U.S. Geological Survey

Geology of the Gulf of Mexico Region (geolcaribg)

Geology of the Gulf of Mexico Region (geolcaribg)

Metadata also available as: html  text

Return to data files page: click here

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

    Title: Geology of the Gulf of Mexico Region (geolcaribg)
    Abstract:
    This dataset includes polygons that describe the geologic age of surface outcrops of bedrock of the Caribbean region within the Gulf of Mexico map extent (Bahamas, Belize, Cuba, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, (named countries may not be completely shown on map)).

  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Christopher D. French and Christopher J. Schenk, U.S. Geological Survey, Central Energy Resources Team, 2005, Geology of the Gulf of Mexico Region (geolcaribg): U.S. Geological Survey, Central Energy Resources Team.

    Online Links:

    This is part of the following larger work.

    Christopher D. French and Christopher J. Schenk, U.S. Geological Survey, Central Energy Resources Team, 2005, Map Showing Geology, Oil and Gas Fields, and Geologic Provinces of the Gulf of Mexico Region: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report OFR-97-470-L, U.S. Geological Survey, Central Energy Resources Team, Denver, Colorado.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details:
    Open File Report 97-470-L is one of a series of continental-scale geologic maps of the world being published on CD-ROM by the U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Project.

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -92.204269
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -76.505275
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 27.261730
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 14.778363

  3. What does it look like?

    http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1997/ofr-97-470/OF97-470L/graphic/web_images/geol_lgthumb.jpg (JPEG)
    Gulf of Mexico Geology

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Calendar_Date: 2005
    Currentness_Reference: publication date

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Digital Maps

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      This is a Vector data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):

      • G-polygon (1931)

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Horizontal positions are specified in geographic coordinates, that is, latitude and longitude. Latitudes are given to the nearest 0.000000. Longitudes are given to the nearest 0.000000. Latitude and longitude values are specified in Decimal degrees.

      The horizontal datum used is D_WGS_1984.
      The ellipsoid used is WGS_1984.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.000000.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257224.

      Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:
      Altitude_System_Definition:

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    Surface_Geology
    Feature Class Attribute Table (Source: None)

    Id
    Feature Identification Number (Source: User Defined)

    Age
    Geologic Age Code (Source: User Defined)

    ValueDefinition
    gGabbro and related rocks
    iIntrusive rocks, undivided, mostly intermediate to silicic
    JJurassic marine and continental strata
    JTrJurassic and Triassic marine and continental strata
    KCretaceous marine strata
    KiCretaceous plutons, mostly intermediate to silicic
    KvCretaceous volcanic rocks
    KvaCretaceous andesitic to silicic volcanic rocks
    lTEocene and (or) Paleocene marine strata
    MzMesozoic sedimentary and volcanic rocks
    MzgMesozoic metavolcanic and associated metasedimentary rocks
    MzmMesozoic metasedimentary and metaigneous rocks, low to intermediate metamorphic grade
    MzPzmMesozoic and Paleozoic metasedimentary and metaigneous rocks
    PzPaleozoic strata
    PziPaleozoic plutons, mostly intermediate to silicic
    PzmPaleozoic and Precambrian metamorphic rocks, undivided
    PzvPaleozoic volcanic rocks
    QQuaternary alluvium
    QTQuaternary and Tertiary marine limestone, sandstone, and shale
    QTcQuaternary and Tertiary continental deposits
    QvQuaternary volcanic edifices, flows, and pyroclastic deposits
    QviQuaternary pumice fills and pyroclastic mantles
    TcTertiary continental strata
    TiTertiary plutons, mostly intermediate to silicic
    TKTertiary and Cretaceous marine strata
    TKcTertiary and Cretaceous continental strata
    TKiTertiary and Cretaceous plutons, mostly intermediate to silicic
    TKvTertiary and Cretaceous volcanic rocks
    TKxTertiary and Cretaceous complex of deformed sedimentary rocks
    TvTertiary volcanic rocks
    uUltramafic rocks
    uKUpper Cretaceous marine strata
    UndUndetermined
    uTPost-Eocene marine strata
    WWater

    Description
    Geologic Age Description (Source: User Defined)

    see Age attributes for descriptions

    Shape_Length
    Length of feature in internal units. (Source: ESRI)

    Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.

    Shape_Area
    Area of feature in internal units squared. (Source: ESRI)

    Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    Scanning of source map, georeferencing, digitizing, attributing, editing and preparation of geodatabase feature class - Christopher D. French. Metadata Creation - Christopher D. French. Project coordination - Christopher J. Schenk.

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    U.S. Geological Survey, Central Energy Resources Team
    c/o Christopher D. French
    GIS Specialist
    U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS 939, Denver Federal Center
    Denver, Colorado 80225
    USA

    303-236-1655 (voice)
    303-236-0459 (FAX)
    chfrench@usgs.gov


Why was the data set created?

To delineate geologic contacts and thematically depict generalized geologic age of outcrops in Open File Report 97-470-L Surface Geology, Oil and Gas Fields, and Geologic Provinces of the Gulf of Mexico, which was compiled as a reference for the U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Project assessment of undiscovered, technically recoverable oil and gas resources of the world. This dataset was used to produce maps in ESRI ArcMap 8.3 and Adobe Acrobat PDF formats. Files were exported from geodatabase feature class to ESRI shapefile and ArcInfo export formats for use in other applications.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

    USGS (source 1 of 4)
    J.E. Case and T.L. Holcombe, 1980, Geologic-Tectonic Map of the Caribbean Region: Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1100, USGS, Reston, VA.

    Online Links:

    • N/A

    Other_Citation_Details:
    Prepared in cooperation with the United States Naval Oceanographic Office and the United States Naval Ocean Research and Development Activity.
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 2500000
    Source_Contribution: Geologic contacts and ages.

    NIMA (source 2 of 4)
    National Imagery and Mapping Agency, 1997, VMAP_1V10-Vector map Level 0 (Digital chart of the World).

    Other_Citation_Details: Can be found on USGS DDS-62-A (POLBNDA.shp)
    Type_of_Source_Media: CD-ROM
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 1,000,000
    Source_Contribution: Used as a guide for georeferencing.

    (source 3 of 4)
    Department of Lands and Surveys, Nassau N P., Bahamas, unknown, Map of Commonwealth of The Bahamas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper map
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 1,000,000
    Source_Contribution: Coastlines for Commonwealth of the Bahamas

    USGS (source 4 of 4)
    P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt, W.J. Bawiec, 1994, Geologic Units of the Conterminous United States at 1:2,500,000 Scale -- A Digital Representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map: USGS Digital Data Series DDS-11, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 2,500,000
    Source_Contribution: Surface Geology for Florida

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: Jun-2002 (process 1 of 6)
    USGS maps were scanned at 300 dpi resolution and RGB color setting.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • USGS

    Date: Jun-2002 (process 2 of 6)
    USGS source maps merged in Adobe Photoshop 6.0.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • USGS

    Date: Jun-2002 (process 3 of 6)
    Scanned source maps were registered using georeferencing tools in ArcGIS 8.3, and NIMA country boundary shapefile as a guide.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • USGS
    • ESRI

    Date: Jun-2002 (process 4 of 6)
    Geologic contacts were digitized on screen as a personal geodatabase feature class using scanned and referenced image as a guide.

    Date: Jan-2003 (process 5 of 6)
    Geodatabase topology used to identify and modify gaps and overlaps in polygon feature class (> 1,000 errors corrected).

    Date: Jan-2003 (process 6 of 6)
    Geodatabase coded domains established to attribute feature class. Codes and descriptions used original source map legend as a guide. Some descriptions abbreviated.

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    Some special geologic age symbols have been modified to use standard character types. Examples of this modification occur in the geologic codes for Triassic, Mesozoic, and Precambrian rock types. No generalization (grouping) was performed on geologic age attributes. Any unidentified polygons on the source map are attributed as "Und" - Undetermined.

    The scanned source maps were used as a reference for attributing.

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    Horizontal positional accuracy was not formally quantified. Some details about the scanning and referencing process along with errors are stated below.

    1) The original source map was provided in two plates at a scale of 1:2,500,000. Each plate was scanned at 300 dpi in RGB color mode. Adobe Photoshop 6.0 was used to merge east and west images together at edges. Some discrepancies were noticed on edge match. Edge mismatch was no greater than 500 m in a few areas, while good matches were found elsewhere. Discrepancies were averaged while digitizing.

    2) A vector dataset originating from the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Digital Chart of the World (DCW) series was available for georeferencing. This dataset is known to have a nominal scale of 1:1,000,000 and was available as a shapefile from the United States Geological Survey, Digital Data Series DDS-62-A Global GIS Database: Digital Atlas of Central and South America.

    3) The ArcMap 8.3 georeferencing tool was used to establish control points and reference merged image. The original maps were provided in Mercator projection with true scale at 19 degrees north latitude. Attempts were made to transform the reference shapefile to the stated projection for georeferencing, but major errors existed along southern edges of map. A geographic coordinate system (WGS_1984) was used with more success. 57 control points were established to perform a 3rd order polynomial transformation. Other transformation methods were attempted along with other control point placement, but resulted in more error. A root mean square (RMS) error of 1611.8 m was recorded.

    4) Discrepancies were anticipated between source map shorelines and country boundaries because of scale difference. Other distortions may have been inherent in the source maps. Overall dimensions of map fit well at desired display scale of 1:2,500,000. Discrepancies in shoreline were random and variable, rarely exceeding 3,500 m.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

    Not Assessed

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    Complete

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    Polygon topology exists. Geodatabase topology rules used to identify and correct gaps and overlaps in the polygon feature class. Geodatabase coded domains used for attributing.

    Most geologic descriptions follow naming conventions found on the original source map. Some descriptions may be abbreviated. Several polygons were of an undetermined age because of printing problems or lack of clarity on original source map. There was no grouping of ages in the attributing process.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints: None

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    USGS Information Services
    Box 25286 Denver Federal Center
    Denver, Colorado 80225
    USA

    1-888-ASK-USGS (voice)
    303.202.4693 (FAX)
    ask@usgs.gov

  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    Downloadable Data

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    This publication was prepared by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.

    Although all data and software published on this CD-ROM are used by the U.S. Geological Survey, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the U.S. Geological Survey as to the accuracy of the data and related materials and (or) the functioning of the software. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by the U.S. Geological Survey in the use of these data, software, or related materials.

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 17-Aug-2005
Last Reviewed: 24-Aug-2005

Metadata author:
U.S. Geological Survey, Central Energy Resources Team
c/o Christopher D. French
GIS Specialist
U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS 939, Denver Federal Center
Denver, Colorado 80225
USA

303-236-1655 (voice)
datamgt@usgs.gov

Contact_Instructions:
For inquiries regarding this document, please include the metadata contact person's name, dataset name, and publication series and number.
Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)


Generated by mp version 2.7.33 on Thu Sep 08 15:06:32 2005