James Lenihan, David Crumpacker, and Stephen Hodge
USEPA - Environmental Research Laboratory
Corvallis, Oregon
(file lists/download) |
(file download) |
|
EPA Kuchler Potential Natural Vegetation of the Conterminous United States
EPA Kuchler Potential Natural Vegetation of the Conterminous United States
File type | Metadata | Data |
Raster grid | ekform.doc | ekform.img |
Raster Series | ||
Vector Point | ||
Vector Line | ||
Vector Polygon | ekveg.dvc | ekveg.vec |
Attribute Table | eklgnd.txt | eklgnd.mdb |
Color Palette | ||
Projection | albersus.ref |
File type | Metadata | Data |
Raster grid | ektype.doc | ektype.img |
Raster Series | ||
Vector Point | ||
Vector Line | ||
Vector Polygon | ekveg.dvc | ekveg.vec |
Attribute Table | eklgnd.txt | eklgnd.mdb |
Color Palette | ||
Projection | albersus.ref |
EPA Kuchler Potential Natural Vegetation of the Conterminous United States
This coverage has been digitized from the 1979 Physiographic Regions Map produced by the BLM. This BLM product contains more than the complete set of information form Kuchler's 1966 USGS Potential Natural Vegetation map. The USGS map was revised in 1985 by Kuchler and others. In comparison to the 1985 USGS map (106 types for the contiguous U.S.), the BLM map contains 10 additional physiognomic types (116 types for the same area). These disparate units are defined as follows:
10. Ponderosa shrub forest (Pinus)
11. Western Pine (Pinus)
22. Great Basin pine forest (Pinus)
24. Juniper steppe woodland (Juniperus - Artemisia - Agropyron)
25. Alder - ash forest (Ulmus - Fraxinus)
34. Montane chaparral (Arctostaphylos - Castanopsis - Ceanothus)
36. Mosaic of numbers 30 and 35
44. Creosote bush - tarbush (Larrea - Flourensia)
60. Mesquite savanna (Prosopis - Hilaria)
72. Sea oats prairie (Uniola - Andiropogon)
80. Marl - everglade (Mariscus and Persea - Taxodium)
109. Transition between numbers 104 and 106
Other info:
1979 BLM map - - scale: 1:3,168,000
- - by: Kenneth Brown and Richard Kerr
1985 USGS map - - scale: 1:7,500,000
- - by: A.W. Kuchler
The relationships that exist between the physiognomic units defined in the 1985 USGS map and those used in coverage digitized from the 1979 BLM are summarized in the following table.
BLM | USGS | BLM | USGS | BLM | USGS | BLM | USBS | BLM | USGS |
1 | 1 | 28 | 24 | 55 | 49 | 82 | 73 | 109 | 97 |
2 | 2 | 29 | 25 | 56 | 50 | 83 | 74 | 110 | 100 |
3 | 3 | 30 | 26 | 57 | 51 | 84 | 75 | 111 | 101 |
4 | 4 | 31 | 27 | 58 | 52 | 85 | 76 | 112 | 102 |
5 | 5 | 32 | 28 | 59 | 53 | 86 | 77 | 113 | 103 |
6 | 6 | 33 | 29 | 60 | 76 | 87 | 78 | 114 | 104 |
7 | 7 | 34 | 22,29,5 | 61 | 54 | 88 | 79 | 115 | 105 |
8 | 8 | 35 | 30 | 62 | 55 | 89 | 80 | 116 | 106 |
9 | 9 | 36 | 26 | 63 | 56 | 90 | 81 | 117 | - - |
10 | 10 | 37 | 31 | 64 | 57 | 91 | 82 | 118 | - - |
11 | 10 | 38 | 32 | 65 | 58 | 92 | 83 | 119 | - - |
12 | 11 | 39 | 33 | 66 | 59 | 93 | 84 | 120 | - - |
13 | 12 | 40 | 34 | 67 | 60 | 94 | 85 | 121 | HI - 1 |
14 | 13 | 41 | 35 | 68 | 61 | 95 | 86 | 122 | HI - 2 |
15 | 14 | 42 | 36 | 69 | 62 | 96 | 87 | 123 | HI - 3 |
16 | 15 | 43 | 37 | 70 | 63 | 97 | 88 | 124 | HI - 4 |
17 | 16 | 44 | 52 | 71 | 64 | 98 | 89 | 125 | HI - 5 |
18 | 17 | 45 | 38 | 72 | 70 | 99 | 90 | 126 | HI - 6 |
19 | 18 | 46 | 39 | 73 | 65 | 100 | 91 | 127 | HI - 7 |
20 | 19 | 47 | 40 | 74 | 66 | 101 | 92 | 128 | - - |
21 | 20 | 48 | 41 | 75 | 67 | 102 | 93 | 129 | - - |
22 | 10 | 49 | 42 | 76 | 68 | 103 | 94 | 130 | - - |
23 | 21 | 50 | 43 | 77 | 69 | 104 | 95 | 131 | 46 |
24 | 49 | 51 | 44 | 78 | 70 | 105 | 96 | 132 | - - |
25 | 2 | 52 | 45 | 79 | 71 | 106 | 97 | 133 | - - |
26 | 22 | 53 | 46 | 80 | 83 | 107 | 98 | 134 | - - |
27 | 23 | 54 | 47 | 81 | 72 | 108 | 99 | 135 | - - |
NOTE: From these relationships, given a community type in the
BLM coverage, one can identify the corresponding community type on the
USGS map. Note that community type 34 on the BLM coverage is a composite
of 3 different community types from the USGS map, #'s 22, 29, and 5.
The source data file was originally in ARC/INFO EXPORT format. One coverage was provided. The coverage consisted of a map of feature polygons and an attribute table listing a vegetation type and form for each polygon.
The coverage was exported from ARC/INFO as a DLG file (with coordinate transformation), and then imported into IDRISI as a polygon vector file. The reverse coordinate transformation was applied in IDRISI to restore coordinate values.
Next the IDRISI module POLYRAS was run on the polygon vector file in order to create a raster file of vegetation types. This raster file was then reclassed to create the raster file of vegetation forms. Registration accuracy was checked against Pospeschil US Boundaries from Micro World Databank II (GED 1.0, 1994) and the projection parameters (see Geographic Reference above) were reconfirmed within ARC/INFO. In spot checking the raster files some local areas were found to be mis - registered by up to 7 km, however the best overall fit with Pospeschil US Boundaries... was achieved.
The 5 km by 5 km grid size was chosen as being most appropriate for the resolution of the source vector data given the available grid sizes compatible with the GED nested grid structure (see User's Guide).
The vector polygon file produced for rasterization using the "DLG" procedure is included in the SOURCE directory.
The vector polygon file included in the main dataset (not the Source directory) was created using the "Ungenerate" command in Arc/Info after first substituting the values in the -ID field with the data values for the file (EKTYPE). This produces a vector polygon map that does not "reverse out" the holes. Such files are better for visual overlay (for example in Idrisi) because the connecting lines between parent and polygon are removed; however, they are less robust for use in rasterizing because one must be certain that hole polygons follow sequentially in the file after the parent polygons. If this is not the case, the parent polygon data will "fill-in" the hole during rasterization.