skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 221768  
Title: Findings From an Outcome Examination of Rhode Island's Specialized Domestic Violence Probation Supervision Program: Do Specialized Supervision Programs of Batterers Reduce Reabuse?
Journal: Violence Against Women  Volume:14  Issue:2  Dated:February 2008  Pages:226 to 246
Author(s): Andrew R. Klein ; Ann Crowe
Sponsoring Agency: US Dept of Justice
National Institute of Justice
United States
Agency Summary Url: Agency Summary 
Publisher Url*: http://www.sagepub.com/ 
Publication Date: 02/2008
Pages: 21
Type: Program/project evaluations
Origin: United States
Language: English
Grant No.: 2002-WG-BX-0011
Annotation: This study examined whether specialized probation supervision in combination with treatment was effective in reducing reoffending for a sample of 552 domestic-violence offenders in Rhode Island.
Abstract: The study found that there were high rates of rearrests of the sample for both domestic violence offenses and other offenses. Between 6 months and 2 years after their probationary sentences ended, 58.7 percent of the sample was arrested for a nondomestic-violence criminal offense, and 39.85 percent were arrested for a new domestic-violence offense. Findings show, however, that lower risk abusers, which constituted almost half of the probation caseload of abusers supervised by the special unit, were significantly less likely to be rearrested for domestic violence or other crimes than were lower risk abusers supervised in the traditional mix of caseloads. Victim satisfaction was apparently higher, and abusers were held more accountable for their behavior while on specialized probation. Lower risk domestic-violence offenders were those with no prior probation supervision for domestic violence, those not sentenced concurrently for multiple domestic violence cases, and those not incarcerated as part of their sentence. These findings suggest that risk assessments are critical in the selection of domestic-violence offenders likely to benefit from probation supervision in combination with treatment. The research compared the effectiveness of the specialized supervision program with regular, undifferentiated supervision of male domestic-violence offenders prosecuted for misdemeanors against female intimate partners. The quantitative analysis was based on findings from a nonrandom representative sample of 552 male probationers drawn from the nearly 3,000 misdemeanor domestic-violence probationers in Rhode Island as of January 1, 2003. At sentencing, these offenders were placed in either a regular caseload or a specialized domestic-violence caseload. The probationers were tracked through January 2004 in order to determine differences in rearrests for domestic-violence offenses and other offenses. 1 table, 1 figure, and 32 references
Main Term(s): Victims of violence
Index Term(s): Recidivism ; Domestic assault ; Probation casework ; Offender supervision ; Recidivism causes ; Probation effectiveness ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Rhode Island
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=243652

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder