Date: 11/18/97 1:18 PM Subject: s7-26-97 / Edward J Hoort Mr. Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20549 Email: questionnaire@sec.gov Reference to: File No. S7-26-97 I have received copies of two bills which would require all regulated companies to request approval from stockholders prior to making charitable contributions. It is my understanding that the SEC is seeking comments on these proposals. First, allow me to state my interest in these proposals. I administer a non-profit agency which seeks corporate contributions. Secondly, I teach a graduate course for the University of Michigan regarding non-profit administration. Third, I am a serious investor in the stock market. I find the proposal to require stockholder participation in this matter to be absurd on all three levels. Let me begin with my expierence admiistering a non-profit. In the last three years I have received 3 contributions from regulated industries. From one publicly traded bank, I received law books that they were no longer using. From a chemical company, I received outdated personal computers, which we could use. I also received a used copier from another publicly traded company. I would suggest that to require a company to request approval for such donations from stockholders is absurd. It would cost more in mailing then the total value of the contributions. The real result would be that each of the companies would destroy the equipment rather then donating it to a non-profit. As an instructor of non-profit administration, I would suggest that the bills would complicate donations to small non-profits in such a manner as to totally eliminate all such donations. The regulatory morass created by the bills would out weigh any potential benefit. I am unclear as to who would benefit at all from such proposals. Fianlly, as a stockholder in a number of companies, I would hate to see the mailings requesting stockholder approval. The amount of paper generated by such a requirement would create a disaster in my mail box. For most companies that I hold, the cost of mailing would outweigh the total amount of contributions made. And frankly, I don't care if they give funds to local public radio, the United Way, or other organizations. I believe in corporate giving, and would encourage them to be generous to who ever. Voting on it is not in my self interest, and would waste my time and the resources of the companies. Please do all that you can to defeat such absurd proposals. Edward J Hoort ehoort@aol.com