exerted by a volatile organic liquid as determined in accordance with methods described in American Petroleum Institute Bulletin 2517, “Evaporation Loss From Floating Roof Tanks,” second edition, February 1980 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742).

Two-piece can means a can which is drawn from a shallow cup and requires only one end to be attached.

Undercoaters means any coatings formulated for and applied to substrates to provide a smooth surface for subsequent coats.

Unregulated safety relief valve means a safety relief valve which cannot be actuated by a means other than high pressure in the pipe or vessel which it protects.

Vacuum producing system means any reciprocating, rotary, or centrifugal blower or compressor or any jet ejector or device that creates suction from a pressure below atmospheric and discharges against a greater pressure.

Valves not externally regulated means valves that have no external controls, such as in-line check valves.

Vapor balance system means any combination of pipes or hoses which creates a closed system between the vapor spaces of an unloading tank and a receiving tank such that vapors displaced from the receiving tank are transferred to the tank being unloaded.

Vapor collection system means all piping, seals, hoses, connections, pressure-vacuum vents, and other possible sources between the gasoline delivery vessel and the vapor processing unit and/or the storage tanks and vapor holder.

Vapor control system means any system that limits or prevents release to the atmosphere of organic material in the vapors displaced from a tank during the transfer of gasoline.

Vapor recovery system means a vapor gathering system capable of collecting all VOM vapors and gases discharged from the storage tank and a vapor disposal system capable of processing such VOM vapors and gases so as to prevent their emission to the atmosphere.

Vehicle means a device by which any person or property may be propelled, moved, or drawn upon a highway, excepting a device moved exclusively by human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks.

Vinyl coating means any topcoat or printing ink applied to vinyl coated fabric or vinyl sheets. Vinyl coating does not include plastisols.

Vinyl coating facility means a facility that includes one or more vinyl coating line(s).

Vinyl coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative or functional coating is applied onto vinyl coated fabric or vinyl sheets.

Volatile organic liquid means any substance which is liquid at storage conditions and which contains volatile organic compounds.

Volatile organic material (VOM) or volatile organic compounds (VOC) is as defined in §51.100(s) of this chapter.

Wash coat means a coating containing binders which seals wood surfaces, prevents undesired staining, and controls penetration.

Wood furniture means room furnishings including cabinets (kitchen, bath, and vanity), tables, chairs, beds, sofas, shutters, art objects, wood paneling, wood flooring, and any other coated furnishings made of wood, wood composition, or fabricated wood materials.

Wood furniture coating facility means a facility that includes one or more wood furniture coating line(s).

Wood furniture coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied onto wood furniture.

Woodworking means the shaping, sawing, grinding, smoothing, polishing, and making into products of any form or shape of wood.

(4) Testing methods and procedures —(i) Coatings, inks and fountain solutions. The following test methods and procedures shall be used to determine compliance of as applied coatings, inks, and fountain solutions with the limitations set forth in §52.741.

(A) Sampling. Samples collected for analyses shall be one-liter taken into a one-liter container at a location and time such that the sample will be representative of the coating as applied (i.e., the sample shall include any dilution solvent or other VOM added during the manufacturing process). The container must be tightly sealed immediately after the sample is taken. Any solvent or other VOM added after the sample is taken must be measured and accounted for in the calculations in paragraph(a)(4)(i)(C) of this section. For multiple package coatings, separate samples of each component shall be obtained. A mixed sample shall not be obtained as it will cure in the container. Sampling procedures shall follow the guidelines presented in:

( 1 ) ASTM D3925–81 (Reapproved 1985) Standard Practice for Sampling Liquid Paints and Related Pigment Coating. This practice is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.

( 2 ) ASTM E300–86 Standard Practice for Sampling Industrial Chemicals. This practice is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.

(B) Analyses. The applicable analytical methods specified below shall be used to determine the composition of coatings, inks, or fountain solutions as applied.

( 1 ) Method 24 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, shall be used to determine the VOM content and density of coatings. If it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Administrator that plant coating formulation data are equivalent to Method 24 results, formulation data may be used. In the event of any inconsistency between a Method 24 test and a facility's formulation data, the Method 24 test will govern.

( 2 ) Method 24A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, shall be used to determine the VOM content and density of rotogravure printing inks and related coatings. If it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Administrator that the plant coating formulation data are equivalent to Method 24A results, formulation data may be used. In the event of any inconsistency between a Method 24A test and a facility's formulation data, the Method 24A test will govern.

( 3 ) The following ASTM methods are the analytical procedures for determining VOM:

( i ) ASTM D1475–85: Standard Test Method for Density of Paint, Varnish, Lacquer and Related Products. This test method is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.

( ii ) ASTM D2369–87: Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of Coatings. This test method is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.

( iii ) ASTM D3792–86: Standard Test Method for Water Content of Water-reducible Paints by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph. This test method is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.

( iv ) ASTM D4017–81 (Reapproved 1987): Standard Test Method for Water in Paints and Paint Materials by the Karl Fischer Method. This test method is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.

( v ) ASTM D4457–85: Standard Test Method for Determination of Dichloromethane and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane in Paints and Coatings by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph. (The procedure delineated above can be used to develop protocols for any compounds specifically exempted from the definition of VOM.) This test method is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.

( vi ) ASTM D2697–86: Standard Test Method for Volume Non-Volatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings. This test method is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.

( vii ) ASTM D3980–87: Standard Practice for Interlaboratory Testing of Paint and Related Materials. This practice is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.

( viii ) ASTM E180–85: Standard Practice for Determining the Precision of ASTM Methods for Analysis of and Testing of Industrial Chemicals. This practice is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.

( ix ) ASTM D2372–85: Standard Method of Separation of Vehicle from Solvent-reducible Paints. This method is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.

( 4 ) Use of an adaptation to any of the analytical methods specified in paragraphs (a)(4)(i)(B)( 1 ), ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) may be approved by the Administrator on a case-by-case basis. An owner or operator must submit sufficient documentation for the Administrator to find that the analytical methods specified in paragraphs (a)(4)(i)(B)( 1 ), ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) will yield inaccurate results and that the proposed adaptation is appropriate.

(C) Calculations. Calculations for determining the VOM content, water content and the content of any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM of coatings, inks and fountain solutions as applied shall follow the guidance provided in the following documents.

( 1 ) “A Guide for Surface Coating Calculation” EPA–340/1–86–016 (which is available from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)

( 2 ) “Procedures for Certifying Quantity of Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted by Paint, Ink and Other Coatings” (revised June 1986) EPA–450/3–84–019 (which is available from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)

( 3 ) “A Guide for Graphic Arts Calculations” August 1988 EPA–340/1–88–003 (which is available from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)

(ii) Automobile or light-duty truck test protocol. The protocol for testing, including determining the transfer efficiency, of coating applicators at topcoat coating operations at an automobile assembly facility shall follow the procedure in: “Protocol for Determining the Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat Operations” December 1988 EPA–450/3–88–018 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)

(iii) Capture system efficiency test protocols —(A) Applicability. The requirements of paragraphs (a)(4)(iii)(B) of this section shall apply to all VOM emitting processes employing capture equipment ( e.g., hoods, ducts), except those cases noted below.

( 1 ) If a source installs a permanent total enclosure (PTE) that meets USEPA specifications, and which directs all VOM to a control device, then the source is exempted from the requirements described in paragraph (B). The USEPA specifications to determine whether a structure is considered a PTE are given in Procedure T of appendix B of this section. In this instance, the capture efficiency is assumed to be 100 percent and the source is still required to measure control efficiency using appropriate test methods as specified in (a)(4)(iv) of this section.

( 2 ) If a source uses a control device designed to collect and recover VOM ( e.g., carbon adsorber), an explicit measurement of capture efficiency is not necessary provided that the conditions given below are met. The overall control of the system can be determined by directly comparing the input liquid VOM to the recovered liquid VOM. The general procedure for use in this situation is given in 40 CFR 60.433, with the following additional restrictions:

( i ) The source must be able to equate solvent usage with solvent recovery on a 24-hour (daily) basis, rather than a 30-day weighted average, within 72 hours following the 24-hour period. In addition, one of the following two criteria must be met:

( ii ) The solvent recovery system (i.e., capture and control system) must be dedicated to a single process line ( e.g., one process line venting to a carbon adsorber system), or

( iii ) If the solvent recovery system controls multiple process lines, then the source must be able to demonstrate that the overall control ( i.e., the total recovered solvent VOM divided by the sum of liquid VOM input to all process lines venting to the control system) meets or exceeds the most stringent standard applicable for any process line venting to the control system.

(B) Specific requirements. The capture efficiency of a process line shall be measured using one of the four protocols given below. Any error margin associated with a test protocol may not be incorporated into the results of a capture efficiency test. If these techniques are not suitable for a particular process, then the source must present an alternative capture efficiency protocol and obtain approval for it by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revisions.

( 1 ) Gas/gas method using temporary total enclosure (TTE). The USEPA specifications to determine whether a temporary enclosure is considered a TTE are given in Procedure T of appendix B of this section. The capture efficiency equation to be used for this protocol is:

Procedure G.2 contained in appendix B of this section is used to obtain Gw. Procedure F.1 in appendix B of this section is used to obtain Fw.

( 2 ) Liquid/gas method using TTE. The USEPA specifications to determine whether a temporary enclosure is considered a TTE are given in Procedure T of appendix B of this section. The capture efficiency equation to be used for this protocol is:

Procedure L contained in appendix B of this section is used to obtain L. Procedure F.1 in appendix B of this section is used to obtain Fw.

( 3 ) Gas/gas method using the building or room (building or room enclosure) in which the affected source is located as the enclosure and in which “F” and “G” are measured while operating only the affected facility. All fans and blowers in the building or room must be operated as they would under normal production. The capture efficiency equation to be used for this protocol is:

Procedure G.2 contained in appendix B of this section is used to obtain G. Procedure F.2 in appendix B of this section is used to obtain F_B.

( 4 ) Liquid/gas method using the building or room (building or room enclosure) in which the affected source is located as the enclosure and in which “F” and “L” are measured while operating only the affected facility. All fans and blowers in the building or room must be operated as they would under normal production. The capture efficiency equation to be used for this protocol is:

Procedure L contained in appendix B of this section is used to obtain L. Procedure F.2 in appendix B of this section is used to obtain F_B.

(C) Recordkeeping and reporting. ( 1 ) All affected facilities must maintain a copy of the capture efficiency protocol submitted to USEPA on file. All results of the appropriate test methods and capture efficiency protocols must be reported to USEPA within sixty (60) days of the test date. A copy of the results must be kept on file with the source for a period of three (3) years.

( 2 ) If any changes are made to capture or control equipment, then the source is required to notify USEPA of these changes and a new test may be required by USEPA.

( 3 ) The source must notify the Administrator 30 days prior to performing any capture efficiency or control test. At that time, the source must notify the Administrator which capture efficiency protocol and control device test methods will be used.

( 4 ) Sources utilizing a PTE must demonstrate that this enclosure meets the requirement given in Procedure T (in appendix B of this section) for a PTE during any testing of their control device.

( 5 ) Sources utilizing a TTE must demonstrate that their TTE meets the requirements given in Procedure T (in appendix B of this section) for a TTE during testing of their control device. The source must also provide documentation that the quality assurance criteria for a TTE have been achieved.

(iv) Control device efficiency testing and monitoring. (A) The control device efficiency shall be determined by simultaneously measuring the inlet and outlet gas phase VOM concentrations and gas volumetric flow rates in accordance with the gas phase test methods specified in paragraph (a)(4)(vi) of this section.

(B) Any owner or operator that uses an afterburner or carbon adsorber to comply with any paragraph of §52.741 shall use USEPA approved continuous monitoring equipment which is installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated according to vendor specifications at all times the afterburner or carbon adsorber is in use. The continuous monitoring equipment must monitor the following parameters:

( 2 ) Temperature rise across each catalytic afterburner bed or VOM concentration of exhaust.

(v) Overall efficiency. (A) The overall efficiency of the emission control system shall be determined as the product of the capture system efficiency and the control device efficiency or by the liquid/liquid test protocol as specified in 40 CFR 60.433 (and revised by paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(A)( 2 ) of this section for each solvent recovery system. In those cases in which the overall efficiency is being determined for an entire line, the capture efficiency used to calculate the product of the capture and control efficiency is the total capture efficiency over the entire line.

(B) For coating lines which are both chosen by the owner or operator to comply with paragraphs (e)(2)(ii), (e)(2)(iii), (e)(2)(iv), (e)(2)(v), or (e)(2)(vi) of this section by the alternative in paragraph (e)(2)(i)(B) of this section and meet the criteria allowing them to comply with paragraph (e)(2) of this section instead of paragraph (e)(1) of this section, the overall efficiency of the capture system and control device, as determined by the test methods and procedures specified in paragraphs (a)(4) (iii), (iv) and (v)(A) of this section, shall be no less than the equivalent overall efficiency which shall be calculated by the following equation:

E = Equivalent overall efficiency of the capture system and control device as a percentage,

VOM_a= Actual VOM content of a coating, or the daily-weighted average VOM content of two or more coatings (if more than one coating is used), as applied to the subject coating line as determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section in units of kg VOM/l (lb VOM/gal) of coating solids as applied,

VOM₁= The VOM emission limit specified in paragraph (e)(2) (i) or (ii) of this section in units of kg VOM/l (lb VOM/gal) of coating solids as applied.

(vi) Volatile organic material gas phase source test methods. The methods in 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, delineated below shall be used to determine control device efficiencies.

(A) 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, Method 18, 25 or 25A, as appropriate to the conditions at the site, shall be used to determine VOM concentration. Method selection shall be based on consideration of the diversity of organic species present and their total concentration and on consideration of the potential presence of interfering gases. Except as indicated in paragraphs (a)(4)(vi)(A)( 1 ) and ( 2 ) of this section, the test shall consist of three separate runs, each lasting a minimum of 60 min, unless the Administrator determines that process variables dictate shorter sampling times.

( 1 ) When the method is to be used to determine the efficiency of a carbon adsoption system with a common exhaust stack for all the individual adsorber vessels, the test shall consist of three separate runs, each coinciding with one or more complete sequences through the adsorption cycles of all the individual adsorber vessels.

( 2 ) When the method is to be used to determine the efficiency of a carbon adsorption system with individual exhaust stacks for each adsorber vessel, each adsorber vessel shall be tested individually. The test for each adsorber vessel shall consist of three separate runs. Each run shall coincide with one or more complete adsorption cycles.

(B) 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, Method 1 or 1A shall be used for sample and velocity traverses.

(F) 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, Methods 2, 2A, 2C, 2D, 3 and 4 shall be performed, as applicable, at least twice during each test run.

(G) Use of an adaptation to any of the test methods specified in paragraphs (a)(4)(vi) (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), and (F) of this section may be approved by the Administrator on a case-by-case basis. An owner or operator must submit sufficient documentation for the Administrator to find that the test methods specified in paragraphs (a)(4)(vi) (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), and (F) of this section will yield inaccurate results and that the proposed adaptation is appropriate.

(vii) Leak detection methods for volatile organic material. Owners or operators required by the various subparts of this regulation to carry out a leak detection monitoring program shall comply with the following requirements:

(A) Leak detection monitoring. ( 1 ) Monitoring shall comply with 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. Method 21.

( 2 ) The detection instrument shall meet the performance criteria of Method 21.

( 3 ) The instrument shall be calibrated before use on each day of its use by the methods specified in Method 21.

( ii ) A mixture of methane or n-hexane and air at a concentration of approximately, but no less than, 10,000 ppm methane or n-hexane.

( 5 ) The instrument probe shall be traversed around all potential leak interfaces as close to the interface as possible as described in Method 21.

( B ) When equipment is tested for compliance with no detectable emissions as required, the test shall comply with the following requirements:

( 1 ) The requirements of paragraphs (a)(4) (vii)(A)( 1 ) through (vii)(A)( 5 ) of this section shall apply.

( 1 ) “APTI Course SI 417 controlling Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Leaking Process Equipment” EPA–450/2–82–015 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)

( 2 ) “Portable Instrument User's Manual for Monitoring VOC Sources” EPA–340/1–86–015 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)

( 3 ) “Protocols for Generating Unit-Specific Emission Estimates for Equipment Leaks of VOC and VHAP” EPA–450/3–88–010 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)

( 4 ) “Petroleum Refinery Enforcement Manual” EPA–340/1–80–008 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)

(viii) Bulk gasoline delivery system test protocol. (A) The method for determining the emissions of gasoline from a vapor recovery system are delineated in 40 CFR part 60, subpart XX, §60.503.

( 1 ) “Inspection Manual for Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Gasoline Marketing Operations: Appendix D” EPA–340/1–80–012 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)

( 2 ) “Control of Hydrocarbons from Tank Truck Gasoline Loading Terminals: Appendix A” EPA–450/2–77–026 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)

(5) Compliance dates. Compliance with the requirements of all rules is required by July 1, 1991, unless otherwise indicated by compliance dates contained in specific rules. This paragraph shall not operate to provide additional time for compliance under section 113(d) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7413(d), for sources subject to compliance upon promulgation.

(6) Afterburners. The operation of any natural gas fired afterburner and capture system used to comply with §52.741 is not required during the period of November 1 of any year to April 1 of the following year provided that the operation of such devices is not required for purposes of occupational safety or health, or for the control of toxic substances, odor nuisances, or other regulated pollutants.

(7) Exemptions, variances, and alternative means of control or compliance determinations. Notwithstanding the provisions of any other paragraphs of this section, any exemptions, variances or alternatives to the control requirements, emission limitations, or test methods in the Illinois SIP or FIP can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.

(8) Vapor pressure of volatile organic liquids. (i) If the VOL consists of only a single compound, the vapor pressure shall be determined by ASTM Method D2879–86 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) or the vapor pressure may be obtained from a published source such as: Boublik, T., V. Fried and E. Hala, “The Vapor Pressure of Pure Substances,” Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York (1973); Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook, McGraw-Hill Book Company (1984); CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Chemical Rubber Publishing Company (1986–87); and Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, John A. Dean, editor, McGraw-Hill Book Company (1985).

(ii) If the VOL is a mixture, the vapor pressure shall be determined by ASTM Method D2879–86 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) or by the following equation:

P_i=Vapor pressure of a component determined in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section

(9) Vapor pressure of organic material or solvent. (i) If the organic material or solvent consists of only a single compound, the vapor pressure shall be determined by ASTM Method D2879–86 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) or the vapor pressure may be obtained from a published source such as: Boublik, T., V. Fried and E. Hala, “The Vapor Pressure of Pure Substances,” Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York (1973); Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook, McGraw-Hill Book Company (1984); CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Chemical Rubber Publishing Company (1986–87); and Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, John A. Dean, editor, McGraw-Hill Book Company (1985).

(ii) If the organic material or solvent is in a mixture made up of both organic material compounds and compounds which are not organic material, the vapor pressure shall be determined by the following equation:

P_om=Total vapor pressure of the portion of the mixture which is composed of organic material,

P_i=Vapor pressure of an organic material component determined in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section,

(iii) If the organic material or solvent is in a mixture made up of only organic material compounds, the vapor pressure shall be determined by ASTM Method D2879–86 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) or by the above equation.

(10) Vapor pressure of volatile organic material. (i) If the VOM consists of only a single compound, the vapor pressure shall be determined by ASTM Method D2879–86 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) or the vapor pressure may be obtained from a published source such as: Boublik, T., V. Fried and E. Hala, “The Vapor Pressure of Pure Substances,” Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York (1973); Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook, McGraw-Hill Book Company (1984); CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Chemical Rubber Publishing Company (1986–87); and Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, John A. Dean, editor, McGraw-Hill Book Company (1985).

(ii) If the VOM is in a mixture made up of both VOM compounds and compounds which are not VOM, the vapor pressure shall be determined by the following equation:

P_vom=Total vapor pressure of the portion of the mixture which is composed of VOM,

P_i=Vapor pressure of a VOM component determined in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section,

(iii) If the VOM is in a mixture made up of only VOM compounds, the vapor pressure shall be determined by ASTM Method D2879–86 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) or by the above equation.

(d) Solvent cleaning —(1) Solvent cleaning in general. The requirements of subpart E (sections 215.182–215.184) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) shall apply to all cold cleaning, open top vapor degreasing, and conveyorized degreasing operations.

Note: For Federal purposes, paragraph (d)(1) supersedes subpart E (section 215.181) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215.)

(2) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of an emission source which was previously exempt from the requirements of subpart E (sections 215.182–215.184) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) because it satisfied the criteria in either (d)(a)(i) or (d)(2)(ii) of this section, shall comply with the requirements of subpart E (sections 215.182–215.184) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) on and after July 1, 1991. A source which did not satisfy the criteria in either (d)(a)(i) or (d)(2)(ii) of this section, shall comply with the requirements of subpart E (sections 215.182–215.184) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) upon promulgation.

(i) If emissions of VOM exceed neither 6.8 kg (15 lbs) in any one day, nor 1.4 kg (3 lbs) in any one hour, or

(ii) If the source is used exclusively for chemical or physical analysis or for determination of product quality and commercial acceptance, provided that the operation of the source is not an integral part of the production process, the emissions of VOM from the source do not exceed 363 kg (800 lbs) in any calendar month, and the exemption had been approved in writing by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.

(3) Test methods. The following test methods shall be used to demonstrate compliance with subpart E (sections 215.182–215.184) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742):

(i) Vapor pressures shall be determined by using the procedure specified in paragraph (a)(9) of this section.

(ii) Exhaust ventilation rates shall be determined by using the procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(vi)(C) of this section.

(iii) The performance of control devices shall be determined by using the procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(vi) of this section.

(e) Coating operations —(1) Emission limitations for manufacturing plants. (i) Except as provided in paragraph (e)(3) of this section, no owner or operator of a coating line shall apply at any time any coating in which the VOM content exceeds the following emission limitations for the specified coating. The following emission limitations are expressed in units of VOM per volume of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied at each coating applicator, except where noted. Compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM should be treated as water for the purpose of calculating the “less water” part of the coating composition. Compliance with this paragraph must be demonstrated through the applicable coating analysis test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (e)(6)(ii) of this section. As an alternative to compliance with this paragraph, the owner or operator of a coating line may meet the requirements of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) or paragraph (e)(2) of this section. The equation presented in paragraph (e)(1)(iii) of this section shall be used to calculate emission limitations for determining compliance by add-on controls, credits for transfer efficiency, emissions trades and cross-line averaging.

	kg/l	lb/gal
(A) Automobile or Light-Duty Truck Coating
( 1 ) Prime coat	0.14	(1.2)
( 2 ) Prime surfacer coat	0.34	(2.8)
Note: The prime surfacer coat limitation is based upon a transfer efficiency of 30 percent. Transfer efficiency credits can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.
( 3 ) Topcoat	1.81	(15.1)
Note: The topcoat limitation is in units of kg (lbs) of VOM per l (gal) of coating solids deposited. Compliance with the limitation shall be based on the daily-weighted average VOM content from the entire topcoat operation (all topcoat spray booths, flash-off areas and bake ovens). Compliance shall be demonstrated in accordance with the topcoat protocol for automobiles and light-duty trucks referenced in paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this section. Paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section does not apply to the topcoat limitation.) At least 180 days prior to the initial compliance date, the owner or operator of a coating line subject to the topcoat limitation shall submit to the Administrator a detailed proposal specifying the method of demonstrating compliance with the protocol. The proposal shall include, at a minimum, a comprehensive plan (including a rationale) for determining the transfer efficiency at each booth through the use of in-plant, or pilot testing; the selection of coatings to be tested (for the purpose of determining transfer efficiency) including the rationale for coating groupings; and the method for determining the analytic VOM content of as applied coatings and the formulation solvent content of as applied coatings. Upon approval of the protocol by the Administrator, the source may proceed with the compliance demonstration.
( 4 ) Final repair coat	0.58	(4.8)
(B) Can Coating
( 1 ) Sheet basecoat and overvarnish	0.34	(2.8)
( 2 ) Exterior basecoat and overvarnish	0.34	(2.8)
( 3 ) Interior body spray coat	0.51	(4.2)
( 4 ) Exterior end coat	0.51	(4.2)
( 5 ) Side seam spray coat	0.66	(5.5)
( 6 ) End sealing compound coat	0.44	(3.7)
(C) Paper Coating	0.35	(2.9)
Note: The paper coating limitation shall not apply to any owner or operator of any paper coating line on which printing is performed if the paper coating line complies with the emissions limitations in paragraph (h)(1) of this section: Printing and Publishing.
(D) Coil Coating	0.31	(2.6)
(E) Fabric Coating	0.35	(2.9)
(F) Vinyl Coating	0.45	(3.8)
(G) Metal Furniture Coating	0.36	(3.0)
(H) Large Appliance Coating	0.34	(2.8)
Note: The limitation shall not apply to the use of quick-drying lacquers for repair of scratches and nicks that occur during assembly, provided that the volume of coating does not exceed 0.95 l (1 quart) in any one rolling eight-hour period.
(I) Magnet Wire Coating	0.20	(1.7)
(J) Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Coating
( 1 ) Clear coating	0.52	(4.3)
( 2 ) Air-dried coating	0.42	(3.5)
( 3 ) Extreme performance coating	0.42	(3.5)
( 4 ) Steel pail and drum interior coating	0.52	(4.3)
( 5 ) All other coatings	0.36	(3.0)

(ii) Daily-weighted average limitations. No owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section shall operate the subject coating line unless the owner or operator has demonstrated compliance with paragraph (e)(1) (ii)(A), (ii)(B), (ii)(C), (ii)(D), (ii)(E) or (ii)(F) of this section (depending upon the source category) through the applicable coating analysis test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (e)(6)(iii) of this section.

(A) No owner or operator of a coating line subject to only one of the limitations from among paragraph (e)(1) (i)(A)( 1 ), (i)(A)( 2 ), (i)(A)( 4 ), (i)(C), (i)(D), (i)(E), (i)(F), (i)(G), (i)(H), or (i)(I) of this section shall apply coating on any such coating line, during any day, whose daily-weighted average VOM content exceeds the emission limitation to which the coatings are subject.

(B) No owner or operator of a miscellaneous metal parts and products coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(J) of this section shall apply coatings to miscellaneous metal parts or products on the subject coating line unless the requirements in paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(B) ( 1 ) or ( 2 ) of this section are met.

( 1 ) For each coating line which applies multiple coatings, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(J) of this section, during the same day ( e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/l [3.5 lbs/gal]), the daily-weighted average VOM content shall not exceed the coating VOM content limit corresponding to the category of coating used, or

( 2 ) For each coating line which applies coatings from more than one of the four coating categories in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(J) of this section, during the same day, the owner or operator shall submit to and receive approval from the Administrator for a site-specific FIP revision. To receive approval, the requirements of USEPA's Emissions Trading Policy Statement (and related policy) must be satisfied.

(C) No owner or operator of a can coating facility subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(B) of this section shall operate the subject coating facility using a coating with a VOM content in excess of the limitations specified in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(B) of this section unless all of the following requirements are met:

( 1 ) An alternative daily emission limitation shall be determined according to paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(C)( 2 ) of this section. Actual daily emissions shall never exceed the alternative daily emission limitation and shall be calculated by use of the following equation.

V_i=Volume of each coating applied for the day in units of l/day (gal/day) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM), and

C_i=The VOM content of each coating as applied in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM).

( 2 ) The alternative daily emission limitation (A_d) shall be determined on a daily basis as follows:

C_i=The VOM content of each surface coating as applied in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM),

D_i=The density of VOM in each coating applied. For the purposes of calculating A_d,the density is 0.882 kg VOM/l VOM (7.36 lbs VOM/gal VOM),

V_i=Volume of each surface coating applied for the day in units of l (gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM),

L_i=The VOM emission limitation for each surface coating applied as specified in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(B) of this section in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM).

(D) No owner or operator of a heavy off-highway vehicle products coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(K) of this section shall apply coatings to heavy off-highway vehicle products on the subject coating line unless the requirements of paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(D) ( 1 ) or ( 2 ) of this section are met.

( 1 ) For each coating line which applies multiple coatings, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(K) of this section, during the same day ( e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/l [3.5 lbs/gal]), the daily-weighted average VOM content shall not exceed the coating VOM content limit corresponding to the category of coating used, or

( 2 ) For each coating line which applies coatings subject to more than one numerical emission limitation in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(K) of this section, during the same day, the owner or operator shall submit to and receive approval from the Administrator for a site-specific FIP revision. To receive approval, the requirements of USEPA's Emissions Trading Policy Statement (and related policy) must be satisfied.

(E) No owner or operator of a wood furniture coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) of this section shall apply coatings to wood furniture on the subject coating line unless the requirements of paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(E) ( 1 ) or ( 2 ) of this section, in addition to the requirements specified in the note to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) of this section, are met.

( 1 ) For each coating line which applies multiple coatings, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) of this section, during the same day (e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.67 kg/l [5.6 lbs/gal]), the daily-weighted average VOM content shall not exceed the coating VOM content limit corresponding to the category of coating used, or

( 2 ) For each coating line which applies coatings subject to more than one numerical emission limitation in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) of this section, during the same day, the owner or operator shall submit to and receive approval from the Administrator for a site-specific FIP revision. To receive approval, the requirements of USEPA's Emissions Trading Policy Statement (and related policy) must be satisfied.

(F) No owner or operator of an existing diesel-electric locomotive coating line in Cook County, subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(M) of this section shall apply coatings to diesel-electric locomotives on the subject coating line unless the requirements of paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(F) ( 1 ) or ( 2 ) of this section are met.

( 1 ) For each coating line which applies multiple coatings, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(M) of this section, during the same day (e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/l [3.5 lbs/gal]), the daily-weighted average VOM content shall not exceed the coating VOM content limit corresponding to the category of coating used, or

( 2 ) For each coating line which applies coatings subject to more than one numerical emission limitation in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(M) of this section, during the same day, the owner or operator shall submit to and receive approval from the Administrator for a site-specific FIP revision. To receive approval, the requirements of USEPA's Emissions Trading Policy Statement (and related policy) must be satisfied.

(iii) Limitations in terms of kg (lbs) of VOM emissions per l (gal) of solids as applied at each coating applicator shall be determined by the following equation:

C=The limitation on VOM emissions in terms of kg/l (lbs/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically excluded from the definition of VOM) specified in paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section,

D=The density of VOM in the coating. For the purposes of calculating S, the density is 0.882 kg VOM/l VOM (7.36 lbs VOM/gal VOM).

(2) Alternative emission limitations. Any owner or operator of a coating line subject to paragraph (e)(1) of this section may comply with this paragraph, rather than with paragraph (e)(1) of this section, if a capture system and control device are operated at all times and the owner or operator demonstrates compliance with paragraphs (e)(2) (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi) or (vii) of this section (depending upon the source category) through the applicable coating analysis and capture system and control device efficiency test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (e)(6)(iv) of this section; and the control device is equipped with the applicable monitoring equipment specified in paragraph (a)(4)(iv) of this section and the monitoring equipment is installed, calibrated, operated and maintained according to vendor specifications at all times the control device is in use. The use of a capture system and control device, which does not demonstrate compliance with paragraph (e)(2) (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi), or (vii), may only be used as an alternative to compliance with paragraph (e)(1) of this section if approved as a FIP revision.

(i) Alternative add-on control methodologies. (A) The coating line is equipped with a capture system and control device that provides 81 percent reduction in the overall emissions of VOM from the coating line and the control device has a 90 percent efficiency, or

(B) The system used to control VOM from the coating line is demonstrated to have an overall efficiency sufficient to limit VOM emissions to no more than what is allowed under paragraph (e)(1) of this section. Use of any control system other than an afterburner, carbon absorption, condensation, or absorption scrubber system can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision. Transfer efficiency credits can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision. Baseline transfer efficiencies and transfer efficiency test methods must be approved by the Administrator.

( 1 ) Obtain the emission limitation from the appropriate paragraph in (e)(1) of this section,

( 2 ) Calculate “S” according to the equation in paragraph (e)(1)(iii) of this section,

( 3 ) Calculate the overall efficiency required according to paragraph (a)(4)(v) of this section. For the purposes of calculating this value, according to the equation in (a)(4)(v)(B) of this section VOM₁is equal to the value of “S” as determined above in (i)(B)( 2 ).

(ii) No owner or operator of a coating line subject to only one of the emission limitations from among paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)( 1 ), (e)(1)(i)(A)( 2 ), (e)(1)(i)(A)( 4 ), (e)(1)(i)(C), (e)(1)(i)(D), (e)(1)(i)(E), (e)(1)(i)(F), (e)(1)(i)(G), (e)(1)(i)(H), or (e)(1)(i)(I) of this section and equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the subject coating line unless the requirements in paragraph (e)(2)(i) (A) or (B) of this section are met. No owner or operator of a coating line subject to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)( 3 ) of this section and equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the coating line unless the owner or operator demonstrates compliance with the topcoat limitation in accordance with the topcoat protocol for automobile or light-duty trucks referenced in paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this section.

(iii) No owner or operator of a miscellaneous metal parts and products coating line which applies one or more coatings during the same day, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(J) of this section (e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/l [3.5 lbs/gal]), and which is equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the subject coating line unless the requirements in paragraph (e)(2)(i) (A) or (B) of this section are met.

(iv) No owner or operator of a heavy off-highway vehicle products coating line which applies one or more coatings during the same day, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(K) of this section (e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/l [3.5 lbs/gal]), and which is equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the subject coating line unless the requirements in paragraph (e)(2)(i) (A) or (B) of this section are met.

(v) No owner or operator of an existing diesel-electric locomotive coating line in Cook County which applies one or more coatings during the same day, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(M) of this section (e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/l [3.5 lbs/gals]), and which is equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the subject coating line unless the requirements in paragraph (e)(2)(i) (A) or (B) of this section are met.

(vi) No owner or operator of a wood furniture coating line which applies one or more coatings during the same day, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) ( e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.67 kg/l [5.6 lbs/gal]), and which is equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the subject coating line unless the requirements in paragraph (e)(2)(i) (A) or (B) of this section are met. If compliance is achieved by meeting the requirements in paragraph (e)(2)(i)(B) of this section, then the provisions in the note to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) of this section must also be met.

(vii) No owner or operator of a can coating facility and equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the subject coating facility unless the requirements in paragraph (e)(2)(vii) (A) or (B) of this section are met.

(A) An alternative daily emission limitation shall be determined according to paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(C)( 2 ) of this section. Actual daily emissions shall never exceed the alternative daily emission limitation and shall be calculated by use of the following equation:

V_i=Volume of each coating as applied for the day in units of 1/day (gal/day) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM),

C_i=The VOM content of each coating as applied in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM), and

F_i=Fraction, by weight, of VOM emissions from the surface coating, reduced or prevented from being emitted to the ambient air. This is the overall efficiency of the capture system and control device.

(B) The coating line is equipped with a capture system and control device that provide 75 percent reduction in the overall emissions of VOM from the coating line and the control device has a 90 percent efficiency.

(3) Exemptions from emission limitations —(i) Exemptions for all source categories except wood furniture coating. The limitations of paragraph (e) of this section shall not apply to coating lines within a facility, that otherwise would be subject to the same subparagraph of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section (because they belong to the same source category, e.g. can coating), provided that combined actual emissions of VOM from all lines at the facility subject to that subparagraph never exceed 6.8 kg/day (15 lbs/day) before the application of capture systems and control devices. (For example, can coating lines within a plant would not be subject to the limitations of subparagraph (e)(1)(i)(B) of this section if the combined actual emissions of VOM from the can coating lines never exceed 6.8 kg/day (15 lbs/day) before the application of capture systems and control devices.) Volatile organic material emissions from heavy off-highway vehicle products coating lines must be combined with VOM emissions from miscellaneous metal parts and products coating lines to determine applicability. Any owner or operator of a coating facility shall comply with the applicable coating analysis test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (e)(6)(i) of this section if total VOM emissions from the subject coating lines are always less than or equal to 6.8 kg/day (15 lbs/day) before the application of capture systems and control devices and, therefore, are not subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section. Once a category of coating lines at a facility is subject to the limitations in paragraph (e)(1) of this section, the coating lines are always subject to the limitations in paragraph (e)(1) of this section.

(ii) Applicability for wood furniture coating. (A) The limitations of paragraph (e) of this section shall apply to a plant's wood furniture coating lines if the plant contains process emission sources, not regulated by paragraphs (d), (e) (excluding paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L)), (h) (excluding paragraph (h)(5)), (i), (j), or (q)(1), or subparts B, Q (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), R (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), S, V, X, Y (sections 215.582–215.584), or Z of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), which as a group both:

( 1 ) Have maximum theoretical emissions of 91 Mg (100 tons) or more per calendar year of VOM if no air pollution control equipment were used, and

( 2 ) Are not limited to less than 91 Mg (100 tons) of VOM per calendar year if no air pollution control equipment were used, through production or capacity limitations contained in a federally enforceable construction permit or SIP or FIP version.

(B) If a plant ceases to fulfill the criteria of paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(A) of this section, the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) of this section shall continue to apply to any wood furniture coating line which was ever subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) of this section.

(C) For the purposes of paragraph (e)(3)(ii) of this section, an emission source shall be considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules), section, or paragraph if it is subject to the limitations of that subpart (of the Illinois rules), section, or paragraph. An emission source is not considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules), section, or paragraph if its emissions are below the applicability cutoff level or if the source is covered by an exemption.

(D) Any owner or operator of a wood furniture coating line to which the limitations of paragraph (e) of this section are not applicable due to the criteria in paragraph (e)(3)(ii) of this section shall, upon request by the Administrator, submit records to the Administrator within 30 calendar days from the date of the request that document that the coating line is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (e) of this section.

(4) Exemption from general rule on use of organic material. No owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section is required to meet the limitations of subpart K (section 215.301 or 215.302) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), after the date by which the coating line is required to meet paragraph (e)(1) of this section.

(5) Compliance schedule. Except as specified in paragraph (e)(7) of this section, every owner or operator of a coating line (of a type included within paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section) shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (e)(1),(e)(2) or (e)(3) of this section and paragraph (e)(6) of this section in accordance with the appropriate compliance schedule as specified in paragraph (e)(5)(i),(ii),(iii) or (iv) of this section.

(i) No owner or operator of a coating line which is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraph (e)(6)(i) of this section. Wood furniture coating lines are not subject to paragraph (e)(6)(i) of this section.

(ii) No owner or operator of a coating line complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (e)(1)(i) and (e)(6)(ii) of this section.

(iii) No owner or operator of a coating line complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (e)(1)(ii) and (e)(6)(iii) of this section.

(iv) No owner or operator of a coating line complying by means of paragraph (e)(2) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (e)(2) and (e)(6)(iv) of this section.

(6) Recordkeeping and reporting. The VOM content of each coating and the efficiency of each capture system and control device shall be determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section to establish the records required under paragraph (e)(6) of this section.

(i) Any owner or operator of a coating line which is exempted from the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section because of paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section shall comply with the following:

(A) By July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility referenced in paragraph (e)(6)(i) of this section shall certify to the Administrator that the facility is exempt under the provisions of paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section. Such certification shall include:

( 1 ) A declaration that the facility is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section because of paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section; and

( 2 ) Calculations which demonstrate that the combined VOM emissions from all coating lines at the facility never exceed 6.8 kg (15 lbs) per day before the application of capture systems and control devices. The following equation shall be used to calculate total VOM emissions:

T_e=Total VOM emissions from coating lines at a facility each day before the application of capture systems and control devices in units of kg/day (lbs/day),

n=Number of different coatings as applied each day on each coating line at the facility,

A_i=Weight of VOM per volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line at the facility in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal), and

B_i=Volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line at the facility in units of l/day (gal/day). The instrument or method by which the owner or operator accurately measured or calculated the volume of each coating as applied on each coating line each day shall be described in the certification to the Administrator.

(B) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility referenced in paragraph (e)(6)(i) of this section shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each coating line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:

( 1 ) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line.

( 2 ) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line.

(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility exempted from the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section because of paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section shall notify the Administrator of any record showing that total VOM emissions from the coating facility exceed 6.8 kg (15 lbs) in any day before the application of capture systems and control devices shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days after the exceedance occurs.

(ii) Any owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section shall comply with the following:

(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new coating line, or upon changing the method of compliance from an existing subject coating line from paragraph (e)(1)(ii) or paragraph (e)(2) to paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section; the owner or operator of a subject coating line shall certify to the Administrator that the coating line will be in compliance with paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date. Such certification shall include:

( 1 ) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line.

( 2 ) The weight of VOM per volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line.

( 3 ) For coating lines subject to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)( 3 ) of this section, certification shall include:

( i ) The name and identification number of each coating line which will comply by means of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)( 3 ) of this section,

( ii ) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line,

( iii ) The weight of VOM per volume of each coating as applied on each coating line,

( iv ) The instrument or method by which the owner or operator will accurately measure or calculate the volume of each coating as applied each day on each coating line,

( v ) The method by which the owner or operator will create and maintain records each day as required in paragraph (e)(6)(ii)(B) of this section for coating lines subject to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)( 3 ) of this section,

( vi ) An example format in which the records required in paragraph (e)(6)(ii)(B) of this section for coating lines subject to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)( 3 ) of this section.

(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each coating line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:

( 1 ) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line.

( 2 ) The weight of VOM per volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line.

( 3 ) For coating lines subject to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)( 3 ) of this section, the owner or operator shall maintain all records necessary to calculate the daily-weighted average VOM content from the coating line in accordance with the proposal submitted, and approved by the Administrator, pursuant to paragraph (e)(1)(A)( 3 ) of this section.

(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject coating line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:

( 1 ) Any record showing violation of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation, except that any record showing a violation of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)( 3 ) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 15 days from the end of the month in which the violation occurred.

( 2 ) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (e)(1) of this section from paragraph (e)(1)(i) to paragraph (e)(1)(ii) or paragraph (e)(2) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (e)(6) (iii)(A) or (iv)(A) of this section, respectively. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (e)(1) of this section from paragraph (e)(1)(i) to paragraph (e)(1)(ii) or paragraph (e)(2) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (e)(6) (iii) or (iv) of this section, respectively.

( 3 ) For coating lines subject to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)( 3 ) of this section, the owner or operator shall notify the Administrator of any change to the topcoating operation at least 30 days before the change is effected. The Administrator shall determine whether or not recertification testing is required. If the Administrator determines that recertification testing is required, then the owner or operator shall submit a proposal to the Administrator to test within 30 days and retest within 30 days of the Administrator's approval of the proposal.

(iii) Any owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section shall comply with the following:

(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new coating line, or upon changing the method of compliance for an existing subject coating line from paragraph (e)(1)(i) or paragraph (e)(2) to paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section; the owner or operator of the subject coating line shall certify to the Administrator that the coating line will be in compliance with paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date. Such certification shall include:

( 1 ) The name and identification number of each coating line which will comply by means of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section.

( 2 ) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line.

( 3 ) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line.

( 4 ) The instrument or method by which the owner or operator will accurately measure or calculate the volume of each coating as applied each day on each coating line.

( 5 ) The method by which the owner or operator will create and maintain records each day as required in paragraph (e)(6)(iii)(B) of this section.

( 6 ) An example of the format in which the records required in paragraph (e)(6)(iii)(B) of this section will be kept.

(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each coating line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:

( 1 ) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line.

( 2 ) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line.

( 3 ) The daily-weighted average VOM content of all coatings as applied on each coating line as defined in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.

(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject coating line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:

( 1 ) Any record showing violation of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.

( 2 ) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (e) from paragraph (e)(1)(ii) to paragraph (e)(1)(i) or paragraph (e)(2) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (e)(6)(ii)(A) or (iv)(A), respectively. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (e) from paragraph (e)(1)(ii) to paragraph (e)(1)(i) or paragraph (e)(2) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (e)(6)(ii) or (iv), respectively.

(iv) Any operator or owner of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(2) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (e)(2)(ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi) or (vii) of this section shall comply with the following:

(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new coating line, or upon changing the method of compliance for an existing coating line from paragraph (e)(1) (i) or (ii) to paragraph (e)(2) of this section; the owner or operator of the subject coating line shall perform all tests and submit to the Administrator the results of all tests and calculations necessary to demonstrate that the subject coating line will be in compliance with paragraph (e)(2) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date.

(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(2) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (e)(2) (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi) or (vii) of this section shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each coating line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:

( 1 ) The weight of VOM per volume of coating solids as applied each day on each coating line, if complying pursuant to paragraph (e)(2)(i)(B) of this section.

( 3 ) A log operating time for the capture system, control device, monitoring equipment and the associated coating line.

( 4 ) A maintenance log for the capture system, control device and monitoring equipment detailing all routine and non-routine maintenance performed including dates and duration of any outages.

(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject coating line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:

( 1 ) Any record showing violation of paragraph (e)(2) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.

( 2 ) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (e) from paragraph (e)(2) to paragraph (e)(1)(i) or paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (e)(6)(ii)(A) or (iii)(A) of this section, respectively. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (e) from paragraph (e)(2) to paragraph (e)(1)(i) or paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (e)(6)(ii) or (iii) of this section, respectively.

(7) Compliance schedule for diesel electric locomotive coatings. Notwithstanding any other provision of this subpart, the compliance date for the emission limitations and standards for “topcoat” and “final repair coat” operations only as applied to General Motors Corporation at their diesel electric locomotive coating lines in Cook County, Illinois, codified at 40 CFR 52.741(e)(1)(i)(M) ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) is specified in this paragraph (e)(7). Compliance with the requirements of paragraph (e)(1), (e)(2) or (e)(3) of this section and paragraph (e)(6) of this section must be in accordance with the appropriate compliance schedule as specified in paragraph (e)(7)(i),(ii),(iii), or (iv) of this section.

(i) No owner or operator of a coating line which is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after March 25, 1995, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraph (e)(6)(i) of this section.

(ii) No owner or operator of a coating line complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after March 25, 1995, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraph (e)(1)(i) and (e)(6)(ii) of this section.

(iii) No owner or operator of a coating line complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after March 25, 1995, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (e)(1)(ii) and (e)(6)(iii) of this section.

(iv) No owner or operator of a coating line complying by means of paragraph (e)(2) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after March 25, 1995, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (e)(2) and (e)(6)(iv) of this section.

(8) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the wood coating line, which coats wooden globe stand components, at Replogle Globes, Inc. (Replogle) Broadview facility in Cook County, Illinois, instead of the control requirements in paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section. Compliance with this paragraph must be demonstrated through the applicable coating analysis test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section.

(i) After October 6, 1991, no coatings shall at any time be applied which exceed the following emission limitations for the specified coating.

(A) 6.59 pounds (lbs) Volatile Organic Material (VOM) per gallon of stain (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to coat wooden globe stand components. Such stain consists of #9250 Walnut NGR Stain (RGI # W06000100), #9974 Cherry NGR Stain (RGI # W06003500) and #9943 Ash NGR Stain (RGI # W06003600). The Administrator must be notified at least ten (10) days prior to the use of any replacement stains.

(B) 5.53 lbs VOM per gallon of Sanding Sealer (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to coat wooden globe stand components. Such sealer consists of #15304 High Build Sanding Sealer (RGI # W06003700). The Administrator must be notified at least ten (10) days prior to the use of any replacement sanding sealer.

(C) 5.20 lbs VOM per gallon of lacquer (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to coat wooden globe stand components. Such lacquer consists of #15352 High Build Lacquer (RGI # W06003300). The Administrator shall be notified at least ten (10) days prior to the use of any replacement lacquer.

(ii) After October 6, 1991, the volume of coatings used shall not exceed the following:

(A) 5,000 gallons per year total for all coatings specified in paragraph (e)(8)(i)(A) of this section. The yearly volume of coatings used are to be calculated as follows:

( 1 ) Compute the volume of specified coating used each month by the 15th of the following month.

( 2 ) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly coating use for the 12 previous months (to obtain the yearly volume of coatings used).

(B) 4,000 gallons per year total for all coatings specified in paragraph (e)(8)(i)(B) of this section. The yearly volume of the coatings used are to be calculated as specified in paragraphs (e)(8)(ii)(A)(1) and (e)(8)(ii)(A)(2) of this section.

(C) 5,000 gallons per year total for all coatings specified in paragraph (e)(8)(i)(C) of this section. The yearly volume of coatings used are to be calculated as specified in paragraphs (e)(8)(ii)(A)(1) and (e)(8)(ii)(A)(2) of this section.

(iii) Beginning on October 6, 1991, the owner and operator of the Replogle Globes, Inc. plant in Broadview, Illinois shall keep the following records for each month. All records shall be retained at Replogle Globes, Inc. for three (3) years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.

(A) the name and identification number of each coating as applied on any wood coating line.

(B) The weight of VOM per volume (determined in accordance with the procedures in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section) and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each month on any wood coating line.

(10) Until December 31, 1996, the control and recordkeeping requirements in this paragraph apply to the three solvent-based polyester paper coating lines (Lines C, D and E) at Riverside Laboratories' Kane County, Illinois facility, instead of the control requirements in paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section and the recordkeeping requirements in paragraph (e)(6) of this section. Compliance with this paragraph must be demonstrated through the applicable coating analysis test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section. The requirements in paragraphs (e)(1), (e)(2), and (e)(6) of this section shall apply to Riverside on and after December 31, 1996.

(i) After December 21, 1995, no coatings shall at any time be applied on Lines C, D or E which exceed 3.5 pounds (lbs.) volatile organic material (VOM) per gallon of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM), except as provided in paragraph (e)(10)(ii) of this section.

(ii) After December 21, 1995, the following specifically identified coatings may exceed 3.5 lbs. VOM per gallon of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) only if they are applied on Line E and they do not exceed the limits indicated below (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM):

(iii) That portion of Riverside's polyester production which is manufactured with the use of any VOC, from Lines C, D, and E, may not exceed the following levels: 35 million square feet per year during and after 1992, 29 million square feet per year during and after 1994, and 25 million square feet during 1996. Compliance with this requirement shall be determined by adding the polyester production from any 12 consecutive months during and after the years indicated, through 1996. That is, the polyester production for any 12 consecutive months starting with January 1992 cannot exceed 35 million square feet; the polyester production from any 12 consecutive months starting with January 1994 cannot exceed 29 million square feet; and the polyester production for the twelve months from January through December 1996 cannot exceed 25 million square feet. Only those square feet of polyester whose production involves the use of VOC need to be restricted by the production levels in this paragraph (e)(10)(iii) of this section.

(iv) By December 21, 1995, Riverside shall certify to the Administrator that its polyester coating operations will be in compliance with paragraphs (e)(10)(i), (e)(10)(ii), and (e)(10)(iii) of this section. Such certification shall include the following:

(A) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on coating lines C, D and E.

(B) The weight of VOM per volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied on each coating line.

(v) The Administrator must be notified at least 10 days prior to the use of any polyester coating not previously identified pursuant to paragraph (e)(10)(iv) of this section. This notification must include the information specified in paragraphs (e)(10)(iv)(A) and (e)(10)(iv)(B) of this section.

(vi) On and after December 21, 1995, Riverside shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each coating and maintain the information at the facility for a period of 3 years:

(B) The weight of VOM per volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day.

(C) Any record showing a VOM content in excess of the emission limits in paragraph (e)(10)(i) or (e)(10)(ii) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following its collection.

(vii) Starting with the first full month after December 21, 1995, Riverside shall collect and record the figures on polyester production (in square feet), for each month and maintain the information at the facility for a period of at least 3 years.

(viii) Regardless of any other provision of paragraph (e)(10) of this section, after August 21, 1995 no coating which contains any VOM other than acetone shall at any time be applied on Line C, D, or E which exceeds 2.9 lbs. VOM per gallon of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM).

(h) Printing and publishing —(1) Flexographic and rotogravure printing. (i) No owner or operator of a subject flexographic, packaging rotogravure or publication rotogravure printing line shall apply at any time any coating or ink unless the VOM content does not exceed the limitation specified in either paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) or (B) of this section. Compliance with this paragraph must be demonstrated through the applicable coating or ink analysis test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (h)(4)(ii) of this section. As an alternative to compliance with paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section, a subject printing line may meet the requirements of paragraph (h)(1)(ii) or (iii) of this section.

(A) Forty percent VOM by volume of the coating and ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM), or

(B) Twenty-five percent VOM by volume of the volatile content in the coating and ink.

(ii) No owner or operator of a subject flexographic, packaging rotogravure or publication rotogravure printing line shall apply coatings or inks on the subject printing line unless the weighted average, by volume, VOM content of all coatings and inks as applied each day on the subject printing line does not exceed the limitation specified in either paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) (as determined by paragraph (h)(1)(ii)(A) or (h)(1)(i)(B) (as determined by paragraph (h)(1)(ii)(B) of this section. Compliance with this paragraph must be demonstrated through the applicable coating or ink analysis test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (h)(4)(iii) of this section.

(A) The following equation shall be used to determine if the weighted average VOM content of all coatings and inks as applied each day on the subject printing line exceeds the limitation specified in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) of this section.

VOM(i)(A)=The weighted average VOM content in units of percent VOM by volume of all coatings and inks (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) used each day,

n=The number of different coatings and/or inks as applied each day on a printing line,

C_i=The VOM content in units of percent VOM by volume of each coating or ink as applied (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM),

(B) The following equation shall be used to determine if the weighted average VOM content of all coatings and inks as applied each day on the subject printing line exceeds the limitation specified in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(B) of this section.

VOM(i)(B)=The weighted average VOM content in units of percent VOM by volume of the volatile content of all coatings and inks used each day,

n=The number of different coatings and/or inks as applied each day on each printing line,

C_i=The VOM content in units of percent VOM by volume of the volatile matter in each coating or ink as applied,

L_i=The liquid volume of each coating or ink as applied in units of l (gal), and

(iii) No owner or operator of a subject flexographic, packaging rotogravure or publication rotogravure printing line equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the subject printing line unless the owner or operator meets the requirements in paragraph (h)(1)(iii) (A), (B) or (C) and paragraphs (h)(1)(iii) (D), (E) and (F) of this section.

(A) A carbon adsorption system is used which reduces the captured VOM emissions by at least 90 percent by weight, or

(B) An incineration system is used which reduces the captured VOM emissions by at least 90 percent by weight, or

(C) An alternative VOM emission reduction system is demonstrated to have at least a 90 percent control device efficiency and the alternative emission reduction system is approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revisions, and

(D) The printing line is equipped with a capture system and control device that provides an overall reduction in VOM emissions of at least:

(E) The control device is equipped with the applicable monitoring equipment specified in paragraph (a)(4)(iv)(B) of this section and the monitoring equipment is installed, calibrated, operated and maintained according to vendor specifications at all times the control device is in use, and

(F) The capture system and control device are operated at all times when the subject printing line is in operation. The owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance with this paragraph by using the applicable capture system and control device test methods and procedures specified in paragraphs (a)(4) (iii) through (vi) of this section and by complying with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (h)(4)(iv) of this section.

(2) Applicability. (i) The limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section apply to all flexographic and rotogravure printing lines at a subject facility. All facilities with flexographic and/or rotogravure printing lines are subject facilities unless:

(A) Total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from all flexographic and rotogravure printing line(s) at the facility never exceed 90.7 Mg (100 tons) per calendar year before the application of capture systems and control devices, or

(B) A federally enforceable construction permit or SIP or FIP revision for all flexographic and rotogravure printing line(s) at a facility requires the owner or operator to limit production or capacity of these printing line(s) to reduce total VOM emissions from all flexographic and rotogravure printing line(s) to 90.7 Mg (100 tons) or less per calendar year before the application of capture systems and control devices.

(ii) Upon achieving compliance with paragraph (h) of this section, the emission source is not required to meet subpart K (sections 215.301 or 215.302) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742). Emission sources exempt from paragraph (h) of this section are subject to subpart K (sections 215.301 or 215.302). Rotogravure or flexographic equipment used for both roll printing and paper coating are subject to paragraph (h) of this section.

(iii) Once subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section, a flexographic or rotogravure printing line is always subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section.

(iv) Any owner or operator of any flexographic or rotogravure printing line that is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(2) of this section is subject to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (h)(4)(i) of this section.

(3) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of a flexographic and/or rotogravure printing line shall comply with the applicable requirements of paragraph (h)(1) of this section and paragraph (h)(4) of this section in accordance with the applicable compliance schedule specified in paragraph (h)(3) (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) of this section.

(i) No owner or operator of a flexographic or rotogravure printing line which is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section because the criteria in paragraph (h)(2) of this section shall operate said printing line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraph (h)(4)(i) of this section.

(ii) No owner or operator of a flexographic or rotogravure printing line complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section shall operate said printing line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (h)(1)(i) and (h)(4)(ii) of this section.

(iii) No owner or operator of a flexographic or rotogravure printing line complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section shall operate said printing line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (h)(1)(ii) and (h)(4)(iii) of this section.

(iv) No owner or operator of a flexographic or rotogravure printing line complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(iii) of this section shall operate said printing line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (h)(1)(iii) and (h)(4)(iv) of this section.

(4) Recordkeeping and reporting. The VOM content of each coating and ink and the efficiency of each capture system and control device shall be determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section to establish the records required under paragraph (h)(4) of this section.

(i) Any owner or operator of a printing line which is exempted from the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(2) of this section shall comply with the following:

(A) By July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility to which paragraph (h)(4)(i) of this section is applicable shall certify to the Administrator that the facility is exempt under the provisions of paragraph (h)(2) of this section. Such certification shall include:

( 1 ) A declaration that the facility is exempt from the limitations of the criteria in paragraph (h)(1) of this section because of paragraph (h)(2) of this section, and

( 2 ) Calculations which demonstrate that total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from all flexographic and rotogravure printing lines at the facility never exceed 90.7 Mg (100 tons) per calendar year before the application of capture systems and control devices. Total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM for a flexograhpic or rotogravure printing facility is the sum of maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from each flexographic and rotogravure printing line at the facility. The following equation shall be used to calculate total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM per calendar year before the application of capture systems and control devices for each flexographic and rotogravure printing line at the facility:

E_p=Total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from one flexographic or rotogravure printing line in units of kg/year (lbs/year),

A=Weight of VOM per volume of solids of the coating or ink with the highest VOM content as applied each year on the printing line in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of coating or ink solids, and

B=Total volume of solids for all coatings and inks that can potentially be applied each year on the printing line in units of l/year (gal/year). The instrument and/or method by which the owner or operator accurately measured or calculated the volume of each coating and ink as applied and the amount that can potentially be applied each year on the printing line shall be described in the certification to the Administrator.

(B) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility referenced in paragraph (h)(4)(i) of this section shall collect and record all of the following information each year for each printing line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:

( 1 ) The name and identification number of each coating and ink as applied on each printing line.

( 2 ) The VOM content and the volume of each coating and ink as applied each year on each printing line.

(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility exempted from the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(2) of this section shall notify the Administrator of any record showing that total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from all printing lines exceed 90.7 Mg (100 tons) in any calendar year before the application of capture systems and control devices, shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days after the exceedance occurs.

(ii) Any owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section shall comply with the following:

(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new printing line, or upon changing the method of compliance from an existing subject printing line from paragraph (h)(1) (ii) or (iii) of this section to paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section, the owner or operator of a subject printing line shall certify to the Administrator that the printing line will be in compliance with paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date. Such certification shall include:

( 1 ) The name and identification number of each coating and ink as applied on each printing line.

( 2 ) The VOM content of each coating and ink as applied each day on each printing line.

(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each coating line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:

( 1 ) The name and identification number of each coating and ink as applied on each printing line.

( 2 ) The VOM content of each coating and ink as applied each day on each printing line.

(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject printing line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:

( 1 ) Any record showing violation of paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.

( 2 ) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(1) of this section from paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section to paragraph (h)(1) (ii) or (iii) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(4) (iii)(A) or (iv)(A) of this section respectively. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(1) from paragraph (h)(1)(i) to paragraph (h)(1) (ii) or (iii) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(4) (iii) or (iv) of this section, respectively.

(iii) Any owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section shall comply with the following:

(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new printing line, or upon changing the method of compliance for an existing subject printing line from paragraph (h)(1) (i) or (iii) of this section to paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section, the owner or operator of the subject printing line shall certify to the Administrator that the printing line will be in compliance with paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date. Such certification shall include:

( 1 ) The name and identification number of each printing line which will comply by means of paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section.

( 2 ) The name and identification number of each coating and ink available for use on each printing line.

( 3 ) The VOM content of each coating and ink as applied each day on each printing line.

( 4 ) The instrument or method by which the owner or operator will accurately measure or calculate the volume of each coating and ink as applied each day on each printing line.

( 5 ) The method by which the owner or operator will create and maintain records each day as required in paragraph (h)(4)(iii)(B) of this section.

( 6 ) An example of the format in which the records required in paragraph (h)(4)(iii)(B) of this section will be kept.

(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section shall collecting line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:

( 1 ) The name and identification number of each coating and ink as applied on each printing line.

( 2 ) The VOM content and the volume of each coating and ink as applied each day on each printing line.

( 3 ) The daily-weighted average VOM content of all coatings and inks as applied on each printing line.

(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject printing line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:

( 1 ) Any record showing violation of paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.

( 2 ) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(1) of this section from paragraph (h)(1)(ii) to paragraph (h)(1)(i) or (iii) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(4)(ii)(A) or (iv)(A), respectively. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(1) from paragraph (h)(1)(ii) to paragraph (h)(1)(i) or (iii), the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(4)(ii) or (iv) of this section, respectively.

(iv) Any owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(iii) of this section shall comply with the following:

(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new printing line, or upon changing the method of compliance for an existing printing line from paragraph (h)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section to paragraph (h)(1)(iii) of this section, the owner or operator of the subject printing line shall perform all tests and submit to the Administrator the results of all tests and calculations necessary to demonstrate that the subject printing line will be in compliance with paragraph (h)(1)(iii) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date.

(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(iii) of this section shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each printing line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:

( 2 ) A log of operating time for the capture system, control device, monitoring equipment and the associated printing line.

( 3 ) A maintenance log for the capture system, control device and monitoring equipment detailing all routine and non-routine maintenance performed including dates and duration of any outages.

(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject printing line shall notify the Administration in the following instances:

( 1 ) Any record showing violation of paragraph (h)(1)(iii) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.

( 2 ) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(1) from paragraph (h)(1)(iii) to paragraph (h)(1) (i) or (ii), the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(4) (ii)(A) or (iii)(A) of this section, respectively. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(1) from paragraph (h)(1)(iii) to paragraph (h)(1) (i) or (ii) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(4) (ii) or (iii) of this section, respectively.

(5) Heatset-web-offset lithographic printing —(i) Applicability. (A) The limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section apply to all heatset-web-offset lithographic printing lines at a subject facility. All facilities with heatset-web-offset lithographic printing lines are subject facilities unless:

( 1 ) Total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from all heatset-web-offset lithographic printing lines at the facility never exceed 90.7 Mg (100 tons) per calendar year in the absence of air pollution control equipment, or

( 2 ) A federally enforceable construction permit or SIP or FIP revision for all heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line(s) at a facility requires the owner or operator to limit production or capacity of these printing line(s) to reduce total VOM emissions from all heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line(s) to 90.7 Mg (100 tons) per calendar year or less in the absence of air pollution control equipment, and

(B) Any owner or operator of any heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line that is exempt from the limitations in paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(5)(i)(A) of this section shall be subject to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements in paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(A) of this section.

(ii) Specific provisions. No owner or operator of a subject heatset-web-offset printing line may cause or allow the operation of the subject heatset-web-offset printing line unless the owner or operator meets the requirements in paragraph (h)(5)(ii) (A) or (B) of this section and the requirements in paragraphs (h)(5)(ii) (C) and (D) of this section.

(A) An afterburner system is installed and operated that reduces 90 percent of the VOM emissions from the dryer exhaust, or

(B) The fountain solution contains no more than 8 percent, by weight, of VOM and a condensation recovery system is installed and operated that removes at least 75 percent of the non-isopropyl alcohol organic materials from the dryer exhaust, and

(C) The control device is equipped with the applicable monitoring equipment specified in paragraph (a)(4)(iv)(B) of this section and the monitoring equipment is installed, calibrated, operated and maintained according to vendor specifications at all times the control device is in use, and

(D) The control device is operated at all times when the subject printing line is in operation. The owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance with paragraph (h)(5) of this section by using the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraphs (a)(4) (i), (iv), and (vi) of this section and by complying with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (h)(5)(iii) of this section.

(iii) Recordkeeping and reporting. The VOM content of each fountain solution and ink and the efficiency of each control device shall be determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section to establish the records required under paragraph (h)(5)(iii) of this section.

(A) Any owner or operator of a printing line which is exempted from the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(5)(i) of this section shall comply with the following:

( 1 ) By July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility to which paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(A) of this section is applicable shall certify to the Administrator that the facility is exempt under the provisions of paragraph (h)(5)(i) of this section. Such certification shall include:

( i ) A declaration that the facility is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(5)(i) of this section, and

( ii ) Calculations which demonstrate that total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from all heatset-web-offset lithographic printing lines at the facility never exceed 90.7 Mg (100 tons) per calendar year before the application of air pollution control equipment. Total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM for a heatset-web-offset lithographic printing facility is the sum of maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from each heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line at the facility. The following equation shall be used to calculate total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM per calendar year in the absence of air pollution control equipment for each heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line at the facility.

E_p=Total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from one heatset-web-offset printing line in units of kg/year (lbs/year),

A=Weight of VOM per volume of solids of ink with the highest VOM content as applied each year on the printing line in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of solids, and

B=Total volume of solids for all inks that can potentially be applied each year on the printing line in units of l/year (gal/year). The instrument or method by which the owner or operator accurately measured or calculated the volume of each ink as applied and the amount that can potentially be applied each year on the printing line shall be described in the certification to the Administrator.

D=The total volume of fountain solution that can potentially be used each year on the printing line in units of l/year (gal/year). The instrument and/or method by which the owner or operator accurately measured or calculated the volume of each fountain solution used and the amount that can potentially be used each year on the printing line shall be described in the certification to the Administrator.

( 2 ) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility to which paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(A) of this section is applicable shall collect and record all of the following information each year for each printing line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:

( i ) The name and identification of each fountain solution and ink as applied on each printing line.

( ii ) The VOM content and the volume of each fountain solution and ink as applied each year on each printing line.

( 3 ) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility exempted from the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(5)(i) of this section shall notify the Administrator of any record showing that total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from all printing lines exceed 90.7 Mg (100 tons) in any calendar year in the absence of air pollution control equipment shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days after the exceedance occurs.

(B) Any owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section shall comply with the following:

( 1 ) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new printing line, or upon changing the method of compliance for an existing printing line from paragraph (h)(5) (ii)(B) to (ii)(A) of this section, the owner or operator of the subject printing line shall perform all tests and submit to the Administrator the results of all tests and calculations necessary to demonstrate that the subject printing line will be in compliance with paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date.

( 2 ) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section shall collect and record the following information each day for each printing line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:

( ii ) A log of operating time for the control device, monitoring equipment and the associated printing line.

( iii ) A maintenance log for the control device and monitoring equipment detailing all routine and nonroutine maintenance performed including dates and duration of any outages.

( 3 ) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject printing line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:

( i ) Any record showing violation of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.

( ii ) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section from paragraph (h)(5) (ii)(A) to (ii)(B), the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(C)( 1 ) of this section. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(5)(ii) from paragraph (h)(5) (ii)(A) to (ii)(B) of this section the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(C) of this section.

(C) Any owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(B) of this section shall comply with the following:

( 1 ) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new printing line, or upon changing the method of compliance for an existing printing line from paragraph (h)(5) (ii)(A) to (ii)(B) of this section, the owner or operator of the subject printing line shall perform all tests and submit to the Administrator the results of all tests and calculations necessary to demonstrate that the subject printing line will be in compliance with paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(B) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date.

( 2 ) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(B) of this section shall collect and record the following information each day for each printing line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:

( i ) The VOM content of the fountain solution used each day on each printing line.

( ii ) A log of operating time for the control device and the associated printing line.

( iii ) A maintenance log for the control device detailing all routine and non-routine maintenance performed including dates and duration of any outages.

( 3 ) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject printing line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:

( i ) Any record showing violation of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(B) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.

( ii ) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section from paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(B) to (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(B)( 1 ) of this section. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section from paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(B) to (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(B) of this section.

(iv) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of a heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line shall comply with the applicable requirements of paragraphs (h)(5) (ii) and (iii) of this section in accordance with the applicable compliance schedule specified in paragraph (h)(5)(iv) (A), (B) or (C) of this section.

(A) No owner or operator of a heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line which is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(5)(i) of this section shall operate said printing line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (h)(5)(iii)(A) and (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section.

(B) No owner or operator of a heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line complying by means of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section shall operate said printing line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (h)(5)(iii)(B) and (h)(5)(ii)(B) of this section.

(C) No owner or operator of a heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line complying by means of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(B) of this section shall operate said printing line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(C) of this section.

(6) The control and recordkeeping and reporting requirements, as well as the test methods in this paragraph, apply to the rotogravure and flexographic presses at General Packaging Products, Inc.'s (GPP) plant in Chicago, Illinois, instead of the requirements in 40 CFR 52.741(h)(1) through 40 CFR 52.741(h)(5).

(i) After July 1, 1992, no inks or other volatile organic material (VOM) containing materials shall at any time be applied or used which have a higher percent VOM by weight than the following:

(B) 82 percent VOM by weight for solvent based inks as applied on GPP's presses.

(ii) After July 1, 1992, the weight of ink and other VOM containing materials used shall not exceed the following:

(A) 200,000 pounds per year total for all waterbased inks, as applied (including dilution material). The yearly weight of waterbased inks used is to be calculated according to the procedure in paragraph (h)(6)(iii) of this section.

(B) 100,008 pounds per year total for all solvent based inks, as applied (including dilution material). The yearly weight of solvent based inks used is to be calculated according to the procedure in paragraph (h)(6)(iii) of this section.

(C) 100,000 pounds per year total (based upon the formulation of the material as it is used on the presses) for all other VOM containing materials (besides inks). The yearly weight of other VOM containing materials is to be calculated according to the procedure in paragraph (h)(6)(iii) of this section.

(A) Compute the weight of ink/material used each month by the 15th of the following month.

(B) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly ink/material usage for the 12 previous months (to obtain the yearly weight of ink/material used).

(iv) Beginning on July 1, 1992, the owner and operator of GPP's plant in Chicago, Illinois, shall keep the following records for each month. All records shall be retained at GPP for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request:

(A) The name and identification number of each waterbased ink, each solvent based ink, and each other VOM containing material as applied or used on any press.

(B) The pounds of waterbased ink as applied on all presses for each month and the percent VOM by weight for each waterbased ink as applied on any press for each month.

(C) The pounds of solvent based ink as applied on all presses for each month and the percent VOM by weight for each solvent based ink as applied on any press for each month.

(D) The pounds of other (non-ink) VOM containing material used on all presses for each month and the percent VOM by weight for each (non-ink) VOM containing material as used on any press for each month.

(v) Any record showing a violation of paragraph (h)(6)(i) or (h)(6)(ii) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days of the violation.

(vi) To determine compliance with paragraphs (h)(6)(i) and (h)(6)(ii) of this section and to establish the records required under paragraph (h)(6)(iv) of this section the percent VOM by weight of each ink and other VOM containing material shall be determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.

(i) Leaks from synthetic organic chemical and polymer manufacturing equipment —(1) Inspection program for leaks. The owner or operator of a synthetic organic chemical or polymer manufacturing plant subject to paragraph (i) and subpart Q (sections 215.430, 215.431, 215.433, 215.434, 215.435, and 215.437) of Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) shall, for the purposes of detecting leaks, conduct a component inspection program using the test methods specified in Method 21, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, consistent with the following provisions:

(i) Test annually those components operated near extreme temperature or pressure such that they would be unsafe to routinely monitor and those components which would require the elevation of monitoring personnel higher than two meters above permanent worker access structures or surfaces.

(ii) Test quarterly all other pressure relief valves in gas service, pumps in light liquid service, valves in light liquid service and in gas service, and compressors.

(iii) If less than or equal to 2 percent of the valves in light liquid service and in gas service tested pursuant to paragraph (i)(1)(ii) of this section are found not to leak for five consecutive quarters, no leak tests shall be required for three consecutive quarters. Thereafter, leak tests shall resume for the next quarter. If that test shows less than or equal to 2 percent of the valves in light liquid service and in gas service are leaking, then no tests are required for the next three quarters. If more than 2 percent are leaking, then tests are required for the next five quarters.

(vi) Test any relief valve within 24 hours after it has vented to the atmosphere.

(vii) Routine instrument monitoring of valves which are not externally regulated, flanges, and equipment in heavy liquid service, is not required. However, any valve which is not externally regulated, flange or piece of equipment in heavy liquid service that is found to be leaking on the basis of sight, smell or sound shall be repaired as soon as practicable but no later than 30 days after the leak is found.

(ix) Within one hour of its detection, a weatherproof, readily visible tag, in bright colors such as red or yellow, bearing an identification number and the date on which the leak was detected must be affixed on the leaking component and remain in place until the leaking component is repaired.

(x) The following components are exempt from the monitoring requirements in paragraph (i)(1) of this section:

(B) Any pressure relief valve that is connected to an operating flare header or vapor recovery device.

(2) Alternative program for leaks. The Administrator shall approve an alternative program of monitoring, recordkeeping, or reporting to that prescribed in paragraph (i) and subpart Q (sections 215.430, 215.431, 215.433, 215.434, 215.435, and 215.437) of Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), upon a demonstration by the owner or operator of such plant that the alternative program will provide plant personnel and USEPA personnel with an equivalent ability to identify and repair leaking components. Any alternative program can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.

(j) Petroleum refining and related industries: asphalt materials —(1) Monitoring program for leaks. (i) The owner or operator of a petroleum refinery subject to subpart R (section 215.445) of Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) shall, for the purpose of detecting leaks, conduct a component monitoring program consistent with the following provisions:

(A) Test once between March 1 and June 1 of each year, by methods referenced in paragraph (a)(4)(vii) of this section, all pump seals, pipeline valves in liquid service and process drains.

(B) Test once each quarter of each calendar year, by methods referenced in paragraph (a)(4)(vii) of this section, all pressure relief valves in gaseous service, pipeline valves in gaseous service and compressor seals.

(F) Test any relief valve within 24 hours after it has vented to the atmosphere, and

(ii) Storage tank valves and pressure relief devices connected to an operating flare header or vapor recovery device are exempt from the monitoring requirements in paragraph (j)(1)(i) of this section.

(iii) The Administrator may require more frequent monitoring than would otherwise be required by paragraph (j)(1)(i) of this section for components which are demonstrated to have a history of leaking.

(2) Alternative program for leaks. The Administrator may approve an alternative program of monitoring, recordkeeping or reporting to that prescribed in paragraph (j)(1) of this section and subpart R (sections 215.446, 215.448, and 215.449) of Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), upon a demonstration by the owner or operator of a petroleum refinery that the alternative program will provide refinery and USEPA personnel with an equivalent ability to identify and repair leaking components. Any alternative program can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.

(3) Compliance schedule for leaks. The owner or operator of a petroleum refinery shall adhere to the increments of progress contained in the following schedule:

(i) Submit to the Administrator a monitoring program consistent with subpart R (section 215.446) of Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) prior to September 1, 1990.

(ii) Submit to the Administrator the first monitoring report pursuant to subpart R (section 215.449) of Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) prior to October 1, 1990.

(m) Pharmaceutical manufacturing —(1) Applicability. (i) The rules of paragraph (m) of this section, except for paragraphs (m)(4) through (m)(6) of this section, apply to all emission sources of VOM, including but not limited to reactors, distillation units, dryers, storage tanks for VOL, equipment for the transfer of VOL, filters, crystallizers, washers, laboratory hoods, pharmaceutical coating operations, mixing operations and centrifuges used in manufacturing, including packaging, of pharmaceuticals, and emitting more than 6.8 kg/day (15 lbs/day) and more than 2,268 kg/year (2.5 tons/year) of VOM. If an emission source emits less than 2,268 kg/year (2.5 tons/year) of VOM, the requirements of this paragraph still apply to the emission source if VOM emissions from the emission source exceed 45.4 kg/day (100 lbs/day).

(ii) Notwithstanding paragraph (m)(1)(i) of this section, the air suspension coater/dryer, fluid bed dryers, tunnel dryers, and Accelacotas located in Libertyville Township, Lake County, Illinois shall be exempt from the rules of paragraph (m) of this section, except for paragraphs (m)(4) through (m)(6) of this section, if emissions of VOM not vented to air pollution control equipment do not exceed the following levels:

(iii) Paragraphs (m)(4) through (m)(6) of this section apply to a plant having one or more emission sources that:

(B) Emit more than 6.8 kg/day (15 lbs/day) of VOM and more than 2,268 kg/year (2.5 tons/year) of VOM, or, if less than 2,268 kg/year (2.5 tons/year), these paragraphs still apply if emissions from one or more sources exceed 45.4 kg/day (100 lbs/day).

(iv) No owner or operator shall violate any condition in a permit when the condition results in exclusion of an emission source from paragraph (m) of this section.

(v) Any pharmaceutical manufacturing source that becomes subject to the provisions of paragraph (m) of this section at any time shall remain subject to the provisions of paragraph (m) of this section at all times.

(vi) Emissions subject to paragraph (m) of this section shall be controlled at all times consistent with the requirements set forth in paragraph (m) of this section.

(vii) Control devices required pursuant to paragraph (m) of this section shall be operated at all times when the source it is controlling is operated.

(viii) Determinations of daily and annual emissions for purposes of paragraph (m)(1) of this section shall be made using both data on the hourly emission rate (or the emissions per unit of throughput) and appropriate daily and annual data from records of emission source operation (or material throughput or material consumption data). In the absence of representative test data pursuant to paragraph (m)(8) of this section for the hourly emission rate (or the emissions per unit of throughput), such items shall be calculated using engineering calculations, including the methods described in appendix B of “Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacturing of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products” (EPA–450/2–78–029). (This subparagraph shall not affect the Administrator's authority to require emission tests to be performed pursuant to paragraph (m)(8) of this section.)

(2) Control of reactors, distillation units, crystallizers, centrifuges and vacuum dryers. (i) The owner or operator shall equip all reactors, distillation units, crystallizers, centrifuges and vacuum dryers that are used to manufacture pharmaceuticals with surface condensers or other air pollution control equipment listed in paragraph (m)(2)(i)(B) of this section.

(A) If a surface condenser is used, it shall be operated such that the condenser outlet gas temperature does not exceed:

( 1 ) 248.2 K (−13 ° F) when condensing VOM of vapor pressure greater than 40.0kPa (5.8 psi) at 294.3K (70 ° F), or

( 2 ) 258.2 K (5 ° F) when condensing VOM of vapor pressure greater than 20.0 kPa (2.9 psi) at 294.3 K (70 ° F), or

( 3 ) 273.2 K (32 ° F) when condensing VOM of vapor pressure greater than 10.0 kPa (1.5 psi) at 294.3 K (70 ° F), or

( 4 ) 283.2 K (50 ° F) when condensing VOM of vapor pressure greater than 7.0 kPa (1.0 psi) at 294.3 K (70 ° F), or

( 5 ) 298.2 K (77 ° F) when condensing VOM of vapor pressure greater than 3.45 kPa (0.5 psi) at 294.3 K (70 ° F).

(B) If a scrubber, carbon adsorption, thermal afterburner, catalytic afterburner, or other air pollution control equipment other than a surface condenser is used, such equipment shall provide a reduction in the emissions of VOM of 90 percent or more.

(ii) The owner or operator shall enclose all centrifuges used to manufacture pharmaceuticals and that have an exposed VOL surface, where the VOM in the VOL has a vapor pressure of 3.45 kPa (0.5 psi) or more at 294.3 K (70 ° F), except as production, sampling, maintenance, or inspection procedures require operator access.

(3) Control of air dryers, production equipment exhaust systems and filters. (i) The owner or operator of an air dryer or production equipment exhaust system used to manufacture pharmaceuticals shall control the emissions of VOM from such emission sources by air pollution control equipment which reduces by 90 percent or more the VOM that would otherwise be emitted into the atmosphere.

(ii) The owner or operator shall enclose all rotary vacuum filters and other filters used to manufacture pharmaceuticals and that have an exposed VOL surface, where the VOM in the VOL has a vapor pressure of 3.45 kPa (0.5 psi) or more at 294 K (70 ° F), except as production, sampling, maintenance, or inspection procedures require operator access.

(4) Material storage and transfer. The owner or operator of a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant shall:

(i) Provide a vapor balance system that is at least 90 percent effective in reducing VOM emissions from truck or railcar deliveries to storage tanks with capacities equal to or greater than 7.57 m³ (2,000 gal) that store VOL with vapor pressures greater than 28.0 kPa (4.1 psi) at 294.3 K (70 ° F), and

(ii) Install, operate, and maintain pressure/vacuum conservation vents set at 0.2 kPa (0.03 psi) or greater on all storage tanks that store VOL with vapor pressures greater than 10 kPa (1.5 psi) at 294.3 K (70 ° F).

(5) In-process tanks. The owner or operator shall install covers on all in-process tanks used to manufacture pharmaceuticals and containing a VOL at any time. These covers must remain closed, except as production, sampling, maintenance or inspection procedures require operator access.

(6) Leaks. The owner or operator of a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant shall repair any component from which a leak of VOL can be observed. The repair shall be completed as soon as practicable but no later than 15 days after the leak is found. If the leaking component cannot be repaired until the process unit is shut down, the leaking component must then be repaired before the unit is restarted.

(7) Other emission sources. The owner or operator of a washer, laboratory hood, tablet coating operation, mixing operation or any other process emission source not subject to paragraphs (m)(2) through (m)(6) of this section, and used to manufacture pharmaceuticals shall control the emissions of VOM from such emission sources by:

(i) Air pollution control equipment which reduces by 81 percent or more the VOM that would otherwise be emitted to the atmosphere, or

(ii) A surface condenser which captures all the VOM which would otherwise be emitted to the atmosphere and which meets the requirements of paragraph (m)(2)(i) of this section.

(8) Testing. (i) Upon request by the Administrator, the owner or operator of any VOM emission source subject to paragraph (m) or exempt from paragraph (m) of this section by virtue of the provisions of paragraph (m)(1) of this section shall, at his own expense, demonstrate compliance to the Administrator by the methods or procedures listed in paragraph (a)(vi)(A) of this section.

(ii) A person planning to conduct a VOM emissions test to demonstrate compliance with paragraph (m) of this section shall notify the Administrator of that intent not less than 30 calendar days before the planned initiation of the test.

(9) Monitoring and recordkeeping for air pollution control equipment —(i) Monitoring. (A) At a minimum, continuous monitors for the following parameters shall be installed on air pollution control equipment used to control sources subject to paragraph (m) of this section:

(D) Each monitor shall operate at all times while the associated control equipment is operating.

(ii) Recordkeeping. (A) The owner or operator of a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility shall maintain the following records:

( 1 ) Parameters listed in paragraph (m)(9)(i)(A) of this section shall be recorded.

( 2 ) For sources subject to paragraph (m)(2) of this section, the vapor pressure of VOM being controlled shall be recorded for every process.

(B) For any leak subject to paragraph (m)(6) of this section which cannot be readily repaired within one hour after detection, the following records shall be kept:

(C) The following records shall be kept for emission sources subject to paragraph (m)(5) of this section which contain VOL:

( 2 ) For production and sampling, detailed written procedures or manufacturing directions specifying the circumstances under which covers may be opened and the procedures for opening covers.

(D) For each emission source used in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals for which the owner or operator of a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant claims emission standards are not applicable, because the emissions are below the applicability cutoffs in paragraph (m)(1)(i) of this section or paragraph (m)(1)(ii) of this section the owner or operator shall:

( 1 ) Maintain a demonstration including detailed engineering calculations of the maximum daily and annual emissions for each such emission source showing that the emissions are below the applicability cutoffs in paragraph (m)(1)(i) or paragraph (m)(1)(ii) of this section, as appropriate, for the current and prior calendar years;

( 2 ) Maintain appropriate operating records for each such emission source to identify whether the applicability cutoffs in paragraph (m)(1)(i) or paragraph (m)(1)(ii) of this section, as appropriate, are ever exceeded; and

( 3 ) Provide written notification to the Administrator within 30 days of a determination that such an emission source has exceeded the applicability cutoffs in paragraph (m)(1)(i) or paragraph (m)(1)(ii) of this section, as appropriate.

(E) Records required under paragraph (m)(9)(ii)(A) of this section shall be maintained by the owner or operator for a minimum of two years after the date on which they are made.

(F) Copies of the records shall be made available to the Administrator upon verbal or written request.

(q) Gasoline distribution—( 1) Bulk gasoline plants. (i) Subject to paragraph (q)(1)(v) of this section, no person may cause or allow the transfer of gasoline from a delivery vessel into a stationary storage tank located at a bulk gasoline unless:

(A) The delivery vessel and the stationary storage tank are each equipped with a vapor collection system that meets the requirements of paragraph (q)(1)(iv)(D) of this section,

(C) The delivery vessel displays the appropriate sticker pursuant to the requirements of sections 215.584 (b) or (d) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742),

(D) The pressure relief valve(s) on the stationary storage tank and the delivery vessel are set to release at no less than 0.7 psi or the highest pressure allowed by state or local fire codes or the guidelines of the National Fire Prevention Association, and

(ii) Subject to paragraph (q)(1)(vi) of this section, no person may cause or allow the transfer of gasoline from a stationary storage tank located at a bulk gasoline plant into a delivery vessel unless:

(A) The requirements set forth in paragraphs (q) (1)(i)(A) through (1)(i)(D) of this section are met, and

(B) Equipment is available at the bulk gasoline plant to provide for the submerged filling of the delivery vessel or the delivery vessel is equipped for bottom loading.

(iii) Subject to paragraph (q)(1)(v) of this section, each owner of a stationary storage tank located at a bulk gasoline plant shall:

(A) Equip each stationary storage tank with a vapor control system that meets the requirements of paragraph (q) (1)(i) or (1)(ii) of this section, whichever is applicable,

(B) Provide instructions to the operator of the bulk gasoline plant describing necessary maintenance operations and procedures for prompt notification of the owner in case of any malfunction of a vapor control system, or

(iv) Subject to paragraph (q)(1)(v) of this section, each operator of a bulk gasoline plant shall:

(A) Maintain and operate each vapor control system in accordance with the owner's instructions,

(B) Promptly notify the owner of any scheduled maintenance or malfunction requiring replacement or repair of a major component of a vapor control system,

(D) Operate the bulk plant vapor collection system and gasoline loading equipment in a manner that prevents:

( 1 ) Gauge pressure from exceeding 45.7 cm (18 in.) of water and vacuum from exceeding 15.2 cm (6 in.) of water, as measured as close as possible to the vapor hose connection,

( 2 ) A reading equal to or greater than 100 percent of the lower explosive limit (LEL measured as propane) when tested in accordance with the procedure described in “Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor Collection Systems”, Appendix B, EPA 450/2–78–051 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161), and

(E) Provide a pressure tap or equivalent on the bulk plant vapor collection system in order to allow the determination of compliance with paragraph (q)(1)(iv)(D)( 1 ) of this section, and

(F) Within 15 business days after discovery of any leak by the owner, operator, or the Administrator, repair and retest a vapor collection system which exceeds the limits of paragraph (q)(1)(iv)(D) ( 1 ) or ( 2 ) of this section.

(v) The requirements of paragraphs (q) (1)(i), (1)(iii) and (1)(iv) of this section, shall not apply to:

(A) Any stationary storage tank with a capacity of less than 2,177 l (575 gal), or

(B) Any bulk gasoline plant whose daily gasoline throughtput is less than 15,140 l (4,000 gal/day) on a thirty-day rolling average.

(vi) The requirements of paragraph (q)(1)(ii) of this section shall only apply to bulk gasoline plants:

(A) Whose daily gasoline throughput is greater than or equal to 15,140 l (4,000 gal/day) on a thirty-day rolling average, and

(B) That either distribute gasoline to gasoline dispensing facilities subject to the requirements of section 215.583(a)(2) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) or that are in Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry or Will County.

(vii) Any bulk gasoline plant which is ever subject to paragraph (q)(1) (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) of this section shall always be subject to these paragraphs.

(s) Paint and ink manufacturing —(1) Applicability. (i) Paragraph (s) shall apply to all paint and ink manufacturing plants which:

(A) Include process emission sources not subject to subparts (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or to paragraphs (d), (e) (excluding paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L)), (h) (excluding paragraph (h)(5)), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; and which as a group both:

( 1 ) Have maximum theoretical emissions of 91 Mg (100 tons) or more per calendar year of VOM if no air pollution control equipment were used, and

( 2 ) Are not limited to less than 91 Mg (100 tons) of VOM emissions per calendar year in the absence of air pollution control equipment, through production or capacity limitations contained in a federally enforceable construction permit or a SIP or FIP revision, or

(B) Produce more than 7,570,820 l (2,000,000 gal) per calendar year of paint or ink formulations, which contain less than 10 percent (by weight) water, and ink formulations not containing as the primary solvents water, Magie oil or glycol.

(ii) For the purposes of paragraph (s) of this section, uncontrolled VOM emissions are the emissions of VOM which would result if no air pollution control equipment were used.

(2) Exemption for waterbase material and heatset-offset ink. The requirements of paragraphs (s)(4) and (s)(5) of this section and paragraph (s)(7)(i) of this section shall not apply to equipment while it is being used to produce either:

(i) Paint or ink formulations which contain 10 percent or more (by weight) water, or

(3) Permit conditions. No person shall violate any condition in a federally enforceable permit when the condition results in exclusion of the plant or an emission source from paragraph (s).

(4) Open-top mills, tanks, vats or vessels. No person shall operate an open-top mill, tank, vat or vessel with a volume of more than 45 l (12 gal) for the production of paint or ink unless:

(i) The mill, tank, vat or vessel is equipped with a cover which completely covers the mill, tank, vat or vessel opening except for an opening no larger than necessary to allow for safe clearance for a mixer shaft. Such cover shall extend at least 1.27 cm (0.5 in.) beyond the outer rim of the opening or be attached to the rim.

(ii) The cover remains closed except when production, sampling, maintenance or inspection procedures require access.

(iii) The cover is maintained in good condition such that, when in place, it maintains contact with the rim of the opening for at least 90 percent of the circumference of the rim.

(5) Grinding mills. (i) No person shall operate a grinding mill for the production of paint or ink which is not maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.

(ii) No person shall operate a grinding mill fabricated or modified after the effective date of paragraph (s) which is not equipped with fully enclosed screens.

(iii) The manufacturer's specifications shall be kept on file at the plant by the owner or operator of the grinding mill and be made available to any person upon verbal or written request during business hours.

(6) Storage tanks. (i) The owner or operator shall equip tanks storing VOL with a vapor pressure greater than 10 kPa (1.5 psi) at 20 °C (68 °F) with pressure/vacuum conservation vents set as a minimum at +/–0.2 kPa (0.029 psi). These controls shall be operated at all times. An alternative air pollution control system may be used if it results in a greater emission reduction than these controls. Any alternative control system can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.

(ii) Stationary VOL storage containers with a capacity greater than 946 l (250 gal) shall be equipped with a submerged-fill pipe or bottom fill. These controls shall be operated at all times. An alternative control system can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.

(7) Leaks. The owner or operator of a paint or ink manufacturing plant shall, for the purpose of detecting leaks, conduct an equipment monitoring program as set forth below:

(i) Each pump shall be checked by visual inspection each calendar week for indications of leaks, that is, liquids dripping from the pump seal. If there are indications of liquids dripping from the pump seal, the pump shall be repaired as soon as practicable, but no later than 15 calendar days after the leak is detected.

(ii) Any pump, valve, pressure relief valve, sampling connection, open-ended valve and flange or connector containing a fluid which is at least 10 percent VOM by weight which appears to be leaking on the basis of sight, smell or sound shall be repaired as soon as practicable, but no later than 15 calendar days after the leak is detected.

(iii) A weather proof, readily visible tag, in bright colors such as red or yellow, bearing an identification number and the date on which the leak was detected shall be attached to leaking equipment. The tag may be removed upon repair, that is, when the equipment is adjusted or otherwise altered to allow operation without leaking.

(iv) When a leak is detected, the owner or operator shall record the date of detection and repair and the record shall be retained at the plant for at least two years from the date of each detection or each repair attempt. The record shall be made available to any person upon verbal or written request during business hours.

(8) Clean up. (i) No person shall clean paint or ink manufacturing equipment with organic solvent unless the equipment being cleaned is completely covered or enclosed except for an opening no larger than necessary to allow safe clearance for proper operation of the cleaning equipment, considering the method and materials being used.

(ii) No person shall store organic wash solvent in other than closed containers, unless closed containers are demonstrated to be a safety hazard, or dispose of organic wash solvent in a manner such that more than 20 percent by weight is allowed to evaporate into the atmosphere.

(9) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to the control requirements of paragraph (s) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (s) of this section on and after July 1, 1991.

(10) Recordkeeping and reporting. (i) Upon request by the Administrator, the owner or operator of an emission source which claims to be exempt from the requirements of paragraph (s) of this section shall submit records to the Administrator within 30 calendar days from the date of the request which document that the emission source is in fact exempt from paragraph (s) of this section. These records shall include (but are not limited to) the percent water (by weight) in the paint or ink being produced and the quantity of Magie oil, glycol and other solvents in the ink being produced.

(ii) Every owner or operator of an emission source which is subject to the requirements of paragraph (s) of this section shall maintain all records necessary to demonstrate compliance with those requirements at the facility for three years.

(u) Miscellaneous fabricated product manufacturing processes —(1) Applicability. (i) The requirements of paragraph (u) of this section shall apply to a plant's miscellaneous fabricated product manufacturing process emission sources which are not included within any of the source categories specified in subparts (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or specified in paragraph (d), (e), (h), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; if the plant is subject to paragraph (u) of this section. A plant is subject to paragraph (u) of this section if it contains process emission sources, not regulated by subparts (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or by paragraph (d), (e) (excluding paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L)), (h) (excluding paragraph (h)(5)), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; which as a group both:

(A) Have maximum theoretical emissions of 91 Mg (100 tons) or more per calendar year of VOM if no air pollution control equipment were used, and

(B) Are not limited to less than 91 Mg (100 tons) of VOM emissions per calendar year in the absence of air pollution control equipment, through production or capacity limitations contained in a federally enforceable construction permit or a SIP or FIP revision.

(ii) If a plant ceases to fulfill the criteria of paragraph (u)(1)(i) of this section, the requirements of paragraph (u) of this section shall continue to apply to a miscellaneous fabricated products manufacturing process emission source which was ever subject to the control requirements of paragraph (u)(3) of this section.

(iii) No limits under paragraph (u) of this section shall apply to emission sources with emissions of VOM to the atmosphere less than or equal to 0.91 Mg (1.0 ton) per calendar year if the total emissions from such sources not complying with paragraph (u)(3) of this section does not exceed 4.5 Mg (5.0 tons) per calendar year.

(iv) For the purposes of paragraph (u) of this section, an emission source shall be considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph if it is subject to the limits of that subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph. An emission source is not considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph if its emissions are below the applicability cutoff level or if the source is covered by an exemption.

(v) For the purposes of paragraph (u) of this section, uncontrolled VOM emissions are the emissions of VOM which would result if no air pollution control equipment were used.

(2) Permit conditions. No person shall violate any condition in a permit when the condition results in exclusion of the plant or an emission source from paragraph (u) of this section.

(3) Control requirements. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to paragraph (u) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (u)(3) (i), (ii) or (iii) of this section:

(i) Emission capture and control techniques which achieve an overall reduction in uncontrolled VOM emissions of at least 81 percent, or

(ii) For coating lines, the daily-weighted average VOM content shall not exceed 0.42 kg VOM/l (3.5 lbs VOM/gal) of coating as applied (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) during any day. Owners and Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or

(iii) An alternative control plan which has been approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.

(4) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to the control requirements of paragraph (u) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (u) of this section on and after July 1, 1991.

(5) Testing. Any owner or operator of a VOM emission source which is subject to paragraph (u) of this section shall demonstrate compliance with paragraph (u)(3) of this section by using the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.

(6) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the adhesive globe coating operations at Replogle's Broadview facility in Cook County, Illinois, instead of the control requirements in paragraph (u)(3) of this section.

(i) After October 6, 1991, no coatings shall at any time be applied which exceed the following emission limitations for the specified coating.

(A) 7.0 lbs VOM per gallon of adhesive coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to coat globes. Such coating consists of #7879446 Methylene Chloride (RGI #01004100). The Administrator shall be notified at least ten (10) days prior to the use of any replacement adhesive for coating globes.

(ii) After October 6, 1991, the volume of coatings used shall not exceed the following:

(A) 572 gallons per year total for all coatings specified in paragraph (u)(6)(i)(A) of this section. The yearly volume of coatings used are to be calculated as follows:

( 1 ) Compute the volume of specified coating used each month by the 15th of the following month.

( 2 ) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly coating use for the 12 previous months (to obtain the yearly volume of coatings used).

(A) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on any adhesive globe coating line.

(B) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each month on any adhesive globe coating line.

(7) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the glass candle container coating line(s) and silk screening machines at the Candle Corporation of America (CCA), Chicago, Illinois facility, instead of the control requirements in paragraph (u)(3) of this section.

(i) After June 1, 1992, no coatings or inks shall at any time be applied, at any coating or ink applicator, which exceed the following emission limitations for the specified coating or ink.

(A) 6.04 pounds (lbs) volatile organic material (VOM) per gallon of clear lacquer/varnish (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to coat glass candle containers. Such clear lacquer/varnish (multi-color) is identified as LP3500. The Administrator must be notified at least 10 days prior to the use of any replacement clear lacquers/varnishes.

(B) 5.23 lbs VOM per gallon of translucent coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to coat glass candle containers. Such translucent coating (multi-color) is identified as LP3603. The Administrator must be notified at least 10 days prior to the use of any replacement translucent coatings.

(C) 5.84 lbs VOM per gallon of white lacquer (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to coat glass candle containers. Such white lacquer is identified as LP3507. The Administrator must be notified at least 10 days prior to the use of any replacement white lacquers.

(D) 3.40 lbs VOM per gallon of fast dry enamel silk screen printing ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to print onto glass candle containers.

(ii) After June 1, 1992, the volume of coating and ink used shall not exceed the following:

(A) 2,164 gallons per month total for all coatings specified in paragraph (u)(7)(i)(A) of this section.

(B) 369 gallons per month total for all coatings specified in paragraph (u)(7)(i)(B) of this section.

(D) 50 gallons per month total for all inks specified in paragraph (u)(7)(i)(D) of this Section.

(iii) Beginning on June 1, 1992, the owner and operator of CCA's plant in Chicago, Illinois, shall keep the following records for each month. All records shall be retained at CCA for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.

(A) The name and identification number of each coating and ink as applied on any glass candle container coating line or silk screening machine.

(B) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating and ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each month on any glass candle container coating line or silk screening machine.

(iv) After June 1, 1992, no more than 100 gallons per month of cleaning solvent is allowed to be used on the glass candle container coating line(s) at CCA. The only cleaning solvents allowed for use are acetone (identified as LP3525) and methyl ethyl ketone (identified as LP3520). Beginning on June 1, 1992, CCA shall keep monthly records of the type and volume of all cleaning solvents used. All such records shall be retained at CCA for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.

(v) After June 1, 1992, no more than 50 gallons per month of cleaning solvent is allowed to be used on the glass candle container silk screening machines at CCA. The only cleaning solvent allowed for use is petroleum naphtha (identified as light aromatic naphtha with 7.28 lbs VOM per gallon, minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM). Beginning on June 1, 1992, CCA shall keep monthly records of the type and volume and the weight of VOM per volume (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) of all cleaning solvents used on the glass candle container silk screening machines. All such records shall be retained at CCA for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.

(8) The control, recordkeeping and reporting requirements in this paragraph apply to the cellulose food casing manufacturing operations at the Viskase Corporation plant in Bedford Park, Illinois (Cook County) instead of the requirements in paragraph (v) of this section, the other parts of paragraph (u) of this section, and the recordkeeping requirements in paragraph (y) of this section. Unless otherwise stated, the following requirements must be met by Viskase on and after November 21, 1995.

(ii) VOM emissions shall not exceed 2.22 tons per day, on a monthly average, during June, July, and August.

(iii) VOM emissions shall not exceed 2.44 tons per day during June, July, and August.

(iv) Compliance with the emission limits in paragraphs (u)(8) (i) through (iii) of this section, and the records in paragraph (u)(8)(v) of this section, shall be determined using an emission factor of “0.72 pounds of VOM emissions per pound of carbon disulfide consumed.”

(A) The pounds of carbon disulfide per charge for its Fibrous process. If charges with different levels of carbon disulfide per charge are used the same day, a separate record must be kept for each level of carbon disulfide per charge.

(B) The pounds of carbon disulfide per charge for its NOJAX process. If charges with different levels of carbon disulfide per charge are used the same day, a separate record must be kept for each level of carbon disulfide per charge.

(D) The number of charges per day, for each level of carbon disulfide per charge, used in Viskase's NOJAX process.

(E) The total quantity of carbon disulfide used per day in Viskase's Fibrous process, the total quantity of carbon disulfide used per day in Viskase's NOJAX process, and the daily VOM emissions resulting from use of the carbon disulfide.

(F) The monthly use of carbon disulfide, and the monthly VOM emissions resulting from use of the carbon disulfide, during June, July, and August.

(vi) Any violation of the emission limits in paragraphs (u)(8) (i) through (iii) of this section must be reported to USEPA within 30 days of its occurrence.

(vii) In order to determine daily and monthly VOM emissions, the test methods in paragraph (a)(4) of this section may be used in addition to, and take precedence over, the emission factor cited in paragraph (u)(8)(iv) of this section. Method 15 is to be used instead of Methods 18, 25, and 25A when the test methods in paragraph (a)(4) of this section are used to determine VOM emissions from Viskase's cellulose food casing facility.

(v) Miscellaneous formulation manufacturing processes —(1) Applicability. (i) The requirements of paragraph (v) of this section shall apply to a plant's miscellaneous formulation manufacturing process emission sources, which are not included within any of the source categories specified in subpart (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452),(S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or specified in paragraph (d), (e), (h), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; if the plant is subject to paragraph (v) of this section. A plant is subject to paragraph (v) of this section if it contains process emission sources, not regulated by subpart (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or by paragraph (d), (e) (excluding paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L)), (h) (excluding paragraph (h)(5)), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; which as a group both:

(A) Have maximum theoretical emissions of 91 Mg (100 tons) or more per calendar year of VOM if no air pollution control equipment were used, and

(ii) If a plant ceases to fulfill the criteria of paragraph (v)(1)(i) of this section, the requirements of paragraph (v) of this section shall continue to apply to a miscellaneous formulation manufacturing process emission source which was ever subject to the control requirements of paragraph (v)(3) of this section.

(iii) No limits under paragraph (v) of this section shall apply to emission sources with emissions of VOM to the atmosphere less than or equal to 2.3 Mg (2.5 tons) per calendar year if the total emissions from such sources not complying with paragraph (v)(3) of this section does not exceed 4.5 Mg (5.0 tons) per calendar year.

(iv) For the purposes of paragraph (v) of this section, an emission source shall be considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph if it is subject to the limits of that subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph. An emission source is not considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph if its emissions are below the applicability cutoff level or if the source is covered by an exemption.

(v) For the purposes of paragraph (v) of this section uncontrolled VOM emissions are the emissions of VOM which would result if no air pollution control equipment were used.

(2) Permit conditions. No person shall violate any condition in a permit when the condition results in exclusion of the plant or an emission source from paragraph (v) of this section.

(3) Control requirements. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to paragraph (v) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (v)(3) (i) or (ii) of this section.

(i) Emission capture and control techniques which achieve an overall reduction in uncontrolled VOM emissions of at least 81 percent, or

(ii) An alternative control plan which has been approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.

(4) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to the control requirements of paragraph (v) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (v) of this section on and after July 1, 1991.

(5) Testing. Any owner or operator of a VOM emission source which is subject to paragraph (v) of this section shall demonstrate compliance with paragraph (v)(3) of this section by using the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.

(6) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the 7 blenders and 3 moguls of the adhesive coating solution formulation (compounding) operations at the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Corporation's (3M) Bedford Park facility in Cook County, Illinois, instead of the control requirements in paragraph (v)(3) of this section.

(i) After September 1, 1991, the following operating restrictions shall apply to 3M's Bedford Park, Illinois, compounding operations.

(A) The combined operating hours for all blenders shall not exceed 8,400 hours per quarter (rolled on a monthly basis). The combined quarterly operating hours of all blenders are to be calculated as follows:

( 1 ) By the 15th of each month, compute the combined monthly operating hours of all blenders during the previous month.

( 2 ) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly operating hours of all blenders for the 3 previous months (to obtain the combined quarterly operating hours of all blenders).

(B) The combined operating hours for all moguls shall not exceed 4,200 hours per quarter (rolled on a monthly basis). The quarterly operating hours of all moguls are to be calculated as follows:

( 1 ) By the 15th of each month, compute the combined monthly operating hours of all moguls during the previous month.

( 2 ) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly operating hours of all moguls for the 3 previous months (to obtain the combined quarterly operating hours of all moguls).

(ii) Beginning on September 1, 1991, the owner and operator of the 3M Bedford Park Plant in Bedford Park, Illinois, shall keep the following records. These records shall be compiled on a monthly basis, be retained at the 3M facility for a period of 3 years, and be made available to the Administrator upon request.

(A) Separate monthly records for each of the 7 blenders identifying each batch and the length of each batch as well as the total monthly hours of operation for all blenders.

(B) Separate monthly records for each of the 3 moguls identifying each batch and the length of each batch as well as the total monthly hours of operation for all moguls.

(w) Miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing processes —(1) Applicability. (i) The requirements of paragraph (w) of this section shall apply to a plant's miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing process emission sources which are not included within any of the source categories specified in subparts (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or specified in paragraph (d), (e), (h), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; if the plant is subject to paragraph (w) of this section. A plant is subject to paragraph (w) of this section if it contains process emission sources, not regulated by subparts (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or by paragraph (d), (e) (excluding paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L)), (h) (excluding paragraph (h)(5)), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; which as a group both:

(A) Have maximum theoretical emissions of 91 Mg (100 tons) or more per calendar year of VOM if no air pollution control equipment were used, and

(ii) If a plant ceases to fulfill the criteria of paragraph (w)(1)(i) of this section, the requirements of paragraph (w) of this section shall continue to apply to a miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing process emission source which was ever subject to the control requirements of paragraph (w)(3) of this section.

(iii) No limits under paragraph (w) of this section shall apply to emission sources with emissions of VOM to the atmosphere less than or equal to 0.91 Mg (1.0 ton) per calendar year if the total emissions from such sources not complying with paragraph (w)(3) of this section does not exceed 4.5 Mg (5.0 tons) per calendar year.

(iv) For the purposes of paragraph (w) of this section, an emission source shall be considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph if it is subject to the limits of that subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph. An emission source is not considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph if its emissions are below the applicability cutoff level or if the source is covered by an exemption.

(v) For the purposes of paragraph (w) of this section, uncontrolled VOM emissions are the emissions of VOM which would result if no air pollution control equipment were used.

(2) Permit conditions. No person shall violate any condition in a permit when the condition results in exclusions of the plant or an emission source from paragraph (w) of this section.

(3) Control requirements. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to paragraph (w) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (w)(3)(i) or (ii) of this section.

(i) Emission capture and control techniques which achieve an overall reduction in uncontrolled VOM emissions of at least 81 percent, or

(ii) An alternative control plan which has been approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.

(4) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to the control requirements of paragraph (w) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (w) of this section on and after July 1, 1991.

(5) Testing. Any owner or operator of a VOM emission source which is subject to paragraph (w) shall demonstrate compliance with paragraph (w)(3) of this section by using the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.

(x) Other emission sources —(1) Applicability. (i) The requirements of paragraph (x) of this section shall apply to a plant's VOM emission sources, which are not included within any of the source categories specified in subpart (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or specified in paragraph (d), (e), (h), (i), (j), (q)(1), (s), (u), (v) or (w) of this section; if the plant is subject to paragraph (x) of this section. A plant is subject to paragraph (x) of this section if it contains process emission sources, not regulated by subpart (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or by paragraph (d), (e) of this section (excluding paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L)), (h) (excluding paragraph (h)(5)), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; which as a group both:

(A) Have maximum theoretical emissions of 91 Mg (100 tons) or more per calendar year of VOM if no air pollution control equipment were used, and

(ii) If a plant ceases to fulfill the criteria of paragraph (x)(1)(i) of this section, the requirements of paragraph (x) of this section shall continue to apply to an emission source which was ever subject to the control requirements of paragraph (x)(3) of this section.

(iii) No limits under paragraph (x) of this section shall apply to emission sources with emissions of VOM to the atmosphere less than or equal to 2.3 Mg (2.5 tons) per calendar year if the total emissions from such sources not complying with paragraph (x)(3) of this section does not exceed 4.5 Mg (5.0 tons) per calendar year.

(iv) For the purposes of paragraph (x) of this section, an emission source shall be considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph if it is subject to the limits of that subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph. An emission source is not considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph of its emissions are below the applicability cutoff level or if the source is covered by an exemption.

(v) The control requirements in paragraphs (u), (v), (w), and (x) of this section shall not apply to sewage treatment plants, vegetable oil processing plants, coke ovens (including by-product recovery plants), fuel combustion sources, bakeries, barge loading facilities, jet engine test cells, pharmaceutical manufacturing, production of polystyrene foam insulation board (including storage and extrusion of scrap where blowing agent is added to the polystyrene resin at the plant), production of polystyrene foam packaging ( not including storage and extrusion of scrap where blowing agent is added to the polystyrene resin at the plant), and iron and steel production.

(2) Permit conditions. No person shall violate any condition in a permit when the condition results in exclusion of the plant or an emission source from paragraph (x) of this section.

(3) Control requirements. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to paragraph (x) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (x)(3) (i), (ii) or (iii) of this section.

(i) Emission capture and control equipment which achieve an overall reduction in uncontrolled VOM emissions of at least 81 percent, or

(ii) For coating lines, the daily-weighted average VOM content shall not exceed 0.42 kg VOM/l (3.5 lbs VOM/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied during any day. Owners and operators complying with this paragraph are not required to comply with section 215.301 of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or

(iii) An alternative control plan which has been approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.

(4) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of an emissions source which is subject to paragraph (x) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (x) of this section on and after July 1, 1991.

(5) Testing. Any owner or operator of a VOM emission source which is subject to paragraph (x) of this section shall demonstrate compliance with paragraph (x)(3) of this section by using the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.

(6) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the varnish operations at the General Motors Corporation, Electro-Motive Division Plant (GMC Electro-Motive), LaGrange, Illinois, instead of the control requirements in paragraph (x)(3) of this section.

(i) After July 1, 1991, no coatings shall at any time be applied which exceed the following emission limitations for the specified coating.

(A) 8.0 lbs VOM per gallon of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied at each coating applicator to coat Nomex rings. Such coating consists of Monsanto Skybond 705 Polyamide Resin (EMD P/N 9088817) and diluents. The Administrator must be notified at least 10 days prior to the use of any replacement coating(s) and/or diluents for coating Nomex rings.

(B) 6.8 lbs VOM per gallon of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied at each coating applicator for any coatings not specified in paragraph (x)(6)(i)(A) of this section.

(ii) After July 1, 1991, the volume of coatings used shall not exceed the following:

(A) 600 gallons per year total for all coatings specified in paragraph (x)(6)(i)(A) of this section. The yearly volume of coatings used are to be calculated as follows:

(1) Compute the volume of specified coating used each month by the 15th of the following month.

(2) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly coating use for the 12 previous months (to obtain the yearly volume of coatings used).

(B) 28,500 gallons per year total for all coatings other than those specified in paragraph (x)(6)(i)(A) of this section. The yearly volume of coatings used are to be calculated as specified in paragraphs (x)(6)(ii)(A)(1) and (x)(6)(ii)(A)(2) of this section.

(iii) Beginning on July 1, 1991, the owner and operator of the General Motors Corporation Electro-Motive Division Plant in LaGrange, Illinois shall keep the following records for each month. All records shall be retained at General Motors for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.

(A) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on any coating line within the varnish operation.

(7) The control, recordkeeping, and monitoring requirements in this paragraph apply to the aluminum rolling mills at the Reynolds Metals Company's McCook Sheet & Plate Plant in McCook, Illinois (Cook County) instead of the control requirements and test methods in the other parts of paragraph (x), and the recordkeeping requirements in paragraph (y) of this section. All of the following requirements must be met by Reynolds on and after July 7, 1995.

(i) Only organic lubricants with initial and final boiling points between 460 degrees F and 635 degrees F, as determined by a distillation range test using ASTM method D86–90, are allowed to be used at Reynolds' aluminum sheet cold rolling mills numbers 1 and 7. All incoming shipments of organic lubricant for the number 1 and 7 mills must be sampled and each sample must undergo a distillation range test to determine the initial and final boiling points using ASTM method D86–90. A grab rolling lubricant sample shall be taken from each operating mill on a monthly basis and each sample must undergo a distillation range test, to determine the initial and final boiling points, using ASTM method D86–90.

(ii) An oil/water emulsion, with no more than 15 percent by weight of petroleum-based oil and additives, shall be the only lubricant used at Reynolds' aluminum sheet and plate hot rolling mills, 120 inch, 96 inch, 80 inch, and 145 inch mills. A grab rolling lubricant sample shall be taken from each operating mill on a monthly basis and each sample shall be tested for the percent by weight of petroleum-based oil and additives by ASTM Method D95–83.

(iii) The temperature of the inlet supply of rolling lubricant for aluminum sheet cold rolling mills numbers 1 and 7 shall not exceed 150°F, as measured at or after (but prior to the lubricant nozzles) the inlet sump. The temperature of the inlet supply of rolling lubricant for the aluminum sheet and plate hot rolling mills, 120 inch, 96 inch, 80 inch, and 145 inch mills shall not exceed 200°F, as measured at or after (but prior to the lubricant nozzles) the inlet sump. Coolant temperatures shall be monitored at all the rolling mills by use of thermocouple probes and chart recorders or electronic data recorders.

(iv) All distillation test results for cold mill lubricants, all percent oil test results for hot mill lubricants, all coolant temperature recording charts and/or temperature data obtained from electronic data recorders, and all oil/water emulsion formulation records, shall be kept on file, and be available for inspection by USEPA, for three years.

(8) The control and recordkeeping requirements in this paragraph apply to the silk screen presses and associated ovens, cleaning operations and laminators at Parisian's Novelty Company (Parisian), Chicago, Illinois, facility, instead of the control requirements in paragraphs (x)(8) (u)(3) and (x)(3) of this section and the recordkeeping requirements in paragraph (x)(8)(y) of this section.

(i) After March 1, 1993, no coatings or inks shall at any time be applied, at any coating or ink applicator, which exceed the following emission limitations for the specified coating or ink.

(A) 6.65 pounds (lbs) volatile organic material (VOM) per gallon of ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied on Parisian's silk screen presses.

(B) 6.4 lbs VOM per gallon of adhesive coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied on Parisian's laminators. Such adhesive is identified as MIX #963.

(ii) After March 1, 1993, the volume of coating and ink used shall not exceed the following:

(A) 2,556 gallons per year total for all inks. The yearly volume of inks used is to be calculated as follows:

( 1 ) Compute the volume of ink used each month by the 15th of the following month.

( 2 ) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly ink usage for the 12 previous months (to obtain the yearly volume of ink used).

(B) 780 gallons per year total for all coatings specified in paragraph (x)(8)(i)(B) of this section. The yearly volume of coatings used are to be calculated as specified in paragraphs (x)(8)(ii)(A)( 1 ) and (x)(8)(ii)(A)( 2 ) of this section.

(iii) Beginning on March 1, 1993, the owner and operator of Parisian's plant in Chicago, Illinois, shall keep the following records for each month. All records shall be retained at Parisian for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.

(A) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on any laminator.

(B) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each month on any laminator.

(C) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each type of ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each month on any screen press.

(iv) After March 1, 1993, no more than 84 gallons per year of denatured alcohol may be used for cleaning labels at Parisian. The yearly volume of denatured alcohol used is to be calculated as specified in paragraphs (x)(8)(ii)(A)( 1 ) and (x)(8)(ii)(A)( 2 ) of this section. Beginning on March 1, 1993, Parisian shall keep monthly records of the type, volume, and VOM content of all solvents used for label cleaning. These records shall be retained at Parisian for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.

(v) After March 1, 1993, no more than 7,932 gallons per year of screen wash #956 may be used on Parisian's screen cleaner. The yearly volume of screen wash #956 used is to be calculated as specified in paragraphs (x)(8)(ii)(A)( 1 ) and (x)(8)(ii)(A)( 2 ) of this section. Beginning on March 1, 1993, Parisian shall keep monthly records of the type, volume, and VOM content of all cleaning compounds used on Parisian's screen cleaner. These records shall be retained at Parisian for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.

(vi) After March 1, 1993, only those cleaners specifically identified in paragraphs (x)(8)(iv) and (x)(8)(v) of this section may be used at Parisian.

(9) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the process sources listed in paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A) of this section at the Nalco Chemical Company facility in Bedford Park, Illinois, instead of the control requirements in paragraph (x)(3) of this section.

(A) On and after October 1, 1992, the maximum volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions per batch, the 12-month rolling average number of batches per year, and the peak limit of batches per month shall not exceed the following limits:

Source	Maximum VOC emissions, lb/batch	12-mo. rolling average limit batch/yr	Peak batch limit, batch/month
( 1 ) System 1 charge	0.16	280	33
System 1 purge	1.35
( 2 ) 24–T–156, 157	2.60	300	33
( 3 ) 28–T–217, 234	0.23	402	45
( 4 ) 28–T–214–216	5.70	603	65
( 5 ) 20–R–182, 185	0.02	72	8
( 6 ) 20–R–130	0.07	340	38
( 7 ) 20–R–155	0.21	254	29
( 8 ) 20–WT–174	0.21	254	29
( 9 ) 12–T–97–99	4.6E–4 lb/hr	8,760 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 10 ) 12–T–95	4.0E–6 lb/hr	8,760 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 11 ) 12–T–96	7.7E–5 lb/hr	8,760 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 12 ) 12–T–67, 73	0.003 lb/hr	8,760 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 13 ) 20–T–121–122	0.85	312	34
( 14 ) 20–T–123–125	5.4	616	68
( 15 ) 20–T–140, 142	8.0	600	65
( 16 ) 20–T–159	0.31	416	46
( 17 ) 20–R–193, 200	9.8	540	59
( 18 ) 32–R–300	0.18	365	41
( 19 ) 32–T–302	0.21	365	41
( 20 ) 32–T–304	0.21	730	81
( 21 ) 32–T–314	0.23	365	41
( 22 ) 32–T–322	0.21	365	41
( 23 ) 32–T–328	0.23	365	41
( 24 ) 10–T–61	0.001	365—containing organic	31—containing organic
( 25 ) 24–T–441, 166	0.12	730	81
( 26 ) 25–T–284, 440, 443–444	0.28	730	81
( 27 ) 25–T–170	4E–6	104	12
( 28 ) Tank truck loading	0.12 lb/truck	1,600 trucks/yr	134 trucks/mo
( 29 ) System 2	0.36	280	33
( 30 ) System 4	2.88	280	33
( 31 ) 25–R–164	0.10	365	41
( 32 ) 25–R–205	0.14	365	41
( 33 ) Drum station	3.51	1,005	110
( 34 ) V–4SAC	1.56	254	29
( 35 ) 20–CT–155	13.90	254	29
( 36 ) 12–SE–100	1.10 lb/hr	8,760 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 37 ) Drum exhaust hood A	1.00	365—involving use of organic material	31—involving use of organic material
( 38 ) 24–T–230	0.98	730	81
( 39 ) 8–CT–1	0.002 lb/hr	8,760 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 40 ) 9–CT–1	0.002 lb/hr	8,760 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 41 ) 10–CT–1	0.005 lb/hr	8,760 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 42 ) 22–CT–1	0.003 lb/hr	8,760 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 43 ) 25–CT–1	0.005 lb/hr	8,760 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 44 ) 25–CT–2	0.002 lb/hr	8,760 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 45 ) 29–CT–1	0.002 lb/hr	8,760 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 46 ) 32–CT–1	0.005 lb/hr	8,760 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 47 ) 36–CT–1	0.002 lb/hr	8,760 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 48 ) 32–T–325	0^a	365	41
( 49 ) 26–R–195	0.1^a	365	41
( 50 ) Continuous polymer-blending	0.1 lb/hr^a	2,000 hr/yr
( 51 ) Portafeed washer booth 1	0.84 lb/hr^b	4,160 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 52 ) Portafeed washer booth 2	0.84 lb/hr^b	8,736 hr/yr	744 hr/mo
( 53 ) 32–T–392	4.4E–7	104	12

^aAssumed value.

^bBased on monitoring data.

(B) The following equation shall be used to calculate maximum VOC emissions per batch for the process sources listed in paragraphs (x)(9)(i)(A)( 1 ) (charge only and ( 2 ) through ( 28 ) and ( 53 ) of this section:

(C) The following equation shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per batch from the process sources listed in paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A)( 1 ) of this section (purge only) and ( 29 ) through ( 32 ) of this section:

(D) The following equation shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per batch from the drum station listed at paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A)( 33 ) of this section:

(E) The following equation shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per batch from the V–4SAC listed at paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A)( 34 ) of this section:

(F) The following equation shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per batch from 20–CT–155 listed at paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A)( 35 ) of this section:

(G) The following equation shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per hour from 12–SE–100 listed at paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A)( 36 ) of this section:

Evap = Evaporation rate from a surface 8.93 cm × 8.9 cm (lb/[cm² ] [sec]) calculated using the following equation:

P_d= Partial pressure of the component in the incident air stream, assumed to be 0 mmhg; and

(H) The following equation shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per batch from the drum exhaust hood A listed at paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A)( 37 ) of this section:

(I) The following equation shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per batch from 24–T–230 listed at paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A)( 38 ) of this section:

(J) The following equations shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per batch from the process sources listed in paragraph (x)(9)(i) ( 39 ) through ( 47 ) of this section:

(K) The number of batches for each process source shall be calculated as follows:

( 1 ) Compute the monthly number of batches for each process source by the 15th day of the following month.

( 2 ) By the 15th day of each month, add the monthly number of batches for each process source for the 12 previous months to obtain the total number of batches per year.

(ii) Recordingkeeping. (A) On and after October 1, 1992, the owner and operator of the Nalco Chemical Company facility in Bedford Park, Illinois, shall keep the following records for all process sources listed in paragraphs (x)(9)(i)(A) ( 1 ) through ( 53 ) of this section. These records shall be maintained for the units specified in paragraphs (x)(9)(i) (A) through (K) of this section, be compiled on a monthly basis, be retained at the facility for a period of 3 years, and be made available to the Administrator upon request.

( 1 ) Calculations of the pounds per batch or pounds per hour (as appropriate) for each batch for each process source. This includes the information necessary for each calculation.

( 3 ) The total number of batches per year for the 12 previous months for each process source.

(10) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the storage tanks listed in paragraph (x)(10)(i)(A) of this section at the Nalco Chemical Company facility in Bedford Park, Illinois, instead of the control requirements in paragraph (x)(3) of this section.

(i) Production and Operation Restrictions. (A) On and after October 1, 1992, the product of the molecular weight of vapor in each storage tank (M_v), the true vapor pressure at bulk liquid conditions for each tank (P), and the paint factor (F_p); the storage tank maximum yearly throughput for each tank; and the maximum monthly throughput for each tank shall not exceed the following limits:

Tank No.	M_V× P × F_p, (lb) (mmhg)/lb-mole	Yearly throughput, gal/yr	Monthly throughput, gal/month
( 1 ) 24–T–147	45.4	56,250	4,688
( 2 ) 24–T–150	227	266,450	22,204
( 3 ) 24–T–151	227	266,450	22,204
( 4 ) 24–T–158N	18.9	173,830	14,486
( 5 ) 24–T–158C	18.0	110,190	9,183
( 6 ) 24–T–158S	1.17	52,010	4,334
( 7 ) 24–T–160	226.8	266,450	22,204
( 8 ) 24–T–161	227	182,450	15,204
( 9 ) 24–T–162	473	93,900	7,825
( 10 ) 20–T–101	3.72	90,290	7,525
( 11 ) 20–T–102	1.80	122,900	10,242
( 12 ) 20–T–103	420	23,960	1,997
( 13 ) 20–T–104	180	475,900	39,659
( 14 ) 20–T–105	370	52,360	4,363
( 15 ) 20–T–106	1,210	623,100	51,926
( 16 ) 20–T–107	294	90,040	7,503
( 17 ) 20–T–108	1,360	81,470	6,789
( 18 ) 20–T–109	1,390	167,060	13,922
( 19 ) 20–T–153	180	35,000	2,917
( 20 ) 20–T–131^a
( 21 ) 20–T–132^a
( 22 ) 20–T–133^a
( 23 ) 20–T–134^a
( 24 ) 20–T–135^a
( 25 ) 20–T–136	29.5	307,710	26,580
( 26 ) 20–T–137^a
( 27 ) 20–T–138	29.5	307,710	26,580
( 28 ) 32–T–305	288	785,550	65,462
( 29 ) 32–T–306	66.5	165,350	13,779
( 30 ) 32–T–307	66.5	294,750	24,563
( 31 ) 32–T–308	66.5	128,470	10,706
( 32 ) 32–T–310	66.5	77,290	6,441
( 33 ) 32–T–311	66.5	182,130	15,177
( 34 ) 32–T–319	50.0	688,950	57,413
( 35 ) 32–T–320	50.0	688,950	57,413
( 36 ) 32–T–326	70.0	248,440	20,703
( 37 ) 32–T–331	70.0	489,540	40,795
( 38 ) 32–T–332	70.0	70,380	5,865
( 39 ) 32–T–333	70.0	270,850	22,571
( 40 ) 32–T–334	70.0	210,610	18,267
( 41 ) 32–T–335	70.0	418,200	34,850
( 42 ) 32–T–336	70.0	632,460	52,706
( 43 ) 32–T–337	798	53,850	4,488
( 44 ) 17–T–206	27,000	300,760	25,063
( 45 ) 17–T–208	27,000	300,760	25,063
( 46 ) 17–T–207	2.48	180,180	15,016
( 47 ) 17–T–209	2.48	180,180	15,016
( 48 ) 24–T–515	331	216,860	18,072
( 49 ) 25–T–282	1.42	1,920,410	160,034
( 50 ) 25–T–283	1.42	1,920,410	160,034
( 51 ) 24–T–442	18.0	90,990	7,583
( 52 ) 17–T–210	47.9	582,990	48,583
( 53 ) 17–T–211	47.9	582,990	48,583
( 54 ) 17–T–212	508	728,420	60,702
( 55 ) 17–T–213	508	728,420	60,702
( 56 ) 17–T–401	50.0	131,970	10,998
( 57 ) 17–T–402	15.0	120,160	10,014
( 58 ) 17–T–403	6.20	127,770	10,648
( 59 ) 17–T–404	26.5	1,601,510	133,460
( 60 ) 17–T–405	50.0	113,830	9,486
( 61 ) 17–T–406	40.0	231,030	19,253
( 62 ) 17–T–407	206	135,180	11,265
( 63 ) 17–T–409	395	327,410	27,285
( 64 ) 17–T–410	395	129,290	10,774
( 65 ) 17–T–411	50.0	213,870	17,843
( 66 ) 17–T–412	50.0	277,840	23,153
( 67 ) 17–T–414	50.0	72,920	6,077
( 68 ) 17–T–415	50.0	56,140	4,678
( 69 ) 17–T–416	395	393,550	32,796
( 70 ) 17–T–417	23.4	233,780	19,482
( 71 ) 17–T–418	115	873,270	72,773
( 72 ) 17–T–419	119	278,460	23,205
( 73 ) 17–T–420	112	730,780	60,898
( 74 ) 17–T–421	25.2	300,010	25,001
( 75 ) 17–T–422	115	873,270	72,773
( 76 ) 17–T–423	23.4	215,060	17,922
( 77 ) 17–T–424	23.4	209,610	17,468
( 78 ) 26–T–218	50.0	64,890	5,408
( 79 ) 26–T–219	1.50	197,900	16,492
( 80 ) 26–T–220	2,460	160,020	13,336
( 81 ) 26–T–221	50.0	74,820	6,235
( 82 ) 26–T–222	80.0	66,590	5,550
( 83 ) 26–T–224	4.80	225,290	18,774
( 84 ) 26–T–225	50.0	36,610	3,051
( 85 ) 26–T–226	294	47,390	3,949
( 86 ) 26–T–227	50.0	63,040	5,253
( 87 ) 26–T–228	500	136,150	11,346
( 88 ) 26–T–229	50.0	112,970	9,414
( 89 ) 26–T–231	23.4	319,610	26,634
( 90 ) 26–T–232	117	564,280	47,024
( 91 ) 26–T–233	23.4	539,700	44,975
( 92 ) 27–T–245	21.6	361,970	30,165
( 93 ) 27–T–246	348	141,820	11,818
( 94 ) 27–T–247	23.4	71,670	5,972
( 95 ) 27–T–248	198	96,010	8,001
( 96 ) 27–T–249	927	51,240	4,270
( 97 ) 27–T–250	110	433,030	36,086
( 98 ) 27–T–251	396	45,440	3,787
( 99 ) 27–T–252	21.6	171,370	14,281
( 100 ) 27–T–253	348	237,900	19,825
( 101 ) 26–T–192	10.0	117,950	9,829
( 102 ) 27–T–278	0.62	74,910	6,243
( 103 ) 27–T–279	0.18	583,760	48,647
( 104 ) 27–T–285	21.6	459,530	38,294
( 105 ) 27–T–286	21.6	459,530	38,294
( 106 ) 25–T–201	19.8	143,550	11,963
( 107 ) 32–T–388	0.07	499,340	41,612
( 108 ) 32–T–389	0.07	499,340	41,612
( 109 ) 32–T–390	288	808,310	583,340
( 110 ) 32–T–391	1.42	800,00	583,340

^aTank not in use.

( 1 ) Compute the monthly throughput for each tank by the 15th day of the following month.

( 2 ) By the 15th day of each month, add the monthly throughputs for the 12 previous months to obtain the yearly throughput.

(ii) Recordkeeping. (A) On and after October 1, 1992, the owner and operator of the Nalco Chemical Company facility in Bedford Park, Illinois, shall keep the following records for all storage tanks. These records shall be compiled on a monthly basis, be retained at the facility for a period of 3 years, and be made available to the Administrator upon request.

( 1 ) The molecular weight of vapor in each storage tank (M_v), the true vapor pressure at bulk liquid conditions for each tank (P), the paint factor (F_p), and their product. F_pshall be determined from Table 4.3–1 of “Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources,” AP–42, September 1985.

(iii) Test Methods. (A) The true vapor pressure at bulk liquid temperature shall be determined by using the procedures specified in paragraph (a)(8) of this section.

(B) The molecular weight of vapor in the storage tank shall be determined by using Table 4.3–2 “Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources,” AP–42, September 1985, or by analysis of vapor samples. Where mixtures of organic liquids are stored in a tank, M_vshall be estimated from the liquid composition using the following equation:

(11) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the fugitive emission sources listed in paragraph (x)(11)(i)(A) of this section at the Nalco Chemical Company facility in Bedfore Park, Illinois, instead of the control requirements in paragraph (x)(3) of this section.

(A) On and after October 1, 1992, all components (e.g., pumps, valves, flanges, pressure relief valves (PRV's), and open end lines) at the specified locations (e.g., Building 32—Tube Reactor System, etc.), and in the specified type of service (e.g., heavy liquid stratified, light liquid stratified, etc.) shall be limited by the maximum monthly hours in the following table:

(A) On and after October 1, 1992, the owner and operator of the Nalco Chemical Company facility in Bedford Park, Illinois, shall keep the following records for all fugitive emission sources. These records shall be compiled on a monthly basis, be retained at the facility for a period of 3 years, and be made available to the Administrator upon request.

( 1 ) The total number of hours of organic service for each component at each location specified in paragraphs (x)(11)(i)(A) ( 1 ) through ( 10 ) of this section.

( 2 ) The vapor pressure of each organic compound in each component at each location specified in paragraphs (x)(11)(i)(A) ( 1 ) through ( 10 ) of this section.

(12) The control and recordkeeping and reporting requirements, as well as the test methods in this paragraph, apply to the gravure and screen press operations at the Meyercord Corporation (Meyercord) in Carol Stream, Illinois, instead of the requirements in paragraphs (x)(1) through (x)(5) of this section.

(i) After July 1, 1991, no materials which contain volatile organic material (VOM), including coatings, inks, and cleaning material, may be used at any gravure or screen press unless the total VOM emissions remain below 100 tons of VOM for every consecutive 365-day period, or fraction thereof, starting on July 1, 1991. A new 365-day period starts on each day. The VOM emissions, which are to be calculated on a daily basis, are to be added to the VOM emissions for the prior 364 days (but not including any day prior to July 1, 1991). VOM emissions are based upon the VOM content of the material and the volume of material used. The effect of add-on control equipment is not considered in calculating VOM emissions; that is, the VOM emissions are to be determined as if the press(es) do(es) not have add-on control equipment. The applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section are to be used in determining daily VOM emissions.

(ii) The VOM content of each coating, ink, and cleaning solution shall be determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section to establish the records required under paragraph (x)(12)(ii) of this section. Beginning on July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of the subject presses shall collect and record all of the following information each day and maintain the information at the facility for 3 years:

(A) The name and identification number of each coating, ink, and cleaning solution as applied on any press.

(B) The pounds (lbs) of VOM per gallon of each coating, ink, and cleaning solution (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied on any press.

(C) The total gallons of each coating, ink, and cleaning solution (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) used per day.

(D) The total lbs of VOM contained in the volume of each coating, ink, and cleaning solution used per day on any press. The lbs of VOM per day is to be calculated by multiplying the lbs of VOM per gallon (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) times the gallons (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) used per day.

(E) The total lbs of VOM per day from all coatings, inks, and cleaning solutions used on all presses. The total lbs of VOM per day is to be obtained by adding the lbs of VOM per day contained in all coatings, inks, and cleaning solutions.

(F) Within 7 days after each 365-day period, the VOM emissions (as calculated in paragraph (x)(12)(ii)(E)) of this section before add-on control, from the 365-day period, are to be determined.

Starting on July 7, 1992, VOM emissions are to be determined for the 365 days ending 7 days earlier. Each day concludes a new 365-day period. However, no VOM emissions are to be included for any days prior to July 1, 1991. For example, on July 17, 1991, the emissions from July 1, through July 10, 1991, are to be included, whereas on January 7, 1994, the emissions from January 1, 1993, through December 31, 1993, are to be included.

(13) The control and recordkeeping and reporting requirements, as well as the test methods in this paragraph, apply to the sheet fed cold set presses and web heatset presses at the Wallace Computer Services, Inc. (Wallace) printing and binding plant in Hillside, Illinois, instead of the requirements in 40 CFR 52.741(h) and 40 CFR 52.741(x)(1) through 40 CFR 52.741(x)(5).

(i) After July 1, 1991, no inks shall at any time be applied, at the presses indicated below, which exceed the pounds (lbs) volatile organic material (VOM) per gallon of ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) limit established for each press. After July 1, 1991, the yearly volume of ink used at each press, in gallons of ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) per year, shall not exceed the gallons per year limit established below for each press. The yearly volume of ink used per press is to be calculated according to the procedure in paragraph (x)(13)(iii) of this section.

(ii) After July 1, 1991, no materials (other than those inks subject to the limits in paragraph (x)(13)(i)) of this section, shall at any time be applied or used, at the presses indicated below, which exceed the lbs VOM per gallon of material (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) limit established for each press. After July 1, 1991, the yearly volume of material (excluding ink and water) used at each press, in gallons of material (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) per year, shall not exceed the gallons per year limit established for each press. The yearly volume of material (excluding ink and water) used per press is to be calculated according to the procedure in paragraph (x)(13)(iii) of this section.

(A) Compute the volume of ink/material used each month per press by the 15th of the following month.

(B) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly ink/material usage per press for the 12 previous months (to obtain the yearly volume of ink used).

(iv) Beginning on July 1, 1991, the owner and operator of Wallace's plant in Hillside, Illinois, shall keep the following records for each press for each month. All records shall be retained by Wallace for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request:

(A) The name and identification number of each ink, fountain solution, fountain solution additive, cleaning solvent, and other VOM containing material as applied or used.

(B) The weight of VOM per volume of each ink, fountain solution, fountain solution additive, cleaning solvent, and each other VOM containing material (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied or used each month.

(C) The volume of ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each month.

(D) The total volume of miscellaneous VOM containing materials (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM), other than inks, that are used each month.

(v) Any record showing a violation of paragraph (x)(13)(i) or (x)(13)(ii) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days of the violation.

(vi) To determine compliance with paragraphs (x)(13)(i) and (x)(13)(ii) of this section and to establish the records required under paragraph (x)(13)(iv) of this section the VOM content of each ink and miscellaneous VOM containing material shall be determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.

(14) The control and recordkeeping and reporting requirements, as well as the test methods in this paragraph, apply to the power-operated silk screen presses, the hand screen presses, the screen adhesive printing lines, the Andreotti rotogravure press, the Halley Rotogravure press, and the Viking press at the American Decal and Manufacturing Company's plant in Chicago, Illinois, instead of the requirements in paragraphs (h) and (x)(1) through (x)(5) of this section. The emissions from the sources listed above (in paragraph (x)(14) of this section) are to be included in the calculation of “maximum theoretical emissions” for determining applicability for any other sources (for which applicability is based on the quantity of maximum theoretical emissions) at American Decal and Manufacturing Company's Chicago plant not included in paragraph (x)(14) of this section.

(i) After July 24, 1992, no inks, coatings, thinner, clean-up material or other VOC-containing material shall at any time be applied, at the presses/printing lines listed above (in paragraph (x)(14) of this section), which exceed the VOC content (in percent by weight VOC) limit established below. After July 24, 1992, the yearly usage (in weight of material applied) of ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material, shall not exceed the applicable pounds per year limit established below. The yearly weight of ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material is to be calculated according to the procedure in paragraph (x)(14)(ii) of this section.

(A) Compute the weight of each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material used each month by the 15th of the following month.

(B) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly usage (in pounds) for each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material for the twelve previous months (to obtain the yearly weight of each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material used). A comparison of these yearly usage levels (in pounds) with purchase records must be made to ensure the accuracy of the monthly usage levels (in pounds) obtained to satisfy paragraph (x)(14)(ii)(A) of this section.

(iii) Beginning on August 1, 1992, the owner and operator of the American Decal and Manufacturing Company plant in Chicago, Illinois, shall keep the following records for each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material for each month. All records shall be kept by the American Decal and Manufacturing Company for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request:

(A) The name and identification number of each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material as applied or used.

(B) The weight percent VOC of each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and each other VOC-containing material as applied or used each month.

(C) The as applied weight of each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material used each month.

(iv) Any record showing a violation of paragraph (x)(14)(i) of this section after October 20, 1995 shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days of the violation.

(v) To determine compliance with paragraph (x)(14)(i) of this section and to establish the records required under paragraph (x)(14)(iii) of this section, the weight percent VOC of each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material shall be determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section. Any material reported to be 100 percent VOC does not have to be tested for weight percent VOC.

(y) Recordkeeping and reporting for non-CTG sources —(1) Exempt emission sources. Upon request by the Administrator, the owner or operator of an emission source which is exempt from the requirements of paragraphs (u), (v), (w), (x), or (e)(3)(ii) of this section shall submit records to the Administrator within 30 calendar days from the date of the request that document that the emission source is exempt from those requirements.

(2) Subject emission sources. (i) Any owner or operator of a VOM emission source which is subject to the requirements of paragraph (u), (v), (w) or (x) of this section and complying by the use of emission capture and control equipment shall comply with the following:

(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new emission source, the owner or operator of the subject VOM emission source shall perform all tests and submit to the Administrator the results of all tests and calculations necessary to demonstrate that the subject emission source will be in compliance on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date.

(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a subject VOM emission source shall collect and record all of the following information each day and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:

( 2 ) A log of operating time for the capture system, control device, monitoring equipment and the associated emission source.

( 3 ) A maintenance log for the capture system, control device and monitoring equipment detailing all routine and non-routine maintenance performed including dates and duration of any outages.

(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject VOM emission source shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:

( 1 ) Any record showing a violation of the requirements of paragraphs (u), (v), (w), or (x) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.

( 2 ) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraphs (u) or (x) of this section from the use of capture systems and control devices to the use of complying coatings, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (y)(2)(ii)(A) of this section. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraphs (u) or (x) of this section from the use of capture systems and control devices to the use of complying coatings, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (y)(2)(ii) of this section.

(ii) Any owner or operator of a coating line which is subject to the requirements of paragraphs (u) or (x) of this section and complying by means of the daily-weighted average VOM content limitation shall comply with the following:

(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a coating line subject to paragraph (u) or (x) of this section; the owner or operator of the subject coating line shall certify to the Administrator that the coating line will be in compliance on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date. Such certification shall include:

( 1 ) The name and identification number of each coating line which will comply by means of the daily-weighted average VOM content limitation.

( 2 ) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line.

( 3 ) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line.

( 4 ) The instrument or method by which the owner or operator will accurately measure or calculate the volume of each coating as applied each day on each coating line.

( 5 ) The method by which the owner or operator will create and maintain records each day as required in paragraph (y)(2)(ii)(B) of this section.

( 6 ) An example of the format in which the records required in paragraph (y)(2)(ii)(B) of this section will be kept.

(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a subject coating line shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each coating line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:

( 1 ) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line.

( 2 ) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line.

( 3 ) The daily-weighted average VOM content of all coatings as applied on each coating line as defined in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.

(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject coating line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:

( 1 ) Any record showing violation of the requirements of paragraph (u) or (x) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.

( 2 ) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (u) or (x) of this section from the use of complying coatings to the use capture systems and control devices, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (y)(2)(i)(A) of this section. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraphs (u) or (x) of this section from the use of complying coatings to the use capture systems and control devices, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (y)(2)(i) of this section.

(iii) Any owner or operator of a VOM emission source which is subject to the requirements of paragraphs (u), (v), (w) or (x) of this section and complying by means of an alternative control plan which has been approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision shall comply with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in the altenative control plan.

(z) Rules stayed. Not withstanding any other provision of this subpart, the effectiveness of the following rules is stayed as indicated below.

(2) Compliance with all of 40 CFR 52.741 is stayed for 60 days (July 1, 1991, until August 30, 1991) as it pertains to the following parties: The Illinois Environmental Regulatory Group including its approximately 40 member firms; Allsteel, Incorporated; Riverside Laboratories, Incorporated; the Printing Industry of Illinois/Indiana Association including its member firms, and R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company; the rules applicable to General Motors Corporation; Reynolds Metals Company; Stepan Company; and Duo-Fast Corporation. Final compliance for these parties is extended 60 days from July 1, 1991 until August 30, 1991.

(3) The following rules are stayed from July 23, 1991, until USEPA completes its reconsideration as indicated:

(i) 40 CFR 52.741(e) only as it applies to Duo-Fast Corporation's Franklin Park, Illinois “power-driven metal fastener” manufacturing facility, and

(ii) 40 CFR 52.741 (w) and (y) only as it applies to Stepan Company's miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing processes at its manufacturing facility located near Millsdale, Illinois.

When USEPA concludes its reconsideration, it will publish its decision and any actions required to effectuate that decision in theFederal Register.

Appendix A to §52.741—List of Chemicals Defining Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing

OCPDB No.¹	Chemical
20	Acetal.
30	Acetaldehyde.
40	Acetaldol.
50	Acetamide.
65	Acetanilide.
70	Acetic acid.
80	Acetic anhydride.
90	Acetone.
100	Acetone cyanohydrin.
110	Acetonitrile.
120	Acetophenone.
125	Acetyl chloride.
130	Acetylene.
140	Acrolein.
150	Acrylamide.
160	Acrylic acid & esters.
170	Acrylonitrile.
180	Adipic acid.
185	Adiponitrile.
190	Alkyl naphthalenes.
200	Allyl alcohol.
210	Allyl chloride.
220	Aminobenzoic acid.
230	Aminoethylethanolamine.
235	p-aminophenol.
240	Amyl acetates.
250	Amyl alcohols.
260	Amyl amine.
270	Amyl chloride.
280	Amyl mercaptans.
290	Amyl phenol.
300	Aniline.
310	Aniline hydrochloride.
320	Anisidine.
330	Anisole.
340	Anthranilic acid.
350	Anthraquinone.
360	Benzaldehyde.
370	Benzamide.
380	Benzene.
390	Benzenedisulfonic acid.
400	Benzene-sulfonic acid.
410	Benzil.
420	Benzilic acid.
430	Benzoic acid.
440	Benzoin.
450	Bennzonitrile.
460	Benzophenone.
480	Benzotrichloride.
490	Benzoyl chloride.
500	Benzyl chalcohol.
510	Benzyl amine.
520	Benzyl benzoate.
530	Benzyl chloride.
540	Benzyl dichloride.
550	Biphenyl.
560	Bisphenol A.
570	Bromobenzene.
580	Bromonaphthalene.
590	Butadiene.
592	1-butene.
600	n-butyl acetate.
630	n-butyl acrylate.
640	n-butyl alcohol.
650	s-butyl alcohol.
660	t-butyl alcohol.
670	n-butylamine.
680	s-butylamine.
690	t-butylamine.
700	p-pert-butyl benzoic acid.
750	n-butyraldehyde.
760	Butyric acid.
770	Butyric anhydride.
780	Butyronitrile.
785	Caprolactam.
790	Carbon disulfide.
800	Carbon tetrabromide.
810	Carbon tetrachloride.
820	Cellulose acetate.
840	Chloroacetic acid.
850	m-chloroaniline.
860	o-chloroaniline.
870	p-chloroaniline.
880	Chlorobenzaldehyde.
890	Chlorobenzene.
900	Chlorobenzoic acid.
905	Chlorobenzotrichloride.
910	Chlorobenzoyl chloride.
920	Chlorodifluoroethane.
921	Chlorodifluoromethane.
930	Chloroform
940	Chloronaphthalene.
950	o-chloronitrobenzene.
951	p-chloronitrobenzene.
960	Chlorophenols.
964	Chloroprene.
965	Chlorosulfonic acid.
970	m-chlorotoluene.
980	o-chlorotoluene.
990	p-chlorotoluene.
992	Chlorotrifluoromethane.
1000	m-cresol.
1010	o-cresol.
1020	p-cresol.
1021	Mixed cresols.
1030	Cresylic acid.
1040	Crontonaldehyde.
1050	Crontonic acid.
1060	Cumene.
1070	Cumene hydroperoxide.
1080	Cyanoacetic acid.
1090	Cyanogen chloride.
1100	Cyanuric acid.
1110	Cyanuric chloride.
1120	Cychohexane.
1130	Cyclohexanol.
1140	Cyclohexanone.
1150	Cyclohexene.
1160	Cyclohexylamine.
1170	Cyclooctadiene.
1180	Decanol.
1190	Diacetone alcohol.
1200	Diaminobenzoic acid.
1210	Dichloroaniline.
1215	m-dichlorobenzene.
1216	o-dichlorobenzene.
1220	p-dichlorobenzene.
1221	Dichlorodifluoromethane.
1240	Dichloroethyl ether 1,2-dichloroethane.
1250	Dichlorohydrin
1270	Dichloropropene.
1280	Dicyclohexylamine.
1290	Diethylamine.
1300	Diethylene glycol.
1304	Diethylene glycol diethyl ether.
1305	Diethylene glycol dimethyl ether.
1310	Diethylene glycolmonobutyl ether.
1320	Diethylene glycolmonobutyl ether acetate.
1330	Diethylene glycolmonoethyl ether.
1340	Diethylene glycolmonoethyl ether acetate.
1360	Diethylene glycolmonomethyl ether.
1420	Diethyl sulfate.
1430	Difluoroethane.
1440	Diisobutylene.
1442	Diisodecyl phthalate.
1444	Diisooctyl phthalate.
1450	Diketene.
1460	Dimethylamine.
1470	N,N-dimethylaniline.
1480	N,N-dimethylether.
1490	N,N-dimethylformamide.
1495	Dimethylhydrazine.
1500	Dimethyl sulfate.
1510	Dimethyl sulfide.
1520	Dimethylsulfoxide.
1530	Dimethylterephthalate.
1540	3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid.
1545	Dinitrophenol.
1560	Dioxane.
1570	Dioxolane.
1580	Diphenylamine.
1590	Diphenyl oxide.
1600	Diphenyl thiourea.
1610	Dipropylene glycol.
1620	Dodecene.
1630	Dodecylaniline.
1640	Dodecylphenol.
1650	Epichlorohydrin.
1660	Ethanol.
1661	Ethanolamines.
1670	Ethyl acetate.
1680	Ethyl acetoacetate.
1690	Ethyl acrylate.
1700	Ethylamine.
1710	Ethylbenzene.
1720	Ethyl bromide.
1730	Ethylcellulose.
1740	Ethyl chloride.
1750	Ethyl chloroacetate.
1760	Ethylcyanoacetate.
1770	Ethylene.
1780	Ethylene carbonate.
1790	Ethylene chlorodhydrin.
1800	Ethylenediamine.
1810	Ethylene dibromide.
1830	Ethylene glycol.
1840	Ethylene glycol diacetate.
1870	Ethylene glycol dimethyl ether.
1890	Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether.
1900	Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether acetate.
1910	Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether.
1920	Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether acetate.
1930	Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether.
1940	Ethylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate.
1960	Ethylene glycol monophenyl ether.
1970	Ethylene glycol monopropyl ether.
1980	Ethylene oxide.
1990	Ethyl ether.
2000	2-ethylhexanol.
2010	Ethyl orthoformate.
2020	Ethyl oxalate.
2030	Ethyl sodium oxalacetate.
2040	Formaldehyde.
2050	Formamide.
2060	Formic acid.
2070	Fumaric acid.
2073	Furfural.
2090	Glycerol (Synthetic).
2091	Glycerol dichlorohydrin.
2100	Glycerol triether.
2110	Glycine.
2120	Glyoxal.
2145	Hexachlorobenzene.
2150	Hexachloroethane.
2160	Hexadecyl alcohol.
2165	Hexamethylenediamine.
2170	Hexamethylene glycol.
2180	Hexamethylentetramine.
2190	Hydrogen cyanide.
2200	Hydroquinone.
2210	p-hydroxy-benzoic acid.
2240	Isoamylene.
2250	Isobutanol.
2260	Isobutyl acetate.
2261	Isobutylene.
2270	Isobutyraldehyde.
2280	Isobutyric acid.
2300	Isodecanol.
2320	Isooctyl alcohol.
2321	Isopentane.
2330	Isophorone.
2340	Isophthalic acid.
2350	Isoprene.
2360	Isopropanol.
2370	Isopropyl acetate.
2380	Isopropylamine.
2390	Isopropyl chloride.
2400	Isopropylphenol.
2410	Ketene.
2414	Linear alkylsulfonate.
2417	Linear alkylbenzene.
2420	Maleic acid.
2430	Maleic anhydride.
2440	Malic acid.
2450	Mesityl oxide.
2455	Metanilic acid.
2460	Methacrylic acid.
2490	Methallyl chloride.
2500	Methanol.
2510	Methyl acetate.
2520	Methyl acetoacetate.
2530	Methylamine.
2540	n-methylaniline.
2545	Methyl bromide.
2550	Methyl butynol.
2560	Methyl chloride.
2570	Methyl cyclohexane.
2590	Methyl cyclohexanone.
2620	Methylene chloride.
2630	Methylene dianiline.
2635	Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate.
2640	Methyl ethyl ketone.
2644	Methyl formate.
2650	Methyl isobutyl carbinol.
2660	Methyl isobutyl ketone.
2665	Methyl methacrylate.
2670	Methyl pentynol.
2690	a-methyl styrene.
2700	Morpholine.
2710	a-napthalene sulfonic acid.
2720	B-napthalene sulfonic acid.
2730	a-naphthol.
2740	B-naphthol.
2750	Neopentanoic acid.
2756	o-nitroaniline.
2757	p-nitroaniline.
2760	o-nitroanisole.
2762	p-nitroanisole.
2770	Nitrobenzene.
2780	Nitrobenzoic acid (o, m & p).
2790	Nitroethane.
2791	Nitromethane.
2792	Nitrophenol.
2795	Nitropropane.
2800	Nitrotoluene.
2810	Nonene.
2820	Nonyl phenol.
2830	Octyl phenol.
2840	Paraldehyde.
2850	Pentaerythritol.
2851	n-pentane.
2855	l-pentene.
2860	Perchloroethylene.
2882	Perchloromethylmercaptan.
2890	o-phenetidine.
2900	p-phenetidine.
2910	Phenol.
2920	Phenolsulfonic acids.
2930	Phenyl anthranilic acid.
2940	Phenylenediamine.
2960	Phthalic anhydride.
2970	Phthalimide.
2973	b-picoline.
2976	Piperazine.
3000	Polybutenes.
3010	Polyethylene glycol.
3025	Polypropylene glycol.
3063	Propionaldehyde.
3066	Propionic acid.
3070	n-propyl alcohol.
3075	Propylamine.
3080	Propyl chloride.
3090	Propylene.
3100	Propylene chlorohydrin.
3110	Propylene dichloride.
3111	Propylene glycol.
3120	Propylene oxide.
3130	Pyridine.
3140	Quinone.
3150	Resorcinol.
3160	Resorcylic acid.
3170	Salicylic acid.
3180	Sodium acetate.
3181	Sodium benzoate.
3190	Sodium carboxymethylcellulose.
3191	Sodium chloroacetate.
3200	Sodium formate.
3210	Sodium phenate.
3220	Sorbic acid.
3230	Styrene.
3240	Succinic acid.
3250	Succinitrile.
3251	Sulfanilic acid.
3260	Sulfolane.
3270	Tannic acid.
3280	Terephthalic acid.
3290 & 3291	Tetrachloroethanes.
3300	Tetrachlorophthalic anhydride.
3310	Tetraethyllead.
3320	Tetrahydronaphthalene.
3330	Tetrahydrophthalic anhydride.
3335	Tetramethyllead.
3340	Tetramethylenediamine.
3341	Tetramethylethylenediamine.
3349	Toluene.
3350	Toluene-2,4-diamine.
3354	Toluene-2,4-diisocyanate.
3355	Toluene diisocyanates (mixture).
3360	Toluene sulfonamide.
3370	Toluene sulfonic acids.
3380	Toluene sulfonylchloride.
3381	Toluidines.
3393	Trichlorobenzenes.
3395	1,1,1-trichloroethane.
3400	1,1,2-trichloroethane.
3410	Trichloroethylene.
3411	Trichlorofluoromethane.
3420	1,2,3-trichloropropane.
3430	1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane.
3450	Triethylamine.
3460	Triethylene glycol.
3470	Triethylene glycoldimethyl ether.
3480	Triisobutylene.
3490	Trimethylamine.
3510	Vinyl acetate.
3520	Vinyl chloride.
3530	Vinylidene chloride.
3540	Vinyl toluene.
3541	Xylene (mixed).
3560	o-xylene.
3570	p-xylene.
3580	Xylenol.
3590	Xylidine, 1,3-butylene glycol, Dinitrotoluene, Methyltertbutyl ether, Phosgene, Polyethylene, Polypropylene, Polystyrene, Urea.

¹The OCPDB Numbers are reference indices assigned to the various chemicals in the Organic Chemical Producers Data Base developed by the USEPA.

1.1 Applicability. This procedure is applicable for determining the volatile organic compounds (VOC) content of captured gas streams. It is intended to be used as a segment in the development of liquid/gas or gas/gas protocols for determining VOC capture efficiency (CE) for surface coating and printing operations. The procedure may not be acceptable in certain site-specific situations, e.g., when: (1) Direct fired heaters or other circumstances affect the quantity of VOC at the control device inlet; and (2) particulate organic aerosols are formed in the process and are present in the captured emissions.

[55 FR 26856, June 29, 1990; 55 FR 31981, Aug. 6, 1990; 55 FR 39774, 39775, Sept. 28, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 24723, May 31, 1991; 56 FR 33712, July 23, 1991; 57 FR 3946, Feb. 3, 1992; 57 FR 7550, Mar. 3, 1992; 57 FR 27936, June 23, 1992; 58 FR 31653, June 4, 1993; 58 FR 34908, June 30, 1993; 59 FR 14112, Mar. 25, 1994; 59 FR 46569, Sept. 9, 1994; 60 FR 41, Jan. 3, 1995; 60 FR 13045, Mar. 10, 1995; 60 FR 14900, Mar. 21, 1995; 60 FR 43387, 43393, 43395, Aug. 21, 1995; 61 FR 54559, Oct. 21, 1996]

§ 52.742 Incorporation by reference.

The materials listed below are incorporated by reference in the corresponding sections noted. The incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Office of Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. These materials are incorporated as they exist on the date of approval, and a notice of any change in these materials will be published in theFederal Register.The materials are available from the sources listed below.

(a) The following material is available for purchase from the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103.

(1) ASTM D1475–85, Standard Test Method for Density of Paint, Varnish, Lacquer, and Related Products, for §52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)( 3 )( i ).

(2) ASTM D2369–87, Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of Coatings, for §52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)( 3 )( ii ).

(3) ASTM D3792–86, Standard Test Method for Water Content of Water-Reducible Paints by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph, for §52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)( 3 )( iii ).

(4) ASTM D4017–81(Reapproved 1987), Standard Test Method for Water in Paints and Paint Materials by Karl Fischer Method, for §52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)( 3 )( iv ).

(5) ASTM D4457–85, Standard Test Method for Determination of Dichloromethane and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane in Paints and Coatings by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph, for §52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)( 3 )( v ).

(6) ASTM D2697–86, Standard Test Method for Volume Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings, for §52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)( 3 )( vi ).

(7) ASTM D3980–87, Standard Practice for Interlaboratory Testing of Paint and Related Materials, for §52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)( 3 )( vi ).

(8) ASTM E180–85, Standard Practice for Determining the Precision of ASTM Methods for Analysis and Testing of Industrial Chemicals, for §52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)( 3 )( viii ).

(9) ASTM D2372–85, Standard Method of Separation of Vehicle from Solvent-Reducible Paints, for §52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)( 3 )( ix ).

(10) ASTM D2879–86, Standard Test Method for Vapor Pressure-Temperature Relationship and Initial Decomposition Temperature of Liquids by Isoteniscope, for §52.741(a)(3), (a)(8)(ii), (a)(9)(iii), and (a)(10)(iii).

(11) ASTM D323–82, Standard Test Method for Vapor Pressure of Petroleum Products (Reid Method), for §52.741(a)(3).

(12) ASTM D86–82, Standard Method for Distillation of Petroleum Products, for §52.741(a)(3).

(13) ASTM D3925–81(Reapproved 1985), Standard Practice for Sampling Liquid Paints and Related Pigment Coatings, for §52.741(a)(4)(i)(A)( 1 ).

(14) ASTM E300–86, Standard Practice for Sampling Industrial Chemicals, for §52.741(a)(4)(i)(A)( 2 ).

(b) The Evaporation Loss From External Floating-Roof Tanks, Publication 2517, second edition, February 1980, for §52.741(a)(3) is available for purchase from the American Petroleum Institute, 2101 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.

(c) The Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987, for §52.741(a)(3) is available for purchase from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.

(d) 35 Illinois Administrative Code 215, June 1989, subparts (B), (E) (sections 215.182, 215.183, and 215.184), (K) (sections 215.301 and 215.302), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), and (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 for §52.741 (d)(l)–(d)(3); (e)(3), (e)(4); (h)(2); (i)(1), (i)(2); (j)(1)–(j)(3); (q)(1); (s)(1); (u)(1), (3); (v)(1); (w)(1); and (x)(1), (x)(3) is available from the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation Division, Region V, 230 S. Dearborn, Chicago, IL, 60604.

§ 52.743 Continuous monitoring.

(a) Alternative monitoring requirements established under Section 201.402 of Title 35, IAC must be either: Incorporated into a federally enforceable operating permit or construction permit or submitted to USEPA for approval as a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP). Illinois shall set forth alternative emissions monitoring and reporting requirements to satisfy the intent of 40 CFR part 51, appendix P whenever Illinois exempts any source subject to Section 201.401 from installing continuous emission monitoring systems. Illinois may exempt a source if the source cannot install a continuous emission monitoring system because of physical plant limitations or extreme economic reasons, according to the criteria of Section 201.402.

(b) As codified at 40 CFR 52.737 (USEPA's approval of the Illinois operating permit program for the purpose of issuing federally enforceable construction and operating permits), USEPA reserves the right to deem an operating permit not federally enforceable. Such a determination will be made according to appropriate procedures including operating permit requirements promulgated at 54 FR 27274 (June 28, 1989) and will be based upon either; the permit, permit approval procedures or state or local permit requirements which do not conform with the operating permit program requirements or the requirements of USEPA's underlying regulations. Among other things, underlying requirements include 40 CFR 51.214 and part 51, appendix P and Illinois' approved SIP, 40 CFR part 52. Should USEPA deem an operating or construction permit containing alternative monitoring requirements not federally enforceable, the underlying continuous monitoring requirements at Section 201.401 of the State rule would be the Federal requirements contained in the SIP to which the source would be subject. This interpretation of the impact of an operating permit deemed not federally enforceable by USEPA on a source to which it was issued was acknowledged by the State in a March 3, 1993, letter from Bharat Mathur, Chief, Bureau of Air, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, to Stephen Rothblatt, Chief, Regulation Development Branch, Region 5, USEPA.

§ 52.744 Small business stationary source technical and environmental compliance assistance program.

The Illinois program submitted on November 12, 1992, as a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan satisfies the requirements of section 507 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.

Subpart O—Illinois

§ 52.719 [Reserved]

§ 52.720 Identification of plan.

§ 52.721 Classification of regions.

§ 52.722 Approval status.

§ 52.723 [Reserved]

§ 52.724 Control strategy: Sulfur dioxide.

§ 52.725 Control strategy: Particulates.

§ 52.726 Control strategy: Ozone.

§ 52.727 [Reserved]

§ 52.728 Control strategy: Nitrogen dioxide. [Reserved]

§ 52.729 Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.

§ 52.730 Compliance schedules.

§§ 52.731-52.735 [Reserved]

§ 52.736 Review of new sources and modifications.

§ 52.737 Operating permits.

§ 52.738 Significant deterioration of air quality.

§ 52.739 Permit fees.

§ 52.740 Interstate pollution.

§ 52.741 Control strategy: Ozone control measures for Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will Counties.

§ 52.742 Incorporation by reference.

§ 52.743 Continuous monitoring.

§ 52.744 Small business stationary source technical and environmental compliance assistance program.