Authors:
Alice S. Carter and Margaret J. Briggs-Gowan
Publisher:
Contact Alice S. Carter at Alice.Carter@umb.edu,
Margaret J. Briggs-Gowan at Margaret.Briggs-Gowan@yale.edu,
or the ITSEA project office at ITSEA@yale.edu.
Initial Material Cost:
Free; if the authors give permission, they will email you
the forms and manual.
Representativeness of Norming Sample:
Not nationally representative. Age and gender stratified random
sample of children born at a Connecticut hospital between
July 1995 and September 1997 and who lived in the New Haven-Meridan
SMSA. The sample excludes children likely to have significant
developmental delays, whose parents lost custody, or who had
poor command of English.
Languages:
English, French, Spanish, Hebrew, and Dutch
|
Type of
Assessment:
Parent (or child care provider) report (self-administration)
or parent assessment (structured interview)
Age Range and Administration Interval:
1 to 4 years of age
Personnel, Training, Administration,
and Scoring Requirements:
The reading level is between 4th and 6th grade. Administration
time is 20 to 30 minutes to complete as a questionnaire, and
35 to 45 minutes as an interview. A professional with training
in standardized assessment is needed to interpret the results.
Summary
Initial Material Cost: 1 (> $100)
Reliability: 3 (majority is .65 or higher)
Validity: 3 (.5 or higher with CBCL)
Norming Sample Characteristics: 2 (normed within the past
15 years, not representative sample)
Ease of Administration and Scoring: 2 (self-administered,
but scored by a trained individual)
|
Description: The Infant Toddler
Social and Emotional Assessment (ITSEA) is designed to detect
social-emotional and behavior problems, and delays in the
acquisition of competencies in children age 12 to 48 months
old. The ITSEA relies on parents and child care providers’
observations of the child in natural environments. It can
be administered as a questionnaire or a structured interview.
The ITSEA measures four behavioral domains: (1) externalizing
using activity/impulsivity, aggression/defiance, and peer
aggression scales; (2) internalizing using depression/withdrawal,
general anxiety, separation distress, and inhibition to novelty
scales; (3) dysreg-ulation using sleep, negative emotionality,
eating, and sensory sensitivity scales; and (4) competencies
using compliance, attention, imitation/play, mastery motivation,
empathy, and prosocial peer relations scales. The ITSEA also
includes three indices—maladaptive, atypical behavior,
and social relatedness—to identify more serious problems.
The indices are comprised of behaviors that have clinical
significance but are not necessarily correlated. Items are
rated on a three point scale: 0 = not true/rarely, 1 = somewhat
true/sometimes, and 2 = very true/ often, with a no opportunity
option if the caregiver did not have the opportunity to observe
the behavior. There is also a short version, the Brief Infant-Toddler
Social and Emotional Assessment, which can be used as an initial
screen for the ITSEA.
Uses of Information: The ITSEA
is a tool for identifying children and caregivers who may
benefit from additional dialogue about children’s behavior
and development to determine the presence of abnormal behaviors,
psychopathology, or delayed competences. By itself, it is
not sufficient to make such a determination.
Reliability: (1) Internal consistency
(Cronbach’s alpha): the domains and scales alphas were
.87 for externalizing (.73 to .79 for the scales), .80 for
internalizing (.71 to .77 for the scales), .86 for dysregulation
(.63 to .84 for the scales), and .90 for competence (.59 to
.82 for the scales). The majority of the scales scores exceeded
.65. The alphas for the indices were .56 for mal-adaptive,
.56 for social relatedness, and .45 for atypical behaviors.
(2) Test-retest reliability (test completed within a 44-day
interval): the ITSEA domain and scale coefficients were .82
for externalizing (.69 to .85 for the scales), .83 for internalizing
(.74 to.85 for the scales), .91 for dysregula-tion (.82 to
.88 for the scales), .90 for competence (.77 to .88 for the
scales). (3) Inter-rater reliability: agreement between mothers
and fathers were .69 for externalizing (.65 to .73 for the
scales), .58 for internalizing (.43 to .64 for the scales),
.79 for dysregulation (.66 to .78 for the scales), and .76
for competence (.47 to .73 for the scales).
Validity: (1) Criterion and
construct validity were evaluated by comparing parent ITSEA
ratings with their ratings on the Child Behavior Checklist2/3
(CBCL2/3), Colorado Child Development Inventory (CCTI), Parenting
Stress Index (PSI), Mullen Scales of Early Learning, and Vineland
Adaptive Behavior Scales. The authors reported that the strength
of the relationships between the ITSEA ratings and these other
measures varied according to the similarities of the constructs.
The correlations between parent reports on their 2-year olds
on the ITSEA and CBCL2/3 were .57 and .71 for the internalizing
and externalizing domains, respectively. The correlations
between the CBCL2/3 Internalizing and Externalizing constructs
and ITSEA Dysregulation scores were .52 and .49, respectively.
The authors reported that the Maladaptive and Atypical behavior
indices correlation with CBCL2/3 Internalizing and Externalizing
scores (.15 to .42), as well as the correlations between ITSEA
problem domains and PSI domains (between .21 and .45) supported
the validity of the ITSEA. According to the authors, other
relationships that supported the validity of the ITSEA were
the correlations between ITSEA Internalizing, Externalizing,
and Dysregulation problem scales and CCTI Emotionality (between
.37 and .53) and Soothability domains (between -.23 and -.31-),
and the ITSEA Competence scale with all CBCL2/3 domains (between
-.28 and -.31), PSI scales (between -.16 and -.24), and with
CCTI Soothability (.28).
Method of Scoring: Web-based
scoring is available. For more information, Email: Alice.Carter@umb.edu
or ITSEA@yale.edu, or
call 203-764-9093. Prior to scoring, 7 reverse items and “no
opportunity” responses are recoded. Then, the items
in the scale are summed and divided by the total number of
non-missing items for a given subject. The following scores
are calculated: Domain Scores, Scale Scores, and Indices.
Tables are provided to derive the T-Scores for the domains
and Cut-Points for the domain, scales, and indices. Cut-points
are the mean scores for the domains and scales above and below
which the extreme 10 percent at either ends of the reference
sample fell.
Interpretability: The manual
contains tables of the reference group’s mean scores
by age and sex group for comparison to the calculated
mean score. The manual contains tables for converting
raw scores into T-scores and the cut-points for each age
group and sex grouping. Cut-points are the mean score
for the domains and scales above and below which the extreme
10 percent at either ends of the reference sample fell.
The interpretation of the ITSEA results should be done
by a professional trained in the administration and interpretation
of psychometric tests.
When following up with parents and interpreting the results,
it is important to assess whether the behaviors that the parent
endorsed are (1) of concern to the parent; (2) evident in
multiple settings and with multiple people; (3) culturally
appropriate or inappropriate; (4) atypical or deviant problems
in development; (5) transient problems that are secondary
responses to stress; (6) transient problems that are related
to a child’s developmental phase.
Training Support: None described.
Adaptations/Special Instructions for
Individuals with Disabilities: None described.
Report Preparation Support: Not
described, however, the manual stresses that the ITSEA was
not designed to be used or interpreted by parents or other
caregivers without the help of a professional who has received
training in the administration and interpretation of psychometric
tests.
References:
Carter, Alice S., and Margaret J. Briggs-Gowan. Infant Toddler
Social and Emotional Assessment (ITSEA) Manual Version 1.1.
June 13, 2001.
|