Global climate change not a future
fantasy Studies show it's
here and having a real impact, and lawmakers should
pay close attention.
It's getting harder to brush off warnings about
how climate change can affect the global landscape,
especially when recent reports demonstrate it's
already happening.
The Pew Center on Global Climate Change, for
instance, said this month that climate change has
affected migration patterns of birds and insects,
which, in turn, could impact forestry and
agriculture. The center's report compiles data from
40 scientific studies.
The journal Nature published a report by a
British Antarctic Survey scientist who said
populations of the shrimp-like krill have declined
by about 80 percent, jeopardizing the whales,
penguins and seals that depend on krill for food.
A four-year study conducted by 300 scientists for
the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment said that the
Arctic has lost an area of sea ice that's greater
than Texas and Arizona put together. This could mean
that coastal communities will deal with more storms,
and thawing ground in northern regions will have an
impact on buildings and transportation.
Detractors will argue that climate change is a
natural phenomenon that occurs on a cyclical basis.
Most scientists however, agree that it's happening
more rapidly than ever and that it's related to the
increased production of greenhouse gases.
Though the Bush administration has dedicated
funding to climate change research, it has been
reluctant to join international treaties on reducing
greenhouse gas emissions or to enact tough climate
change legislation at home.
Lawmakers, including Maine's Sens. Olympia Snowe
and Susan Collins, can make a difference, however,
by pushing for laws that reduce the nation's output
of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide. The two
Republican senators have already been working to
counteract climate change and they should continue.
Collins traveled with Sen. John McCain to a
Norwegian island in the Arctic this summer to talk
with scientists working on the Arctic Climate
report. That study says that the strength and
pattern of changes indicate that human influences
such as carbon dioxide and other emissions have "now
become the dominant factor" in climate change.
Though Maine and other states are moving forward
with their own laws to cut emissions, this is an
effort that should be undertaken on a national and
global scale. The implications for the future health
of both the environment and industry are too great.
Targeting emission and fuel-efficiency standards
in automobiles is a great place to start, as well as
making sure
that clean air standards for power plants match
with available emission control technology.
Collins and Snowe can take the lead and get the
administration moving on what's gone from a future
concern to a very current worry.
|