skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 063085  
Title: EMPIRICAL STUDY OF FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW OF STATE COURT JUDGMENTS
Author(s): P H ROBINSON
Corporate Author: US Dept of Justice
Office for Improvements in the Admin of Justice
United States
Sponsoring Agency: US Dept of Justice
Office for Improvements in the Admin of Justice
United States
Sale: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States
Publication Date: 1979
Pages: 92
Type: Studies/research reports
Origin: United States
Language: English
Contract No.: JADAG-79-C-0002
Publication No.: FJRP-79/0005
Annotation: A BRIEF DESCRIPTION AND PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ARE PRESENTED OF THE DATA GENERATED BY A STUDY OF HABEAS CORPUS PETITIONS FILED IN SIX FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS AND ONE COURT OF APPEALS.
Abstract: THE STUDY WAS STIMULATED BY THE LARGE VOLUME OF HABEAS CORPUS PETITIONS FILED IN FEDERAL COURTS AN INCREASE DUE LARGELY TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN BROWN V. ALLEN, WHERE THE COURT HELD THAT FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS ARE EMPOWERED TO REDETERMINE THE MERITS OF CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES ARISING IN THE COURSE OF STATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS). FINDINGS SHOW THAT THE TYPICAL PETITIONER WAS CONVICTED OF A SERIOUS, VIOLENT OFFENSE, PLED NOT GUILTY, IS ATTACKING HIS CONVICTION, IS FILING ONE AND ONE-HALF YEARS AFTER CONVICTION, IS OFFERING MULTIPLE GROUNDS FOR RELIEF, AND IS FILING PRO SE AND IN FORMA PAUPERIS. OF THE PETITIONS, 55 PERCENT WERE NOT CONSIDERED BECAUSE OF PROCEDURAL DEFECTS. ALTHOUGH DATA INDICATE THAT THE PROCESSING OF MOST PETITIONS OCCURS IN LESS TIME THAN A TRADITIONAL LAWSUIT, THE LARGE VOLUME OF COMPLAINTS HAS AN IMPACT ON THE COURTS. FACTORS AFFECTING THE SUCCESS OF PETITIONS (ONLY 3.2 PERCENT RESULTED IN ANY RELIEF) WERE (1) REPRESENTATION BY COUNSEL, WITH COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL BEING MOST EFFECTIVE; (2) THE DECISION PATTERNS OF THE COURT HEARING THE PETITION; (3) MAGISTRATE INVOLVEMENT IN THE SCREENING OF THE PETITION, WHICH HAD A NEGATIVE EFFECT UPON THE PETITIONER'S CHANCE OF SUCCESS; AND (4) THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE PETITION WAS FILED. THE APPENDIXES PROVIDE DESCRIPTIONS OF THE DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES AND THE ADDITIONAL DATA AVAILABLE. TABULAR DATA ARE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE REPORT. (RCB)
Index Term(s): Court statistics ; Habeas corpus ; Studies/ ; Failure factors ; Success factors
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=63085

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder