skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 193786  
Title: Abner Louima Case: Idiosyncratic Personal Crime or Symptomatic Police Brutality? (From Police Misconduct: A Reader for the 21st Century, P 232-242, 2001, Michael J. Palmiotto, ed. -- See NCJ-193774)
Author(s): Richard G. Frey
Sale: Prentice Hall Publishing
Criminal Justice and Police Training
1 Lake Street
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
United States
Publisher Url*: http://www.policetrainingstore.com 
Publication Date: 2001
Pages: 11
Type: Studies/research reports
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This paper describes the events of the Abner Louima case in New York City, in which a police officer was convicted of forcing a wooden rod into Louima's rectum in the bathroom of the precinct station, and it discusses how the case reflects some of the unresolved debates about the police and legal system.
Abstract: Regarding the legal processing of the accused officer Justin Volpe, the author discusses State and Federal jurisdiction over the case, police witnesses for the prosecution, the defense, and Volpe's sentence. In commenting on the case, the author argues that the Louima case suggests that, from a legal perspective, conduct that is shocking to the conscience will be punished and generally not tolerated even within the insular police society; however, in many ways the Louima case is the exception that proves the rule regarding the police code of silence. Louima also claimed to have been roughed up by the police during his transport to the police station, but although police witnesses were found on the issue of Volpe's actions in the station bathroom, none testified about the beatings in the car on the way to the station. Further, no one at the station intervened to stop Volpe's brutalization of Louima in the bathroom, nor did anyone report him. It was clear that Volpe felt he could abuse Louima even in the precinct station without fear of intervention or adverse consequences for himself. Honing the deterrence effect of State and Federal laws, internal investigation units, civilian review board procedures, and political responsibility will not end police brutality as long as society entrusts police with the right to use force to maintain peace and order. 27 references
Main Term(s): Police brutality
Index Term(s): Case studies ; Defense ; Prosecution ; Criminal proceedings ; Police subculture ; Police misconduct ; New York
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=193786

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder