skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 122278  
Title: Corrections: Out of Balance
Journal: Federal Probation  Volume:53  Issue:4  Dated:(December 1989)  Pages:31-35
Author(s): T W White
Sale: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States
Publication Date: 1989
Pages: 5
Type: Issue overviews
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: Beginning in the 1940s and 1950s, corrections began to implement a philosophy of rehabilitation, rather than the historic approach of unsuccessfully combining retribution, deterrence, and rehabilitation; despite two subsequent decades of intensive therapeutic treatment for offenders, the crime rate increased, prisons became overcrowded, and correctional officials began to question their theories' validity.
Abstract: In 1971, the uprising at the Attica State prison in New York resulted in a public outcry for complete prison reform and led to research efforts studying the effectiveness of various rehabilitative programs. Three years later, a landmark study claimed that, with few exceptions, these programs had no appreciable effect on recidivism. These results initiated a debate within the correctional community over the value of rehabilitation and compulsory rehabilitation. A new approach to corrections emerged in which equal emphasis was given to retribution, deterrence, and rehabilitation. The medical model which had supported past programs was rejected: authorities argued that inmates could not be coerced into treatment, and criminality was not an illness. For the first time, the responsibility for rehabilitation was put on the offender to seek out and utilize facility programs. The principles of the free market were applied to rehabilitation; resources and programs would be supplied based on the inmates' demand. Unsuccessful at deterring crime, the free market approach has not punished offenders nor reduced the rate of recidivism. The author argues that society should no longer leave rehabilitation choices in the hands of inmates who are incapable of making responsible life decisions. The failure of society's correctional system stems from its failure to actually provide a balanced approach. The free market approach has eroded the number and variety of rehabilitative programs and removed the incentive to participate by making participation voluntary. The system has placed inordinate emphasis on incapacitation without impacting on offenders' basic attitudes and values. Further, incarceration must be made sufficiently aversive to act as a deterrent to future criminal activity. 5 references.
Main Term(s): Correctional reform ; Offender participatn in rehab goals
Index Term(s): Recidivism ; Deterrence effectiveness ; Incapacitation theory
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=122278

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder