About USAID Our Work Locations Policy Press Business Careers Stripes Graphic USAID Home
United States Agency for International Development Documents Image
Search USAID Reports
           
 
Indonesian port sector reform and the 2008 shipping law
Other USAID Supported Study/Document:PDF
Author:

Ray, David

Organizations:

Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI) | USAID. Mission to Indonesia

Publication Date:

Aug 2008

Pagination: [25 p.]
Additional Data: Project title: Indonesia competitiveness program (SENADA) | Indonesian ed.: PN-ADN-189
Document Type: Other USAID Supported Study/Document
Format: PDF
Order Number: PN-ADN-188
Award/Agreement Number: 497-M-00-05-00043-00
Primary Subject:

Economic Reform

USAID Thesaurus Terms:

Ports | Sector restructuring | Shipping lines | Regulatory reform | Economic competition | Constraints | Private sector

Geographic Descriptors:

Indonesia

Abstract:  
For an archipelago nation such as Indonesia, an efficient and well run sea freight transport system is a crucial element of economic competitiveness as well as national integrity. Indonesia has relatively high sea transport costs and this reduces incentives to trade both domestically and internationally. Indonesia's ports, regarded as relatively inefficient and poorly equipped/managed, are an important factor driving up shipping costs. Vessels involved in domestic trade for example, are spending over half their time sitting idle or waiting at or outside ports. Poor port performance can be explained in large part by the long-held legislated monopoly of port services by state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and the current legal and regulatory environment that effectively constrains competition both within and among ports.

The 2008 Shipping Law provides the foundation for a comprehensive reform of the Indonesian port system. Most notably the law removes the state-sector monopoly on ports and opens the door for new participation by the private sector. This could lead to the injection of much needed competition in the ports system, putting downward pressure on prices and driving general improvements in port services. Whilst there is some guarded optimism about the new law, investors must now confront a policy vacuum whilst awaiting the development of implementing regulations and supporting institutions.

Key concerns focus on: (1) the composition, orientation, and financial / technical capacity of the planned Port Authorities; (2) the possible restrictiveness of the national and individual port master-plans; (3) the degree of pricing autonomy of terminal operators; and (4) the ability of private ports to convert their status to commercial public ports in order to compete with the incumbent SOEs. (Author abstract, modified)
Help us improve this site! Was this page helpful?   
Yes No