USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
publications > open file report > OFR-00-327 > results and discussion > sedimentation, core dating and element accumulation rates (EAR)


Regional Geochemistry of Metals in Organic-Rich Sediments, Sawgrass and Surface Water, from Taylor Slough, Florida

Click here for a printable version of this page (note: document will open in a new browser window)

Summary
Introduction
General Regional Information
Investigations and Concerns
Methods
Sample Preparation
Results and Discussion
Acknowledgements and Literature Cited
Figures and Tables

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Tables 6, 7, 8, and 9 list the analytical results for the determination of element concentrations in sediment, sawgrass leaf, sawgrass root, and water samples discussed in this report. Due to convention, many of the analyses for sediment and vegetation have been converted from a measured ash-weight basis to a dry-weight basis.

Sedimentation, Core Dating and Element Accumulation Rates

Parameters used in the calculation of depth-related sediment ages, sediment deposition rates, and element accumulation rates are given in Table 10. The sedimentation rate, as measured in the core material, for most sites ranged from 0.03 - 0.16 cm yr-1 (table 10). The sedimentation rate for core TS1, at the upper-most end of Taylor Slough where canal water was continuously being directed by gates into the Slough, was about 1.5 cm yr-1. Because of the unconsolidated and flocculent nature of the sediment/water interface, it was difficult to accurately sample or preserve intact the 0-2 cm portion of core. Although dating was successful in some instances above 2 cm, dating usually began below this level. With a sedimentation rate of 0.1 cm yr-1, the removal of the top 2 cm of material means a potential loss of about 20 years of sediment record.

As mentioned above, the table 10 data were obtained from a core ("geochronology core") collected adjacent to the core used for geochemical analysis. Because our geochemical samples were collected at 5-cm intervals, and not at the 2-cm interval used for the geochronology cores, the geochemistry dates presented in subsequent discussions are calculated for the 5-cm depth intervals using simple linear regression:

Y = a + b(X);

where Y (age at a specific depth) = (intercept, a) + (slope, b) x (depth in cm, X). For example, using the data below for core 1, the calculation of core age at 12 cm takes the form Y = 1997 + (-1.26(12)), or 1982.

Core
Regression estimates
n (count) R2
Intercept Slope
TS1 1997 -1.26 12 0.99
TS7 2038 -20.9 8 1.00
TS9 1996 -19.5 10 1.00
TS7E 1995 -6.88 9 1.00
TS15 2012 -5.28 9 0.95
TS2 2011 -7.42 9 1.00

The mass of sediment that accumulates per year (gm cm-2 yr-1) is the product of the bulk density of the core sample material (gm cm-3) and the sedimentation rate (cm yr-1). The determination of element mass accumulation rates (EAR, µg m-2yr-1 or g m-2yr-1) is then a simple calculation of element concentration (µg g-1) times the sediment mass accumulation rate (g m-2 yr-1). Tables 11 and 12 give the EAR down-core trends for selected major and minor elements, respectively, for cores TS1, TS7, TS7E, TS9, and TS15. 

Next: Results and Discussion continued - Sediment Geochemistry

Return to Publications Page



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/ofr/00-327/results.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 17 March, 2005 @ 01:48 PM (KP)