NLM Gateway
A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health
Your Entrance to
Resources from the
National Library of Medicine
    Home      Term Finder      Limits/Settings      Search Details      History      My Locker        About      Help      FAQ    
Skip Navigation Side Barintended for web crawlers only

Resistance testing in HIV-1 infected patients treated with indinavir/ritonavir 800mg/100mg BID after at least one protease inhibitor-based therapy failure.

Boulme R, Wit SD, Necsoi C, Sommereijns B, Schmit JC, Clumeck N; International Conference on AIDS.

Int Conf AIDS. 2002 Jul 7-12; 14: abstract no. TuPeB4472.

Advanced Biological Laboratories, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

BACKGROUND: To investigate the predictive value of resistance testing in patients (p.) who previously failed protease inhibitor (PI) therapy and were treated with a new regimen including indinavir (IDV) 800mg + ritonavir (RTV) 100mg BID. METHODS: We identified p. who had had genotyping (TruGene), viral load (VL) measurement and from whom information on antiretroviral therapy (ART) was available. Resistance data were interpreted using the ViroScorer system (www.ablnetworks.com). Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed according to the Resistance Collaborative Group (RCG) data analysis plan (DAP). Number (n) of PI failures were entered as a covariate and estimated odds-ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. RESULTS: From 11/98 to 11/2000, 96 p. were enrolled. 70% were male, 60% Caucasian, 53% heterosexual and 51% had at least experienced 2 or more lines of PI therapy. VL (4.4 log cp/ml) and DAP genotypic sensitivity score (GSS=2) were comparable in both groups in p. with 1 PI failure (group1, (g1)) or more (group2, (g2)), whereas the median n of drugs previously received (g1 n=5, g2 n=9, p<.0001) and the median n of mutations (g1 n=5, g2 n=9, p<.006) were different. The n of new drugs, PI mutations and previous PI failures (dropouts considered as censored) were significant predictors of outcome (defined as VL<400copies/ml at month 6) in the univariate (OR=.59, CI=.39-.92, p<.02; OR=1.33, CI=1.08-1.63, p<.006; OR=2.84, CI=1.20-6.76, p<.02 respectively) and in the multivariate (OR=.51, CI=.29-.89, p<.02; OR=1.47, CI=1.16-1.86, p<.001; OR=2.64, CI=1.09-6.43, p<.03 respectively) model. In contrast, the GSS was not a significant predictor of response. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the n of PI mutations, new drugs and lines of PI failures were significant independent predictors of outcome but not the interpreted genotype. The data support the use of viral genotype information but in conjunction with ART history.

Publication Types:
  • Meeting Abstracts
Keywords:
  • Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • HIV-1
  • Humans
  • Indinavir
  • Male
  • Protease Inhibitors
  • Ritonavir
  • Viral Load
  • drug therapy
  • therapy
Other ID:
  • GWAIDS0019863
UI: 102258850

From Meeting Abstracts




Contact Us
U.S. National Library of Medicine |  National Institutes of Health |  Health & Human Services
Privacy |  Copyright |  Accessibility |  Freedom of Information Act |  USA.gov