Changeset 3865

Timestamp:

02/16/09 17:47:16 (16 hours ago)

Author:

goodell

Message:

Fix for ticket #409. MPIR_Comm_is_node_consecutive was not checking for whether
or not a communicator was node-aware, causing node-aware logic to be used on a
non-node-aware communicator.

Reviewed by thakur@.

Files:

• mpich2/trunk/src/mpi/comm/commutil.c (modified) (2 diffs)

mpich2/trunk/src/mpi/comm/commutil.c

@@ -284 +284 @@
-        if (num_external == comm->remote_size) {
-            MPIU_Assert(num_local == 1);
-fail
+exit
-        }
-
@@ -388 +388 @@
-}
-
-processes in all the nodes are consecutive. For example, 
-if node 0 contains "0, 1, 2, 3", node 1 contains "4, 5, 6", and node 2 
-
+communicator is node-aware and processes in all the nodes
+are consecutive. For example, if node 0 contains "0, 1, 2, 3", node 1
+4, 5, 6", and node 2 contains "
-int MPIR_Comm_is_node_consecutive(MPID_Comm * comm)
-{
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-    {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-    return 1;
-}