skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 138964  
Title: Reassessing Dred Scott: The Possibilities of Federal Power in the Antebellum Context
Journal: University of Cincinnati Law Review  Volume:60  Issue:3  Dated:(Winter 1992)  Pages:713-755
Author(s): E T Dean Jr
Publication Date: 1992
Pages: 43
Type: Legislation/policy analysis
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: Historians have generally misunderstood important aspects of the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford and its State court precedessor, Scott v. Emerson; these cases involved the basic issue of whether a Missouri slave taken by his master into an area from which slavery had been excluded by the Missouri Compromise could be declared free.
Abstract: In order to understand the antebellum context of civil rights cases, the arguments forwarded by Scott's counsel and Supreme Court dissenters, and the exact nature and implications of the proslavery doctrine propounded by the Supreme Court majority, it is necessary to place the Dred Scott case in the proper framework of substantive and procedural law by paying particular attention to the legal doctrines of res judicata, Federal rules of decision, and the conflict of laws. Keeping in mind the proper antebellum context, the author shows, however, that the Dred Scott case did not involve the common postwar situation of the Supreme Court being asked to declare a State law unconstitutional due to conflict with a Federal statute (the Missouri Compromise). Rather, in an atmosphere of State sovereignty and equality in which the Federal Government had a limited role, each side in the dispute between North and South labored to develop doctrines in the sphere of the conflict of laws to advance sectional interests, while preserving the concept of State autonomy. 133 footnotes
Main Term(s): Civil Rights Laws
Index Term(s): Black Americans ; Legal doctrines ; US Supreme Court decisions
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=138964

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder