Search the National Biological Information Infrastructure Metadata Clearinghouse for more biological information.

When you connect to the NBII Metadata Clearinghouse you will be able to search through metadata-based descriptions of biological data sets and information products from many different sources to identify those that meet your particular search criteria.

The NBII Metadata Clearinghouse: http://metadata.nbii.gov/

The NBII Home Page: http://www.nbii.gov/

Powered by Mercury

Ecology and Conservation of Heather in Mount Rainier National Park

Metadata:


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Regina Marie Rochefort
Publication_Date: 19951211
Title:
Ecology and Conservation of Heather in Mount

Rainier National Park

Series_Information:
Series_Name: PhD dissertation
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Seattle, WA
Publisher: University of Washington
Other_Citation_Details:
An additional article is Rochefort, Regina M. and

David L. Peterson, Temporal and Spatial

Distribution of Trees in Subalpine Meadows of

Mount Rainier National Park, Washington, U.S.A.,

Arctic and Alpine Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1996,

pp. 52-59

Description:
Abstract:
Phyllodoce empetriformis and P. glanduliflora are

persistent and widespread species in mountainous

areas of the Pacific Northwest. Although these

species are quite common, little information is

available on the population dynamics or

reproductive biology of the species. In National

Parks, increasing recreational demands escalates

the potential for damage to these populations.

This study describes genetic and morphologic

diversity of heather populations in mount Rainier

National Park, assesses the potential influence of

human use, and utilizes this information to

propose strategies for long-term protection of

heather populations. Allozyme analysis was used

to estimate genetic diversity of P. empetriformis

and P. glanduliflora. Study sites were

established at high and low elevation in three

locations within Mount Rainier National Park.

Analysis indicated high levels of genetic

diversity within populations and significant

differences in allele frequencies among

populations and study areas. Heather populations

are composed of multiple clones with high ratios

of local to widespread genotypes. Morphologic

variation was surveyed through measurements of

field and greenhouse populations. Significant

differences existed among field populations for

the four characters measured: annual stem

extension, plant height, leaf width and leaf

length. Greenhouse populations exhibited

significant differences among populations for leaf

width (P. empetriformis) and leaf length (P.

glanduliflora). The role of tree establishment in

long-term heather survival was examined.

Significantly more trees established in heather

populations than in plant communities dominated by

other species. Survival of Abies lasiocarpa

seedlings was significantly higher in heather

populations than populations of other species.

Low-elevation heather populations growing on

topographic convexities often provide safe-sites

for the establishment of tree seedlings. A simple

simulation model was developed to estimate the

potential impact of human sue on heather

populations. Number of genotypes, allele

frequencies, observed heterozygosity, number of

live plants, and heather crown cover were

calculated before and after simulated Human use.

No significant differences were found in allele

frequency or heterozygosity levels even after

severe impacts were modeled. Genotypic diversity

is not sensitive indicator of human use. Numbers

of genotypes only showed significant changes when

impacts were very large or when restoration

programs were initiated.

Purpose:
This study describes genetic and morphologic

diversity of heather populations in Mount Rainier

National Park, assesses the potential influence

of human use, and utilizes this information to

propose strategies for long-term protection of

heather populations.

Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates_Times:
Beginning_Date: 199106
Ending_Date: 199410
Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned
Spatial_Domain:
Description_of_Geographic_Extent: Mount Rainier National Park
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -121.8472
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -121.6078
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 46.97167
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 46.77889
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: genetic diversity
Theme_Keyword: morphologic diversity
Theme_Keyword: human use
Theme_Keyword: human impact
Theme_Keyword: heather
Theme_Keyword: trees
Theme_Keyword: allozyme
Theme_Keyword: allele
Theme_Keyword: populations
Theme_Keyword: genotypes
Theme_Keyword: annual stem extension
Theme_Keyword: plant height
Theme_Keyword: leaf width
Theme_Keyword: leaf length
Theme_Keyword: tree establishment
Theme_Keyword: Abies lasiocarpa
Theme_Keyword: subalpine fir
Theme_Keyword: trails
Theme_Keyword: alpine meadows
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Place_Keyword: Mount Rainier National Park
Place_Keyword: Cascade Mountains
Place_Keyword: Washington
Taxonomy:
Keywords_Taxon:
Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus: none
Taxonomic_Keywords: plants
Taxonomic_Keywords: vegetation
Taxonomic_Keywords: trees
Taxonomic_Keywords: heather
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Phyllodoce
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: empetriformis
Applicable_Common_Name: red mountainheath
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Phyllodoce
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: glanduliflora
Applicable_Common_Name: cream mountainheath
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Abies
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: lasiocarpa
Applicable_Common_Name: subalpine fir
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Tsuga
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: mertensiana
Applicable_Common_Name: mountain hemlock
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Chamaecyparis
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: nootkatensis
Applicable_Common_Name: Alaskan yellow cedar
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Cassiope
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: mertensiana
Applicable_Common_Name: western cassiope
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Vaccinium
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: deliciosum
Applicable_Common_Name: blueleaf huckleberry
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Carex
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: spectabilis
Applicable_Common_Name: showy sedge
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Lupinus
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: latifolius
Applicable_Common_Name: broadleaf lupine
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Valeriana
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: sitchensis
Applicable_Common_Name: Sitka valerian
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Veratrum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: viride
Applicable_Common_Name: American false hellebore
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinus
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: albicaulis
Applicable_Common_Name: whitebark pine
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Picea
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: engelmannii
Applicable_Common_Name: Engelmann spruce
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Potentilla
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: flabellifolia
Applicable_Common_Name: fanleaf cinquefoil
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Antennaria
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: lanata
Applicable_Common_Name: woolly everlasting
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Carex
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: nigricans
Applicable_Common_Name: black alpine sedge
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Festuca
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: viridula
Applicable_Common_Name: green fescue
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Aster
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: alpigenus
Applicable_Common_Name: alpine aster
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints: A citation is required
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Regina Rochefort
Contact_Organization: USNPS, North Cascades National Park
Contact_Position: Science Advisor
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 2105 State Route 20
City: Sedro-Woolley
State_or_Province: WA
Postal_Code: 98284
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 360-856-5700 x 254
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (360)856-1934
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: regina_rochefort@nps.gov
Back to Top
Data_Quality_Information:
Lineage:
Methodology:
Methodology:
Methodology_Type: Field
Methodology_Description:
Genetic and Morphologic Diversity of Heather

Populations: STUDY SITE: Study sites were

established in three areas within Mount Rainier

National Park: Paradise, Spray Park, and Panhandle

Gap (Figure 2.2, Table 2.1). Two to four

populations were sampled within each area. Paired

populations at high and low elevations were

identified within each study area in order to

sample the range of genetic diversity. Four

populations of each species (Phyllodoce

empetriformis and P. glanduliflora) were sampled

at Spray Park and Paradise, two high elevation and

two low elevation populations. At Panhandle Gap,

four populations of P. empetriformis (two high and

two low) and two populations of P. glanduliflora

(two high populations, no low populations) were

sampled. Populations were separated by greater

than 100 meters. Study plots were established

within each population; plots are 400 meters

squared (20 m x 20 m) and subdivided into 4

quarters. Fifty plants (12-13 per quarter) were

randomly selected within the large plot for

genetic analysis.

Methodology:
Methodology_Type: Lab
Methodology_Description:
Genetic and Morphologic Diversity of Heather

Populations: ELECTROPHORESIS: Stems with first and

second year leaves were collected for

electrophoretic analysis. Leaves were placed in

plastic bags and kept moist and cold in a

refrigerator (4"C) until they were prepared for

electrophoresis. Leaf tissues were ground with a

mortar and pestle under liquid nitrogen (Mitton et

al., 1979), and the frozen leaf powder was mixed

with a tris-HCL grinding buffer PVP solution

(Soltis et al., 1983). The homogenate was

immediately transferred into microtiter trays and

stored in an ultra-low freezer (-70C). Homogenates

were thawed, applied to paper wicks, and inserted

into 12.5% starch gels. Plant material was

initially tested for activity on 26 enzyme systems

(Appendix A). Only five loci for each species

exhibited consistent, scorable resolution. Five

putative loci were resolved on three systems for

Phyllodoce glanduliflora. Phosphoglucose isomerase

(PGI) (two loci) and uridine diphosphoglucose

pyrophosphorylase (UGP) were resolved on a

continuous morpholine citrate system, Ph 8.1

(system E in Conkle et al. 1982). Shikimate

dehydrogenase (SKD) was run on morpholine citrate,

Ph 6.1 (system D in Conkle et at. 1982).

Phosphoglucomutase (PGM) was resolved on a

discontinuous histidine citrate system, Ph 7.0

(Werth, 1985). Five putative loci were resolved

on two systems for P. empetrifonnis.

Phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI) (two·loci) was

resolved on a continuous morpholine citrate

system, Ph 8.1 (system E in Conkle et al. 1982).

Uridine diphosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase (UGP-1,

UGP-2) and phosphoglucomutase (PGM) were scored on

a discontinuous histidine-Hcl, Ph 6.5 (system 11

in Soitis et al. 1983). Only loci polymorphic at

the 95% level were utilized for genetic analysis;

PGI-1 was monomorphic for both species and

therefore was not utilized.

Methodology:
Methodology_Type: Lab
Methodology_Description:
Genetic and Morphologic Diversity of Heather

Populations: MORPHOLOGIC DIVERSITY: Morphologic

diversity was surveyed on field populations and

greenhouse plants grown from cuttings of field

plants. Four morphologic characters were monitored

on 25 plants in each of the field populations:

leaf width, leaf length, plant height, and annual

stem growth (i.e. extensional growth as measured

between bud scars). Plant height was measured at

the tallest portion of the plant. Annual stem

growth, leaf width, and leaf length were measured

with a micrometer; values for each character are

the average of three measurements for each plant.

Leaf width was measured at the widest portion of

each leaf. Greenhouse plants were propagated from

cuttings of plants from the Paradise field

populations. Cuttings were collected in the fall

of 1992 and rooted cuttings were transplanted into

10 cm diameter pots in the spring of 1993 and

arranged in a completely randomized design. Plants

were moved from the greenhouse to a shadehouse in

June 1994. Leaf width and length were measured in

1995 on leaves formed in 1994.

Methodology:
Methodology_Type: Lab
Methodology_Description:
Genetic and Morphologic Diversity of Heather

Populations: DATA ANALYSIS: Genetic data were

analyzed using Biosys-l, version 1.7 (Swofford and

Selander, 1q89) and Genestat (Lewis and Whitkus,

1989). Genetic variability was characterized by

calculating allele frequencies, observed

heterozygosity (Ho direct count), expected

heterozygosity (He Nei's 1978 unbiased estimate),

and Hamrick and Godt's Ht (1990; Nei and Chesser,

1983). Diversity within and among populations was

examined by calculating Wright's F-statistics

(1943, 1951) and Nei's genetic identity (1978).

Phenograms were produced to visualize similarities

between populations by conducting a cluster

analysis using UPGMA and Nei's genetic identity.

Correlation analysis was conducted between pairs

of genetic identity values and geographic

distances and elevation differences. Diversity

among populations and study areas was examined by

using a X2 contingency analysis to analyze

differences in allele frequencies (Snedecor and

Irwin, 1933; Workman and Niswander, 1970). In

addition, because P. glanduliflora and P.

empetriformis propagate vegetatively, genetic

diversity was examined by calculating the number

of genotypes, proportion of clones

distinguishable, and the number of local and

widespread genotypes per population (Ellstrand and

Roose, 1987). The number of genotypes was

calculated by using only those individuals for

which all four loci had been scored. The

proportion distinguishable was calculated by

dividing the number of genotypes by the sample

size. Local and widespread genotypes were

calculated within study areas and across all

populations. Local genotypes were defined as

types found in only one population within the

study area. Widespread genotypes were defined as

types found in 75% of the populations within the

study area or across all populations. Morphologic

characters were analyzed with a one-way analysis

of variance. If heteroscedasticity was

encountered, Kruskal-Wallis procedures were

followed. When the null hypothesis was rejected,

the Tukey HSD test was applied (p= 0.05). Relative

percents of among and within population variances

were calculated for each character (Sokal and

Rohlf, 1981).

Methodology:
Methodology_Type: Field
Methodology_Description:
Tree Establishment in Alpine Meadows: STUDY SITES:

Study sites were located in five subalpine meadows

within Mount Rainier National Park (Fig. 2). The

park is located on the western slope of the

Cascade Range, 100 km southeast of the Seattle

-Tacoma metropolitan area. It encompasses 95,389

ha and extends from low elevation, old growth

forest (530 m) through subalpine and alpine

communities to the summit of Mount Rainier at 4400

m. Climate is temperate maritime with cool, wet

winters and mild, dry summers. Most of the annual

precipitation falls as snow between October and

May. Limited climatic data indicate that

precipitation generally is higher on the westside

of the park, and increases with elevation up to

about 3000 m. Subalpine parkland covers

approximately 23% of the park. Meadow vegetation

of this zone can be described by five broad

vegetation types (Henderson, 1974). (1)

heath-shrub types dominated by one or two

ericaceous species, including Phyllodoce

empetriformis, P. glanduliflora, Cassiope

mertensiana, and Vaccinium deliciosum, (2) lush

herbaceous vegetation dominated by tall perennials

including Valeriana sitchensis, Lupinus

latifolius, and Veratrum viride, (3) low

herbaceous vegetation dominated by Potentilla

flabellifolia and Antennaria lanata, often with

lesser amounts of Carex nigricans, (4) wet sedge

types in low, wet areas dominated by C. nigricans,

C. spectabilis, Aster alpigenus, and Antennaria

lanata, and (5) dry grass vegetation found on

well-drained sites common on the east side of the

park, dominated by Festuca viridula and Lupinus

latifolius. The dominant tree species in the

subalpine zone are Abies lasiocarpa, Tsuga

mertensiana, and Chamaecyparis nootkatensis. Pinus

albicaulis and Picea engelmannii are present on

drier sites on the eastside of the park. Human

activities have had limited influence on the

subalpine ecosystem of Mount Rainier National

Park. Grazing by sheep and cattle occurred in

several areas on the eastside of the park in the

early 1890s prior to the establishment of the

Pacific Forest Reserve in 1893. Once the reserve

was created, it became illegal for stock to graze

on federal lands, but it still continued to some

extent due to lack of enforcement (Martinson,

1966). After the establishment of the park in

1899, grazing was limited to cattle in two areas

during 1917-1919, use of milk cows in Paradise

(1905-1910), and sheep for 2 yr (1931-1932) on the

east boundary (McIntyre, 1952). Plant removal and

soil erosion was so great from these practices

that a survey completed in 1944 recommended that

no additional grazing permits be issued in the

event of a war emergency (Stagner, 1944). More

recent influences on subalpine ecosystems include

tree removals from the Paradise region of the

park, as well as increased recreational use of

this area (Rochefort and Gibbons, 1993; Rochefort

and Peterson, 1993).

Methodology:
Methodology_Type: Field
Methodology_Description:
Tree Establishment in Alpine Meadows: FIELD

METHODS: Study sites were established in five

subalpine meadows of Mount Rainier National Park

in 1991. Spray Park, Paradise, Sunrise, Grand

Park, and Burnt Park (Fig. 2). Sites were selected

based on the geographic location and weather

patterns within the park. Paradise and Sunrise

were selected because they were surveyed in the

1960s and we wanted to see if more recent periods

of establishment had occurred since that time

(Franklin et al, 1966; Franklin et al., 1971). The

three additional meadows were chosen in order to

expand the geographic scope of the Franklin study

and to describe variation in patterns of

establishment within the park. We concentrated on

west versus east (rainshadow) sides of the park

because weather patterns (precipitation and

temperature)and vegetation vary significantly

between the two sides. Two to five strip transects

were established randomly within the predominant

vegetation types of each meadow (Table i). Strip

transects were used to estimate tree density

because visual observation indicated that tree

density decreased with distance from clumps of

large trees (trees approximately 20--30 m tall and

200 yr old). Transects were established in areas

where there were no visible signs of fire (fire

scars or charred trunks) or human use (tree

cutting or bare ground) and in sites that had no

recorded history of grazing, tree cutting or

development. Strip transects were 3 m wide and

extended 60 m from the outer edge of mature tree

clumps. Transects were divided into 3 m x 5 m

blocks for ease in tallying trees. Within each

block, tree species were identified, tree height

and basal diameter were recorded, and every other

tree was sampled for age determination. Seedlings

and sap-lings (<5 cm basal diameter) were

collected for age determination by cutting below

the root collar. Seedlings were aged by counting

terminal bud scars, and saplings were aged by

counting rings on sanded basal disks; both counts

were conducted under a dissecting microscope.

Seedlings were generally trees with a basal

diameter less than 2 mm, height less than 12 cm,

and less than 15 yr old. Larger trees were sampled

by collecting a core close to the root collar.

Cores were finely sanded and annual rings counted

under a dissecting microscope. Only tree cores

that included the center of the tree were included

for aging. All trees were aged by two individuals,

and discrepancies were resolved by additional

counts. Analysis of our 1991 data revealed that

more trees established in heath-shrub vegetation

types than other vegetation types surveyed.

Therefore, we wanted to look more closely at

seedling survival patterns among vegetation types.

Abies lasiocarpa seedlings germinating in 1992

were monitored for 3 yr to determine if survival

rates of seedlings germinating in heath-shrub

vegetation (Phyllodoce empetriformis, P.

glanduliflora, Cassiope mertensiana) were

significantly different from those germinating in

other vegetation types. Eleven paired sites were

established at the Paradise study site. In each

site, 20 to 50 seed-lings were tagged and

monitored for survival from July 1992 until

October 1994. Surveys of heath-shrub communities

were conducted in 1992 to determine if tree

establishment within them is random with respect

to landscape position and other environmental

parameters. Forty-five circular plots (12.6 m2)

were randomly established in heath-shrub

vegetation at the Paradise study site (1640 to

1920 m elevation). Random sample points were

selected by placing a grid over a vegetation map

of the Paradise meadow (approximately 390 ha). A

random number generator was used to select

coordinates for potential plots; all random

locations falling within mapped ericaceous

vegetation types were sampled. Within each plot,

all trees were counted, identified to species, and

height measured. Dominant plant association,

slope, aspect, topography (convex, flat, concave),

and landscape position (ridge, midslope, bench,

valley bottom) were recorded. Vegetation was

classified into one of four plant community types

based on the dominant species: (1) Phyllodoce

empetriformis / Vaccinium deliciosum, (2) P.

empetriformis / Lupinus latifolius, (3) P.

empetriformis / Cassiope mertensiana, (4) P.

empetriformis.

Methodology:
Methodology_Type: Lab
Methodology_Description:
Tree Establishment in Alpine Meadows: DATA

ANALYSIS: Tree establishment and climatic data

were summarized by 5-yr intervals for the

1930-1990 time period. Five-year periods were used

to examine these relationships because successful

tree establishment depends on climatic factors

during at least 3 yr after germination (Cui and

Smith, 1991; Jakubos and Romme, 1993). In

addition, we recognized that germination dates

could be miscalculated by several years due to

missing rings and the difficulty recognizing

terminal bud scale scars (Henderson, 1974; Little

et al., 1994; Miller, 1995). Data analysis focused

on the 1930-1990 period, for which climatic data

was nearly complete. Stepwise multiple

regression was used to examine the relationship

between climate and tree establishment. Numbers of

trees established were summed for each period, and

climatic variables were averaged. Counts of tree

establishment were transformed using a square root

transformation to stabilize the variance. Climatic

variables included monthly average temperature

(May through October) and total precipitation (May

through September) (Paradise Ranger Station, Mount

Rainier National Park database), and monthly

Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) (state of

Washington Division 4 data from the National

Climatic Data Center database). Spring PDSI was

the average value for May-June, while summer PDSI

was the average value for July-August. The effect

of snowpack on tree establishment was investigated

by using snow depth at Paradise on 15 May

(Paradise Ranger Station, Mount Rainier National

Park database). Data missing from these records

were previously estimated by Little (1992) using

standard techniques (Paulhus and Kohler, 1952;

MacDonald, 1957). Selection of climate variables

for analysis was based on the assumption that seed

germination and survival of seedlings are most

influenced by growing season length, temperature,

and precipitation. Relationships with winter

weather were not examined because snow generally

covers seed-lings from November through May.

Tree density by vegetation type was compared using

data from all established strip transects. Blocks

along each transect were numbered from 1 to 12

indicating their distance from mature trees. The

number of blocks sampled in each vegetation type

was then tallied by distance class. A chi-square

analysis was performed to determine if the

sampling distribution among vegetation types was

homogeneous with respect to distance from a tree

clump (seed source). Tree density for each 3 m X 5

m subplot was tallied and categorized by

vegetation type. Data were transformed using the

log (x f I) transformation (Zar, 1984) because the

variances were positively skewed. Analysis of

variance was then used to compare tree densities

within four vegetation types: heath-shrub, lush

herbaceous, low herbaceous, and dry grass. The wet

sedge vegetation type did not have a large enough

sample size to include in the analysis. Following

rejection of the null hypothesis of equal mean

tree densities among the four vegetation types,

multiple comparisons were made using the Tukey HSD

test (p = 0.05). Seedling survival was analyzed

by performing a paired t-test comparing percent

survival of seedlings inside and outside heather

at annual intervals. Mean differences between 11

paired plots were used for analysis in 1992 and

1993, but only 9 pairs were used in 1994 due to

removal of tags by animals that summer

Discriminant analysis was used to identify

important factors associated with successful tree

establishment in heather communities. Predictor

variables were categorized using a binary

dependent variable (i.e., "O" if no A. lasiocarpa

were observed in the plots, "1" if one or more A.

lasiocarpa were observed). Prediction potential

of the classification criteria was evaluated using

a cross-validation (jackknife) procedure (SAS,

1988). Discriminant coefficients were examined to

identify the direction of the relationship between

predictor variables and the dependent variable.

The class means were then compared with an ANOVA

to identify significant differences.

Methodology:
Methodology_Type: Lab
Methodology_Description:
Potential Human Impact on Heather Populations:

MODELING AND ANALYSIS: The effect of human use on

heather populations was examined by simulating

damage within mapped, undamaged populations. I had

initially hoped to sample paired sites' of damaged

and undamaged populations, but damaged sites

usually had different environmental

characteristics than undamaged sites. Damaged

populations were frequently found on areas that

melted out earlier than undamaged sites, thus

attracting visitor use. For this reason,

simulation models provide a better appraisal of

short- term changes caused by human use. Two

populations in the Paradise study area were

selected: PG8 and PE1. Within each study plot (20

x 20 m), one quarter of the site was designated

for intense monitoring. All plants within this

block were mapped (crown cover), measured for

height, and sampled for genetic analysis. Damage

was simulated by randomly drawing social trails of

several widths (15, 56, and 102 cm) in the mapped

plot and removing all plants within the boundaries

of the plot. Simulations were conducted with a

dBase program that generated random numbers for

social trail location. Rules for the program

required straight social trails and no overlapping

of trails. For each run of the model, 1 to 20

socials trail were placed in the plot. Widths of

impacts were selected based on typical widths of

human impacts in Mount Rainier National Park

(Rochefort, 1989). Simulations allowed the

placement of 20 social trails 15 cm wide within

the study plot, but only 10 social trails 56 cm

wide and 6 or 7 trails 102 cm wide. The impact of

human use was then evaluated by calculating allele

frequencies, observed heterozygosity (H,), the

number of genotypes, the number of live plants

remaining, and heather crown cover.

Pre-disturbance and post-disturbance estimates for

each index were compared after one run of the

model for each combination of social trail width

and number of social trails (i.e., 1 social trail

of 15 cm, 2 social trails of 15 cm, up to the

maximum number of social trails for each trail

width). Significant decreases were observed in

the number of genotypes, the number of remaining

plants and heather crown cover with the addition

of increased number of social trails, but no

significant changes were observed in allele

frequencies or observed heterozygosity (H,) at the

p = 0.05. The model was then run 20 times for each

social trail width. The impact of human use was

evaluated by calculation of the number of

genotypes, number of plants, and crown cover for

each combination of social trail width and number.

However, because no significant changes in allele

frequencies and H, were observed after the initial

run of the model, these indices were calculated

only for the most severe level of impact for each

social trail width (i.e., 20 social trails of 15

cm, 10 social trails of 56 cm, and 7 social trails

of 102 cm) .

Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Regina Marie Rochefort
Publication_Date: 19951211
Title:
Ecology and Conservation of Heather in Mount

Rainier National Park

Series_Information:
Series_Name: PhD dissertation
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Seattle, WA
Publisher: University of Washington
Other_Citation_Details:
An additional article is Rochefort, Regina M. and

David L. Peterson, Temporal and Spatial

Distribution of Trees in Subalpine Meadows of

Mount Rainier National Park, Washington, U.S.A.,

Arctic and Alpine Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1996,

pp. 52-59

Back to Top
Back to Top
Back to Top
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Site designations and locations of heather

populations

Entity_Type_Definition:
Site designations, descriptions, and locations for

10 populations of Phyllodoce glanduliflora and 12

populations of P. empetriformis in Mount Rainier

National Park

Entity_Type_Definition_Source: Regina Rochefort
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Population number
Attribute_Definition: Identification number for heather populations
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGXX
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Phyllodoce glanduliflora combined with integer

number for each population

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PEXX
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Phyllodoce empetriformis combined with integer

number for each population

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Location
Attribute_Definition:
Location place name along with indication of

whether it was the high or low elevation site for

that local

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Elevation
Attribute_Definition: Elevation in meters
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 1573
Range_Domain_Maximum: 2451
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Aspect
Attribute_Definition: Slope aspect
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: UTM coordinates
Attribute_Definition: East and North UTM coordinates of site
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Allele frequencies for Phyllodoce glanduliflora
Entity_Type_Definition:
Isozyme allele frequencies in 10 populations of P.

glanduliflora

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Isozyme
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGI
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Phosphoglucose isomerase
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGM
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Phosphoglucomutase
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: SKD
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Shikimate dehydrogenase
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: UGP
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: uridine diphosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Allele
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 1
Range_Domain_Maximum: 4
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Population
Attribute_Definition:
Allele frequencies for each of the individual

populations of P. glanduliflora.

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 0
Range_Domain_Maximum: .99
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Allele frequencies for Phyllodoce empetriformis
Entity_Type_Definition:
Isozyme allele frequencies in 12 populations of P.

empetriformis

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Isozyme
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGI
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Phosphoglucose isomerase
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: UGP
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: uridine diphosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGM
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Phosphoglucomutase
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Allele
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 1
Range_Domain_Maximum: 4
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Population
Attribute_Definition:
Allele frequencies for each of the individual

populations of P. empetriformis

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 0
Range_Domain_Maximum: .969
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Genetic diversity indices
Entity_Type_Definition:
Summary of genetic diversity and fixation indices

at four polymorphic loci in ten populations of

both P. glanduliflora and P. empetriformis in

Mount Rainier N.P.

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Locus
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGI
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Phosphoglucose isomerase
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: UGP
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: uridine diphosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGM
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Phosphoglucomutase
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: SKD
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Shikimate dehydrogenase
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Mean
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Mean of four loci
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Xe2
Attribute_Definition: chi squared
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 51.968
Range_Domain_Maximum: 127.720
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Ho
Attribute_Definition: Observed heterozygosity
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: .138
Range_Domain_Maximum: .599
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: He
Attribute_Definition: Expected heterozygosity
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: .179
Range_Domain_Maximum: .649
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Fis
Attribute_Definition:
Fis values estimate the deviation from

Hardy-Weinberg expectations averaged over all

subpopulations

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: -.05
Range_Domain_Maximum: .524
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Fit
Attribute_Definition: Fit estimates this deviation over the entire

population

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: -.001
Range_Domain_Maximum: .549
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Fst
Attribute_Definition:
Fst compares the deviation in subpopulations

relative to that over the entire population

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: .043
Range_Domain_Maximum: .082
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Genetic identity distances among populations of

Phyllodoce

Entity_Type_Definition:
Multi-locus averages of genetic identity and

distance (m) for 10 populations each of P.

glanduliflora and P. empetriformis

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Population
Attribute_Definition: Individual populations
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Genetic identity
Attribute_Definition: Genetic identity between pairs of populations
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: .871
Range_Domain_Maximum: 1.00
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Distance
Attribute_Definition: Distance in meters between paired populations
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 112
Range_Domain_Maximum: 18420
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Phenogram of Phyllodoce
Entity_Type_Definition:
Cluster analysis of 12 populations of P.

empetriformis and 10 populations of P.

glanduliflora. Analysis and phenogram are base on

Nei's genetic identity (1978)

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Location
Attribute_Definition: Population location
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Identity values
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: .94
Range_Domain_Maximum: 1.00
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Chi-squared analysis among populations of

Phyllodoce

Entity_Type_Definition:
Chi-squared contingency analysis of heterogeneity

among populations of each Phyllodoce species

within each study area

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Locus
Attribute_Definition: PGI, UGP, PGM, SKD, Total
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Location
Attribute_Definition: Study site
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: All areas
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Paradise
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Panhandle Gap/Indian Bar
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Spray Park
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Chi-square
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: .03
Range_Domain_Maximum: 127.72
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: df
Attribute_Definition: degrees of freedom
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 1
Range_Domain_Maximum: 33
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: P
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: <.001
Range_Domain_Maximum: .191
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Clonal diversity within populations of Phyllodoce
Entity_Type_Definition:
Clonal diversity within populations and study

areas for Phyllodoce

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Population
Attribute_Definition: The specific heather population divided into study

sites

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Number of genotypes
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 11
Range_Domain_Maximum: 36
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Sample size
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 18
Range_Domain_Maximum: 50
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: The local genotypes (%)
Attribute_Definition:
Number of local genotypes along with the percent

of the total number

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 2 (11)
Range_Domain_Maximum: 18 (56)
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Widespread genotypes
Attribute_Definition:
Number of widespread genotypes along with the

percent of the total number

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 1(6)
Range_Domain_Maximum: 11(39)
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Proportion distinguishable
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: .32
Range_Domain_Maximum: .83
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Sensitivity of clonal diversity calculations
Entity_Type_Definition:
Sensitivity of genotype calculations to number of

loci used in calculations

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: The Species/Category
Attribute_Definition: The species of Phyllodoce and number of loci
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 2 loci
Range_Domain_Maximum: 4 loci
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Number of genotypes
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 11
Range_Domain_Maximum: 116
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: The local genotypes (%)
Attribute_Definition:
Number of local genotypes and the percentage of

the total number of genotypes

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 1(9)
Range_Domain_Maximum: 52(45)
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Widespread genotypes
Attribute_Definition:
Number of widespread genotypes and the percentage

of the total number of genotypes

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 4(3)
Range_Domain_Maximum: 7(17)
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Summary of morphologic measurements for heather
Entity_Type_Definition:
Summary of mean morphologic measurements for field

populations of heather

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Population
Attribute_Definition: Individual heather population
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Annual stem growth
Attribute_Definition: Measured in mm, standard error also included
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 6.5 (.1)
Range_Domain_Maximum: 15.8 (1)
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Plant height
Attribute_Definition: Measured in cm, standard error also included
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 2.8 (.6)
Range_Domain_Maximum: 22.7 (1.4)
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Leaf width
Attribute_Definition: Measured in mm, standard error also included
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 1 (.02)
Range_Domain_Maximum: 1.5 (.03)
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Leaf length
Attribute_Definition: Measured in mm, standard error also included
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 5.4 (.1)
Range_Domain_Maximum: 8.5 (.2)
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Mean values for morphologic characters of

greenhouse heather

Entity_Type_Definition:
Means and standard errors for two morphologic

characters for greenhouse populations of

Phyllodoce

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Population
Attribute_Definition: Individual greenhouse populations
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Leaf width
Attribute_Definition: Measured in mm, standard error also included
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: .5 (.04
Range_Domain_Maximum: 1.4 (.2)
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Leaf length
Attribute_Definition: Measured in mm, standard error also included
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 6.1 (.25)
Range_Domain_Maximum: 9.2 (.65)
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: The description of tree establishment study sites
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Study site
Attribute_Definition:
Location of study site by east or west side and

specific local

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Number of transects
Attribute_Definition:
Number of transects run for Abies lasiocarpa tree

establishment

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 2
Range_Domain_Maximum: 5
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Elevation
Attribute_Definition: Measured in meters
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 1650
Range_Domain_Maximum: 2010
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Vegetation type
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: heath-shrub
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Dominated by one or two ericaceous species,

including Phyllodoce empetriformis, P.

glanduliflora, Cassiope mertensiana, and Vaccinium

deliciosum.

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: lush herbaceous
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
dominated by tall perennials including Valeriana

sitchensis, Lupinus latifolius, and Veratrum

viride

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: low herbaceous
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
dominated by Potentilla flabellifolia and

Antennaria lanata, often with lesser amounts of

Carex nigricans

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: wet sedge
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
low wet areas dominated by C. nigricans, C.

spectablis, Aster alpigenus, and Antennaria lanata

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: dry grass
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
well-drained sites common on the east side of the

park, dominated by Festuca viridula and Lupinus

latifolius

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Number of Abies lasiocarpa tallied (number aged)
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 25 (25)
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: 661 (302)
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label:
Multivariate regression between tree establishment

dates and climate

Entity_Type_Definition:
Summary of multiple regression between square-root

transformed number of trees established and

climatic variables.

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Study site
Attribute_Definition:
Location of study site by east or west side and

specific local

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Climatic variable
Attribute_Definition: Specific climatic variable used in regression

analysis

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: p value
Attribute_Definition: regression coefficient and the sign of that

coefficient

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: .001
Range_Domain_Maximum: .069
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Adjusted r squared
Attribute_Definition: Adjusted r squared of the regression model for

each site

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: .51
Range_Domain_Maximum: .76
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Histograms of Abies lasiocarpa establishment
Entity_Type_Definition:
Age at which Abies lasiocarpa trees established

themselves on each of the five study sites

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Year
Attribute_Definition: Year of establishment condensed into 5 year

intervals

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 1930
Range_Domain_Maximum: 1990
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Trees
Attribute_Definition:
Number of Abies lasiocarpa trees established on

each site for a specific 5 year interval

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 0
Range_Domain_Maximum: 45
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Density of tree establishment
Entity_Type_Definition:
Boxplot indicating density of tree establishment

within four vegetation types

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Vegetation type
Attribute_Definition:
Four types of vegetation differentiated for this

part of the study

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Number of trees
Attribute_Definition: Number of trees established in each vegetation

type

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 0
Range_Domain_Maximum: 68
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Differences in tree establishment density
Attribute_Definition:
Vegetation types with different lower case letters

are statistically different at the p = .001 level

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: a
Range_Domain_Maximum: b
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Mean survival of Abies Lasiocarpa
Entity_Type_Definition:
Mean survival rates Abies lasiocarpa for heath

communities and non-heath communities

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Date
Attribute_Definition: Range of dates when surviving seedlings were

inventoried

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 199207
Range_Domain_Maximum: 199410
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Percent survival
Attribute_Definition:
Percentage of surviving seedlings compared to

counts on first date of inventory

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 30
Range_Domain_Maximum: 100
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Vegetation type
Attribute_Definition: Type of vegetation that dominates the site
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Abies lasiocarpa in-heath
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Abies lasiocarpa out-of-heath
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Potential impacts of social trails on heather

populations

Entity_Type_Definition:
Number of social trails required to result in 5%,

10%, 25%, and 40% reduction in number of

genotypes, number of plants, and crown cover

within a 100 square meter study plot.

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: The Species/Category
Attribute_Definition:
The species of Phyllodoce each divided into

categories of number of genotypes, number of

plants, heather crown cover

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Trail width
Attribute_Definition: social trail width modeled at 15, 56, and 102 cm
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Number of social trails for reduction
Attribute_Definition:
The number of social trails of each of the three

modeled widths that are necessary to cause a 5%,

10%, 25% or 40% reduction in the number of

genotypes, number of plants or heather crown

cover.

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: <1
Range_Domain_Maximum:
>20
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label:
Reduction in number, crown cover, and genotypes of

Phyllodoce with human impact

Entity_Type_Definition:
Changes in the number of plants, crown cover, and

numbers of genotypes of Phyllodoce with increased

number of social trails

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Number of social trails
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 0
Range_Domain_Maximum: 20
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Width
Attribute_Definition: 15 cm, 56 cm, 102 cm
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Number of plants
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 40
Range_Domain_Maximum: 110
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Crown cover
Attribute_Definition: Square meters
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 9
Range_Domain_Maximum: 44
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Number of genotypes
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 15
Range_Domain_Maximum: 44
Back to Top
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: University Microfilms
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing address
Address: 1490 Eisenhower Place, P.O. Box 975
City: Ann Arbor
State_or_Province: MI
Postal_Code: 48106
Country: USA
Resource_Description:
Ecology and Conservation of Heather in Mount

Rainier National Park

Distribution_Liability:
The author(s) cannot assure the reliability or

suitability of this information for a particular

purpose. Original data elements were compiled

from various sources. This information may be

updated, corrected, or otherwise modified without

notification. For additional information about

this data contact the author(s).

Standard_Order_Process:
Non_digital_Form: hardcopy
Fees: unknown
Ordering_Instructions:
Requests for copying or reproduction of this

dissertation may be referred to University

Microfilms, 1490 Eisenhower Place, P.O. Box 975,

Ann Arbor, MI 48106, to whom the author has

granted "the right to reproduce and sell (a)

copies of the manuscript"

Back to Top
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 19990812
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Dave L. Peterson
Contact_Organization: Cascadia Field Station, USGS
Contact_Position: Field station leader
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: Mailing Address
Address:
USGS Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

Cascadia Field Station Box 352100

City: Seattle
State_or_Province: WA
Postal_Code: 98195-2100
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (206) 543-1587
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (206) 685-0790
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: wild@u.washington.edu
Metadata_Standard_Name:
NBII Content Standard for National Biological

Information Infrastructure Metadata

Metadata_Standard_Version: December 1995
Back to Top