United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) TRIS Online small green bullet TRT small green bullet NTL Catalogs
NTL Integrated Search
National Transportation Library
Transportation Research Board
Transportation Research Board
Of the National Academies
New Search Browse Advanced Search Search History Marked Records TRT Help

TRIS Online Record

Printable View
Title ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF BROAD-BASED DIPS VERSUS ALUMINUM PIPE CULVERTS ON LOW-VOLUME ROADS
Accession No 00459590
Authors Eck, R W; Morgan, P J
Journal Title Transportation Research Record information No. 1055
Corp. Authors
/ Publisher
Transportation Research Board information
Publication Date   19860000
Description p. 17-25; Figures(4); References(9)
Abstract There is currently some controversy regarding the relative benefits and costs of culverts and broad-based dips as drainage devices on low-volume roads where no intermittent or permanent streams exist. A research project was undertaken in the Monongahela National Forest to attempt to determine, by using an economic analysis, under what conditions broad-based dips were more appropriate than 18-in. aluminum pipe culverts. Construction cost data for each of the drainage devices were acquired from Forest Service records and a survey of contractors. Eighty percent of the contractors preferred culverts to dips. The type of drainage structure specified in project plans affected contractors' bids. Typical culvert costs were around $500 per structure, whereas dips averaged around $350 per device. Maintenance costs had to be estimated on the basis of discussions with private foresters, because no actual maintenance cost data were available. Annual maintenance cost per culvert was estimated at $8.33 whereas that per dip was $10. To gain insight relative to road user attitudes toward broad-based dips, a truck driver questionnaire was utilized. Almost 90 percent of the respondents reported feeling physical discomfort when passing through a dip; one-half of the drivers suggested eliminating the use of dips entirely. It was found that the additional travel time through a dip can be neglected; excess vehicle operating costs were estimated at $0.077 per vehicle per dip. Broad-based dips were less expensive than pipe culverts for roads carrying traffic volumes in the range of 5 to 10 vehicles per day. At higher volumes, the increased road user costs associated with dips made culverts the more economical alternative.
Supplemental
Information
This paper appeared in Transportation Research Record N1055, Low-Volume Rural Roads.
TRT Terms Aluminum culverts information; Costs information; Economic analysis information; Low volume roads information; Maintenance management information; Surface drainage information
Other Terms Aluminum cmp culverts; Cost comparison; Dipping; Highway drainage; Highway user costs; Maintenance costs
Subject Areas H17 ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT; H21 FACILITIES DESIGN; H22 HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS; I21 Planning of Transport Infrastructure
ISBN 0-309-03971-1
Availability
Transportation Research Board Business Office information
Find a library where document is available
TRIS Files HRIS
Database TRIS Online
TRIS is a bibliographic database funded by sponsors of the Transportation Research Board (TRB), primarily the state departments of transportation and selected federal transportation agencies. TRIS Online is hosted by the National Transportation Library under a cooperative agreement between the Bureau of Transportation Statistics and TRB.
Privacy Policy | Accessibility
Plug-ins: PDF Reader | Flash Player | Excel Viewer | PowerPoint Viewer | Word Viewer | WinZip